IR 05000366/1978052
| ML19259B518 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 01/12/1979 |
| From: | Graham M, Martin R, Vogtlowell R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19259B515 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-366-78-52, NUDOCS 7903010355 | |
| Download: ML19259B518 (4) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES p* Rf 00g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,#
o,,
REGloN 11
,
&
c
.$
101 M ARIETTA STREET, N.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
~s.,...../
Report No.: 50-366/78-52 Docket No.: 50-366 License No.: NPF-5 Licensee:
Georgia Power Company Plant E. I. Hatch Post Office Box 442 Baxley, Georgia 31513 Facility Name:
E. I. Hatch, Units 2 Inspection at:
Baxley, Georgia Inspection conducted: Decemiser 19-22, 1978 Inspectors:
R. Vogt-Lowell M. J. Gr am Approved by:
N [44 A
h1/99
'
Dite '
R. D. Martin, Chief Nuclear Support Section No. 1 Reactor Operations and Nur. ear Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on December 19-22, 1978 (Report No. 50-366/78-52)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection to review Unit 2 startup test activities.
The inspection involved 56 inspector-hours on-site by two NRC inspectors.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in tse areas inspected.
'
790303og,g,
w_-
.
>
.
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-366/78-52 I-I DE1 AILS I Prepared by:
M hy R. J. Vogt-Lowell, Reactor Inspector Date Nuclear Support Section No. 1 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Dates of Inspection:
Decenber 19-22, 1978 Reviewed by:
//7
//tv/79 R. D. Martin, Chief
' Da'te '
Nuclcar Support Section No. 1 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch 1.
Persons Contacted a.
Georgia Power Company
- M. Manry, Plant Manager
- H. Nix, Assistant Plant Manager
- T. Grt ene, Superintendent of Engineering Service
- S. X. Baxley, Superintendent of Operations
- C. L. Coggin, Startup Test Director
- C.
E. Belflower, QA Site Supervisor P. E. Fornel, QA Field Representative
- G. E. Spell, Senior QA Field Representative b.
General Electric Company R. M. Wyatt, Lead STD&A Engineer
- Denotes those present at the Exit Interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not applicable to this inspection report period.
3.
Unresolved Items No new un. solved items this report period.
4.
Exit Interview The inspector met with M. Manry, Plant Manager, and members of his staff as denoted in paragraph 1 on December 22, 1978. The inspector
,.
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-366/78-52 1-2 summarized the scope and findings of the inspection and indicated that subsequent inspections would continue to focus on the ongoing startup test program.
5.
Startup Test Results Evaluation Five completed startup test procedures and two plateau procedures were reviewed by the inspector to ascertain whether uniform criteria are being applied for evaluating completed startup tests to assure their technical and administrative adequacy. Each procedure was reviewed to verify:
Each procedure change was approved in accordance with the a.
pertinent administrative procedures.
b.
That the test change had been completed if it entailed specific action.
That the procedure change did not change the basic objectives of c.
the test.
d.
That all test exceptions had been resolved and that the resolution had been accepted by appropriate management.
That outstanding exceptions have been identified and if completed, e.
proper approval signature obtained.
f.
If required, the retest requirements have been completed.
Licensee review and evaluation of the test results and acknowledge-g.
ment that testing demonstrated system design requirements.
h.
That the licensee specifically compared test results with estab-lished acceptance criteria.
i.
That data sheets had been completed and that all data recorded where required are within acceptance tolerance.
j.
That those personnel charged with responsibility for review and acceptance of test results have documented their review and acceptance of test package.
The following documents were reviewed:
HNP-2-10514 RCIC - Test Condition 2
-
HNP-2-10519 Core Performance - Test Condition 2
-
HNP-2-10522 Pressure Regulator - Test Condition 2
-
.
.
RII Rpt. No. 50-366/78-52 I-3 HNP-2-10531 Loss of Off-Site Power - Test Condition 2
-
HNP-2-10622 Pressure Regulator - Test Condition 3
-
HNP-2-10400 Test Condition 1 - Plateau Procedure
-
HNP-2-10600 Test Condition 2, 3, 7 - Plateau Procedure
-
Final management approval of the results of the startup tests listed above is yet outstanding pending review of the individual tests by the plant review board (PRB).
Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Quality Assurance Audits The following QA audits of startup activities performed by the on-site QA staff were reviewed:
QA-78-200 Audit of startup test activity, implementation and compliance with procedures for testing pcior to initial heatup.
QA-78-201 Audit of reactor vessel fuel load.
QA-78-246 Audit of startup testing in the heatup rart:e of the following startup test procedures (STP's): HP-2-10306; HNP-2-10310; HNP-2-10312; HNP-2-10313.
QA-78-250 Audit of the following STP's at test conditiu 1:
HNP-2-10406; HNP-2-10411; HNP-2-10416.
QA-78-254 Audit of the following STP's at test condition 1:
HNP-2-10417; HNP-2-10422; HNP-2-10428; HNP-2-10444; HNP-2-10474; HNP-2-10941 QA-78-261 Audit of the following STP's at test condition 1:
HNP-2-10400; HNP-2-10409; HNP-2-10413; HNP-2-10418 QA-78-284 Special Audit of HPCI and RCIC S'.artup Activities QA-78-289 Audit of the following STP's at test condition 2:
HMe-2-10530; HNP-2-10529; HNP-2-10570; HNP-2-10514.
Within the areas inspected, there were no items of noncompliance or deviations identified.
..