IR 05000354/1982002
| ML20041D361 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 02/12/1982 |
| From: | Bateman W, Caphton D, Napuda G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041D327 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-354-82-02, 50-354-82-2, NUDOCS 8203050262 | |
| Download: ML20041D361 (6) | |
Text
m
-
-
.
.
!
l U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION I
Report No.
82-02 Docket No.
50-354 License No.
CPPR-120 Priority
-
Category Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
'
80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Hope Creek Generating Station, Unit 1 Inspection At:
- ancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection Conducted:
January 18-22, 1982 Inspectors:
/ peh
2-G 4Napuda, Reactor Inspector
' fate New
[D g W.4Bateman, Senior Resident Inspector
/
date
/}
date Approved by:
I?L EY/
l2f/?kW D. L. Chpt(ton, Chief, Management Programs
' date Section, Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection Inspection Summary:
Inspection on January 18-22, 1982 (Report No. 50-354/82-02)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced In-Depth QA Inspection of Performance of ongoing work associated with Reactor Vessel Internals; Reactor Controls Supports; Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning System; Concrete Placement; Plant Tours; and, QA Audits /Surveillances. The inspe.' ion involved 49 inspector hours onsite by one region based inspector and the resident inspector.
Results: No violations were identified.
.
Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 1977)
8203050262 820218 PDR ADOCK 05000354
'
O PM i
____ ___
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - - _ - - - _ - -
_
__
.
.
i DETAILS l
1.
Persons Contacted
!
Public Service Electric and Gas Co.
i
- A. Barnabei, QA Engineer
- R. Bravo, Principle Construction Engineer
- C, Dalton, Jr., Lead Construction Engineer
- R. Donges, QA Engineer
- A. Giardino, Project QA Engineer
-
- K. Jenkin, Engineer
- J. Stefanache, Senior Staff Construction Engineer i
Bechtel Corp.
~
- W. Dormon, Assistant Project Field Engineer W. Goebel, QA Engineer
-
- R. Hanks, Project QC Engineer D. Long, Project Superintendent K. Mills, Lead Mechanical QC Inspector
- G. Moulten, Project QA Engineer D. Reel, QC Engineer D. Sakers, Lead Civil QC Inspector S. Vezendy, Lead Welding QC Inspector N. Wypych, Assistant Lead Welding Inspector General Electric Co.
- C. Brinson, QA Engineer R. Burke, Project Manager W. H. Constructors L. Berstler, QC Inspector W. McLaughlin, QC Inspector
- D. Stover, Contracts Administration M. Timmens, Project Manager The inspectors also held discussions with other administrative, construction, engineering, QA/QC, and technical personnel.
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
General This inspection was conducted to verify that selected site work is being performed in accordance with NRC requirements and SAR commitments; the QA/QC Program is functioning in a manner to assure that requirements
-
and commitments are met; and, prompt and effective corrective action is taken with respect to identified deficiencie. _ _
.
.
.
.
3.
Reactor Pressure Vessel Internals and Reactor Controls Supports
,
a.
References Technical Specification 10855-M-098(Q), RPV Internals Installation,
--
Rev. 2
--
Procedure 22A6639, Installation Instructions for RPV and Internals FDI 19/79450, Core Support Plugging and Filler Metal Requisition
--
--
Joint Process Control Sheet HCI-4-J-MI
.
--
Drawing 761E761, Core Plate, Rev. 5
--
Hope Creek PSAR b.
Observations The inspector examined the under vessel supports for the Reactor Controls to verify that the installation (partial) conformed to requirements.
The inspector observed the fitting of jet pump diffusers differential pressure lines inside the reactor vessel on January 18 and grinding / polishing of the diffuser welds the same day and on January
21. The inspector noted a QC Inspector in the area both times with
a complete package of instructions / drawings /checksheets in his possession.
The inspector used contractor and NRC supplied measuring instruments and selected perforations machined into the Core Plate on site and by the manufacturer to verify the dimensions were within the tolerances specified by the drawing. The inspector also visually examined the Core Plate for finish defects /da. mass.
No violations were identified.
4.
Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning System (HVAC)
a.
References (sub-contractor documents)
M-735-3-5, Seismic Duct Construction Standards
--
M-735-9-1, On-Site Inspection Procedures
--
Drawing SEIS, STD-5A, Seismic Duct Construction Details
--
--
Drawing SM-265-H, Control Room Ducts-(marked up as-built)
Hope Creek PSAR (PSE&G)
--
b.
Observations The inspector observed the installation of duct work in the Control i
Room on January 18, 19 and 20. The inspector noted that a connecting piece had been installed in place of a damper. This had been identified by the sub-contractor's QC Inspectors and documented on both the as-built drawing and Additional Work Notice (ADN) No. 29. The sub-contractor representative stated this had been intentionally done to facilitate an upcoming flow test.
The inspector also noted
.
- _ - -
-
.
that the drawings did not clearly detail the application of the sealant (cartridge type) nor was application technique addressed by a procedure. The inspector expressed concern that the sealant may not be spreading properly after compression by bolt tightening.
Proper equipment was provided, duct coverings were removed and the inspector performed a close-up visual examination of spool pieces 85 and 86 flange connection (interior and exterior perimeter). A continuous filament of sealant was visable at both perimeters.
Prior to the conclusion of the inspection, the sub-contractor and construction representatives stated that a procedure change had been initiated to more clearly explain sealant application so as to assure continued proper coverage. The inspector acknowledged the statement.
No violations were identified.
5.
Concrete Placement a.
References
--
Quality Control Inspection Report (QCIR) 1-P-EC-02-2-T-1.00
--
QCIR 1-P-EC-05-1-T-1.00
--
QCIR 1-P-EC-269-1-T-1.00
--
QCIR l-P-EC-275-1-T-1.00
--
QCIR 1-P-EC-264-1-T-1.00 Drawings 1-P-EC-02 (Rev. 7), -05 (Rev. 2), -019 (Rev. 1),
--
-027 (Rev. 1), -264 (Rev. 0), -269 (Rev. 2), -275 (Rev. 1) -276 (Rev. 1) and M-53-1-2, Various Embedded Piping
--
P-1000-1-EC-05, Leak Testing Procedure of Piping Systems and Report
--
SWP/P-50, Concrete Operations, Rev. O.
b.
Observations The inspector observed cleaning / preparation prior to placement of Pour No. 1C-XW-007 (outside Containment wall). The inspector also reviewed selected documents to assure that required NDE and hydro testing was completed on piping that would be embedded. The inspector noted that the concrete placement was delayed until the constructor-Piping QC Group had assured that all pre-requisites associated with piping to be embedded had been completed.
No violations were identified.
6.
Plant Tours a.
References (constructor)
SWP/P-3, Housekeeping, Rev. 3
--
--
SWP/P-14, Material Receipt,. Storage and Handling, Rev. 12 L-
.
-
,
,
.-
-
.
.
_
.-
,
SWP/P-15, Maintenance of Material in Storage, Rev. 4
--
P-404(Q), Flued Headfitting for Primary Containment
--
QCIR 1-P-BC-02-9-P-1.10
--
b.
Observations The inspector noted that a Main Steam /Feedwater Fluehead Penetration weld on the 102 Elevation was damaged by a hoist chain that was pressing against it.
The constructor QC Department initiated immediate
.
corrective action when informed of the conditions.
The inspector also noted that a large N stamped valve by the RHR Expansion Bellows and two Anchor Head Fittings (in opened crates),
all on Elevation 102, were not properly protected.
The constructor QA Department had previously identified the valve condition on a
" Punch List" and immediately initiated corrective action by way of the same list for the fittings.
The constructors procedures permit in plant (other than in place) storage of components.
Routine OA/AC surveillance tours are conducted in-plant and identified storage deficiencies are entered on the " Punch List" which is the corrective action system used for maintaining acceptable storage conditions.
The inspector performed a perfunctory review of the storage system and noted its complexity. The inspector stated that the storage system would be reviewed in its entirety during a susbsequent inspection.
The licensee acknowledged the inspector's comment.
No violations were identified.
7.
Audits /Surveillances The inspector verified that the licensee and constructor were providing an independent QA/QC overview of the activities discussed in previous paragraphs. The following audits /surveillances provided this objective evidence.
PSE&G Audit H-214, General Electric I&SE/Bechtel-Reactor Internals and
--
Appurtenances Audit H-237, General Electric I&SE-RPV
--
QA Surveillance Log-WH Constructors, eight survaillances between
--
December 7, 1981 and January 15, 1982 Bechtel
--
Audit 25.7/26.5-3, GE/I&SE, Bechtel QC, GE/NEBG QA HVAC Surveillances, November 16-30, 1981 and January 1-15, 1982
--
--
QA Surve111ances-GE I&SE, November 1-15, 1981, December 1-15,-1981 and January 1-15, 1982
(_
.
_ _ _ _
l
.
.
The QA audits were conducted in accordance with written procedures and checklists by qualified personnel. Audits were found to have followup action either completed or initiated; and general audit conduct was being carried out in accordance with the established schedules and procedures.
The QA/QC surveillances were conducted by qualified personnel on pre-established planned frequencies or activities basis, were documented, and corrective actions were being initiated /followed up/ completed.
8.
Entrance and Exit Interviews t
Licensee mangement was informed of the purpose and scope of the inspection at the entrance interview.
The findings of the inspection were periodically discussed with licensee representatives during the inspection and with licensee, constructor and sub-contractor management (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on January 22, 1982.
i
,..._.
....
.
__
_ _ _. _ _