IR 05000400/1981008
| ML18017B405 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1981 |
| From: | Julian C, Maxwell G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B404 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-81-08, 50-400-81-8, 50-401-81-08, 50-401-81-8, 50-402-81-08, 50-402-81-8, 50-403-81-08, 50-403-81-8, NUDOCS 8106080092 | |
| Download: ML18017B405 (6) | |
Text
~
~R RE0Ij (4 PO ce csO I
r+~
~O
++*++
UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-400/81-08, 50-401/81-08, 50-402/81-08 and 50-403/81-08 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light-Company 411 Fayetteville Street Ral ei gh NC 27602 Facility Nam(:
Shearon Harr is Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401, 50-402, 50-403 License Nos.
(PPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160 and CPPR-161 Inspection at Harris,.site near Raleigh, North Carolina Inspector:
Mi G. F.
Maxwe 1, Senior si ent Inspector Approved by: C--
'.
.
u n,
cting ection ie,
ivision of Resident and Reactor Project Inspection SUMItARY Date Signed.
Joie'te igne Inspection on March 20 - Apri.l 20, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine resident inspection involved 124 inspector hours on site in the areas of action on previous inspection findings (Unit 1), welding (Units 1-4),
concrete- (Units, 1-4), equipment storage and inspection and enforcement bulletins (Units 1.-4)..-
Results Of the five areas inspected, no violations or deviations wer e identifie DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
"R. M. Parsons, Site Manager
- N. J. Chiangi, Manager, Engineering and Construction QA/QC
'G. L. Forehand, Director; QA/QC
"A. M. Lucas, Senior Resident Engineer
"G. M. Simpson, Principal Construction Inspection Specialist
"T. J. Wait, Welding Specialist, QA/QC
"R. Hanford, Principal Engineer
"I. A. Johnson, Principal QA Specialist Other Organizations.
- W. D. Goodman, Daniel Project Manager
"Attended exit interview Exit Interview-The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 10, and 21, 1981 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action. on Previous, Inspection Findings (Closed)
Severity.
Level V Violation-400/81-02-01:
Failure to require activities affecting quality. to be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or-drawings.
CP&L's letter of response dated March 5, 1981 has been'eviewed and found, acceptable by Region II.
The inspector evaluated the procedures referred to in the March 5, 1981 letter and interviewed electrical craft personnel.
As a result, the inspector found that satis-factory corrective action has been taken by CP&L.
This item is cl'osed.
4.
Unresolved 'Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Welding Units 1 and 2 a
The inspector observed the inspections being performed by the respon-sible welding QA inspection personnel for the following weld joints:
(1)
1-CC-171-FW-600 (observed fit-up)
(2)
1-SW-84-FW-549 (observed fit-up)
(3)
1-SW-49-FW-54 (observed pre fit-up)
(4)
1-SW-48-FW-33 (observed final-visual)
b.
The inspector participated in a site inspection conducted by another RII inspector.
The inspection involved:
observation of completed ASME Section III, class three welds; nondestructive testing of the completed welds; review of inspection personnel qualification records; observa-tion of-weld-wire control; observation of in-process welding and post.-weld, heat treatment of. a safety injection system accumulator foundation and observation of in-process welding on unit. 1 feed system containment penetration welds.
The results of the inspection are documented in RII reports numbered 50-400, 401 402, 403/81-07.
In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Concrete Units 1-4
. b.
The inspector observed portions of concrete placements being made in:
Unit 1 reactor auxiliary-common building (pours numbered 1ACSL324004, 1ACIW322003B.
and.
1ACSL305001);
Unit
containment building (pour numbered, 1CBIW299002)
and Unit 1 reactor auxiliary building (pour numbered 1RAIW301007).
The concrete-forms were tight, clean and level.
The concrete placement'ctivities pertaining to delivery time, free fall, consolidation and testing conformed to specification require-ments, concrete placement activities were continuously monitored by inspection personnel, (reference PSAR section 5,
EBASCO specification CAR-SH-CH-6, procedures CQC-13, CQC-6, WP-5, TP-15 and QCI-13.3).
On March 27, 1981 the: inspector observed the stored condition of the stockpiled aggregate located around the. site's concrete. batch plant.
The'oll'owing resulted from the observation:,
(1)
The number 4 aggregate stockpile was contaminated by similar stone which was extremely dirty;, the surfaces of the uncleaned stone appeared to have been subjected to extended storage periods in contact with cl'ay..
(2)
The inspector advised the batch plant supervisor and responsible CP&L QA management personnel of the above unsatisfactory condi-tion.
C.
As a result, the contaminated (dirty) aggregate wa's immediately removed from the storage stockpile.
However, further inspection was conducted by the responsible site QA Specialist.
As a result the stockpile was found to contain numerous pockets of fine material which-was less than the minimum acceptable sized number 4 aggregate.
The responsible QA Specialist required a nonconformance report (NCR-C-420) to be written and the stockpi.le placed in a hold status pending further evaluation.
The inspector has no further questions about this matter, at. this time.
The inspector observed portions of the work activities for the pre-paration and placement of soil-cement placed at the electrical duct bank adjacent to manhole number 70 (pour numbered 1ACSC254009).
The soil test results were evaluated and the soil onto which the
soil-cement was placed had satisfactorily passed a 95% standard proctor test.
The soil-cement placement activities pretaining to del ivery time, free fall and testing conformed to specification requirements.
The soil-cement. placement activities were continuously monitored by inspection personnel, (reference FSAR section 8.3. 1. 1.2. 16; EBASCO drawings and specifications numbered CAR-2167-G'-0488, CAR-SH-CH'-6, CAR-SH-CH-18; procedures MP-202, TP-02, TP-15, CgC-13, CgA-6 and gC1.-13.3).
In the areas. inspected, no violations were deviations were identified.
~8 7.
Equipment Storage - Units 1-4 a.
The inspector observed the stored condition of:
the reactor vessels for units 1, 2, 3 and 4; the pressurizer'for Unit-1; piping and rebar stored in the warehouse outside storage-areas.
located west of the power block; materials stored in warehouses numbered 1, 2, 3 and 4.
The inspector randomly selected three piping spool pieces located in the outside warehouse storage and reviewed the corresponding location and maintenance records; the recor ds correctly described the spool pieces and their locations.
C.
The inspector, accompanied by the responsible Daniel safety personnel, toured the site outside areas and within the power block; the following were observed:
(1)
The; site fire pumps wer found to be operable.
(2)
In areas, where cutting and, welding operations were in progress",
fire extinguishing. equipment was located in the proximity of the
. affected, work areas.
(3). Portable fire extinguishers displayed tags indicating that they had recently been inspected..
Each extinguisher displayed a
breakable lock to further assure and indicate that they had been inspected and would operate, should the need arise.
(4)
The required emergency equipment was found to be stored in the
'esignated fire houses (inspected three fire"houses).
(5)
The fire hoses and water supplies were found to be in their designated locations throughout the power block and were found to be operable.
In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins Units 1-4 (Closed)
IEB 79-03A, "Longitudinal weld defects in ASME SA-312 type 304 stainless steel pipe spools manufactured by Youngstown Melding and
Engineering Company."
Bulletin IEB 79-03A is closed on the basis of notification by responsible USNRC RII personnel that a
CPKL response dated August 5, 1980 appropriately addressed-the concerns noted in the Bulletin.