IR 05000400/1981004
| ML18017B355 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/1981 |
| From: | Julian C, Maxwell G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017B353 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-81-04, 50-400-81-4, 50-401-81-04, 50-401-81-4, 50-402-81-04, 50-403-81-04, NUDOCS 8103270534 | |
| Download: ML18017B355 (11) | |
Text
ClO Cy
+>>*++
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Repor t Nos. 50-400/81-04, 50-401/81-04, 50-402/81-04 and 50-403/81-04 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401, 50-402 and 50-403 License Nos
~ CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160 and CPPR-161 Inspection at Harris site near aleigh, North Carolina Inspector:
G. F. Maxwell Approved by:
C. Juli
, Acting Section Chief, RRPI Division Date Signed Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on February 2-20, 1981 Areas Inspected II This routine resident inspection involved 77 inspector-hours on site in the areas of concrete, material control, mechanical equipment, and coatings.
C ', ~
Re sul'ts Of the four areas inspected,'o violations or deviations were identified:
~
II A
l'
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- S. D. Smith, Vice President Nuclear Plant Construction
"H. R. Banks, Corporate QA Manager
"R. M. Parsons, Site Manager
"A. M. Lucas, Senior Resident Engineer
- G. L. Forehand, Director QA/QC Other licensee employees contacted included 14 construction craftsmen, five technicians, two mechanics, and 12 office personnel.
NRC Personnel N. Economos, Reactor Inspector, RII
"Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 20, 1981 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items
.. -.:Unresolved.items were not.identified.durigg thi.s inspection..
"~
5.
Concrete Units, 1-4 a.
The inspector observed portions of conc~etc placements being made at:
(1)
The emergency service water intake structure, pour numbered 11 S IW244001.
(2)
Units
and
auxi l iary common bui 1 ding, pour numbered 1ACS L324010.
Forms were tight, clean and level.
Placement activities pertaining to delivery time, free fall and consolidation conformed to specification requirements.
Concrete activities were continuously monitored by inspection personnel, (reference PSAR section 1,
5; EBASCO specifi-cation CAR-SH-CH-6; procedures CQC-13, CQA-6, WP-5 and TP-15).
b.
The inspector evaluated the results of tests which were conducted relative to the batch plant operation during the last twelve months; i.e.:
(1)
Uniformity tests.
(2)
Cement tests
- tensil strength, chemical analysis and autoclave expansion.
(3)
Batch plant scales water scales, cement scales, and aggregate scales.
The results of the above were compared with the requirements referenced in CP&L PSAR section 5.5, construction procedures CQC-13 and TP-04.
As a result of the above observations the inspector observed that site document control was maintaining the historical copies. of all site specifications, technical procedures and work procedures.
The specifications and procedures were being stored in a
locked room measuring about sixty-four square feet.
However, the room did not meet the construction requirements of National Fire Protection Association Class I o'r the requirements for records storage as required by CP&L's procedure CQA-4 section 9.0.
The inspector discussed the concern with CP&L management.
Immediate corrective action was taken, requiring the historical procedures and specifications, to be transferred to the site QA records vault.
Responsible CP&L document control and QA personnel conducted a close review of other historical documents and determined the above improper storage practices to be an isolated case.
The inspector evaluated the actions taken by CP&L, relative to the storage of historical procedures and specifications, and determined this condition to be of no safety significance.
The inspector has no further questions,.about thismatter,. at this time.
C.
The inspector observed the methods employed in the identification, control and curing of concrete test cylinders in the CP&L Environmental Center concrete test laboratory (referenced PSAR section 5.5, EBASCO specification CAR-SH-CH-6 and ASTM C 511),
In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Material Control - Units 1-4
The inspector observed the receipt inspection of nine ASME section III, class 3 valves and one thousand pounds of ASME SFA 5.9 bare welding wire.
The issuance process and the rigging practices associated with a
~
system (valve numbered 3CC-B6-SB-1)
were observed.
The documents referenced during the above observations included:
PSAR section 1.8.5, 1.4.9 (Regulatory Guide 1.39);
CP&L procedures numbered CQC-2, QCI-6. 1,
',:..'QC-.6; AP-Xll-01;.AP;X111-05 and AP-X111-08..-
four ASME section III, class 3 piping spool pieces were witnessed.
The receipt inspection, issuance and storage practices associated with a
motor operated butterfly valve to be used in the component cooling
b.
The stored condition of the reactor vessels and their internals for units 1, 2, 3 ancj 4 was reviewed.
The inspector toured the power block outside storage areas, the warehouse outside rebar and pipe storage yards and the rebar storage areas located at the main dam.
C.
The installed condition of ASME section III class 3 pipe spool piece numbered T2-240-2-SW-168-4 was inspected along with the field changes which had been made to one part of the spool piece.
The changes resulted in:
(1)
Removal by CP&L of the shop weld, numbered
on Southwest Fabricators document S.O. f3303-TB, sheet II.
(2)
Removal of one portion of spool part (20'-ll" in length)
numbered P4 on Southwest Fabricator's document numbered S.O. f3303-TB sheet 11.
(3)
CP&L relocated the Southwest Fabricator's ASME code data plate from part number P4 above to part numbered P3 (identified on same document noted in C.(2) above).
(4)
CP&L. replaced par t numbered P4 with an equivalent material.
(5)
The new weld made by CP&L to replace shop weld number
was numbered by CP&L as 2-SW-168-4-"SW-1".
, (6)
- a's P-l.
'7)
CP&L placed their ASME NPT-3 code data plate beside the relocated
.,;.data plate;and completed. an ammended NPP-1 data report.
The i,nspector discussed, with RII supervisory personnel and site CP&L management, the use of letters
"SW-1" to identify the field weld which replaced Southwest's weld number 10.
The inspector has no further questions about this matter at this time.
In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Mechanical Equipment Unit 1 a,
An inspection was made of the chemical and volume control pumps (CVCS)
numbered lA-SA, 1B-SB and 1C-SAB.
The pumps and their baseplates had been installed to the following status:
(1)
The location and orientation of the pumps had been established and inspected.
(2)
The leveling, alignment and elevation had been established and inspecte (3)
The baseplates had been grouted up to their lower surfaces.
(4)
The foundation bolts which anchor the baseplates to their foundations had been attested to by construction inspection personnel as being tightened.
b.
An evaluation of the equipment installation packages and inspection installation checklist (exhibit 1 of construction procedure TP-28) for the above pumps revealed the following.
(1)
Sufficient information was available to determine that in general the pumps were correctly located, oriented, leveled, aligned and located at the correct elevations.
(2)
The inspector could not determine exactly what methods were utilized during the tightening of the foundation bolts which anchor the pump baseplates or what acceptance criteria was utilized by the responsible inspection personnel who attested to the tightened status of the bolts.
This matter was discussed with CPSL management personnel who stated that the Architect Engineer will be consulted to determine if the fastening technique discussed in the applicable work procedure (WP-105) is acceptable for mechanical equipment installations Further, the construction inspection procedure (TP-28) will be evaluated to clarify the acceptance criteria and the means whereby it will be documented.
This matter is identified as inspector followup item 400/81-04-01;
"Installation of chemical and volume control pumps."
The documents referenced during the above observations included:
PSAR section 1, table 18.2-1; construction procedures WP-29,
. WP.-.105,.j'P-.05,,
and,.TP.-.28;..EBASCO drawings. numbered CAR 2165-G-140, CAR 2'167-G-1'370; CAR 2167'-G-1371, CAR 2167"G"1162,'AR'2165"G-016"
. and Pacific Pump (EBASCO drawing number) 1364-1908.
In the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Other Areas Inspected - Units 1-4 a o The inspector observed the inspection of coatings which had been applied to the concrete surfaces located inside Unit 1 containment elevations 221'o 256'orth of the reactor vessel.
The documents referenced included:
PSAR section 1.8.5, 1.4.9 (Regulatory Guide 1.54);
EBASCO specification CAR-SH-COR-02 and CP@L procedures WP-24 and TP-29.
The installed condition of the pressure grouting of the diversionary pipes for the main dam was examined.
The water level in the main dam reservoir has risen to an elevation of approximately 185 feet.
The wate~ level was at about 177 feet when the diversionary pipes were initially closed in mid-November, 198 C.
Since the last reporting period, CP&L has plans to make significant upper management changes as they relate to gA.
That is, gA will report to Corporate.gA Manager who will report directly to the Executive Vice President for Power Supply and Engineering and Construction.
In the areas. inspected, no violations of deviations were identifie '