IR 05000387/1985023
| ML17139D190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1985 |
| From: | Bailey R, Keimig R, Martin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17139D189 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-85-23, 50-388-85-19, IEIN-83-83, IEIN-84-07, IEIN-84-7, IEIN-85-004, IEIN-85-4, NUDOCS 8509200284 | |
| Download: ML17139D190 (7) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
50-387/85-23 Report No.
50-388/85-19 50-387 NPF-14 Docket No.88-388 License No.
NPF-22 Licensee:
Penns lvania Power and Li ht Com an 2 North Ninth Street Allentown Penns 1 vania 18101 Facility Name:
Sus uehanna Steam Electric Station
'I Inspection At:
Salem Townshi Penns lvania Inspection Conducted:
Jul 22-26 1985 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection:
Februar 19-22 1985
. J. Bailey, hysi S curity Inspector date W.. Martin Physica S
rity Inspector date e
Approved by:
~
~
R.
. Keimig, ief, Saf uards Section, Division o Radiatio afety and Safeguards date Ins ection Summar
Routine Unannounced Ph sical Securit Ins ection Jul 22-26 1985 Combined Ins ection Re ort No. 50-387/85-23 and 50-388/85-19
~AI d:
fl Eff i;Pt 1B i
(P dA Access Control (Personnel);
Security Systems Power Supply; Alarm Stations; Training and Qualification Plan; Security Contingency Plan; and, followup on previous inspector concerns and IE notices concerning the security program.
The inspection involved 82 hours9.490741e-4 days <br />0.0228 hours <br />1.35582e-4 weeks <br />3.1201e-5 months <br /> onsite by two region-based inspectors; six hours were during non-regular hours.
Results:
The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas examined during this inspection.
Three IE Notices were addressed and one t
inspector follow-up item was resolved.
8509200284 850909 PDR ADOCK 05000387
f Al
DETAIL Ke Personnel Contacted T.
M. Crimmins Plant Superintendent D. J.
Thompson - Assistant Plant Superintendent R. J.
Prego - Supervisor, guality Assurance R.
M. Paley - Plant Compliance Staff R. J. Stotler Supervisor of Security L.
R. Plisco - Resident Inspector, NRC 2.'he inspectors also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the proprietary guard force during the inspection.
MC 30703 Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives listed in paragraph I at the conclusion of the inspection on July 26, 1985, reviewed the purpose and scope of the inspection and presented the findings.
.I At no time during this inspection was written material provided to I'the licensee by the inspectors.
MC 92701 - Followu on Ins ector-Identified Problems (Closed) Inspector Followup Item ( IFI) (50-387/83-22-03 and 50-388/83-20-03):
Central and Secondary Alarm Station operators (CAS/SAS)
could independently
'change the status of the security system without the knowledge of the other.
The inspector determined during this inspection that the licensee has revised the procedure.
CAS/SAS operators must now utilize a computer command to request cognizance from the other to change the status of the security system.
Computer generated records are checked by the Security Systems Supervisor to ensure compliance with this proce-dure.
MC 92703 - Follow-u on Ins ection and Enforcement Bulletins Circulars and Notices 5.
Attachment I contains information concerning the licensee's actionsilin response to current NRC security related Information Notices.
These notifications were forwarded to all nuclear power reactor facility
'l licensees for their information and consideration.
The inspectors discussed with the licensee the following initiatives implemented to enhance the security program:
Increased classroom capacity in the security training building.
The addition of an outside tactical training area.
Construction of a training building annex to conduct unarmed defense tactics.
~
Publication of a written policy reaffirming an existing policy on how employees can address security organizational changes and differing professional opinion.
~
Establishment of the practice of having the Plant Superintendent visit the security training classes for new security personnel and those who are undergoing their annual requalification.
6.
MC 81052 Ph sical Barriers Protected Area LE( U tHFo~iVi>T:O;
~ )co >g Pi",j F~jP PU>L)g 05I:LOSL".c l> IZ I')T")TgigLiy LEF1 OL~t;>
7.
MC 81058 - Securi t S stem Power Su
THIS PtIRAGAAPH COIIITACNS SAFEGUARDS lHFORt(A1tON A!lo tS NOT FOR PUBLIC 0JSCLtjS JRE, LT tS lNTEtIITIOQL'
LEF1'LANK.
8.
MC 81070 Access Control Personnel The inspectors observed that personnel access to the protected and vital areas was controlled by the licensee in accordance with the security plan.
Search equipment was adequate and appropriate for detection of firearms and explosives.
Equipment testing was witnessed by the inspectors.
9.
MC 81084 - Alarm Stations The licensee's central alarm station (CAS) and secondary alarm station (SAS) were in conformance with the physical security plan and adequate and appropriate for their intended functions.
This was determined by the inspectors'bservations and review of CAS/SAS operations.
10.
MC 81501 - Trainin and ualification Plan T8 The inspectors reviewed Change D, dated June 10, 1985, to the Training and Qualification Plan with a licensee representative in preparation for NRC review.
The change was submitted to NRC under the provision of
CFR 50.54(p).
11.
HC 81601 Securi t Contin enc Plan SCP the re lanned res o
The inspectors observed the licensee exercise p
p p nses and actions to a simulated bomb threat.
This exercise included the participation of plant operating staff and on-duty security force members, After 30 minutes, the exercise was terminated because of a severe
~rain storm which caused several alarms that interfered with the exercis'e.
However, the inspectors determined through observation and interviews with several participants that all actions would have been completed in~ accor-dance with the SCP.
In addition, the inspectors reviewed records, that indicated 24 of 40 security contingencies listed in the SCP have been exercised since January ll, 1985.
The results of these exercises were documented in a professional manner and are used as a training aid~ to develop the proficiency of security officers.
No discrepancies were identifie a ATTACHMENT 1 rl Ins ectors Findin s on Licensee Res onse to IE Information Notices IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 83-83:
USE OF PORTABLE RADIO TRANSMITTERS INSIDE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DATED DECEMBER 19 1983 PPBL Action
~
~
The licensee had addressed the concerns expressed in the notice prior to its publication by issuing a station policy letter, number 2-83, titled,',,Plant Communications and Radio Restrictions, dated February 19, 1983.
The policy letter outlined the maximum power output of portable radios and identified those areas of the plant where the use of radios were prohibited or where special precautions were necessary for use.
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 85-04:
INADE UATE MANAGEMENT OF SECURITY RESPONSE PAL Action The license its publica ACCESS CONTROLS DATED FEBRUARY 3 1984 DRILLS DATED JANUARY 17 1985 e
had addressed the concerns expressed in this notice prior to tion by establishing a training program to exercise the security contingencies outlined in the Security Contingency Plan on a monthly basis.
The inspectors reviewed the results of these monthly security exercises,'.and observed that pre-notifications of these exercises are made to 'key operating plant staff and to local law enforcement authorities to ensure proper manage-ment control.
The security exercise report also contains positive and negative comments and recommended corrective actions, if appropriate.
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 84-07:
DESIGN-BASIS THREAT AND REVIEW OF VEHICULAR PPKL Action The inspectors reviewed the results of an analysis conducted between May. and August of 1984 by the corporate security staff.
The security staff concluded that additional vehicular safeguards were not warranted at this time; ho'wever, an annual reassessment of the postulated threat would be conducted and contingency procedures would be developed, if necessar e