IR 05000445/1993038

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-445/93-38 & 50-446/93-38 on 931018-22 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Records & Repts,Security Organization,Alarm Stations,Test & Maint & Training & Qualifications
ML20059K571
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 11/04/1993
From: Murray B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20059K556 List:
References
50-445-93-38, 50-446-93-38, NUDOCS 9311160100
Download: ML20059K571 (2)


Text

.

.

.j'

DOCUENT CONTAINS =

SAFEGUARDS-INFORMATIO APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY, COMMISSION-

REGION IV

Inspection Report: 50-445/93-38 50-446/93-38 ,

Operating Licenses: NPF-87 NPF-89 Licensee: TU Electric Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Facility Name: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 & 2 Inspection At: Glen Rose, Texas Inspection Conducted: October 18-22, 1993 Inspector: A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist Facilities Inspection Programs Section Approved: h//fA[lt4 Blaine Murray,'Chie~f f

cilities Inspection

/

Date /

/ '

Programs Section / -

.

Inspection Summary Areas Inspected (Units I and 2): Routine, announced inspection of the licensee's physical security program. The areas inspected included records and reports, security organization, alarm stations, test and maintenance, and-training and qualification Results (Units 1 and 2):

  • An excellent system of records and reports was maintained. Required!

reporting was completed within the correct time frames (Section 1.1).

DOCUNENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS PAGE IS DECONTROLLED-9311160100 9311095 PDR ADOCK 05000445 G .PDR

--

__ , . . . .-

-n - . ~ . . . - _ - - . c_

J

  • !

q

'

--, l-2- DOCLNENT CONTAINS l SAFEGUARDSsINFORNATION- !

j

.. An excellent security organization was maintained that was capable of meeting security and contingency plan requirements (Section 1.2).- l

  • The alarm stations were redundant, well protected, and..the operators [

were alert, well trained, and efficient (Section 1.3). 1 m ;

  • A concern about the testing ~of assessment aid'~ cameras was identiff ed and ' l changes were implemented by the licensee to address possible testing ,

-j weaknesses. The licensee had an excellent testing-and maintenance - ,

program that exceeded regulatory requirements (Section 1.4).

  • Significant progress had been made in improving classroom: training for.- d security officers (Section 1.5). .

i Summary of Insoection Findinas:

-

I e Inspection Followup' Item 445/9250-01; 446/9250-01 was closed l (Section2.1). l

  • Inspection Followup Item 445/9250-05; 446/9250-05 was closed (Section 2.2).  !
  • Inspection Followup Item 445/9329-01; 446/9329-01 was closed I (Section 2.3).

'

  • Violation 445/9317-01; 446/9317-01 was closed (Section 3). '

i e Licensee Event Reports 445/92-023, 92-023-01; 446/92-023, 92-023-01 wer j closed (Section 4). ]

Attachment:

  • . Attachment - Pe.rsons Contacted and Exit Meeting . ;

i

!

t

!

!

!

-

!

DOCUNENT CONTAINS i ENCLOSURE CONTAINS-~

' *

SAFEGUARDS INFORNATION SAFEGUARDS-INFORMATION UPON SEPARATION THIS- 1 PAGE IS DECONTROLLED l

!

o

!

.- - - _ . _ .

l