IR 05000445/1993038

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-445/93-38 & 50-446/93-38 on 931018-22 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Records & Repts,Security Organization,Alarm Stations,Test & Maint & Training & Qualifications
ML20059K571
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 11/04/1993
From: Murray B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059K556 List:
References
50-445-93-38, 50-446-93-38, NUDOCS 9311160100
Download: ML20059K571 (2)


Text

.

.

.j'

DOCUENT CONTAINS =

SAFEGUARDS-INFORMATION.

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY, COMMISSION-

REGION IV

Inspection Report:

50-445/93-38 50-446/93-38

,

Operating Licenses: NPF-87 NPF-89 Licensee: TU Electric Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Facility Name: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 & 2 Inspection At: Glen Rose, Texas Inspection Conducted: October 18-22, 1993 Inspector:

A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Section Approved:

h//fA[lt4

/

/

f Blaine Murray,'Chie~f cilities Inspection Date /

'

Programs Section /

-

.

Inspection Summary Areas Inspected (Units I and 2): Routine, announced inspection of the licensee's physical security program. The areas inspected included records and reports, security organization, alarm stations, test and maintenance, and-training and qualifications.

Results (Units 1 and 2):

An excellent system of records and reports was maintained.

Required!

reporting was completed within the correct time frames (Section 1.1).

DOCUNENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED-9311160100 9311095 PDR ADOCK 05000445 G

.PDR

--

.-.

.

,.

..

.-

-n

-. ~...

- _ - -

.

n.

c_

J

!

'

q

--, l-2-DOCLNENT CONTAINS l

SAFEGUARDSsINFORNATION-

!

..

An excellent security organization was maintained that was capable of j

e.

meeting security and contingency plan requirements (Section 1.2).-

l

The alarm stations were redundant, well protected, and..the operators

[

were alert, well trained, and efficient (Section 1.3).

m A concern about the testing ~of assessment aid'~ cameras was identiff ed and '

l

changes were implemented by the licensee to address possible testing-j

,

weaknesses. The licensee had an excellent testing-and maintenance -

,

program that exceeded regulatory requirements (Section 1.4).

Significant progress had been made in improving classroom: training for.-

d

security officers (Section 1.5).

.

i Summary of Insoection Findinas:

-

I Inspection Followup' Item 445/9250-01; 446/9250-01 was closed l

e (Section2.1).

l Inspection Followup Item 445/9250-05; 446/9250-05 was closed

(Section 2.2).

!

Inspection Followup Item 445/9329-01; 446/9329-01 was closed I

(Section 2.3).

  • Violation 445/9317-01; 446/9317-01 was closed (Section 3).

'

'

i Licensee Event Reports 445/92-023, 92-023-01; 446/92-023, 92-023-01 were.

j e

closed (Section 4).

]

Attachment:

  • .

Attachment - Pe.rsons Contacted and Exit Meeting

. ;

i

!

t

!

!

!

-

!

DOCUNENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS-~

i

SAFEGUARDS INFORNATION SAFEGUARDS-INFORMATION

'

UPON SEPARATION THIS-

PAGE IS DECONTROLLED l

!

o

!

.

.

l

.

.-

.

- -

.

- - - - -

- - -

- -