IR 05000460/1979010
| ML19290C300 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Washington Public Power Supply System |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1979 |
| From: | Dodds R, Hernandez G, Hutson T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290C296 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-460-79-10, 50-513-79-10, NUDOCS 8001100504 | |
| Download: ML19290C300 (7) | |
Text
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND EN"ORCEMENT
REGION V
50-460/79-10 Report No.
50-513/79-10 Docket No.
50-460, 50-513 License No. CPPR-134, CPPR-174 Safeguards crcup Licensee:
Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Facility Name: Washington Nuclear Projects Nos. I and 4 (WNP-1 and 4)
Inspection at: WNP-1 and 4 site, Benton County, Washington October 15-18, 1979 Inspection conducted:
Inspectors:
I f71
//[27[79
'
T, W. Hutson, Reactor Inspector Dat'e S/gned h
.7
G. 'Hernandez, Reactor Inspector Date Signed Date Signed Approved By :
/
//
3[77 R.' T. Dodds, Chief, Reactor Engineering Support Da(e Sisned Section, Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch Summary:
Inspection on October 15-18, 1979 (Report Nos. 50-460/79-10 and 50-513/79-10)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection by regional based inspectors of construction activities including:
safety-related components, safety-relateo piping installation, and review of welder qualification records. The inspection involved 44 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
1727 508 RV Forr ?l9(?)
8 00110 0 6Of
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted a.
Washington Public Power Supply System
- W. E. Bibb, Project Manager, WilP-1 and 4
- J. P. Thomas, Deputy Project Manager
- M. C. Carrigan, Construction Manager, WiiP-1 and 4
- W. J. Taylor, Depaty Construction Manager
- T. J. Houchins, Project Quality Assurance Manager, W11P-1 and 4
- W. M. Laziar, Senior Quality Assurance Engineer F. Board, Preventive Maintenance Engineer R. D. Dean, Preventive Itaintenance Coordinator b.
Pacific Testing Laboratory (PTL)
A. B. Griggs, Level I Technician
G. S. Christensen, Level I Technician c.
United Engineers and Constructors (UE&C)
- R. S. Millne, Deputy Project Manager
- E. C. Haren, Deputy Project Quality Assurance Manager D. K. Webb, Preventive Maintenance Engineer M. S. Livingston, Lead Quality Assurance Engineer R. Siever, Lead Quality Assurance Engineer d.
J. A. Jones Construction Company R. Pope, Engineering Manager S. Wellenbrock, Lead Quality Control Inspector Duc figuyen Huir, Field Engineer W. S. Roe, Quality Assurance Manager J. J. Flannery, Project Manager T. D. Higgenbotham, ilDE Level III e.
State of Washington G. Hansen, EFSEC
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Construction Status Licensee representatives reported that as of October 18, 1979, construction of WNP-1 was 31.4% complete, and WIIP-4 was 11.6%
complete.
1727 309
-2-3.
Plant Tour Upon arrival at the site, the inspectors toured the WNP-1 plant area to observe construction activities, completed work, equipment storage and housekeeping. Several areas in both the General Services Building and containment were found to have unprotected anchor bolts partially covered with standing water and several pipe caps missing on pipe stored in place.
Licensee representatives stated that the items would be corrected.
Also, several areas of the GSB appeared cluttered with debris.
Licensee personnel stated that housekeeping would be examined.
4.
Safety-Related Components a.
Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Procedures The inspectors reviewed the following procedures for compliance with the PSAR, applicable codes and standards and regulatory requirements:
JA Jones Procedures JAJ-WI-001 Revision 1C Grouting JAJ-WI-002 Revision 0 Cleaning and Upgrading the Cleanliness of Equipment JAJ-WI-003 Revision 1 Test / Inspection Rigging JAJ-WI-004 Revision 0 Anchor Bolt Lubrication / Cleaning /
Tightening JAJ-WI-005 Revision 2 Preventive Maintenance of Equipment JAJ-WI-006 Revision 1 Handling, Setting, Installing and Alignment of Equipment JAJ-WI-015 Revision 0 Marking and Identification P0P-N-404W Revision 0 Shipping and Receiving P0P-N-405W Revision 2 Storage, Handling and Issuance of Items UE&C Procedures FGCP-16 Revision 3 Preventive Maintenance Program PMI-2 Revision 1 Completing PM Cards 1727 310
-3-UESC Procedures (Cont.)
PMI-ll Revision 3 General PM Requirements PMI-12 Revision 1 Qualification of Visual Checkers fio items of noncompliance or deviations were identified during the review of procedures.
b.
Observation of Work and Work Activities The inprocess grouting of tiSW pump 1 A'was observed by the
,
inspector.
The equipment pad was properly prepared and soaked for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> prior to grouting as required.
The mixing of the grout was in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and two-inch cubes were taken at the required interval to verify grout strength. A QC inspector was observed to be monitoring the placement of grout.
In addition, the inspector examined the completed grouting and in-place storage of the following equipment:
Equipment Item Inspected CCW Pump 5A & 6B Grouting and Storage IAC 1A & 2B Grouting and Storage Diesel Generators lA & 2B Grouting and Storage FPC Tank lio. 1 Grouting and Storage DHR Heat Exchanger lA & 28 Grouting and Storage DHR Pumps lA & 2B Storage CSS Pumps lA & 28 Storage FWA Pumps lA, 2B & 3C Storage All completed grouting appeared to be in compliance with Procedure JAJ-WI-001 (Grouting) and adequately filled in the area under the equipment support / base plates.
The inplace storage of the equipment observed was adequate, however in several cases the flame retardant tarp covering the equipment was torn which allowed an accumulation of dirt and debris.
The covering was not always tied or completely covered the equipment, allowing a slight buildup of dirt in the motor cooling vents. All stored equipment with dessicant inside was tagged to indicate that there was dessicant present.
The number of bags of dessicant was marked on a metal tag 1727 311
.
-4-or the old PM cards that were attached to the equipment.
Since tha old PM card system is being phased out and replaced by a new computtr card system, the number of bags of dessicant may or may not be indicated on the card depending on whether the old card is attached or not. This item is unresolved pending review by the licensee to determine how the number of bags will be indicated.
(50-460/79-09/01)
c.
Review of Quality Records The inspector reviewed the following quality records for compliance with procedural and specification requirements.
(1) Process Control Sheets and Grouting Placement Plans for flSW Pump 1A, CCW Pump SA and 6B, IAC lA and 2B, Diesel Generators lA and 28, DHR Heat ExchangerslA and 2B (2) Preventive Maintenance Program and Completed PM cards for the above listed equipment and DHR Pump 1 A and PB, CSS Pump 1A and 28, FWA Pump 1A, 2B and 3C (3) Receiving Inspection and Data Packages for DHR Pumps l A and 28, CSS Pumps lA and 2B and DHR Heat Exchangers l A and 28.
During the review of the Process Controls Sheets and Grouting Placement Plans, the inspector found that hold points / inspection points for QC inspections had been missed.
In particular, signatures were missing in either Section II, III or IV on Grouting Placement Plans, and the Process Control Sheets for EDG-DG-2A and DHR Heat Exchanger 2B for J. A. Jones receipt inspection and grouting respectively.
The inspector also found that there was no standard method used by the QC in-spectors to indicate hold points; consequently, there appeared to be some confusion by the crafts as to what items may be hold points. The method of designating hold points was not addressed in the procedure.
The above discrepancies concerning hold points had been identified by a J. A. Jones internal audit prior to the inspection. Therefore, the resolution of the above item will be examined during future insnections as part of the review of audits. (79-460/79-09/03)
flo items of noncomoliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Safety-Related Piping Installation a.
Review of Quality Assurance Implementing Procedures The following procedures were reviewed to ascertain the adequacy of the instructions relative to receipt, receipt inspection, identification, storage, handling, protection, installation, testing, fabrication, and documentation of safety-related piping.
1727 312
-
..
-5-J. A. Jones Procedures (1) P0P-N-404-W, Revision 0, Shipping and Receiving (2) P0P-N-405-W, Revision 2, Storage, Handling, and Issuance of Items (3) P0P-N-712-W, Revision 0F, Receiving Inspection (4) JAJ-WI-015, Revision 0, Marking and Identification (5) JAJ-WI-016.1, Revision 0F, ASME III Large Bore Piping Installation (6) JAJ-WI-016.3, Revision 0G, ASME Small Bore Piping Fabrication and Installation No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
b.
Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector toured the J. A. Jones Warehouse, Fabrication Shop, and outside storage areas to verify compliance with the above procedures. While no items of noncompliance were identified, the following items were brought to the attention of the licensee:
(1) Some of the material in the storage yard outside of the warehouse was missing tags making it difficult to establish which material was acceptable and which was not.
(2)
In the storage yard outside of the Fabrication Shop eleven small bore pipe spools were observed to have both red hold tags and green accept tags.
Discussions with the licensee indicated that the contractor had neglected to remove the green accept tags when the pipe spools were tagged as nonconforming and also neglected to remove the nonconforming pipe spools from the area.
Subsequent to this finding, the licensee issued Surveillance Report /
Contractor Motification Report No. 459 to document this situation.
(3)
In this same area (the Fabrication Shop storage yard) the inspector also noted that stainless steel spools were comingled with carbon steel spools, contrary to J. A. Jones Procedure P0P-N-405W which prohibits this practice.
(4)
J. A. Jones procedures require that access to the warehouse storage areas and facilities be controlled.
The inspector was unable to verify that such access control was actually being exercised.
1727 313
-
..
-6-The licensee took immediate action and corrected all of the above items prior to the termination of the inspection.
However, these areas will be monitored during future inspec-tions to assure that conditions of storage remain satisfactory.
6.
Welder Qualification Thirteen welder qualification records were reviewed for compliance with ASME and J. A. Jones procedural requirements.
The following items were identified and brought to the attention of the licensee:
a.
A new version of Form JAJ-224, Welder' Performance Qualification Record, was in use which had no been submitted for approval.
b.
In two cases, for one welder the WPQ indicated he had qualified on a two-inch diameter schedule 80 pipe, wall thickness 0.218, yet the Radiographic Test Sheet indicated a test on a six-inch diameter, schedule 80 pipe, wall thickness 0.432.
c.
In another case the welding record contained a Radiographic Test Sheet, but not the Welding Performance Qualification Record.
The licensee stated that they would investigate these items and take appropriate action. This item is considered unresolved pending review of licensee and contractor action on these items.
(79-460/79-09/02)
7.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in Para-graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 18, 1979 and summarized the inspection scope and findings.
The licensee stated that prompt consideration would be given and appropriate action taken on the items called to their attention (Paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6).
1727 314
.