IR 05000528/1990014
| ML20043A412 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1990 |
| From: | Mcqueen A, Norderhaug L, Schaefer D, Schuster M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20043A411 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-528-90-14, 50-529-90-14, 50-530-90-14, NUDOCS 9005220047 | |
| Download: ML20043A412 (2) | |
Text
LSAFEC2U ARDS INi"OnM Al lON:
t, e
q
.
-
3.s
,
l LC-The information on this page is considered to be appropriate for public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790-U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.,
REGION V
- Report Nos.
50-526/90-14,50-529/90-14,50-530/90-14(IE-V-921)
Docket Nos.
'50-528, 50-529, and 50-530 License No..
'
' Licensee:
ArizonaNuclearPowerProject
-P.O.. Box 52034-
-
Phoenix, Arizona 85072-2034 Facility Name:
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3
- Inspection at: Wintersburg, Arizona LInspection Conducted:
April 4, 1990, through' April 30, 1990 k
MM4 a-Inspectors:
Date Signed
,Norderhaug]asw. )
p Material Ctntrol Analyst sh ho 1.
-
D.Schaefer,PhysicalpecurityInspector Date Signed Osak tQ.mSCm
.sM&
A. D. McQueen,' Physical'5ecurity Inspector Date Signed Other:
R. Hsu and M. Warren NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation J. Cashion and J. Moore
-
'-
U. S.' Army Special Forces OnO h w [
1/7/4 Approved by:
M. D. Schuster, Chief,-Safeguards Section Date Signed
,
Summary:
Areas Inspected: Management Effectiveness; Security Organization; Physical Barriers; Lighting;' Compensatory Measures; Assessment Aids Access Control; AlarmStations;PersonnelTrainingandQualificationsPlan; Detection Aids;ingency Plan Implementation Review; Physical Security Program Safe uards Cont for.ower Reactors and Follow-up.
During the inspection, portions of
. Inspection Procedures 30703, 81020, 81022, 81052, 81062, 81064, 81066, 81070, 81078, 81084, 81501, 81601, 81700, 90712, 90713, 92701 and 92702 were used.
Results:
In the areas inspected, the licensee's programs appeared adequate to accomplish their security objectives.
However, weakness was exhibited in the areas as detailed below.
DCIo3*e corrA7ns AAFEGU ANDS 'Ni UnMATIOh 8mcmics I::.w.m m.
- 3 SUARATI:S THI3 9005220047 900515 PDR ADOCK 05000528
~ ~ ~ '
~ FAGE IS LE:'ONmoLLg:3, O
,,
-
_ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _
__
_
_
_
p
- -
-
-
-
.
.,..
.
y..
. ;.
,v
.
'
.p.
' With!ii t'be areas examined, the licen?ee was found to have violated (but proriptly corrected to be in' full compliance with) NRC requirements in the-following area: - Personnel Training and Qualifications Plan (See paragraph 2.f.(1) of the report details).
Program weaknesses were identified in the areas of:
Mana ement Effectiveness, Security Organization, Assessment Aids, Access Control -
ersonnel, Alarm
!
'
!.-
- Stations, Personnel Training and Qualifications Plan and Safeguards.
Contingency Plan Implementation Review (See Report Details, paragraphs 2.a.(2), 2.b', 2.c, 2.d, 2.e, 2.f.(3) and 2.g, respectively).
.
'
.
og
,
e
!
.
.