IR 05000344/1989015
| ML20245D521 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1989 |
| From: | Mendonca M NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245D506 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-344-89-15-EC, EA-89-082, EA-89-82, NUDOCS 8906270142 | |
| Download: ML20245D521 (59) | |
Text
_ _
-__
.-
n
.
f-U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
...
REGION V
. Report No. 50-344/89-15 EA No. 89-82 Docket No. 50-344 License No. NPF-1 Licensee:
Portland Ger, al Electric Company
'
121 S. W. Sa N.. Street Portland, Oregon 97204-Facility Name:
Trojan Nuclear Power Plant Meeting at:
Region V Offices, Walnut Creek, California
%'
&c~
J/l&/Vf
~
Approved by:
M. M. Mendonca, Chief Date Signed Reactor Projects Section 1 Meeting Summary:
Meeting on May 10, 1989 (Report No. 50-344/89-15)
An enforcemer.t conference / management meeting was held in the NRC Region V Office, Walnut Creek, California, to discuss NRC concerns developed as a result of a Security Team Inspection (50-344/89-02), a Chemistry Team Inspection (50-344/89-07) a Special Inspection (50-344/89-13) and a routine Resident Inspection (50-344/89-05).
For each area of concern discussed licensee corrective actions generally appear to be acceptable and, when fully implemented, capable of improving performance.
,
Specific conditions that r,equire further evaluation or information are:
)
1.
The overall assessment of licensee training programs based on the j
examples raised in'the security officer firearm proficiency area.
2.
With regard to post modification testing, the licensee agreed to provide i
further information on the involvement of the design engineering group
'
for post maintenance tests required by design changes performed during the 1989 Refueling Outage.
i 8906270142 090606 I PDR ADOCM 0500 4.
O l
_ _.
--
-
_
_
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ - _ _ _ -
- s.
..
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Meeting Attendees-a.
Licensee Attendees D. L. Bennett, Maintenance Manager D. L. Nordstrom, Acting Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance A. N. Roller, Manager, Nuclear Plant Engineer T. D. Walt, General Manager, Technical Functions D. W. Cockfield, Vice President, Nuclear A. Ankrum, Manager, Nuclear Security b.
NRC Attendees J. B. Martin, Region V Administrator R. A. Scarano, Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards R. P. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects A. L. Chaffee, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects M. M. Mendonca, Project Section 1, Chief R. C. Barr, Senior Resident Inspector J. F. Melfi, Reactor Inspector M. D. Schuster, Section Chief, Safeguards H. S. North, Senior Radiation Specialist M. A. Lamastra, Acting Chief, Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch L. R. Norderhaug, Inspector, Safeguards A. D. McQueen, inspector, Safeguards D. W. Schaefer, Inspector, Safeguards M. B. Blume, Regional Attorney A. D. Johnson -Regional Enforcement Dfficer c.
State of Oregon Attendees t
H. F. Moomey, DDOE, Acting Manager of Reactor Safety d.
Bonneville Power Administration
D. L. Williams, Nuclear Engineer 2.
Details
.
Mr. Martin opened the meeting by stating the purposa of the enforcement l
conference was for both PGE and NRC to have a common understanding of the areas of concern and the safety significance of each issue.
He stressed if there were any disagreements on the issues or incorrect tone given to an issue it should be clarified since the enforcement conference is a vehicle for fact finding.
An agenda was then presented and the meeting followed that agenda (Enclosure C).
The licensee also presented a package of information that was referred to throughout the meeting l
(Enclosure B).
!
!
_
,
_
_
. _ _ _ -.__ _-
_
_.
g [ofi%
go t
k, l
'
.- A.
-Security; H
Mri Scarano'then presented Regional concerns about the Trojan ~
'
,
Security Program.
He noted the two top _ics to be_ discussed were handling and storage of safeguard information, and' security officer training._ With respect to safeguards document handling, Mr. Scarano-noted that in an' earlier enforcement conference. held on November 17,
']
1988, the licensee ~ had expressed an' intent to correct the
- i deficiencies in their program for the protection of safeguards information. ~ Subsequently, there' had been ten incidents of -
improperly handled safeguards documents prior to the NRC Security.
.
Team inspection of March and April 1989, and three since that i
W inspection. He continued by noting that PGE had implemented a I
J-series of' corrective measures since the enforcement conference of November 17, 1988; however, these actions, based on the subsequent events of mishandling of safeguards documents, appeared not to'be
-
fully effective.
Also of concern, Mr. Scarano observed, is the apparent lack of adequate training for security offi::ers.
This
.
finding was identified in the course of a security team inspection -
i conducted during the same time frame as the special inspection.
Each of these security issues was discussed in detail as noted below:
s 1.
Control of Safeguards Information Mr. Schuster presented a summary of the NRC's concerns regarding control of safeguards _information.
The licensee agreed that.the-facts, as reported'in NRC Inspection Report No.
50-344/89-08 dated April 18, 1989, were essentially-correct.
j
'
Of the twelve events, ten related to documents (identified as containing safeguards information) being left unattended and not properly secured. One additional event concerned a cocument' marked as containing safeguards information although it no longer did. These eleven events had been identified by the licensee and had been properly reported to the NRC. The
twelfth event concerned the discovery by an NRC inspector of improper protection of the combination to a security container g
used to store safeguards information. The last three events, (since the. inspection) were discovered and reported by the licensee. ~These events also involved the failure to properly-secure safeguards'information when unattended.
Mr. Ankrum then presented a chronological background of the corrective actions taken for the control of safeguards information.
The licensee readily acknowledged that the corrective actions, as discussed at the November enforcement conference, were not as comprehensive as since proven necessary.
However, the heightened awareness prompted by those initial actions resulted in the discovery of the subsequent events and demonstrated the need for much more thorough and
,
prescriptive measures. The licensee described the steps which I
have culminated in their current program, that has been under development since November, and has not had a chance to become fully effectiv,
-____- - - -
.,
-
b (_ f :
i '
,54
,
,
-
!
I
'
Mr. Ankrum noted that on April 17, 1989, the Vice President Nuclear, following a number of events of improperly handling-
safeguards information, issued a. memorandum that reiterated and-
,
L emphasized the importance of proper storage and handling of E
safeguards information (SI) documents,. directed review of
!
document storage locations and directed review of SI materials for identification and destruction of materials no longer
>
needed. He stated as a result of.these reviews significant
.
changes were being implemented and he expected a drastic
,
M'
reduction in the number of SI related events.
f#
'As'of May 2, 1989 the licensee has limited s'torage of L
safeguards information to two primary locations, one at the site and one.at the corporate office complex.
One or more custodians are permanently assigned to each of these " central repositories". An inventory is maintained of all safeguards
!;
documents, whether in storage, issued for day use, or assigned pre-approved extended continuous use.
Such inventory will be verified annually. With the exception of documents assigned to
.the security staff, receipt, storage, copying, and destruction E
of documents containing safeguards information will be done only by the Central Repository Custodian.
Anyone seeking access to documents containing safeguards information must first have a need for such information and be authenticated by his Department Manager. A list of persons so authorized is maintained by the custodian.
Each document containing safeguards information is numbered and logged out to the requestor for the day. All documents must be returned to the repository at the close of the business day unless continuous persona,1 custody has been previously approved.
With regard to assuring compliance, Mr. Ankrum noted that the nuclear security inspector has been assigned responsibility for ensuring and verifying that the program is being properly implemented.
(The most recent event of April 25 had been discovered by the inspector in the course of his surveillance inspection activities.)
..
HedeclaredPGE'scontinueddedicationtoproperprotectionof safeguards information and noted that if future developments demonstrate that even the present measures are not adequate, PGE will take whatever further actions are needed.
For example, Mr. Ankrum noted that the individual responsible for j
one of the recent events was given five days leave without pay.
The events of April 3 and 25, 1989, of improperly handling safeguards documents were discussed in detail.
Mr. Ankrum i
closed his presentation by concluding that there had been no
compromise of safeguards information, all events had been properly reported and remedials actions taken, and central repositories will result in proper control of safeguards information.
.-
. _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
e
.
2.
Security Officer Weapons Training
'
Mr. Schuster next presented the background on the concern over security officer weapons training.
The licensee agreed with the results of the unannounced firearms testing as reported in NRC Inspection Report No. 50-344/89-02 dated May 5, 1989.
On March 31, four of the security officers, designated as members of the armed response team, failed to demonstrate proficiency in the use of their assigned weapons Three of the four individuals failed to qualify.
A second group of five armed officers were chosen at random the following day for the same purpose.
Two of the five fr m this group also failed to qualify.
Thus, five of the nine tested individuals, failed to achieve the passing score of 210, with scores ranging from 57 to 192.
Mr. Ankrum stated the PGE position that weapons proficiency will be maintained.
The licentee noted that they have revised the entire firearms qualification program to include the new category of acceptance termed " marginally qualified".
An individual scoring at least 210 but less than 230 is considered marginally qualified and, although issued a weapon and assigned armed officer responsibilities, must requalify monthly until the individual scores 230.
All members of the guard force will be requalified semiannually, and periodic unannounced test firings similar to that requested by the NRC Team Inspection will be conducted by both the Security Department and the Quality Assurance Department.
This test program will be to provide additional assurance that security officers maintain firearms proficiency.
Mr. Ankrum also reported tnat the security training staff has been augmented with two training assistants. The augmented training staff will provide the resources needed to adequately implement the monthly and semiannual requalification discussed above; to include scheduling of training activities, providing range instruction, improving course and examination material
,
and expanding on-site tactics training.
j
'
Mr. Ankrum' summarized that corrective actions had been taken as a result of the concern raised over security guard proficiency.
l He noted more frequent training (semi-annual vice annual i
retraining), periodic unannounced testing, and a remedial training program for " marginally qualified" would provide additional assurance of security guard proficiency.
Mr. Walt next stated he believed the tone set concerning the funds budgeted for target maintenance in NRC inspection report 50-344/89-08 was not appropriate.
Mr. Scarano noted the intent was not to be overly critical of the funding but to indicate that PGE personnel perceived a lack of management support for guard training, and that it appeared the program intent was to pass an examination rather than to maintain a proficient, well-trained security force.
He continued by questioning s
-
.
hg
}-
]
,
,
( ( wg L
.
- 0
1
'
m j
r0
,9
,
'u
,
- j, l
,
.
'
whether.other training areas had similar weaknesses.
Mr.
t, Cockfield acknowledged Mr. Scarano's remarks and stated PGE was striving to improve both security' guard. proficiency and
- training.
Mr. Nordstrom added that the Quality Assurance Organization had become more proactive and had scheduled F
. proficiency evaluations of the security guard force -
L Next,' Mr. Johnson stated that the Regional Office believed that lack of security guard proficiency was a violation of the Trojan Security Plan, and asked whether PGE agrees.
Mr.'Ankrum
'
y said that he did not believe PGE was in violation of the Security Plan but that PGE was considering revision to the Plan
.
to provide additional assurance that'a proficient security l
force is maintained.
Mr. Johnson then concluded the discussion
!
on security force proficiency by stating the Regional Office l
was seeking further clarification o'n the concept of guard force j
proficiency.-
'
..
B.
Storage of-Hydrogen and Nitronen
..
Mr. Scarano'then opened discussion on the storage of high pressure hydrogen and nitrogen on the roof of the control building (agenda item V), a concern identified by the Chemistry Team Inspection.
Mr.
North ' presented a brief summary of the concern related to the licensee's apparently. inadequate and untimely review of'NRC Information Notice No. 87-20, " Hydrogen Leak in Auxiliary Building."
It was noted that although the initial Operational Assessment Review (OAR) screening recommended including the control building in the evaluation for potential hydrogen leakage, the subsequent evaluation did not include the control building and' control room.
The OAR evaluation also, apparently failed to consider two documents referenced;in the Information Notice which could have altered the
licensee's. response.
In' addition, the delay in responding to the
.j Information Notice was stressed.
i Mr. Roller presented the licensee's response beginning with a-g history of the review and corrective actions reirted to Information Notice No. 87-20.
He acknowledged the untimelf9ess of the review process, but noted that the initial review was being reevaluated along with Information Notice No. 89-44, " Hydrogen Storage on the Roof-of the Control Room".
Measures to assure timeliness in the review process were discussed. The licensee noted that the scope of the response to the Information Notice was consistent with the topic addressed in the Notice. Mr. Roller then discussed the present plans for the relocation of hydrogen storage to the south side of the cooling tower.
An evaluation is to be submitted to the.NRC by May 31, 1989.
With respect to the nitrogen cylinders an analysis is being performed and oxygen monitors have been placed temporarily in the control room.
A report is to be submitted to NRC before restart from the 1989 Refueling Outag,
_
__
_ _ _
_- _
g
%.
r
['y>
6'
<
y C.
' maintenance and Post-Mo"ific'ation Testino i
Mr. Zimmerman s'ummarized the concerns'in the maintenance and
-
H post-modification testing area.
These concerns raise question as to b
Trojan's control of plant work activities and technical work.
Mr.
Mendonca then presented NRC concerns.with the PGE maintenance program.
He stated that there had been increasing concerns on how
<
maintenance was being performed and that'the problems identified by Regional Staff appear to be programmatic.
He continued by noting the_ March 4, 1989, Maintenance Request associated with the Steam Generator Water Level Transient had no specific guidance'on the instruments to be calibrated, the procedures to be used'for the g
'
. calibration. nor had.a pre-job briefing been esnducted for the work k
to be performed, and that multiple opportunities had been missed to identify these-deficiencies.
Mr. Bennett then presented a historical perspective of recent work control problems, work control improvements and the Maintenance Action Plan.
During the presentation Mr. Bennett pointed out that a PGE' supervisor was going to Diablo Canyon to learn how PG&E had implemented their. Instrumentation Program.
Mr. Martin noted that San Onofre should also be considered as a potential source of information. Mr. Bennett also' stated PGE was considering implementing two-shift maintenance coverage. Mr '. Martin commented that historically two shift coverage had many negative attributes.
~
Also, Mr.. Martin asked for the utility response to the proposed p
Maintenance Rule, noting that both safety systems and balance of plant systems were addressed in the documents.. Mr..Bennett replied by acknowledging the Trojan Maintenance Organization had read the e
proposed rule and draft Regulatory Guide and that PGE believes only
'
' minor changes would have to be made to the Trojan Maintenance Program if the rule were to_be implemented. Additionally, Mr.
,
Bennett noted that Trojan had always had the same corrective and preventive maintenance programs on balance of plant equipment as on the' rest of the plant.- Mr. Martin expressed the concern over maintenance supervisory involvement in plant activities. Mr.
g Bennett noted that when the Maintenance Action Plan is fully implemented,' organizational changes will have been made to ensure improved supervisory involvement.
Presently, Plant Managers are tracking supervisory field involvement by using the~ security access report.
Mr. Mendonca then summarized NRC concerns with the inoperability of the interlock and permissive features of RHR suction isolation valve MO-8702. The concerns were that:
(1) Request for Design Change (RDC)85-052, " Remote Shutdown Station," post modification testing i
was not adequate; (2) independent engineering reviews ~did not identify inadequate testing; and (3) independent review groups
'
reviews were non-technical in nature and did not identify the problem.
Mr. Martin added it was inconceivable to him how PGE could gravitate to the position of not having design engineers specify the appropriate post modification tests for a design change.
. -
-,
.
p M '.y
- y.
,
i
7. -
sq
_
u"
- Mr. Roller acknowledged the concerns by presenting a' description and
.
theLcauses of the event, PGE's assessment of the safety significance-
" '
..of,the event and their corrective actions.
PGE concluded the RHR system had never been overpressurized nor, had.RHR system integrity.
been challenged during the time the' interlock / permissive of M0-8702 were inoperable, and that the RHR system was. adequately protected
~
.from overpressurization. Mr. Barr clarified that for the given plant conditions'that existed, specifically the positive
' displacement charging pumps.(PDP) being in pull-to-lock, that there
- was never a risk' of overpressurizing the RHR system.
However, with-7L'
_
the PDP operating, the RHR in service, and a safety injection, the
. potential to overpressurize the RHR system would exist, because relief capacity for that circumstance would not be adequate.
Mr.
L
'8arr also noted'the design basis of the RHR system relief-valves was not' fully. understood and that the.RHR Design Basis Document (DBD)
did have an opeo' action item to determine the basis of the design of these valves. Mr. Zimmeman requested PGE describe the philosophy with respect.te post design change testing thatlwas being used for the design changes of the 1989' Refueling Outage..Mr. Walt' stated-that he would get back to Mr. Zimmerman after fully assessing the testing philosophy with his staff.. Additionally, Mr. Mendonca stated:that RDC-85-052 had.had a significant number of field changes.
Mr. Roller stated that an assessment of the causes of tne high number of field changes (FCNS) had been performed. Twenty-five percent of the FCNs were caused by design error and forty percent for construction convenience.
He noted to improve performance in this area that all non-emergency design change packages (DCPs) are required to be' completed by December 15th of the year. prior to the
,
outage for the conduct of the change.
Additionally, he noted an
'
internal goal to reduce the number of FCNs by ninety percent has been. established.
Mr. Martin asked Mr. Nordstrom if this was j
typical of the way technical work was being performed or had the
-
December 15th DCN requirement improved performance.
Mr. Nordstrom q
stated he was not.yet convinced a performance change had occurred.
'
Mr. Martin then suggested PGE consider the technique of quarterly
' team walkdowns by the. system and design engineers = used at Diablo 3-Canyon.' He also noted the issue of post modification testing clearly stemmed from inadequate engineering involvement.
Mr.'Nordstrom then presented the PGE philosophy toward Quality Assurance.
He stated a QA organization must be intrusive,
~l predictive, responsive, performance and compliance oriented, and technically knowledgeable and experienced.
He acknowledged the areas where the PGE QA Organization had been weak and provided examples of recent improved performance. Mr. Nordstrom examined in detail remnt. staffing and organization change directed at furthering performance improvements.
Mr. Martin stated that for the Quality Organization to be successful it must have PGE Management support.
He also noted for the Quality Organization to be truly intrusive the line organization must acknowledge the Quality Organization's rigFt to exist.
Mr. Martin concluded the enforcement conference by stating he was encouraged by the changes being made in the Quality Assurance
!
. _ _ _ -. _ _ - _ _ _
4;
'T.
,
I
-
!!
' Organization.
He sta..ed QA should not be in a frame of mind to get-things fixed but to point out weaknesses.
Additionally, he noted it'
now appeared the ground work had been established for a successful
[L Quality Organization.
Mr. Martin closed by stating he was uneasy about engineering at Trojan and what he thought had been solved may
,
F not have been.
L
.
_
.
.
.
.
Trojan Nuclear Plant
-
y
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE
'
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
-
II u
I i
!
May 10,1989
-
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
.
'
...
,.
.
.
.
CONTROL OF '
I
.
- BACKGROUND-
,
- 14 (SI) EVENTS SINCE NOVEMBER 17,1988 ENFORCEMENT
'
CONFERENCE
-
f.]
- ALL EVENTS PROMPTLY REPORTED OR RECORDED IN QUARTERLY LOG
__
l'$
-
.
I l
l
.
_ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _.
_ _ _ _ -
v
..
..
'
\\
,
.
EVENT SUMMARY
i NOVEMBER 23,1988 - UNLOCKED SI STORAGE CONTAINER IN
A LOCKED OFFICE AREA AT TROJAN l
JANUARY 11,1989 - IMPROPERLY LOCKED SI STORAGE
CONTAINER WITHIN A LOCKED OFFICE
-
AREA INSIDE THE PLANT PROTECTED AREA JANUARY 25,1989 - 81 DRAWING UNATTENDED FOR FIVE
MINUTES IN A CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA JANUARY 25,1989 - UNLOCKED CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA
WITHIN A MONITORED ACCESS AREA JANUARY 29,198,9 - UNATTENDED POST ORDERS IN A
=
LOCKED OFFICE AREA WITHIN THE i
PLANT PROTECTED AREA
.
.
,
_. _ _ _. _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_
.
..
.
EVENT SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
- FEBRUARY 8,1989 - IMPROPERLY LOCKED SI STORAGE CONTAINER IN LOCKED OFFICE AREA INSIDE THE PLANT PROTECTED AREA
- MARCH 9,1989
- (SAFEGUARDS EVENT REPORT 89-S03-00)
- IMPROPERLY STORED DOCUMENTS IN A CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA
- OPERATORS MANUAL UNACCOUNTED FOR
- MARCH 20,1989
- (SAFEGUARDS EVENT REPORT 89-SO4-00)
- UNSECURED TRAINING MATERIAL IN A CLASSROOM AT TROJAN
- M ARCH 22.1989
- OUT-OF-DATE TEMPORARY POST ORDERS UNATTENDED INSIDE THE PLANT t
PROTECTED AREA
,
,
-
-
i e APRIL 3,1989
- IMPROPERLY IIECURED SI LOCK COMBINATION IN A CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA
'
l l
a
- - - _ - - -
- - _ _ - - _ -
- - -
- - -
-
- - - - - -
. - - - - - - - - - _. - - _ - _ _ _
- - - - - _ _
- _ - - - - - -. _ - - - - _ _
'-
,
..
EVENT SUMMARY (CONTINUED)
- APRIL 19,1980 - OUTDATED TRAINING MATERIALS IMPROPERLY STORED IN A CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA
- APRIL 24,1989 - 81 MICROFILM IMPROPERLY PACKAGED FOR TRANSPORT
- APRIL 25,1989 - UNLOCKED SI STORAGE CONTAINER WITHIN A CONTROLLED ACCESS AREA
- M AY 2,1989
- IMPROPERLY SECURED SI LOCK COMBINATION WITHIN A MONITORED ACCESS OFFICE AREA L
. -
,
l l
'
'
I
_ - - - -
- _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - -
'
,
.
..
.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS OCTOBER 1888 - PROSLEM RECOGNIZED, MANAGEMENT ACTION
'
TAKEN TO ESTABLISH SAFEGUARD 8 INFORMATION TASK FORCE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS (HAVE SEEN IMPLEMENTED)
,
e ACTION PLAN ISSUED NOVEM8ER 17,1988
- INSTRUCTIONAL POSTERS
-
-
- ADDITIONAL TRAINING (GET)
- MANAGEMENT BRIEFINGS
- JOS-8PECIFIC SI INDOCTRINATION
- PERIODIC REMINDERS (r
- REVISE NDP 100-11
...
- MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE: NUCLEAR DIVISION PROCEDURE r-(NDP) 100-11 REVISED (IMPLEMENTED JANUARY 26,1989)
'~
TO REQUIRE:
i
- DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING
- 81 CONTAINER CHECK SHEETS
,
- 81 CONTROL INCLUDED IN ANNUAL AUDITS
- REVISED 81 CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA
..
(
- IDENTIFIED CLAS8IFICATION RESOURCES i
- DEPARTMENTAL LEAD RESPONSIBILITY f
.
- PRESCRISED USE OF UNIOUELY COLORED FOLDERS l
AND COVER SHEET 8
l l
!
l
4 l
l
.
_ _ _ _ - _
"
'
.,
.
.;
.
CORRECTIVE ACTIOtiS I
- APRIL 7,1989 - SAFEGUARDS EVENT REPORT 89-S03-00; PROMPTLY IMPLEMENTED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
- REDUCED DISTRIBUTION OF OPERATORS MANUALS
.
,
- ADDITIONAL CONTROLS FOR MANUAL COPlES/ REVISIONS
,
- ROUTINE ANNUAL INVENTORY
,
>
_..,
.
- APRIL 17,1989 - VICE PRESIDENT, NUCLEAR MEMORANDUM E7
- REITERATED AND EMPHASIZED IMPORTANCE OF PROPER STORAGE AND HANDLING OF Si DOCUMENTS I
- DIRECTED REVIEW OF DOCUMENT STORAGE LOCATIONS (INCLUDING PERMANENT STORAGE FACILITIES) FOR
.
.?
IMPROPERLY STORED Si MATERIALS
_
.-
- DIRECTED REVIEW OF St MATERIALS FOR IDENTIFICATION AND DESTRUCTION OF MATERIALS NO LONGER NEEDED j
i i
.
4; -
.., -
,.
L 1;
.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
- .
'
.
- APRIL 19,1989 - SAFEGUARDS EVENT REPORT 89-804-00;
'
l PROMPTLY IMPLEMENTED CORRECTIVE
'
ACTIONS
~L I.
- SEGREGATED SECURITY DEPARTMENT LESSON PLANS CONTAINING Si
- NUMBERED SI LESSON MATERIALS (IN UNIOUELY COLORED FOLDERS) FOR ENHANCED ACCOUNTABILITY
- INITIATED LESSON PLAN REVISIONS TO REDUCE St CONTENT
.- FURTHER INFRACTIONS SUBJECT TO ESCALATED
DISCIPLINARY ACTION, INCLUDING INTERVIEWS WITH GENERAL MANAGER AND NUCLEAR SECURITY MANAGER T
..
APRIL 28,1989 - DIRECTIVE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF c
81 STORAGE LOCATIONS'
,
- ESTABLISHED Si REPOSITORIES AT TROJAN AND WTC
- lMPROVED SI ACCESS CONTROL
- IMPROVED DOCUMENT ACCOUNTABILITY l
!
- REDUCED SI VOLUME
- CUSTODIAN ESTABLISHES TWO-PERSON ACCOUNTABILITY
'
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
!
___
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
t
'
.
.
s'
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
- M AY 1,1989 - NUCLEAR SECURITY INSPECTOR ASSIGNED
' '
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING / VERIFYING 3,;
PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF St PROGRAM i
- MAY 2,1989 - BOTH CENTRAL REPOSITORIES OPEr!ATIONAL
,
- ANNUAL INVENTORIES
,
'
- COPIES NUMBERED AND LOGGED FCR ACCOUNTABILITY
- NDP 100-11 REVISION m
c.
us
.
-
-
- --
!
i
-
.
-.
,_
.
)
'
CONCLUSIONS i
NO COMPROMISE OF *
- Z t
ALL EVENTS PROMPTLY REPORTED AND REMEDIAL ACTIONS
TAKEN
'
CENTRAL REPOSITORIES,IN ADDITION TO PREVIOUS
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, WILL RESULT IN PROPER CONTROL
-
OF,,
eJ l
.. -
"
i
.
\\
\\
%
!
.
k
.
'
,
.
,
i
<
'
'
.
,
SECURITY OFFICER WEAPONS TRAINING
!
'
BACKGROUND:
DZ i
- MARCH 31,1989 - THREE OF FOUR SECURITY OFFICERS, SELECTED FROM SHIFT COMPLEMENT.BY
'
'
THE NRC, FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE WEAPONS QUALIFICATION
- APRIL 1,1989 - TWO OF FIVE SECURITY OFFICERS,
'.
SELECTED FROM SHIFT COMPLEMENT BY THE NRC, FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE WEAPONS QUALIFICATION
'-
r--
PGE POSITION:
'
..
r
- WEAPONS PROFICIENCY WILL BE MAINTAINED
..
L
- ACCOMPLISHED BY REMEDIAL TRAINING, REQUALIFICATION, AS NECESSARY
'
i'
f
,
t
_ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _
__ _-
-
<
..
.
SECURITY OFFICER WEAPONS QUA' :FICATION
!
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:
- FIVE SECURITY OFFICERS IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFIED
F
,
I'
- REMEDIAL TRAINING PROGRAM
,
,,
L,
- PERSONNEL IDENTIFIED FROM MOST RECENT QUALIFICATION SCORES
!
I'
i..
- ESTABLISHED REVISED WEAPONS QUALIFICATION CRITERIA:
r"-
REMEDIAL TRAINING REQUIRED IF LESS THAN:
!
i.
- HANDGUN - 230 OF 300 POINTS - (CRITERIA 210 POINTS)
t
- SHOULDER WEAPON - 42 OF 72 PELLETS WITHIN SILHOUETTE -(CRITERIA 36 PELLETS)
y
.
..
- SEMIANNUAL REQUALIFICATION r
.-
> MONTHLY REMEDIAL FIREARMS TRAINING i
..
t
_
q
.
9r
f'
..
..,
e b
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _. _. -. - - -.. _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ -
-
.s
' +
.
..
-4 SECURITY OFFICER WEAPONS QUALIFICATION
'-
SUMMARY
- WEAPONS QUALIFICATION CRITERIA
- HANDGUN - 210 OF 300 POINTS
,
pr
- 8HOULDER WEAPON - 36 OF 72 PELLETS WITHIN
'
SILHOUETTE i
.>
- REMEDIAL FIREARMS TRAINING CRITERIA
- HANDGUN - 230 OF 300 POINTS l
- SHOULDER WEAPON - 42 OF 72 PELLETS WITHIN SILHOUETTE
""
I y
rv
- FORMER PROGRAM
'-
ANNUAL REQUALIFICATION
-.
..;.
,
_
- CURRENT PROGRAM L
'"
- SEMIANNUAL REQUALIFICATION
-
.
- MONTHLY REMEDIAL TRAINING 1.'
I-
.9
+
t
.
. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _.
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'
.
.
t
,
WEAPONS QUALIFICATION CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
i FOLLOW-ON CORRF.CTIVE ACTIONS
- SELECTION FOR WEAPONS QUALIFICATION VALIDATION WILL BE PERFORMED BY NUCLEAR SECURITY INSPECTOR AND QUALITY
,
[~
ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT e SEMIANNUAL REQUALIFICATION
'
- MONTHLY REMEDIAL TRAINING AS REQUIRED e TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PLAN REVISION I
!
AUGMENTED SECURITY TRAINING STAFF
= TWO TRAINING ASSISTANTS ADDED
- ACTIVlYlES:
-- REQUALIFICATION
-- SCHEDULING l
-- COURSE INSTRUCTION
-- COURSE MATERIAL IMPROVEMENTS l
-- FIRING RANGE
_J
-- ON-SITE TACTICS TRAINING r
'
i
- ACTUAL STARTDfG DATES:
-- JANUARY 16, 1989
\\,
-- M AY 3,1989
%
CONCLUSION a WEAPON PROFICIENCY WILL BE MAINTAINED
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ - - - - - _. - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - _ - - - _
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'
.
.
=.,
WEAPONS QUALIFICATION CORRECTIVE ACTIONS APRIL 1989 REMEDIAL FIREARMS TRAINING RESULTS:
.
- 9D PERSONNEL IDENTIFIED FOR PARTICIPATION-HANDGUN
-- OF 63 INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED FOR REMEDIAL
,l TRAINING,27 DEMONSTRATED QUALIFICATION ON
' '
THEIR FIRST ATTEMPT i
(
- SHOULDER WEAPON
-- OF 48 INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED FOR REMEDIAL TRAINING,37 DEMONSTRATED QUALIFICATION ON THEIR FIRST ATTEMPT
- NOT E: 21 INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED REMEDIAL TRAINING FOR BOTH WEAPONS I[1
- APRIL RESULTS:
- 81 OF 90 REMAIN QUALIFIED AS ARMED SECURITY
--
OFFICERS
_
.
-- 47 RELEASED FROM REMEDIAL TRAINING
'
-- 34 WILL PARTICIPATE IN MAY REMEDIAL TRAINING
-
l
-- 5 DISQUALIFIED - WILL PARTICIPATE IN M AY REMEDIAL TRAINING
-- 4 MEDICAL LEAVE - DID NOT PARTICIPATE (WILL BE
DECERTIFIED PRIOR TO SECURITY I
OFFICER ASSIGNMENTS)
I
,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _ _ _. _. _. _ _
L
A
.
V
._:,
O
M
'-
E C
R M
-.
T E
A V
E L
.~
H AV
.
LA N
,
.,.
U O
.
.
D T
.I
_
I
.
S C
E U
R S
.
L N
AI T
2 N
U
2 D
I
GE P
0
.
T N
-
.
I
M R R T
O
T N
I N
O VO V
L SB M
-
U
-
EO O E
.
E T
-
O H
.
N E
M L R G O G
I
,O F M
T U
O S TO T A
-
ENV N C N
B V
I I
S VO E O RI SR
-
TG E
L I
I DAl S
ANEN V
LA P H R U
WW A
CI E
TO L
WAI A
VT T T D S F
I E
N AHT T
A UT V
I LWCU O
DR QC Y
,S TO F
.
OD E N F
EC B
P N
I H N M
.
O Y
AL L
2I N AF R
E B AWI S
.
TT D,H O S E
A N G
-
N C N
Y T
R RBL WOSI E O C I
O E
S I
E/ U T
N PE T P
E S O CL I
T H S M VA D G
AD A L O
O FT EO T E5 O N
T WC N E AR0 SR U U O
TR I
4M R
E F F
-
!
I N
F H
!
T CHAY T BG W
NP GO I
TY EE S W
NT N E E
O DT U O N
!
P NWWI DI PN I
L R
A R
E AE S L
D ES A O
I I
LE T
,
L
,
I LL R U
T M E )g O A OU E D
U A H
L LT E A R f
R RSiT E
OOpsC PD V O
HT NT O O F
V C
F E
O E M
SS O S
FL A
R A M NI F E
I RC0 S
R S
N EI TO E-0I N
Y T
A CL E
'.
PO6T N
B I
O OB O R C S T A I
-
E T
A OI T E
A I
EUnS MSFS M
T D
G R
I D
HAa T CT E N
EA D O E
I
~
L O P T
hD A
T E
G UUT A RWO
~
t T O RPC H
GOrT I
eA TTNE C
N A
AI NNt R SSI R NN E
T a
E NER E
I I
R DeE V OHO H
UI OE HA rP UI
-
D D (g O N CTC T
DWPR TW
~
I
~
-
~
~
]
il l
J
.
TG OE HL
'
gp l
o
T g
M
S
W
R T
2 M
1
8
8
'
l
,
007 A
8
,""
g B
T N
N O
%2
g
I g
0 ET
g
MA y=
g
NL P M
M u
IU A
U C
,
pM R S TNI M
g M
OC
_c" CE
"
R A
B T
P
_
M P
M U
C P
U
.
P R
.
H R
-
-
R H
-
-
i
'
R
..M E
[
[
T
l W
S
,.
Y
.
,
AT W
w C
cit
,
S
'
C '
C l
I l
.
-
<,
R
7 A*6 Ag6
^
B
., H
6
1 T
7
.R m
8 G
iJG I
I MS
=
MS
_.
PP BPP G
w N GG
5 0
j 800
006
A
4
_
T T
3
A
/(
M
M
M
_
7
8
8 m
=
_
_
_
-
-
-
4
!S S
CiE
_
S S
S G
G C&
E C
R R
R
l t
L
'CL
flfl
'
'
b...
u
...
L 1.
.
,,
i\\
!
.
I MEMOTE PT485 24V DC ISOL SHUTDOWN STATION
+
+
+
_
_
_
~
4-20 Me LOOP
-.
+
_.
ISOL
.!'
h
,
k_
TXTERNAL TO CONTROL ROOM I~
'
. CONTROL ROOM TEST HAGAN RACK No.8
- input 1I Cl f< un
'
EU
+.
+.
+
,,
.
-
,
1/V
+
.
C R
I82
/
P7405 >
PS4954/5 >
ISOL
>
G
'
TER g9 UMP
=
_
%
MONITOR D
-
a L_
. c -s
.-
_-
f
+
+1 r
-
t/V
-
OVERPRESS.
.
-
/
PY495C >"
I L
PY485E
>
g CATOR
-
CONTROLS.
w.
}
_ -
.
REPRESENTS PORTIONS OF TE INSTRUENT LOOP REWORKED BY ROC 85-852.
l TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT
" ' ' * * *
see
'
-
WIDE RANGE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE MAP 050289 FIG SIMPLIFIED DIAGRAM i
.
-. _. _ _ _ _ - - _. _ - -.. - _. _ _.. _ _ _ -
.
E N
N E R
-
R E
N O
O TI U W
O
-
I R
E T N TS I
OT E
LE A
A S T
E L E T A V
B R R O T GE N
E Z
I E
U U RT R E
.
S R E N G I
OS A S
-
EI P V
I I
V S T HP E H ND E
.
R S W
SRI OA EV S
.
N C
-
-
E E F
APH
.
N RO I
ITI U HE
.
S
.
A RO M 0 H
W C
SE TD P
E
.
C ME S SN EI MM C E OS OVI Y V TSI I
-
F LOT S O SYR MVP O RN B
YSET E E R R FI R
A
.
E M OYA S
SU TR E P L
I Y
N O S R Y
O Y
O O NN T
SPV GL N RI A S RRN-G
- F M E HAI K SO T
l
.
T O I
TE L
E CI S RM2C R
H UE E
o S
I RMT RA I
U EAPE ER 0O HN T B SC I
L 7L RE EN S TM R
HP 8-P D A EC T
EY T HN OE H
A E
-
Y
-
RS TI 3O MW TD P
SQ U
R A M DF O
E
,O N
P T
E R
OS R
R N
D P 6 K S H E O U I
E CR AN N C HS T N
-
R H R S RI AN D
I O
D
,O T F S N L
-
F E
E 2 T1 A
FS N
I
)
I 2 H G MR
,A0 D E OMN OL
.
A 0 T 5R N (O O
N E P 1L 7 N CA
,
T O8A A
,T
-
S I
I I
8 TSSY SS D
S O
T E
-
MC R
CUY R EI O E S T I
OEAS E
D EA E E
-
OV S
OVL T T O
R ML A E
I ERYHR AI L A S YR R
HPBRP VVC VI SP N
N EF T
HO I
I
T
.
.-
.
.
-
E N
N E R
N O
O R E
O
-
TI U W
I R
E T
OT E
LE A N TS I
A S T
E L E T A V
B R R O T GE N
E
,g Z
E U U RT R E
I
.
,
I S R E N G OS A S
C EI P V
I H
E V S T HP E
ND E
-
-
N R S W-SRI OA E V S
C
-
E E F
APH N RO I
I A
RO M 0 H
S TI U HE W
C SE TD P
E C E S
SNEI MM OVIOS E ET E
-
F LOT Y V TSI ER V O
I R
A S O SYR MVP O RN I
B YSET EE R R FI
.
L-E M OYA S
SU TR E P N
T SPV
-
GL N O S R Y
O Y
O O NN RI A S RRN-G SO T
I F
M E HAI K T O I
TE L
E CI S RM2C R
H UE g
S E
I RMT RA I
U EAPE ER 0O HN T B SC I
L 7L RE S TM R
HP 8-A EN
P D EG T
S SO ME EON R RE R
HN
Y EY T TI 3O MW TD O
H A E RS P
SQ U
R P
A M DF O
E
,O N
,
T E
R R
OS R
N D P 6 K S H E O U AN N C HS T
I E
C R H R S R
F S
,O AN D
RI I
O D
,
F E
E 2 T1 A
FS N
N L T
I
)
I 2 H G MR
,A0 D E OMN OL
.
A 0 T CA
N E P 1L 7 N 5 R N (O O 4,
T O8A S
-
A I
S O
T
,T E
CUY R EI O E S T MC R
I OEAS
.
E D EA E E A
OV S
O R
I AI L A
YR R
HPBRP VVC VIS SP T
N N
EF HO I
I
T
.
.
'
.
_
-
.
'
'
'
-
,
M D
C O
R E
t I
S E
T O
E O
T A
L
-
O B F C
R H
M T
E OE L
W S
A
)
TG T
E TL O
DT F
R PI O
-
UU R
E E
E E S R
C P
AD T
TM F
P C P
I F.
L O
N C O E
OX E
.
I NT D M O
E R L
R E
YT
-
E C
T FY E S
LN N
D T O
LR E
EE j
A E VN E
RNS G
WE -
TV I
t T
A E OE H
POUN R
TA U
i CM OO A
MA RR T
QS I
F M V A EI HG E L ET M
EI I
.
F S PE T
T O I
'
AZ N C C S SS P
D H S
2F O
H RTA U SP G
A T l
YIN I
I I
0 D R
LS D
S NE U
U8 S G
F D S U G
8 AN S
8 A L SMMI M N
G
S8 WIR
-
E U EI E S E O A3 S
O M L
O R P
S T T T TW U
I
.
I B
S SA M O A
WPGY 0 SA A
F MD Y
a
GNO E
R R
R NS S H TN
-
H F
T E ~SEI
C TO SO I
P EVN R R A M T T S T Y
i Y
WY O
T I
T YI I
I ON HAH E CI A
I E
T U R R
SL D
CMR E U C I
TD Z
I i
A M
M R S A RI EI E
PO F
F P
EO B
P P
RA N
A R S O O
U A
RU
,
I R
P G
G S H (C S
E P A
CF M Y Y
S I
FM ES S A
0 ER C
M EMU T 0 T 0 R
S HE
.
A E
C9C4 P
N R
LT HT
,P S
O AS PA=A=
R I
2 VYC E TU E R m
P P
0T
SC V
N RE A
A I
NI OV 7A
F C
C O
M FO E
8L
E RD LHN-E H E
-
- O
-
I
OS O
M M
R T
e TF
-
-
lllll
TL IU
%
B
-
-
-
S
-
A i
T t
Y G
-
L E
N N
R T
I 7.
E A
T E
U S
P V
O Q
E E
T
,
R
-
D E
P F
A O
T N
..
I O
N F
N S
O
,
A I
O S
W TA A
,
C
.
W G
I N
F g
S I
E R
IT G
S E
E N
E V
A T
.
S H
E C
N C
g U
O NA G
A I
T R
N A
R C
U I
C
,
T S
I N
I F
S W
E ID A S
L O
B Y
-
A M
A T
N
-
I
-
I G
T LS S
AA I
R O
UW O
P Q
=
=
=
i
_
.
,
-
..
.
-
-
_
_
_
R
)
AK D
D N L C E
E OIMA MT T
.
O TI R E A E
I
.
.
I
,
T N
SOIN P
,
S M
R NAO Y ST
.
R E
S SS O
N O
I IA MET AE C
IR P
URC N
(
.
O T
P E
RU E O E
.
.
R TE T I
S SN O TSN C
I AUO R
-
T N
E NE R UAI N
O H
P T
-
I LC A E
CM T
T M O A
C H
I T R V TI C
AR A
G E
E EOI T
F E
B.N T EH OD S GT E
O I
/
E AW Y
5O S N O C RO T
E T V
M A
N E IT 0L N
C 4 L NHI A N-T y-VT MI T N
R E
O OC
)
TD RMS E
I I
R BF T NSE OR O V
TO R
P C GX T FE P E
I
-
O
EI CH E
R T C
T-TS E L E E E E
,
A2 OE P
T H
ES L
R D T PD A T
-
A4 GT O M
-
U
.
r P
O NO Q T
R NO EN I
C AT E R
D P
'I RH E
E R
-
R OTS(
UWA
_
M D
O D
I M O WR T
E
.
S P
-
O E
C YO T HEN)D E
ER M P
I R
A BD I
V E
R
N A
C EG AT E
E EET
-
I
.
-
TN PS R DM RHE Y
-
EE M M
TL L
EI EE L
RT WIF L U R
R )S P
T I
E B R P
-
-
S P TO M
M N VO R R
I O
I OE EMPI E (H W (C R
N C
R P
P
1l!,l
!l1ll
,
7-
-
O D
D E
-
.
E T
EW E
H O
WE M
T
_
C ET R S
-
I N
EV R
EI W O I
B E
VE R F EI
_
I
,
SN N ES
.
E R U N T
_
L OINT I
LI N
_
R NE E
EH NC EC T G I
WI N N BT E RI
_
F OR D E S D O
S I
LD
-
N E M LT TS I
T WM
_
I E N TO WN R N T
C U
-
I M
SC O EE T S A C E RY S
E N N
I O
R ESD T TN O E
E E
L P
E I
I IU N ET U DGP M
-
D NM TF Q
HC S
ER I
R N F
R C
P u
V EYF NM N
-
E T
G BA G
ED D O I
I N N N RTE
.
T N IT
-
GDF EST EA
-
I I
C E S
E EM NSE N N
,
E T DRY F
A E I
.
F z
P A S R R
I I
Y R S AGB AM A
E OP I
C E
CI Y
Y D S
-
BW R
P D T I
I
,
C F DIEO D FE EI T N D
L I
I D
D MI LA D
I EV A
O ERB A
G
.
O O
WEE
-
M RR Y MHOA UEN E
I I
UL TFR QP T T
TVESL T
RE OS SEHNU SYEP ECE ORTEF OBPO HST P
P T
_
-
l lll l
E
-
G S
i A
N R
R O
E
--
T C
,
S N
-
S O
s
-
A C
.
_
.
4.
G
.
.
_
_
,
.
b
-
-
-
.
m
-
D
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
n eo E
hi
,
t
n Tu C
d l
i o
e9
f
.
I s
1 e OS d 8 T
k
,h n9 y
ae n 0 T n e e
N
.
v m
O O oi Le
ia c m3 t
e m
t nB yo
-
e o2
-
NI r
e uf c
e a F c
af e
l ge M
a vE Rcl T
h ov l
ra s
ps e-NA dH dn ee et gat r
s y
eo Rv Ro nM l
Ht ui a
C w
.
OU i
t o
s
c7rV d
L 8leN sA 8O e
odC
I t e e
l
-
I l
9b
,o sr ot l
T A
,d iy
1 er e o e
e Fl 1 s a
t t
,s uM p
A V 0oM d
,an q
em n2ro s
er ho P
7e1 wCr Ro ME
y d 8m o
o F
TC re t
mrleFwi e
r liohr R
p Acob o n e7 hw R
rFTe t
o g8 ie l
d o nFM O 0 Asei Oet o
WiE an v
ar s Rci t s a1 e
n F
dWeho Og ie n
Oa s e
M DRa n
e l
,
u t
g
R
-
snWC ndn c ar y
Ewt e x o s2 Sei N 7 i
ht e
r e
N PoeV E d cr et T
l l
I cne y
ie y
0nat Nl l
l
2ol a o pegH vb Bm Pu yF m sin rem o
C
- C q
B oat r
l s
Se d F l
ee eCrei a v
e
.
R 8ehd t
_.
d h x
o t
l c
s h TA eTwnEn aN as NT c
uni N
t I
I e
o i
l ahi nR ai I
ut v-
-
h vt -
C-A ec la ie c
R vWR eO eA N
E T
R
.
.
.
j
gn s e
ie n h
.
gB o t
e n
l i
b vi i
t n
n n e c a
ir o
d w
s S
aA A n
-
e o
Ro t
e t
sy g
a D
As 1-N r
r a
u Oa ePn a r
o a
d e
l O
is e o nt s dt v
e fR I
o ce uS e
k o
'
l e
a a
iAc l
n T
t c
R W
o n
"
c e
n ne A gN :
i i
i
_
C t
n g
g ah o
n g
e l
t i
n ci wec ir l
f i
A iW i
o ohi Wd e
e i
f to y
B t
t B
m l
o eN d"H od sl s
s eft n
r s
Ne T
n e e a
o a
t t
e ya
,
O N
elph
i u
l i
r l
eh mt
~d 4 "m n
A hl a t
m of e-o tn v rCo n9o M
d oE E
i tn e e8o i
e Mn p
R n
t Uv s
i R
eo n
oN e
c e
wTr eI o
e R
o g
e s e l
e g
R f
e r
o f
vB htH dc Ct r
A en gRn d
i U
s;uo et n
y iNo y
co e0sC r
e C
H m
C g2 u Bf a
ReN l
l d -
f Pe oe i
o t
ed e7 h
h n
t vo o
lw 8yt 2nt n
s nai r
eHe o
i l
"
ss if o
o m
P onus 7t o i
nI P
t a
k oe 8uf a
eh r
gce ir l
cCtid ao a
e hm l
l ai A Rdd Rvo n
t h
NeA AER s
aWiT t
E p
O n
O M
Goxo I
PTET
E g
.
G n
p i
-
g d
n A
l i
ip u
B n
i R
o P
i l
t
ON c)
n o
r ee o
t t r i
T A n
t ou u
o rs Ps b
C
SJ i
e r
O e
n r
t rP s
o i
u D
.
-
NR se d
-
gsr ieu n
e
.
t srt o
a ET ppp c
h G
ru s
g o
0eR e
n L
v
v i
T Oi o
l l
O A
s a
s s
p V
a o e
l l
GC v
r iV o
R
l o
a l
ef 5 o
T r r h
r
r V
cnu t
e o D
aosks6 vt n
n a
f
,
Y
, Eis s3 o
e or e
tcei f e rD-C g
Ce i
l cS P o
n e
r re R
H s
e7 wd oG s
nr o
y f
k 0 Egu0 H
d l
F n
n n
0Mitsp Ti a
a 0 S e u (3 s
e Ca f
T 8ADR s
d VM s o ko i
r e
v u
- . *
c o
nR o
x r
a F
E P
T
=
=
=
=
.
.
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
E
~;
-
-
d
-
-
G
-- r e
-
e d
t
,
-
-
g e
e a
-
AS t
k u
-
-
a a
a a
-
l
- T RN O
s e
ia n
t n u t
-
u d
ol v
y
-
E a
i e
z t
v uE M
- C OA i
r l
n e
g u
b i
-
L n
t t
o B
y i
-
c U
r e
-
TP i
i t
t B
-
le u
sB a
o
-
u r
g i
l T
C
- Z S
n Do i
f t
t e
S N
R e
T n
R i
d B
m e
yr N
O V
.
NI 9r e e
of r o v
e et e
f o m
le 8wl c
i a
h T
E A 1T 9 a
g
R o
T oe n
e r
D n
GC mg-ki t
f g
d a
o n
n t
i y
u f
e ad ont G
ei O
OO g
t
- ,6 o i
l rl e n
f of Lu L
/r e
o a A
B RE uC ol d
d S
p S
f
-
y y
DR t
R o
e H
e mS rf r
B dt t
ao o
-
r a
r n
t r
n Y
o St f
a c
o l
o f
l a
oat
e W
z o
s
aC L
i i
t
~
H H
f t e
t c
o h
n g
u n
rt 0
-
e o n
o o
l
~
e ou0 P
v p
R i
i R
r o0 N
ig t
i i
s a
n P
k u
PS1 oi I
k p
c l
l R
pi
u a
n
- * =
a P
xP r
v T
E E
T E
=
=
=
=
=
_. - - -, - - - -. - - - _ _, - - - _,, - _ - - _ _
,
-.
,,
/
i I
f isill
\\-
f)
"
'
'
N
['
-
-
A
/
_
..
.
~
g
a
?
<
\\
t
)
.
,
-
-
j
'
-
s ilf; \\
~
e~
i
)
I
_
J, v
,
3.,
_
la b
-
%%
~
wmp s
...
' "il e
"-
e-m
-
/,
,
,,
-
-
-
H s
L I
/
h nQ
'
'
-
\\l8 l
U!~
V ( 1 t
ia!
a
-
>
,
__
I J
j
!
g
,
!
j
-
f
-
'
l L_____________
__
.
A
l l
l1 lil
.
.
.
L
'
'
-
-
-
_
SNRE
m C
or mF
"
o
-
N
-
i f
G o
p o
R u
o ee R
O t
R kk e
r l
l
.
aa h
o r
o a
t t t
r u
r t
C g
nn it t
t S
W n
p n
n ii o
u o
i j
o d
nn C
R C
T l
oo e
E i
J u
c i i B
aa n
o k
n r
t t t
n o
G i
a l l n
a i
ii l
t t d
o nn r
T d
r i
-
r e
P
A t
ee o
n c
n VV c
o a
a C
l o
c R
i i
lP R
t t
C mmA c
n N
i u s e
O oo e
rr n
det y
ff o ko o
I l
i h
-
rap r
T T
t d
t t a
t t ff e
nn r
im o
de O
S n 4 ff m I
eg o
o p
t r
nn r t
a 4 pi o eof mit s
f i
k r
gt e
mu dd e
oad T
bO
)
N n
l r
ee P
ria u
a t t t t s
Sg
E T
aa inz r
cc g
Nea o
n
i f
oo n
VH t
el G
e c
lL e
a n
Bu i
l i
=
s i
ml o
f B
t e
O sg n oi M
oe
0 kn s
TR s
e o
-
nip e
t s
R
ai oRi n
TP y
P M
e t9 s
r g
o8
~
T l
a *
a
y p9 x
n x
e1 I
iS A
O R
N
=
=
=
=
'
-
-
E
-
-i C
.
N N
..
A A
_
JN
- .
--
-
g R T T N g
IA g,
M e
,
-
--
s
-
e
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
.
,.
_
.
,,
. __
,
EN
,.
_
_
IL
..
_.
s O
t
~
n C
e na s
ml
,u m
e P
_
_
e v
..
o n
lb r
o p
o
-.,
i r
m t
P c
i.
-
A l
l
_.
o o
r r
e
.
t t
c n
n n
,
o o
a C
C ne
.
t k
k n
r r
i o
o a
WW M
.
.
=
a
=
.
.
.
~
S
M e
m E
T i
y L
c
)
i t
s
-
B o
n l
s
-
r P
a O
iF l
O R
P tn d
e n
k P
m a
r s
o j
-
e t
W
L gg n
s an o
e i
u y
f O
ni t
d
-
n a
q t
o
.
a e
n c
e i
R Ma n
l R
b w
i i
r l
f A
e a
T P
t i
g f
s s
e s
e o
n i
n N
k e
g c
v e
L n
e r
o n
n r
d a
R u
n i
,
O i
s o o f
a I
t d
i c
e n
c n
iW i
t e
t e
u e
o
-
C
-
i n
n c
.
a s
r r
t s
t B
n h
e o
c e u
s s
c d
r i
i nc a
n b
e n
P e
g, K
a u n C
L a
o M
T e
I R
m n't k
p d
j n
e e
y
-
me o
l r
n o
e a
l
-
O l
o d
p ot o o r
r i
Ci Ri W
P e
n a
p n
t W
a t
n e
e A
i u
e c
eM el e
e e
D
,
G n
t o
t t o t
t
-
a a s a
a a
a t
r f
i u
o u o ue u
u f
l qF qR q
q o
e q
e r
r e
e e
e e
r k
u d
d d
d e
e d
c l
a a
a a
s v
a i
.
a a
n n
n n
U O
n L
F I
i I
I I
=
=
=
=
a
=
=
=
=
.
.
.
.
.
.
STN
.
)
)
E
-
,
-
s
M
e e
e P
v v
i t
E O
i iv A
i t
t (
c c
A Vs i
t b
e e
(
c s
o r
r A
e J
r A
r
.
On o
o s
Q i
-
o t)
g t
e C)
C m
Ri n1 n
v r
i
)
r t
t P
r
o h
t e-i i
Pc n3 o
c o-n i-F g
d f 3 u
o A
r
MA o
o s
r e-h f
sO n
pP s
k R
oP
-
h
.
eA e
s s
.
M (A iA C
T I
m d(
l i
l t
n b
R o)
c
&
s Lr
,
l s
u
-
r1 e e u9 R
I g
OT t
d o
h n-pc r
e t -
o r a r
a s3 T
M n
g o3 o
o e T
i F L H
C c
n n
,.
R-P Se O
s d
i r
A t
n e
t sd o
r d
n e o
n dn kA o
t Tr t
f r(
a
.
i i
f
,
ef s
a2 a a o
t l
t g
No o
c e
h mi e
s
-
rM Ws u
R L
n s4 B
R r
-
l e
o e
'
e f
OS M
i t
rf r
e t
f v o
s y
l n
iuo iO t
n
_
C d
n oi e
i l
q d (A t
I l
e i
o a
l n
ic en u
Ro G)
C ee a
u l
n a
i t
Q u
t
s sv e a i
i
._
K da d -
k Gg Ur Dn e
e c
r n
P e
l e c e3 o
di d
dn S
l t
p A
R i
t t
f
~t ni n
W ee ed ei e
eP pi an s
g r
t a
O mV m (A d
oB n a aM g
n e
r n
l i
e e
e e
e W
i i
t p
p d
v m
l r
d u
l c
d o
d e
i m
m A
D E
l n
A R
I i
i
=
e
=
=
=
=
=
a
'
~
NE r
-
M o
F ro i
E F
d d
e e
i Vs s
)
p p y e
o ot r
[
On
l l i ed el u
i
/
vn vb d
e Rio
ea ea e c
D Di c n
]
Pc l
t (
n e
o a r
s eo eR Pn
)9 t
MA i
Bt B
/e
s a)
d s n t
/
y I
oic0 oe ni l
a Tf 9 Tc o a t
m (
i iM n
c/
e Lr A
se9 sl c
t q
Oe gn e p(
ee ue s
k rS r
r v
e t ) )9 uSt u
t i
T i
r u
e8 8 o
d n
d st r
s9
]
R-d nc e
e n l
W ea d
T/ /
e I
c c m c a r
Tg e
e (9 oiu o
kr n
c
r rnr r
r o
[
No o
c (
o Pht P d)
oC r
ng F
c s e1 W
P ang n e n t
OL na9 e)
ni n g
oTi ol v0 t
ie/
di9 i
la eon n
d i
a R (9 C
t t
rt t
i f
on n
a ai/
e u
n ot r -
t d
iha asl a
b a
bys d e (9 i
r
,
i np MleP r
iel t t v
i
-
K e
s l
T apR ain a es l
i l
d
- b k Cy-Cae S Re t
n t ur t
T um R
i s oo n
y cQu t
i ri or e
c t
pe v p
PTW
-
O m
ih e i
r oht i
f f
t o
icf ir s
l e
caa co et c l
W e
e e.
n vOA eES eFI l
v p
e p
p e
D mS S
D l
=
=
=
=
=
.
,
.
.
'
'
.
-
.
N
~
A
L
"
,
P ss T
N e
rg o m o
O t
r na P
ir g
I so s
T mr s
,
P u
e C
c
.
t ro s
it n
s s
D i
A n
ne t
i o
n v
a im s e r
o l
P t e c v nm e
T s
Ao oe p
p E
n n
s u
s r
iv t
o o
ep coi mS g
C i
n cm Art o e n
t pa c
i t
t a
N t
A ni i
md c
e i
t a
t e
nin c
e n
e e n e
j t
c e
s pe o
M g
A n
e medmn t n r
sp P
e na simr nO t
min f
e N
n a
sio i
c d
e s
e et c s
Mt n
nPme e
r m
E n
s e
d R oLah a
e e
s e t
i l
s a
Ai C Aet c
g
-
-
l T
s AM
-
O STO a
i A
C d
f f
n
-
P e
-
d d ee R-
-
-
a N
l l
-
f e e SSI N M
N D
l t
I e
ata d
S d r
.* **
A
-
g e
y i
-
l l
d oe n
h M
e st g
t i
u n n n
s s
o s
o I
s C
A M
i s
a
=
=
_
_
NA
.
,
L
P
.
.
N
-
O
-
-
I no T
i
,
ta C
r r
e mp
-
A aO r
s gt of
E m9 ri e
Ph t
S C
eg-
s i
a e
dno l
-
N n
n d
adw i
nT r
,
i i
u g
g A
l e
ir e
c prf
,
._
O e
t n
UTO N
i
,
lp et n m.
s f
r n q
E o
o m
uei o
e dmt
%
C epu t
a T
i
ci l
4 y
m o ua N
l r qv
.
r l
-
d a
e PEE I
i e
t T
A
_
t n
- **
e a
r l
M t
e p
s g
mb n
o u
o C
S L
.
=
a
=
,
.
"
TSN h
k t
r n
EO o
o W
Min UI
-
a
-
Q T f
nt o
ab C
M O ya h
E M
t s
R U n
h o
f t e m
M sn c s
O D
-
do u e
n eMd c
d
)
EE s
r a
e e
u n
R cR E
M M
x n o
CR Ea
e s
Mo e
T
R h
e
)
N g
p g
/
T a
<u o 5. s y 0 w
A G g
l ok1 ek 3 t
n oy r
l (
u r
NB o
c c
/
N O i
O sGa r e9 n
t s
a
-
R ue n
n Mk BdoWy ss n
a L
t t i
e s b
ss d
l o
E oie e P
r f
s yy r
N
,
T K cRss o
0We l l x
aa o
(
l
el a
-
N C
.
mEl a
nn C
n s
r AA hi a go o
la ct gn oG R
i o
<a r A
oor t
kk el i
M G
gE v k i I
i Pe d
r r t
AB o rOcd v
d oo ko ad de A WW d
~
l d
~
M e
cFeBAni e
h e
h a
s r c d
h B
Ui TA e
s
-
s f
1 1 i
i n
l l
b
-
b i
- e
a
= *
a a
t t
t b
s s
E O
E
-
=
=
=
.
-
-
!l
T s
R SN M
EO l
r o
e r
s l
-
p p
t UI
-
n i
u t
Q T C
r o
l o
u G
M C
o E
t r
hr
,
R U n
e ie t
-
i h
wp
,,
t D
p s
O R
sU EE sM eh n o s
t t
R eT i
i g
t CR Mn iW n
-
l od i
i d
b pe
N m
en ae s
n mt a
pc uyg G
e pt aa o
-
b n
l
.
A s
Os Cf Ci ki t
t r
r et N O e
y u
e
- t e
rsWe S
f gt t
oO oi g
n n n
M FD L
I e
i E
g t
l l n
ol re mt s n s t
T K i
rA o n e
rt k
t pi v
or e u t
poma c
nd eL
,
N C l
a o e R-o epet T
Ct m n
v RegS r
A aedO n
Ra
,
I rt i
ny eose y
AB R
l v
t sah ipyve l
M rSror n
kuMt t
-.
M u
e et n
,
ios pt m
e a o
d o c u
t n
m e
Pi F
e WS M
v g
I o
a r
- e
- *
- *
n p
a m
M
.
i u
=
.
,
.
.
/
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
' 5
' /
.
.
'-
-
-
'- 5
' 2 e
- /
,
g
' 8
-
p a
'
-
'
t
.
S
' /
.
g
-
'
-
.
n
' 4 i
..
_
.
.'
'
n
-
'
/
-
sn
-
'
'-
a
'
ul
'
-
-
-
tP
' /2 a
'
, _
-
n
'
-
-
ti
.
_
'
'
-.
Ss
,
R
-.
.
' /
-
.
._
-
.~
'6
_
l
/
-
- 2 Mg
'
.
'
'
d
--
/
o
.'
- 5
'
.
l
-
,
k
'
-
~
c
-
m'J a
' /
-
s g
.
B s
i
.. ' '
' 4 n
o
'
L n
ke n
'
S
,
R lP
'
' /
e a
-
mg M
I
%
' 3
R n
L M
s i
-
R s
.
M %
' 0 t
.
e
._
T
_
r
~
e
_
'
' /
b us
.
' 3 u
.
.
.
,f M
' 7
.
-
-
_
-
.i
-
/
.
0
.'0
02
0
0
0
5
5
1
2
SRO TA
C p
I e
_.
D cn s
N a
m
I n
e e
t t
i E
n
,
s e
i
-
-
C r
a c
o M
n N
a r
r d
t s
s a
c u
u e
n e
A v
e v
i o
o d
i t
i M
n H
H c
t n
e i
-
-
e a
s c
I R
e a
a r
n n
r e
M s
R R
-
c o
R M
O M
M n
C e
M s
g F
m e
e a
v d
R i
c c
o t
s n
e M
R t
n R
e s
ro n
n e
f a
a e
v M
p o
g E
y l
r n
n v
e O
C t
e e
e P
P t
t t
P r
i i
n r
n n
n e
f f
o e
p o
o
,
i
.
E i
i
-
y a
a v
o O
P r
f d
l h
M M
e e
e e
[,
C t
r t
g g
f n
P ee fo A
A o
e e
glp N
o v
v f
a M
m r
e e
r i
.
i t
t o
t A
c n
n o e
g g
e d
e e
o eC b
a a
b
-
N e
r v
c m
m r
r i
z e
t r
e e
r E
r a
e u
v v
u o
i T
d C
P R
P N
A A
N
.
ra d
.
N n
I a
A tS M
~
=
,
i l
'
iJ
.
k-G
-
N n
.p o
_
-
i I
t D
a g
g u
n n
_
l i
i t
a t
N v
s r
i E
x o
9/
E p
E
e e
//
c g
R R
n
n
/
R a
3t i
T s
n n/
U M
-
e e0 t
t
n nm/
m9 e
T a
ep9 a8 p
i l
mo-r/
i M
t pl g0 N
l el a o3 u
o v a
E vDi f
l n
r/
M o
ee o
e t
t n
M nmDmn g m-c n
n e
ee au ie r
mts erF dt r
P py a
ey C
rg ns u
oS wry rS o
) "
I le tPl T
U l
f
vg f
u g
o en o eF mn Q
Di St
i i d
rk e
-
n em ec s
-
de nl E
pe t
a Um er a
n r o
cT gmt iT s
e
-
n eoy et p
us ed BCS oR ny mn eM l
i S
-
a
- **
t m
v n
o e
o C
D C
.
=
=
=
-
.'
'
,
'
-
.
,'
'
":
~
S
ECRU n
e i
o c
O i
n ta a
u S
z ts i
t n
r is E
a
o s
g
p A
r R
O
pu n
r
S o
o
C i
,
t i,
r s
o e
c i
n a
v F
c
o r
r f
in t
e
~
o s
sa n
pg gi n o
un
~
n nv t
o ir e C
Si n e n n
t n
n i
t
n pi d
Ca
'
e is a u a
~
m o
e l
l
& P n
P PSM s
l g
a
'
i
e a *
a w
l r
e e
c
.
R N
n i
=
=
=
.
-
-
l!!
r
,
-6%.
l*;
. PROPOSED WANTENANCE ORGANIZATION PRIOR TO ENGINEERNC REORGANIZATION sa n cN um AGER meantNCE
{ LEm CLERK l
!
I I
I L
~
EnsDl I
su swE= son sm= san sm= son ia C
==
mAsnENoct ELECTac a teaseTDeMcE SWPORT taADf7ENANCE l~WestTDuMCE I
I_
I
~ "I ~
issT umf suPEnvson tesf uwt SuPUM50R SwpMECR tECNMsCAL
=
SWERvtBOR
=
-
=
- N* *
DecedER ELECTRCAL i& C -
I I
I l SUlv AA l IECMANCAL PLANT l16 C TECNs l EN0sE Rs ELECTIBCIMI5 Upsf l
ypgr
-. -.
q"D_e0DERC IT**"! '
sm"n.vsanT
~
"
35"*1"
'-
-
ELECT CAL L-J l
l l SERV AA l 16 C TECN$ l l' ECTfuCIANS PLANT CaE
ENOBEUts 5 Ea
,,La
-
r u-
na C
_
l uu 4 s e =ur l swEnr wCMasCn sm t 5tc=.c.*'sl
- - - I se I
m l sEn u l T
liteTECNsl-J r
RZuri eLua e
r umf1
~1 8"c'*E" el Euc mc""5 r um- -l
.----
H m
L _8""'s,1,l H *s w E = son g H *"g,-
r-t c""'EL.
r
- .1
==
i 7,
~T-1 Coa===vani L
".l s l m mutTsTl
l,En u l
.A.nEN cE Soa*8" I m 8""'5'l
-
r LEm-1 t_a#'$12 r-J- 1 L
~I.
H s==5aa i lJOSANALYSTl -
I= - cu.g=
J 1_7. Cm.1
-
r
'"S'""_ i was
-
Daan
_._
,. _ _
. -. _ '.E *I
pu
-
Daan mao I
e CUMENTLY FILLEo IIITH
""
posn,0N ruzo T00Lft0001 esAN
__
_ _ _ - _
{_,,;.
~
.( -
.
.
'
Quality Assurance Philosophy
.
.
j, intrusive e
p
/ Random / Unannounced Surveillance
/ Continuous Presence in Plant
/ Critical / Questioning Attitude
'_
Predictive
=
j i
/ Identifies Developing Problems Early
-
-
/ Knowledgeable of Industry Concerns Responsive j
/ Rapid Response on New issues
-
{
/ Involved Throughe.it Evaluation / Resolution
.
_
Performance and Compliance Oriented
-
/ Ensure Conformance With Requirements i
/ Measure Performance-Catalyst for Raising Standards
--
Technically Knowledgeable and Experienced
,,
[-
/ Technical Experts in All Disciplines
/ Experienced With Credibility
/ Valuable Knowledge Resource For Other
,
Departments
'
.
.
_ - -. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ - - _ _ - - _
sg q
'i.
l i
i>
'
.
!
Quality Assurance Staffing
.
l
.!
'
= Recent Changes
!L
/ Quality Assurance Mgr (Acting)
l
'
/ Quality Operations Branch Mgr
/ Quchty Services Branch Mgr
,
2'i
/ Audit Supervisor
/ Audit Staff-Electrical Eng (l&C)
-
--
Mechnical Eng (ISI)
Rad Prot Eng
'
,
j
/ Quality inspector-l&C rechnician
/ PMEA Eng (EE/l&C) Supporting l&C l
.
Observations and Work Inst Review aJ
- Actions in Progress
_
/ Permanent Quality Assurance Mgr
/ Material Quality Supervisor l
/ Restructure Department Position
]
.].
Requirements-Establish Expertise
'
in All Disciplines
,
~
'
![~
/ Expand Use of Outside Technical
'
Experts in Audit Program y
<.
lt l
r l
-
i
!
.
c
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
_
[
-
.g
.
,
'
l i- ;. '.' ;.
'
s e.-
-
.
.
.
h.
'
_
- ..
D d:i S
.
a n!
i o i..p
-
w i
8lE dI -,-_f__.jd L
ligsjgj ud
,
m
"
---
-
d*4 O-[!!--
>
'
E
!
1-E
!!
c i
--
i!g
-!!-
!!
-
li!
i g
i-
-- d.llii-!i!
[
.o N
i!!-li!!!h o
E +
!!-
, ~i E<
gl l
i-l L__
i s, !c t p
h;!!
l
.
'
ep a;
e p!
-
gi y
l !
4!!- lil!i![!
d
i
> dl l
[I]l
-
It n: :
l
-
l
,
s
~
>
T, k
!
-
,
'
,
i
I i
-
I
=
l_ [3 l
l ed
_
l I
s ni l
-
@
-
-l-l- :l l
_
9g
<n
,!;
_
--
.
,
I l
o
!'i l!El I__ i!$.blh cd
=
l s
A e
i;
!
l l!I
--
!
lll
,--------!
I
'
ihg a n!,! T
!!
r ql
! e
um e e as e e e e as a um a as e a a um e e
._
__ -
_ _ _ _ _.
Fbrin :
(4.
'
/
p
. ;-
NRC: ENFORCEMENT. CONFERENCE WITH PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
'
May 10, 1989 Location: NRC Region V Office Times 1:00 p.m.
Agenda Items:
'
I.
Opening Remarks - J.
B. Martin
'
II.
NRC Security Concerns - R.
A.
Scarano
,
III.
Inadequate Protection of Safeguards Information -
M. D. Schuster PGE Comments -
IV.
Security Officer's Lack of Firearms Proficiency -
M.
D. Schuster PGE Comments -
s V.
Apparent Inadequate Response and Evaluation of
-
Information Notice on Potential Hydrogen Leak into Auxiliary Building - R.
A.
Scarano/H.
S. North PGE Comments -
,
- - - - FIVE MINUTE BREAK - - - -
,
VI.
Steam Generator Water Level Transient of March 4 -
-!
R. C. Barr Post Modification Testing Failed to Detect RHR
!
'
Interlock Reverse Polarity - R.
P.
Zimmerman/M. M.
Mendonca PGE Comments -
VII.
NRC Enforcement Options - A.
D.
Johnson VIII.
Closing Rema*rks - J. B. Martin
.-
%
e
.m_.
m
_________ _ _ _ _ _.. _..
-