IR 05000460/1979011
| ML19260D462 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 11/29/1979 |
| From: | Dodds R, Toth A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19260D439 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-460-79-11, 50-513-79-11, NUDOCS 8002110086 | |
| Download: ML19260D462 (13) | |
Text
.
U.S. f;UCLEAR REGULATORY CC"MISSIGN OFFICE OF IflSPECTION AND Ef! FORCE"ENT 50-460/79-$ll Report tio.
50-513/79-}9 H
-
.
Docket No.
50-460, 50-513 Licensee f:o. CPPR-134, CPPR-174 _ Safeguards Group Licensee:
Washinaton Public Power Sucolv System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washincton 99352 Facility Name:
Washington tiuclear Projects Nos. I and 4 (W!!P 1 & 4)
Inspection at:
WitP 1 & 4 Site, Benton County, Washington Inspection Conducted:
Inspectors:
//
/
//
6 A. D. Toth, Resident keactor Inspector Date Si'gned
'
Date Signed Date Signed Approved by:
///2/
R. T. Dodds, Chief, Engineering Support Section Dat6 Signed d
Suca ry: Inspection durina the ceriod October 1-31, 1979 (Report 'los. 50-460/79-d and 50-513/79-10)a Areas Insoected:
Routine, unannounced inspection activities by the resident insoector of construction activities including:
containment concrete, spray pond concrete, structural backfill, Dipe welding, pice storage, pipe liquid penetrant examination, reactor vessel stora.ge, reactor vessel internal storage, equiprent storage, examination of licensee event recorts and PSAR deviation
-
records, and general work in progress.
Results:
Of seven areas inspected relative to Unit #1, the inspector identified an item of noncompliance related to the placement of containment concrete (paragraph 8). Of six areas inspected relative to Unit #4, the insoector identified a deviation related to spray cond concrete work (paragraph 10).
1939 098 8002110 O RV Form 219 (2)
.
DETAILS
.
1.
Personnel Contacted The inspector interviewed various engineering, nanagement, inspection, suoervision, and craft personnel of the organization listed below.
Key tersonnel, including those who attended the weekly nanagenent meetings, are specifically identified below.
a.
Washington Public Power Sucoly System (WPPSS)
(2)
H. C. Bibb, Project Manager (1, 4)
M. C. Carrigan, Construction Manager (1, 3, 4) T. J. Houchins, Project GA Manager (2. 4)
W. M. Lazaer, Project GA Soecialist J. W. Carson, Senior 0A Engineer - Civil (1)
W. C. Clemens, Construction Superintendent (Civil)
(4)
G. K. Dyekeman, Manager of Engineering (4)
A. D. Edmondson, Field Engineering Supervisor b.
United Engineers and Constructors (IIE&C)
(1)
R. S. Millne, Deputy Project Manager (3, 4)
W. J. Taylor, Deputy Construction Manager (1,2,3,4) E. C. Haren, Deputy Project GA Manager (1, 3, 4) G. E. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Project fianager (1, 2, 4) B. F. Brockett, Senior 0A Engineer (ASi!E III-2)
R. L. Murphy, Senior 0A Engineer (Electrical)
(2. 3)
R. Siever, Senior 0A Engineer (itechanical)
R. D. Bennett, Deputy Welding Suoerintendent (1)
D. C. Leonard, Construction Supervisor (ASME III-2)
(4)
R. H. Bryans, Field Project Engineer Manager (3)
N. D. Anaa, Field Project Engineer c.
G. F. Atkinson-Wriqht/Schuchart/ Harbor (A-WSH).
M. Latch, QA Manager T. Canning, Assistant GA Manager J. Ivora, OC' Supervisor d.
J. A. Jones Construction Coroany (JAJ)
R. Pope, Engineering Manager B. Roe, Project QA Manager B. Phillips, General Superintendent #1 e.
Pacific Test Laboratories (PTL)
K. Blatso, Geotechnical Engineer K. Johnson, Senior Supervisory Inspector 1939 099
.
-2-f.
Northwest Construction Connany (TM)
-
C. Kinion, Superintendent J. Mattoon, CA Pepresentative g.
Babcock and Wilcox Constru_ction Cornany _(B&W)
L. Rafferty, Field Superintendent D. Larson, Senior Site Representative h.
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Comoany Z. Zizak, Authorized luclear Inspector i.
Georae Grant Construction Comoany W. Tillery, OA/QC Supervisor j.
University Nuclear Systems / University ftechanical B. Sachs, QA Engineer k.
Shurtleff and Andrews V,. Engstron, Assistant 0A Manager 1.
BEI/ Royal Globe K. Collins, Authorized Nuclear Inspector (AS!!E Section III Division 2)
(1) Denotes attendees at management reeting on October 9,1979.
(2) Denotes attendees at management meeting on October 22, 1979.
(3) Denotes attendees at management meeting on October 29, 1979.
(4) Denotes attendees at management meeting on November 5,1979.
2.
Construction Status The licensee reports that site construction work is approximately 315 complete for Unit #1 and 125 coralete for Unit #4 as of October 31, 1979.
3.
Plant Tours - Units 1 and 4 The inspector nade plant tours during day and swing shifts at Unit #1 and Unit #4, at various times each week during this reporting period.
He interviewed craftsmen, supervisors and inspectors as they were en-countered in the various work areas, and he examined various in-process records such as work control forms, inspector logs, and equipnent ident-ification, calibration, and work hold / release tags.
The tours included 1939 100
-3-observations relative to compliance with general and specific codes
.
and standards, regulatory cuides and requirements and innlementation of quality assurance program requirements.
The results of detailed exam-ination of work activities are described in other oaragraohs of this report.
Followuo on Licensee Recorted Events The inspector examined records and interviewed personnel regarding the licensee's letter to f;RC related to the ommission of reinforcing steel from concrete structures ~ dated October 8,1979.
On October 15, 1979 the licensee representative notified the inspector that engineering evaluation of the iten had been completed and that it is not considered to be a reportable iten. However, the inspector completed his review of the licensee's letter and addressed this natter as a oreviously identified unresolved item.
The licensee has corsidered all site contractors working on safety related structure reinforcing steel, and assessed the controls to assure that differences betmen design drawings and detailed olacing drawings do not lead to omission of reinforcino steel.
The licensee considered the following structures:
Contract Structure 205 Hoffman Constr.
Containment Basemat 206 Boecon Constr.
General Service Building Walls 252 G. Grant Constr.
Spray Pond 253 A-WSH Containment and Centainment Interior 254 A-WSH General Service Building Some of these contractors had assured that this ratter would be avoided since the DC inspectors perform inseections usinq design drawings, (contracts 205 & 252). The 206 contractor had performed redundant checking of design versus placement drawings by engineering and by OA organizations. For the other contracts (253 & 254) all design / place-ment drawings have been reviewed for consistency, except those prepared by AWSH for work above elevations where concrete work has not correnced.
AWSH has been required to re-check such drawings as discussed in the licensee's letter of October 8, 1979.
There were no instances where concrete has been placed in the containment shell with rebar omissions identified by the above reviews. The inspector had no further questions on this matter at this time.
(Item closed)
1:939 101
.
.
_a_
5.
Licensee Aonlication of ASME Code Case 4-242
-
The insoector exanined documents and interviewed cersonnel relative to the licensee's July 13, 1979 request for NRC anoroval of use of A9ME cede case N-242 for four atnosphere durn valves for Unit i'4.
The inscec-tor ascertained that similar valves for Unit 31 were furnished by the same vendor (Conoonent Controls International) and the status of their material certifications may be equivalent to those for Unit f4. This item is unresolved nending comoletion of the licensee's reivew and action.
(460/79-10-01)
6.
Records of DSAR Deviation Controls The inspector examined the MPPSS thirteenth report of nSAR deviation status, dated n tober 13, 1979 and reviewed design channe checklists and accroval c
documents for two changes planned to be incorporated into the FCAR.
The following two chanaes were considered relative to Criteria III, VI and XVII of Anoendix B of 10 CFR50:
A.
Deviation No. 8.3-2 regarding vertical flame tests on cable.
B.
Deviation No. 9.51 regarding diesel generator qualification tests.
The reports included desion and project engineering review by the licensee, and consideration of regulatory quides and applicable codes and standards as evidence of acceptability of the deviation to MRC. The control of these deviations appeared consistent with control requirements.
No iters of nonconoliance were identified.
7.
Containnont Concrete Delivery, Placement, and Curino - Unit 1 The inspector observed work activities for concrete olacement No. C2102 of the containment shell. Fe attended the preplacerent neetino, ex-anined the placement area prior to placement, observed concrete placement in-progress during the second shift, and observed subseouent curinq 00-erations. These activities were considered relative to the codes and standards requirements referenced in PSAR section 3.8.1.2, general quality assurance requirements discussed in PSAR section 17, and additional work standards provided in specification No. 203 section 3B.
The inspector observed laborers vacunninq water from the surface of the construction joint, but they did not atternt to vacuun water fron under the reinforcinq steel or near the liner olate.
Mater cools were present in denressions near the liner and in narrcw slots between the liner and the concrete. The concrete placerent was released to proceed, even thouqh the contractor's quality control inspectors had not inspected the rasults of the vacuuminq operation.
Specification 253 nart 10.2.3 called
.
1939 102
'
.
-5-for saturation of the construction joint with water, but not subsequent
-
removal of standing water. The failure to renove water from spaces to be occupied by concrete appears to be contrary to part CC-4252 of AS'1E Code Section III division 2 and part 6.4.1 of ACI-318-71.
(460/
79-10-02)
During the concrete placement activities the inspector observed handling of vibrators hy 22 laborers, and he interviewed each.
The inspector observed several instances of vibrators being inserted at angles of 30 -45 and instances of vibrators being thrown up to 6-feet and dragged through the concrete. The inspector observed five areas of insufficient consolida-tion near the liner plate.
These were corrected in the presence of the inspector. The observed handling of the vibrators appears contrary to cart CC 4226.1 of ASME code section III, part 7.1 of ACI-309-72, and part 10.4 of job specification no. 253 section 3B.
(460/79-10-03)
Durino the concrete placement activities at night, the inspector observed that lighting for work t.ithin the forms consisted of 100-watt light bulbs spaced at about 10-feet, about 4-/eet above the forms, and outside the outernost layer of reinforcing steel.
Some of the lights were pulled through the steel network to provide inproved lighting within the forms.
In sore areas the inspector judged lighting to be of questionable ade-quacy to permit observation of the visual indicators of adequate consol-idation discussed in part 7.2 of ACI-309-72.
In the opinion of the inspec-tor, there was insufficient light for the laborers to observe consol-idation of concrete in the vicinity of the liner plate.
Subsequently, the inspector observed on October 10 and 16,1979 that localized construction lighting was improved for placement number C-2104 Small diameter vibrators were in use for assuring consolidation of concrete near the liner plate stiffeners, and QC inspectors were spending more time closer to concrete placement within the forms. Training sessions had been conducted for laborers regarding techniques of hand-ling vibrators, and these were documented in UE&C surveillance reoort SP./CNR #C-792 and were witnessed by the AS"E authorized nuclear inspector.
These actions were summarized by the AWSH OA manager in an October 22, 1979 letter to WPPSS (ATUE-79-5760). The inspector had no further cues-tions regarding lighting.
8.
Containnent Concrete Forms, Embedments, Reinforcina Steel - Unit I and Unit A The inspector observed work activities for placement of forms and en-bedments for concrete placement C-2104 of Unit #1, reinforcing steel cadweld splicing for the west wall of Unit #4, (including observations Ic)37 103
-6-at the splice test laboratory), and reinforcing steel bending at the
'
fabrication yard for Unit al and Unit #.
These activities were con-sidered relative to the codes and standards requirenents described in PSAR Sections 3.8.1.2 and 3.8.1.6, general quality assurance requirements described in PS/R Section 17, and additional work standards provided in job specifications numbered 9779-253 Section 3D and AUSH-QCP-11.
The inspection 'ncluded the following aspects of the work:
a.
Concrete forms clearances, tightress and cleanliness b.
Embedment fastening, freedom fron rust and hardened spilled concrete and clearances from forms and between bar clearances c.
Reinforcing steel identification, bending specifications, bending quality control inspection and reject criteria and teject history d.
Cadweld splice crew (d100 and 2225 specifically) qualification scope and frecuency, test frequency, naterial control, record keeping, presence of quality control inspectors and inspection criteria, test laboratory equipnent calibration and test result trends No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Lakes, Dams, Canals, Soray Pond - Unit #4 The inspector observed work activities on October 31, 1979 for placement of concrete in the Unit 34 spray pond southwest corner wall (placement #S-164, con-crete order 1217A). Activities were considered relative to the codes and standards requirements described in PSAR Section 3.8.4 and 3.12, general quality assurance requirements described in PSAR Section 17, work standards provided in job specifications numbered 252 and 211, and Pacific Testing Laboraiories procedure OAP-XII-3 Revision 18. The inspec-tion included the following aspects of the work:
a.
Placement preparation - Cleanliness, leak tightness and anchoring of forms, and construction joint preparation, b.
Concrete delivery and placement - Specified mix, duration of hold time on trucks, temperature control of mix and ambient, testing for slump-air-strength (including testing technique and equipment calibration), adequacy of crew size and equipment and placing techniques (vibrator handling, free fall height of concrete, clean-liness control of rebar, and contrc' of form pressure), presence and performance of QC inspectors.
c.
Protected concrete curing of a north-end wall section.
d.
Placement of roisture-loss prevention vapor barrier for a slap sec-tion of the spray pond.
The horizontal construction joint contained a key (full length depression 2-inches deep by 16-inches wide in center portion) in which about 2-inches of standing water was left during concrete olacement.
The concrete was olated so as to push the water before the concrete leading edge, except that placement from chutes about 4-feet ahead of the water trapped 1939 104
.
-
.
,
-7-the water between two leading edges, resulting in some mixinq with the con-
'
crete. The vertical construction joint at the southwest corner of the soray cond wall, was wet down with water, but was not " coated with neat cement arout immediately before placino of near concrete." These practices deviate from the requirements of ACI-MB-71, cart 6.4.1, which is one of the applicable codes referenced in the PSAR.
(513/79-10-01)
10.
Foundations Preoaration - Unit 1 The inspector observed work activities for placement and compaction of backfill for the area west of the ceneral services building. The inspection included interviews with f:orthwest Construction Company OA and construction personnel and the UE&C contract supervisor for this contract, examination of test records, and observations of testing in progress for this placement (Phase VI - elevation 436+). These activ-ities were considered relative to: the codes and standards requirements referenced in PSAR Section 2.5, Appendix 2P, and Section 17; the job specification f255 Section 2c; and Porthwest Construction Company Procedures QAP-8 and CP-3.
Requirements of ASilt-D2167-G were considered for density testing on the field.
Records exanined includes (1) proof tests performed on the base raterial prior to backfill (PTL compaction test results #300-2), (2) tests per-formed for each foot of compacted fill (PTt. test results #301-2, 302-1A and IB, 303-1A and 1B, 304-1A arid 18), (3) demonstration qualification com-paction tests for 'tikasa-!!DR-9G and Wacker-74 hand operated comoactors (Contract Waver Requests fW-008, W-010, W-011), (4) drawings #F-110018, F-110016, F-110019 and F-110008 for general consistency with the PSAR relative to boundaries for placerent of Tyoe A backfill in the phase VI area, and (5) !!orthwest Construction Company OA surveillance reports (*215 thru #219) for the phase VI work and two UE&C surveillance reports (SR/Cf!R-89 and 90) for this work.
flo items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
11. Safety-Related Piping Welding The inspector observed welding in progress on two welds of the nuclear service water system. These were welde on carbon steel lines of 14-inch diameter and 24-inch diameter (#411530-FH-2 and f411537-FW-6). Also observed were weld joint preparation, argon purging in preparation for welding a stainless steel pipe joint (f411220-FW12), and availability and use of oxygen analyzers.
The availability and une of purge gases for stainless steel pipe welding was checked during tours of the work areas.
The inspector checked the carbon steel welds for locations and identifica-tion on applicable isometric drawings in the field and exanined the associated weld and f!DE Record for identification of hold points and sion-off by OC inspection where required.
The weld electrode requisit-1939 105
'
.
.s.
-
.
ions and electrode tags were verified to be as specified on the appli-cable drawing for the stage of completion of the welds observed. For the FN-2 weld, the inspector observed the fitup and tack welds, and checked the gap and mismatch of the oipe ends, and cleanliness of the joint.
The welders, fitters and firemen did not have pipe joint fitup gages, but they stated that GC inspectors did have st.ch gages.
?!o fitup dev-iations were observed by the NRC inspector. The welders did not have a copy of the weld orocedure at the work area, nor did the foreman have copies of those procedures to be adhered to by welders working from his work station.
The foreman stated that such procedures would be available in the main J. A. Jones control area in another area of the general services building. The availability of measurina tools required to perform proper weld joint fitup is unresolved (460/79-10-04), as is the avail-ability of weld procedures to individuals cerforming welding activities (450/79-10-05).
The inspector examined QC inspection records and governing material spec-ification fio.1310 relative to requirements of Pegulatory Guide 1.71, PSAR Section 3.12 (1.71-1) and job specification #257.
The specifica-tion requires that limited access ability of pipe welds involving mater-ials described in the regulatory guide shall be radiographically examined.
A J. A. Jones OC memorandum dated October 18, 1979 (Higgenbothan/All 0V Personnel) demonstrated that the contractor had identified this item as requiring attention relative to part 4.4.4 of specification 257, and originated corrective action for examination of future work.
However, there were no plans for review of limited access work accomplished to date.
The licensee representatives subsequently stated that J. A. Jones staff will perform field inspections of comoleted welds and identify each weld where the limited access requirement applies and will docurrent these on nonconfomance reports to assure inclementation of corrective action. The UE&C OA surveillance group has itself issued a contractor notification report (257/211-ISR/C'IR-491) to assure followup on the field inspections, and clarification of JAJ procedure WI-016.1 part 4.4.20(b)
requirenents for advance notification to UE&C of limited access welds.
The inspector had no further questions on this item. f!o items of non-compliance or deviations were identified.
12. Safety Related Pipina (General)
The inspector observed work activities for general storage of Unit 1 and Unit 4 of piping in the laydown area, storage of Unit I nuclear service water piping in the general service building, temporary aligr. ment of Unit 1 makeup water system piping on the rakeup pumos, temporary supports / hoisting of Unit 1 makeup and nuclear service water piping, and temporary blocking / covering / protection of two pipe spools in penetra-tion sleeves at Unit 4.
These activities were considered relative to the AS"E code Section III (1977) general quality assurance requirements described in PSfR Section 17, and additional work standards provided in 1939 106
~
.
-g-
-
.
job specifications nurbered 257 Section 15A.
The inspector's observations, records and personnel interviews included
-
consideration of the following aspects of the work:
(1) protection of weld end oreparations and presence of pipe caps for cleanliness control:
(2) hoisting methods to prevent stress to supoort structures (e.g.
hangers) and damage to the pipe spools; (3) connections to rotating equipment to orevent cold-spring type stresses; (4) dunnage in storage areas, and (5) presence of pipe spool identification and OC release tags.
fio items of nonconpliance or deviations were identified.
13. Safety Related Pioing Weldino-flondestructive Examination-Unit #1 The inspector observed work activities for second shift liquid pene-trant testing of socket welds of stainless steel piping welded in the J. A. Jones on-site pipe fabrication shop. The inspector considered obser-vations, records and personnel interviews in regard to at least the follow-ing aspects of the work: (1) certification of raterials for halogen /
sulphur content; (2) cleanness of the examination areas, suitability of the surfaces for examination; (3) temperature control of surfaces; (4) penetrant / developer application technique and tining, and (5) acceptance criteria used by the examiner. The routine presence of a UE&C surveillance engineer during such activities by on-site contractors was observec.
flo items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
14. Reactor Pressure Vessel I gernals Storage - Unit 4 The inspector reviewed the flSSS saoplier specification relative to storage of !!SSS equipment, and inspected the internals for conpliance with the specification relative to protective coverings, moisture con-trol, and storage supports.
The in'ernals are stored in a separate locked building, with individual cv ers and dessicant and dessicant indi-cators, with bird and rodent contrc s.
fio items of noncompliance or devi-ations were identified.
15. Reactor Pressure Vessel Storage Protection - Unit 4 The inspector examined the storage conditions for the reactor pressure vessel to determine if (1) dunnace was adequate, (2) protective coverina was not damaged, and (3) dessicant indicators showed adequate moisture control! The insnector also interviewed the responsible surveillance inspector and exanined the inspector's record of surveillance-audits conducted.
I!o items of noncompliance or deviations wt a identified.
1939 107
~
.
'
.
,
-10-16.
Reactor Pressure Vessel Protection After Installation - Unit #1
'
The inspector observed work activities for protection of the installed vessel at Unit dl, relative to environment and construction hazards.
These activities were examined relative to the codes and standards requirerents described in PSAP, Sections 5.2.5 and 3.12 (1.38 and 1.39),
general quality assurance requirements described in PSAR Section 17, and additional work standards provided in job specifications numbered FS-II-2 and FS-III-12.
The inspector considered observations, records and personnel interviews in regard to at least the following asoects of the work: presence of protective devices at nozzle, covers for prevention of access of contami-nents to the stainless steel cladding and internal structures, fire retardant treatment of scaffold lumber and general construction hazard protection. The inspector also ascertained that the 0-rings were stored as specified in shipping containers.
The inspector ascertained that water had entered the vessel during handling and in-place storage; this included concrete-curing water. The NSSS supolier has required that the water be removed and surface contamination swipe tests be taken to verify surface cleaning.
The inspector examined documentation of the observed conditions and control for resolution, in UE&C surveillance report #SR/CNR-70 (211) and nonconform-ance report' l-NCR-211-07. Swipe tests and cleaning of in-core tubes (capped) have not yet been accomplished.
Examination of records and interview of UE&C OA personnel indicate that the nonconfomance report has not yet been closed.
This matter is unresolved pending review of the licensee's evaluation of the swipe tests and completion of measures to prevent recurrance of water intrusion during in-place storage.
(460/79-10-06)
17. Safety Related Components Storage, Handlino, Protection - Units 1 & 4 The insoector toured the safety related equipment storage areas, which consisted of the warehouses at both Unit 1 and Unit 4, to determine if material protection requirements of the UE&C Ouality Standards and Field General Construction Procedures were being inclemented.
Items examined included protective covers, identification, segregation of nonconform-ing material, protection of valve actuator devices, assignment and pres-ence of quality control staff, and receiving / shipping / release controls.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
1939 108'
.
-11-
.
18. Safety Related Comoo_nents - Unit 64 The inspector observed work activities for protection and handling of components in Unit #4, including two shutdown cooling water Feat ex-changers (4-NSU-HX-1A and 2B), and associated pumos (4 'lSW-PMP-1A and 2B). The inspector also examined the puro rotors.
These activities were examined relative to the codes and standards requirements described in PSAR Section 3.12 (1.38 and 1.39), oeneral quality assurance require-ments described in PSAR Section 17, and additional work standards provided in job specifications numbered 257 Section 15 /poendix C, and procedures nur.tered FGCP-16 and FQS-13.4 The inspection inclue ' the followina aspects of the work: handling cables used at design d ed lift points of the heat exchangers, labeling with component identification and dessicant content, dessicant indicator status, clearance from water pools, covering by tarps and wood roof struc-tures, pumo rotation and lubrication aspects of the preventative main-tenance orogran, protection of anchor bolts, soac! heater activation on notors, and protection of equipment openings.
The inspector observed that the components were installed or in the process of being set onto anchor bolts in the lower level of the general services building. The areas were within the confines of the building walls, but absence of roof structures exposed the area to outdoor temperatures and weather. The heat exchangers were well wrapped except for the ends where covers were torn or removed. The condition was brought to the attention of the licensee and JAJ staffs, but replacement of the coverings was not effected prior to rain on Movember 4,1979.
The pungs and motors were covered with reinforced plastic tarps and were underncath a plywood roof on stilts.
The rotor space heaters were eneroized.
Anchor bolts were exposed in the general area and where the components had been set.
Corrosion was observed on heat exchanger heat bolts and equipnen'. anchor bolts. This matter is unresolved pending review of the licensee's evaluation and disposition of the items described above.
(513/79-10-02)
19. Electrical Coroonents - Unit #1 and Unit E4 The inspector observed work activities for protection of the installed diesel generators at Unit 51 and Unit #4. Two machines are installed at each Unit, (stored in-place). These activities were considered relative to the codes aM standards requirements described in PSAR Section 3.12 (1.38 and 1.39) and additional work standards provided in job specifi-cations numbered 357 Section 15 Appendix C, and procedures numbered FGCP-16 and FOS-13.4 The inspection included observations, records and personnel interviews in regard to the following asoects of the work: activation of space heaters 1939 109
.
-12-
.
in the ger.erators, covers for openings, general coverings, and clean-liness control. He ascertained that this equipment was included in the
-
periodic preventative taintenance progran.
No itens of noncompliance or deviations were observed.
20. Unresolved Itens Unresolved items are natters about which nore infornation is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, itens of non-comoliance, or deviations.
Unresolved itens i~dentified during this inspection are discussed in paragraphs 5, 7, 9, 11, 16 and 18, 21. Exit Interviews The resident inspector net with licensee nanagenent representatives, and others invited by the licensee representatives, approxinately weekly to discuss the scope of activities and inspection findings (October 9, 22, 29 and Novenber 5, 1979) as detailed in this recort. Attendees at these sessions are designated in Paragraph 1 of this report.
Relative to unresolved items, the licensee lead representative conveyed the following commitments:
79-10-01: A review of Unit #1 atmospheric dunp valves will be perforned.
79-10-02: This item of noncompliance will be answered by correspondence to the regional office following receipt of !lRC regional office notice of violation.
However, corrective reasures have already been initiated - inolenented.
79-10-03: Same as 79-10-02 above.
79-10-04: This item will be replied to following correscondence from the NRC regional office.
However, corrective measures have been initiated - imolemented.
79-10-05: Weld joint fitup reasuring instruments will be made available to welders / fitters.
79-10-06: Weld procedures will be made available to welders at a con-venient location but not necessarily at the station where welding is in progress.
79-10-07:
No cornent.
79-10 08: The covers on the heat exchangers will be reolaced, and action will be taken with the contractor (JAJ) to address this matter.
.
1939 110