IR 05000387/1985030
| ML17139D308 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 11/01/1985 |
| From: | Anderson C, Krasopoulos A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17139D307 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-85-30, 50-388-85-25, NUDOCS 8512100583 | |
| Download: ML17139D308 (28) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Meeting Nos.
50-387/85-30 50-388/85-25 Docket Nos.
50-387 50-388 License Nos.
NPF-14 and NPF-22 Priority Licensee:
Penns lvania Power & Li ht Com an 2 North Ninth Street Allentown Penn s 1 vani a 18101 Category C
Facility Name:
Sus uehanna Steam Electric Station Unit 1 and
Meeting at:
USNRC Re ion
Kin of Prussia Penns lvania Meeting conducted:
October
1985 vaja Prepared By:
a.
A.
G.
ra sopou 1 o s, Reactor Engineer
]~ (
$'S date Approved by:
C.
. Anderson, Chief Plant Systems Section, DRS date M~i:
E f
NR i
I
b 1,
to discuss the findings identified in the combined Inspection Report Nos.
50-387/85-06 and 50-388/85-06, which reviewed the licensee's ability to safely shutdown the plant in the event of a fire.
The items discussed were the two violations identified in the report and various commitments made to NRC in a meeting held in Bethesda, Maryland on April 18, 1985 concerning the findings of the above inspection.
The licensee presented the NRC concerns and their positions on these issues as well as commitments made that would satisfy these concerns.
ggfiQi pg~
ADQGH Pgg gg ig100 pgppOS pD
I g ~
f~f.'~
g~p. gsy g (p pig ~ 'l
~ 6.y n ~,
d
~
DETAILS Partici ants Penns lvania Power and Li ht Co.
PP&L W. Barberich C. Coddington H. Keiser D.
Kohn A. Male D.
McGann D. Thompson Manager, Nuclear Licensing Senior Project Engineer, Licensing Vice President, Nuclear Operations Fire Protection Engineer Manager, Nuclear Design Compliance Engineer Assistant Plant Superintendent 1.2 Nucl ear Re ul ator Commi ssi on NRC J. Allan C. Anderson W. Butler M. Campagnone J. Durr S.
Ebneter R. Ferguson R. Fuhrmeister J. Gutierrez D. Holody A. Krasopoulos T. Murley T. Poindexter S. Pullani J. Strosnider Deputy Regional Administrator Chief, Plant System Section Chief, L.B. No.
Project Manager, NRR L.B. No.
Chief, Engineering Branch Director, Division of Reactor Safety Section Leader Reactor Engineer Regional Counsel Enforcement Specialist Reactor Engineer Regional Administrator Enforcement Staff Lead Reactor Engineer Section Chief, DRP 2.0 3.0
~Put ose The enforcement conference was held at the request of NRC Region I, to discuss the findings of the inspection conducted to assess the licensee's compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R.
Presentation and Discussion NRC Region I Regional Administrator, Dr. T. Murley opened the conference by asking the licensee to present their perspective on the findings'ollowing an introduction of the participants, the NRC Region I Director of the Division of Reactor Safety, Mr. S.
Ebneter stated the purpose of the meeting and iterated the sequence of events leading to the enforcement conference.
Mr. H. Kaiser, Vice President of Nuclear Operations of PP&L responded to the NRC*concerns by first addressing the violations identified in the report and then responding to various Appendix R concern A discussion followed on what constituted a fire barrier and a degraded fire door.
Subsequent to the discussion of the violations, the licensee presented their plan to resolve the Appendix R issues.
The licensee committed to reanalyze the fire zones, redefine fire areas, and upgrade fire barriers as necessary by installing penetration seals, fire dampers, and rated doors.
They also committed to review unrated fire zone boundaries, make an associate circuit analysis for fire zones outside and within the Control Room, and identify exemptions to Appendix RE The licensee also committed to dates when the installation and analysis would be complete.
(See attachment 1, licensee's presentation material)
4.0 Concludin Statements The Regional Administrator and the Director of the Division of Reactor Safety thanked the licensee for their presentation and stated that this information would be considered in the NRC's determination of enforcement actions related to these issue ATTACHMENT 1 Licensees Presentation Material AGENDA
INTRODUCTION PART I FIRE PROTECTION ISSUES
STATUS OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION FOR VIOLATIONS TRANSMITTED IN INSPECTION REPORT 50-387/85M AND 50-388/85M
INADEQUATE TESTING OF FIRE DAMPERS
NON-FUNCTIONAL FIRE DOORS
STATUS OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND Cot%ITMENTS MADE DURING MEETINGS WITH NRR
PLANNED ACTIONS/SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS o
85-06-07 o
85-06-04 o
85-06-05 PART II HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
PLANNED ACTIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS o
85-06-02 o
85-06-01
CONCLUSION
i wf
ITEMS 50-387/85-06-10 AND 50-388/85-06-10 INADEQUATE TESTING OF F IRE DANPERS NRC CONCERN
CERTAIN FIRE DAMPERS WERE NOT FUNCTIONALLY TESTED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NDICA-15,3,1 PP8L POSITION
THIS ITEM IS NOT A VIOLATION
No REGULATORY REQUIREMENT To FUNCTIONALLY TEST DAMPERS
SECTION 6<3 OF THE NDI ONLY APPLIES TO ACCEPTANCE TESTING,
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6s4 OF THE NDI p SPECIFIES TESTING IS DONE ON A REGULARLY SCHEDULED BASIS; 1,
SEGTIQN 6<4 QF THE NDI DoEs NOT REFERENcE NFPA.
2, TESTING AND SURVEILLANCE IS PER THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WHICH SPECIFY VISUAL INSPECTION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA-90Ai APPENDIX Bp SECTION B-7i FUNCTIONAL TESTING IS OPTIONAL CONC( USIoN
VISUAL SURVEILLANCE OF DAMPERS IS TECHNICALLY ADEQUATE AND COMPL IES WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
ITEM 50-%7/85-06-11 NON-FUNCTIONAL FIRE DOORS NRC CONCERN
CERTAIN FIRE DOORS NOT NAINTAINED AS FIRE BARRIERS
CERTAIN FIRE DOORS WERE NON-FUNCTIONAL PPaL REsPONsE
THIS ITEM IS NOT A VIOLATION
NON-FUNCTIONAL FIRE DOORS SPECIFIC PROBLEMS:
BROKEN.DOOR LATCH AND CLOSER NECHANISM DOORS HELD OPEN REPAIRED BY PLANT NAINTENANCE NUMBER OF NON-FUNCTIONAL DOORS NOT EXCESSIVE
FUSIBLE LINKS APPROVED AS PART OF FPRR AND FSAR NO NFPA OR NRC STANDARD PROHIBITS FUSIBLE LINKS NO TECHNICAL CONCERNS WITH RE USE OF FUSIBLE LINKS
~ ~
NRC CONITKNTS
REVIEW THE UNRATED FIRE ZONE BOUNDARIES
ANALYZE THE ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS WITHIN FIRE ZONES OUTSIDE THE CONTROL ROOM
IDENTIFY ANY EXEMPTIONS TO APPENDIX R SECTION III,G
ANALYZE THE ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS WI'THIN THE CONTROL ROOM
NRR CONITttENTS UNRATED FIRE ZONE BOUNDARIES
COl%ITMENT
REANALYZE FIRE ZONES
RE-DEFINE FIRE AREAS PER APPENDIX Ri III,G,
UPGRADE BARRIERS AS REQUIRED
STATUS
ANALYSIS COMPLETE (PLA-2529, SEPT, 4, 1985)
UPGRADE BARRIERS OR PORTIONS OF BARRIERS
RATING OF FIRE DOORS (NO PHYSICAL REPLACEMENT)
INSTALLATION OF FIRE DAMPERS
INSTALLATION OF SEALANT TO PENETRATIONS (
10/o HAD TO BE INSTALLED)
FIVE EXEMPTION REQUESTS WERE REQUESTED
~
~
CRITERIA FOR FIRE PROTECTION OF SAFE SHUTDOWN SYSTPS WITHIN A FIRE ZONE WHICH DO NOT CONPLY WITH THE REQUIRPENTS OF SECTION III,G
CeeImENT
IDENTIFY THE SPECIFIC FPRR SECTION 2,11 CRITERIA FOR EACH FIRE ZONE
'
PROVIDE EXEMPTION REQUESTS AND JUSTIFICATION
STATUS
REPORT SCHEDULED TO BE COMPLETED NOVEMBER 15 1985
THE ANALYSIS OF ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS. WITHIN THE CONTROL ROON
COMMITMENT
REANAI YZE THE EFFECTS OF A FIRE IN THE CONTROL ROOM ON THE ABILITYTO SHUTIXMN
ALTERNATE SHUTIXNN SYSTEMS AND THEIR SUPPORT SYSTEMS WILL REMAIN OPERABLE FROM OUTSIDE THE CONTROL ROON
NO SINGLE SPURIOUS SIGNAL WILL AFFECT ABILITYOF ALTERNATE SHUTDOWN SYSTEMS TO FUNCTION
NO SPURIOUS SIGNAL WILL CAUSE LOSS OF INVENTORY
STATUS
.
ANALYSIS COMPLETED PLA-2529>
SEPTEMBER 4> 1985
ONE ADDITIONAL PERMANENT NANUAL ACTION NOT ALREADY COVERED BY PROCEDURE IS NECESSARY TO PREVENT HIGH/LOW PRESSURE INTERFACE CAUSED BY THE SPURIOUS ACTUATION OF BOTH REACTOR HEAD VENT VALVES ON EACH UNIT
INITIATIONOF INTERIM PROCEDURES (24 FANS)
EXEMPTION REQUEST PROCEDURE TO START BATTERY ROON EXHAUST FANS BE ADOPTED AS PERMANENT CORRECTIVE ACTION
THE ANALYSIS OF ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS WITHIN FIRE ZONES OUTSIDE THE CONTROL ROON
COMMITMENT
VERIFY SUCCESSFUL OPERATION OF NINORITY DIVISION SAFE SHUTDCW SYSTEM OR SUPPORT SYSTEM CAN NOT BE DEFEATED BY A SPURIOUS SIGNAL FROM NAJORITY DIVISION AND THAT MINORITY DIVISION SYSTEM OPERATION DOES NOT RELY ON A NAJORITY DIVISION COMPONENT
VERIFY VESSEL INVENTORY IS NOT COMPROMISED BY SPURIOUS OPERATION OF A NAJORITY DIVISION COMPONENT
STATUS,
ANALYSIS SCHEDULED TO BE COMPLETED - NOVEMBER 15'985
ITEM 50-%8/85-06-07 EYERGENCY LIGHTING BATtERY POWER SUPPLY NOT 8-HOUR RATED IN FIRE ZONE 2-2A NRC CONCERN
ONE EMERGENCY LIGHTING BATTERY POWER SUPPLY NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION III,J OF APPENDIX R, PPRL RESPONSE
THIS IS A VIOLATION
NON-CONFORMING BATTERY POWER SUPPLY WAS REPLACED ON JULY 19'985,
THIS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SAFETY CONCERN SINCE THE PATH LIT BY THIS POWER SUPPLY WOULD BE USED MINUTES AFTER A FIRE STARTED IN THE CONTROL ROOM,
ITEM 50-388/85-06-04 LACK OF AUTONTIC SUPPRESSION IN EQUIPNENT RPDVAL AREA AND EQUIPttlENT SHAFT AREA NRC CONCERN 0,
AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION HAS NOT BEEN INSTALLED IN FIRE ZONES 2-3B AND 2-5A PER THE FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM PAL REsPoNsE
THIS IS NOT A VIOLATION
FIRE ZONE 2-3B FIGURE 5,10 CORRECTLY SHOWS PARTIAL AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION INSTALLED, AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH F IRE PROTECTION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
FIRE ZONE 2-5A FIGURE 5,12 INCORRECTLY SHOWS AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION CONFIGURATION NO NEED FOR AUTOMATIC SUPPRESSION IN FIRE ZONE
~I
I
~ IJ>4.04 Qg OOP
>~%la ~>$ 0 C
)
I 000 1!
Ce 9 V 9 A
q>.
O>l
)
et:0>
Vol 1010':O'
T Ii 1..> j>4 111 11>
0$ 111 0%-OI IOI IO~
r IIJOI Lpj <<KKO Oa CJ
C CJ
- tS 0>L C 0114 COJLJ
'n '
Jro>aw Icoa
~~>
J.
>Cr r.
rLLLL
'rrr" r
J ra
',>4r~'O 0COOO0
~ &04 I
~
,WC.>I~ 111
'>. 0:!
I. 0:
00$ Ol >
ql
~i4)
OIJI I
~I 04>. ~
\\ ~
CEB,'g,l rg CC J>ol
~ I
'
)
~~
.
.)
I
~ a CJ
~tJrbc~
I Cc II\\0 0
~1>LJ IIIOa'I ICJ (Qg)'g~>
g~l I
I a>101\\
@1m '"
n OOOI>0>MZ IC>>
1 0 0>> AfI
~CA Jr C
~
>100004>ock
~
~ 0Oar~I pp Jao>4 CI4JO ~ la>4 4 Lc>r>lr10> 4J>r> >4>
~>JC L '40 COO Qa
Qv -- -i 0>
>I
~ l
V.
Q
'L.
aa I~ >
r crc> >0111 tuxceaa co>
~ 4 I 04>c >>4>4 Irr>1%0 I
!
I J~l
- .Ir j I
p I
)
(
I
~
>
pe
~
I 4 '4 CO 101 (rr. ~ >
1 104 01 OI CKWISCAE
~r 0>
Oto 11 I ~
+OOCI
>I key ~>Jr, 0} I'
'1 Cc,>>;
04LCJ,,
4 rrrC r-r. I.
'. OL
~a. >0>
I>
I ar'IOVIOO I
OCTO1La 0'ff
~t1 TO 00a 1> 101 Cf I
L I
~
4 I
~ i)a
~,',
t
~ t10
~
g ~ >I 0> g
>
orc I"
~ ~
~
0>
~, ~
a~a~
(Q j3 g"""Qi p)
w '"
js)
~
>>>)
IJC OL>01>CJO
~>040>>1 IJ>aa II'.CIZANIN f S'IL
0
tJ Qa Qo Pi I
I I
DTONII>
ttr 01 ~
.,(
~rr 1 I
I Q~
Qsi 8 Q gi Qty I+-
01 Il<<>0'
8'
I I
Qi.
Qv Q~
~
I 4cc A>ta4 icarr> 0>r> r>rch J]
I'
41'l.O YA1 Va A 4'0\\II heal j
~>L t1 0 41>O'
I
.I~
I IV Ta>
I CEHB
~Cea Ia.glo
~~40
>4 \\I
~
4'I L
~
JL 11 I>4"0'
00ICTOC
) $4orc
~
~
. Oj ccn.l'
y.
I I
i
~
'I OrÃcl(O 0
>$>O 0 ~ A$ 0'
~
r CIC
>TOO
8
8
~
~ no10'
0'w I tod clio'
1 d Wyll'If~
I QSO QCC
.
I Ca Sa ntl I
~> ~
'n'
I i
I I
"
I'
'l COO
> Olla>
I I
i I
I Uv arrl c0ocal'44 rjnoc, I ~
Oj O'A P I
I
~
I I
I ISr>OI j >tr ree acv@~ca>n~gqjt I
I
I rc
~ d
~ >
OO a ll Oa
~
Ol a Ol a OO'1 Olvl
/
~tan> vl Sel f],,
rt> Orr>>>vr C Sll
~la \\
gRI ISS o'a
.+OS vr.l O. I--
1 ~ rr Non>
rvvr aa>
~ >
e>a>>>~ >a>>
Q OI
~ >WE+ %no>
>$>vr C>a 0&
~rl W I>
XX8
~
5+
gy',
I
~ >
I
'ria
, Ir>~
>a (55Rrgp(
~ 0> rrv avail ~ >>$
loca la 51,";:.";
jh A ~ v>
~ 0 Ckf>
'S.e Or.
~aa ta>O>
'Vck
'j)7
~a'>k'a
>
~la@
g'd ki?Ca aa(
/0".g
~ Cr>v>5 Ol jnI 0-'
~
I QS A>>'a Cv
>aC j>>0 ga 0 OCO Cal Iv I O L%
C'>
~>>
0'
I 0 $ $1r' '10'0' I 5, v40
'154rCI+DC'rS.M'
ON
~raa vo
~ Ov OraC vO >%0
~
~ >
~
~'>O'
va
'I
'> a
>>l n>
>> av I
r VOO>>r
~
~
C>arl Qj Ilv>O I
I I
(~j
~
~ '
~
~
>'
~
C
C4%
0000
CAR OOOO C5H 0060 CRl OOOO 0 0 I
63 OOOO e3 an i CHRI 0 0 0 Kl Qf59 OOOO Kl GERS 0 0 QCR7
OO C3
5) 0 K3 QK32 0 6n
IT~ 50-%8/85-06-05 INGNPLETE ONE HOUR FIRE BARRIERS IN FIRE ZONE 2-4A NRC CONCERN IN FIRE ZONE 2-4Ai THE INSTALLATIONOF FIRE BARRIERS DID NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ONE HOUR SEPARATION/PROTECTION, PPRL RESPONSE
THIS IS NOT A VIOLATION
WRAPPING IS NOT WALL TO WALL
ONE HOUR INSTALLED WRAPPING SATISFIES THE CRITERIA OF SECTION 2,11 OF THE FPRR IN THAT WRAPPING EXTENDS AT LEAST 50 FEET FROM REDUNDANT CABLES,
THIS IS AN EXEMPTION TO APPENDIX R WHICH WILL BE SUBMITTED ON 11/15/85 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CueImENTS NeE TO NRR,
INSTALLATIONAT INTERFACE OF BARRIER AND WALL,
ONE HOUR WRAPPING IS INSTALLED IN THE CONFIGURATION OF THE AUGUST 1982 TEST WHICH SHONED THAT THE WRAP PROVIDED ONE HOUR PROTECTION TO THE CABLES AT THE INTERFACE POINT,
~ 1 y
D 4V b
SJ n
- INTERFACE 1 HR.
REF. PP(.L TEST AUG. I98Z 5 HR. SILICONE PENETRATION SEAL i~.TSI THERMAL LAG 1 HR.
REF. T.S.I. TEST ET.L. 82.-ll-80 WALL
~s.g:, g
<.D g ~,
~
D4 g
~
TRAY 1 HOUR FIRE WRAP TSI :THERMO-LAG CUT-AWAY VIEW
'
l
ITEMS 50-387/85-06-01 AND 50-388/85-06-01 FIRE HAZARD ANALYSIS - INADEQUATE TO SHOW APPENDIX R IS SATISFIED ITEMS 50-387/85-06-02 AND 50-388/85-06-02 LACK OF SEPARATION IN RHR PUMP ROOMS NRC CONCERN
ANALYSIS NOT BASED ON FIRE AREA CONCEPT
ADEQUACY OF FIRE ZONE BOUNDARIES
LIMITED FIRE ASSUMED
ANALYSIS SHOWS CONFORMANCE TO BTP APCSB 9,5-1 NOT APPENDIX R Pal RESPONSE
THIS IS NOT A VIOLATION
THE PAL ZONE CONCEPT IS EQUIVALENT TO AREA CONCEPT IN THAT FIRE IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE ZONE
BOUNDARY RATINGS WERE PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED
45 MINUTE EQUIVALENT FIRE SEVERITY
6ENERIC LETTER 83-33 ENDORSES APPROACH
LIMITED FIRE WAS NOT ASSUMED
TRANSIENT AND IN SITU COMBUSTIBLES WERE CONSIDERED TO BE CONSUMED
NOMINAL 45 MINUTE BARRIER DESIGN WAS NOT EXCEEDED WITH 15 MINUTE TRANSIENT LOADING ADDED
PAL SOUGHT AND RECEIVED APPROVAL OF PROGRAM REVIEW WAS BASED ON APPENDIX R AS INTERPRETED BY STAFF AT TIME,
I C
tJ
APPROVAL PROCESS BTP APCSB 9,5-1 (APPENDIX A) ISSUED BY NRC (FEBi 77)
SSES FIRE PROTECTION REVIEW REPORT (FPRR)
ISSUED (JANi 78)
NRC PROPOSED RULE 10 CFR 50,48 AND APP, R PUBLISHED FOR C9%ENT (NAY 80)
NRC SITE WALKIKWN ON FIRE PROTECTION (OCT/NOVi 80)
NRC rssuED 10 CFR 50.48 AND APPENDrx R (Nov, 80)-
NRC ISSUED 40 AND 281 SERIES QUESTIONS (FIRE PROTECTION)
TO SSES (JAN, 81)
PAL RESPONDED TO NRC QUESTIONS (FEBi 81)
REvrsroN 1 To SSES FPRR rssuED (Nm, 81)
PP8L/NRC MEETING (MAR, 81)
PAL C(MITTED TO III,Gi J 8, 0,(DOCUMENTED IN PLA-683)
NRC IssuED NUREG 0776 (SSES SER)
(Ar R, 81)
NRC ISSUED SUPPL, ¹1 To SSES SER (JUNi 81)
NRC rssuED SUPPL, ¹2 To SSES SER (SEP, 81)
PAL COMPLETED REMOTE SHUTDOWN NODIFICATION (DECi 81)
PAL REQUESTED VARIANCE FOR USE OF 1-HOUR WRAP (FEBi 82)
.
NRC IssUED SUPPL, ¹3 To SSES SER (JuL, 82)-
UNIT 1 OPERATING LICENSE ISSUED (JULi 82)
PP8L ceerTTED To morn 1-HouR WRAP (AuG, 82)
PPRL COMPLETED WRAP NODIFICATION (OCTi 82)
NRC ISSUED SUPPL, ¹4 To SSES SER (NOVi 82)
REYIsIQN 2 To SSES FPRR IssuED (DEc, 82)
PAL REQUESTED LICENSE AMENDMENT TO INCORPORATE REV, 2 To FPRR (JANi 83)
NRC IssuED SUPPL, ¹5 To SSES SER (NARi 83)
AMENDMENT 16 To'UNIT 1 LICENSE ISSUED To INCORPORATE REV, 2 TO THE SSES FPRR (SEP, 83)
NRC ISSUED GENERIC LETTER 83-33 (OCTi 83)
PAL REQUESTED EXEMPTION FROM APP R SEPARATION CRITERIA (DECi 83)
NRC IssuED SuPPL, ¹6 TO SSES SER (OR, 84)
UNIT 2 OPERATING LICENSE ISSUED (NARi 84)
CONCLUSION
PAL'S FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM
ADEQUATE TO PROTECT THE PLANT
NANAGEMENT ATIENTION IS EVIDENT
SATISFIES THE INTENT OF APPENDIX R
INSPECTION ITEMS
ONLY ONE ITEM IS CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND IT HAS NO SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE
THE SCHEDULE TO CLOSE UNRESOLVED ITEMS EXISTS AND IS TIMELY
SSES FIRE PROTECTION LCO'S UNIT 1 LCO'S, INCURRED WHICH REQUIRED FIRE WATCHES IN 1985:
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL 102
22
16 JUNE JULY
21 AUGUST SEPTEMBER STATUS AS OF 9/23/85:
UNIT 1 ONLY LCO's
~
COMMON UNIT LCO's
LCO's CURRENTLY IN FORCE
SSES FIRE PROTECTION LCO'S UNIT 2 LCO's INCURRED WHICH REQUIRED FIRE WATCHES IN 1985:
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL
15 JUNE JULY
14 AUGUST SEPTEMBER STATUS AS OF 9/23/85:
'UNIT 2 ONLY LCO's COMMON UNIT LCOss
16 LCO's CURRENTLY IN FORCE
I
~ w, t.
V I