IR 05000498/1977014

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Investigation Repts 50-498/77-14 & 50-499/77-09 on 771215-16.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Area Investigated: Allegation That Radiographs Showed Faulty Welds at Site
ML19347E439
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 12/28/1977
From: Crossman W, Renee Taylor, Julie Ward
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML16251A407 List:
References
50-498-77-14, 50-499-77-09, 50-499-77-9, NUDOCS 8104270379
Download: ML19347E439 (4)


Text

.

.

._

_ -. _

.

.

_,. ;

I REPORT'0F INVESTIGATION

.

.

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

.

REGION IV

-Subject: South Texas Project, Units 1 and 2

,

Docket Nos. 50-498; 50-499

,

L".
z i

'

Investigation based on an allegation that radiographs had shown faulty welds at the site,

,

'

gh:g Period of Investigation: December 15 and 16,1977 g;.

e.

Investigator:

/

j

,

ohn J. Ward, Investigation Specialist

_ Date'

=e fi#

5=

Reactor Inspector-61/

a/Af/F

'

-

J. G. Taylor, Projects / Section Date

.I...

'

Approved by:

/

4'45

/2/2f/hr

'

W. A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section Date r?

=.

~;..

.

I$

w e-

..,

.

8104270 M'

is

..F

-

.. yy,

..........

.

...........

...,, -

,,,,

....

.

-

.......

...

.... ~. -

._

.

___ ___

. _. _ _...

._.

._ _ _,

_, _

.

_-

.. - _

--

',.La

.

-

e

'

]

-

k;:i

~

.-

LL-2-l~

h E

REASON FOR INVESTIGATION F

g r 2...

A ' telephone call from an ' individual who claiced to have. radiographs which I"=

,

showed defective welds in the liner plate for the two containrent liners

?='

'

.in-the Comanche peak and South Texas projects plants.

559

'

m= '

hi ffk,

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATICH

-

ggg7,

~

___

To determine the veracity of the' claim and to establish the identity and EsE origin of the all'eged radiographs.

EsF

==

E=5 CCNCLUSIONS SE=

MEL

=

t=:

The radiographs, if they existed, were not of equiptent being put in place

"F9=

at the cwo p uer plants. The informant cay have been the butt of a joke E?i.

played on hin by two acquaintances who possibly had access to radiographs 25~

frca a non-nuclear prcduction firm.

21_

.

- ::

INf)

= = =.,

SUMMARY OF FACTS M'

M:

^:= 9 On December 10, 1977, Individual A rep;rted to the Duty Officer of Recion IV

. 5%

that he had radiographs in his possessien which showed that the welds used his at two nuclear power plants under construction in Region IV were defective.

E4i In a subsequent Region IV contact with this individual by telephone on iEE Dececher 10, he indicated that he had in his possessicn questionable radio-

=-

,

graphs of electro-slag welds in the liner plate for the contair. ment liners

===l of the Corancne Feak and South Texas projects. On December 12, he was again

=.1

'

ccntacted by a RIV representative at which time-he indicated that he had been 7. '

a victim ~ of a hoax perpetrated by two acquaintances who had. admitted the radio-5pf graphs were not as reported and that neither individual had ever been on either

1

. site. At that tire he agreed to confirm his statement in writing to the RIV 5fL i i

contact. His letter dated December 15, 1977, was subsequently received in the

.i E !

!

RIV office en December 19, 1977.

In a personal contact with the individual cn

[G? !

!

- December 15, he professed at that time not to have the radiographs, having

=;, l returned then to the two individuals who reportedly had furnished them.

On m,

Dececher.16, he advised that these two individuals had inforced hic they had s. _ l disposed of all the radiographs (reportedly a total of ten). Fren his description 06 l of the radiographs and his -indication of the size of the welds, it would appear sgs.

that the raterial would have a thickness of greater than 1-3/4 inches and not is5-the type of caterial or welding used in the containment liners of the plants-g;r involved.

-

E'

22=I 1r?

ne i

~n =

.

- j.Jn

&~-

.~

!~

1

-

~-

^ : :~

=

~ Y

^

.-

T --Ln - ' } ' r$-fS:

Y '~N=37kf_ "

=: Y ~ ^

.

.

~

%;

-

w i=

'(:i:+

..

_3_

!

'

DETAILS m-M l.

Investication at Houston, Texas - Decerber 15 and 16,1977

Individual A was interviewed on December 15 at his office in Houston, Texas by Mr. Taylor and the investigator. He stated that he had had

_.... '

one radiograph which had been supplied by his two friends who originally

==

had indicated-to hir that this and other radiographs they had were of welds in the containment liner for the tuo projects. He drew a sketch 2.1 of what the weld profile i k

This was examined by Mr. Robert c

Taylor,ReactorInspector_p2.edlike.

.

Individual A stated that he had returned

=

the radiograph to his friends but that he would return to his office in

!= F approximately two hours at which time he would again meet with the in-vestigators and show the radiograph to them. When asked whatithe " penny"-

r

showed on the radiograph, Individual A did not understand the question

- M and it was obvious from his later comments that he did not understand-

==

what the penetrar,,eter would indicate, showing his lack of knowledge'of

~~

radiography. When Individual A did not return at the end of the two-

= = >

hour period, in fact not at all that afternoon, an attempt was made to contact him at his home without success. At that point, Mr. Taylor MM

= ~

departed from the investigation.

On the following day, December 16, the-

=

investigator contacted Individual. A again at his office and confronted him with his lack of returning with the radiographs on the previous day.

'

Individaul A stated that he had not been able to obtain the radiographs E=

and he had been held up for a two-hour conference and thus had not been

.ig_

able to get word to the investigators about his delay. He stated that

==

when he had gotten in touch with his two friends, they advised him that

=-

the radiographs had been destroyed. There previously had been ten and

=.

he, Individual A, stated that he had seen three of' them. He reaffirmed

==

=

that neither he nor either of his friends had ever worked at either of

..,.;

the two projects which he had originally reported as the source of the radiographs. He stated that the radiographs had not come from either of s

the tv;o plants and that his friends ~had confirmed this. He stated his e

l opinion was that the radiographs had been from a tank manufacturing

......

(

company in Texas. He stated that the two individuals who were his friends Jay

worked in q'uality assurance for the same company. One, whose name was

==

Tommy, and the other, who was a radiographer, did not wish to be identified and that he would not identify them since they would lose their jobs if

==

they were found out. He advised that he had told them to contact the MRC

=

and report what the source of the radiographs was but he could not be sure i

.-

,

'

=

[

1/ aylor privately observed that the weld, as drawn by Individual A, could T

have been only from a thick material of more than 'l-3/4 inches thick, that this would not be comparable to the containment liner of the projects in E=N question since the thickness of that material is a different dimension.

.z.

I E.

<

- U:.i

&[:

..

=

==-

-===

= =. =.

...g.....~......

.

.. _

_. _

.

.m._-

._.

.;

.

v_,-.y

,... - -

--

.-

,..

-.c,

,,-,,-m---e r

. - +

r-n_.---,..---

,

.-

,, - - - -, -,,-- -- ~

,-w

-

- -,,

..

-

-

-

-

.

.

.

.

.

.-

.

,

,.

. :.; :.

'

[5.

'

.

..

,

-4-g c..;:=;.:

_

that they would do this.

Individual A signed a statement-for the 5.=

investigator stating that the "x-rays" were not from a nuclear facility-

--

i anywhere, that neither of his two friends are new working at the site or

=

ever has, that the "x-rays"-are not available for review - they have M'

,

been destroyed, and that he,' Individual' A, was responsible for making

=-

the false ~ report concerning the radiographs. As noted above, he also had

addressed a letter to the P.egion IV office making this same statetent.

1....,2...

..

LIC...

.,,

..........

hh

"

s

,

,.C....

~ !.E::

\\

.. :"'

^

- ;=.

I,5@

..

h5:...*

e a

'

l

.

iME.=

.j 5 55

'

=ir7:

.

i

,

l'.7.1"f.C

.

c'$5bN

'

ikkh

==

h:bb;b '

i

.#l

.:==

.====::

1.';.

f
::

i:55

'

',

95%=

"ll

.".

^iGii:

i qqje-

.5i I

.b5I."

==qs,

E!:T 2

'Nbh i

Q.f..

'

.

...

  • .

e Ess

,

i:!;=:5

.i '

f.5N57 i

f;!!l t:'L':...

== =-.

.

-

...

,.. _.. " ' ~~~. 5;^:. ::.. '. "'f.*:_:_'L.._l..-;'.

~;.?

^

==[;}' "'== f[ =~--

-

=-

_

_ -

....c -

, r.--

' -:. = :

_

<;: - -..

-

r

'

-e-

  • =, - -

w w,-

.+.,,t.y.

- ~,,,, - -,

..r.%,-+y

-._wn-.,,,...,y-,my.,---~.-r-r

-,.

.--r,--r.,

.,-,

y, r,-y

,

-r--

,,

e.-

+- - -