IR 05000341/1982009
| ML20054H645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1982 |
| From: | Danielson D, Ward K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054H640 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-82-09, 50-341-82-9, IEB-82-01, IEB-82-1, NUDOCS 8206240291 | |
| Download: ML20054H645 (5) | |
Text
.
.-
-
-
-
.
.
I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0!!!!ISSION
REGION III
Report No. 50-341/82-09(DETP)
!
Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Licensee: Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, til 48226 Facility Name: Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 Inspection At: Fermi 2 Site, Monroe, MI
,
Inspection Conducted: May 26 and 27, 1982
. h//htt-av W
Inspector yK. D. Ward
/c [k
.bw & L % -
<
'
Approved By:
D. H. Danielson, Chief
/,// o// P
'
Materials and Processes Section
,
Inspection Summary
j Inspection on May 26 and 27, 1982 (Report No. 50-341/82-09(DETP))
!
Areas Inspected: Review of preservice inspection (PSI) procedures, work activities, nondestructive examination (NDE) personnel certifications and data; previous inspection findings. The inspection involved a total of 12 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
f 8206240291 820611
'~
{DRADOCK 05000341
!
.
- -. -. -
- -.... -.
_-.-.
....
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
.
-
-
_
-
.
.
DETAILS
'
Persons Contacted i
Detroit Edison Company (DEcol i
- G. Trahey, Assistant Director Project QA
- H. Walker, Supervisor Construction QA
- E. Newton, Supervisor Operating Assurance
- J. Plona, Technical Engineering Supervisor
- E. Topel, Senior QA/QC Inspector
J. Polsgrove, Assistant Engineering Technician i
Daniel International Corporation (DIC)
l
- E. Thompson, Project Quality Manager
'
i
- B.
Sheffel, Lead ISI Engineer Southwest Research Institute (SWRI)
R. Weber, Project Engineer The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employees.
j
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Noncompliance (341/81-07-01): Use of wrong penetrameters on n
ASME Section III radiography. Over 4,000 Dravo radiographic film packages were reviewed by DIC and approximately 2,600 were found to have the problem with the improper penetrameter. The problem film was grouped per DECO QA Level and ASME Code class. A deviation disposition report (DDR)
was then written for each group and was reviewed by the inspector. Dravo
'
was notified of the problem and a review of Dravo radiographic film indicated that the problem has not occurred since 1977. The action on
'
these items is completed; the inspector reviewed the documents concerned and considers appropriate corrective action was taken.
Licensee Action on IE Bulletins References:
a.
IE Bulletin No. 82-01 Revision 1 titled, " Alteration of Radiographs of Welds in Piping Subassemblies" dated May 7, 1982.
(0 pen) IE Bulletin No. 82-01 Revision 1 l
5 l-
-, _ _ _.,. _..
_ -, _
..
~.
.
.-
_ _
.
..
-
_ _
.
__
_
.__
__
_
.
'
l.
,
There are 68 pipe welds on site with radiography performed by Associate Piping and Engineering.
Project QA reviewed all the radiographs to determine that the ASME penetrameters displayed the proper sensitivity,
were unaltered, and that acceptable weld quality was demonstrated. The inspector reviewed radiographs of the following welds and determined that
.
there was no evidence of any attempt to alter or in any way enhance the
'
evidence of sensitivity demonstrated by the ASME penetrameter. RIII will j
review the licensee's final response to IE Bulletin No. 82-01, Reivsion 1.
Spool Weld Diameter Thickness
.Date RT RD-2-A6 W-G 12" 5/8" 7/26/78
RD-2-A6 W-D 12" 5/8" 7/19/78 RD-2-A6 W-A 12" 5 / 8
7/19/78 RD-2-A6 W-B 12" 5/8" - 1" 7/21/78 RD-2-A6 W-E 12" 5/8" - 1" 7/21/78 RD-2-A6 W-C 12" 1"
8/18/78 RD-2-A6 W-F 12" 1"
8/18/78 RD-2-A5 W-D 12" 5/8" 7/17/78 RD-2-A5 W-A 12" 5/8" 7/19/78
<
RD-2-A5 W-G 12" 5/8" 7/31/78 RD-2-A5 W-B 12" 5/8" - 1" 7/25/78 RD-2-A5 W-E 12" 5/8" - 1" 7/26/78 RD-2-A5 W-F 12" 1"
8/16/78 RD-2-A5 W-C 12" 1"
8/22/78 RD-2-A4 W-G 12" 5/8" 7/25/78 RD-2-A4 W-D 12" 5/8" 7/14/78 RD-2-A4 W-A 12" 5/8" 7/14/78 RD-2-A7 W-D 12" 5/8" 7/14/78 RD-2-A7 W-A 12" 5/8" 7/18/78 RD-2-A7 W-G 12" 5/8" 7/25/78 Licensee Action on 10 CFR 50.55(e) Items Reference:
a.
DECO letter to NRC dated November 25, 1980, " Defective GE-I & SE Welds."
b.
DECO letters to NRC dated February 24, 1981 and March 3, 1982 " Interim Reports on Defective GE-I & SE Welds."
c.
DECO letter to NRC dated May 26, 1982, Final Response j
on Defective GE-I & SE Welds, i
i d.
Dravo letter to NRC dated January 26, 1981, "Possible-i Defective Piping Subassemblies."
e.
DECO telephone conversations to NRC dated May 8, 1981 and May 22, 1981, " Dravo NDE Problem."
(Closed) Defective GE-I and SE welds. The inspector reviewed the final
'
response and actions taken which consisted of procedures and reports. The inspector has no questions at this time.
,
!
i
i
!
-,_.
.-,. _.. _ _
-. - - _,
.~- -
- - - _ _ _ - _
,
,
. _ _. - - _ -. _ _,, _
,_
-_,.y,
_- ---. _ _
.
.
(Closed) Possible Defective Piping Subassemblies from Dravo. Dravo was to respond to DECO stating the exact problem and at that time it was to be determit.ed if there is a Code violation involved. DECO and the inspector reviewed the Dravo response, and it was determined that there was not a Code violation.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
General Ref. NRC Report No. 50-341/79-06(PSI)
The PSI of the reactor pressure vessel will be performed in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1971 Edition, Winter 1971 Addenda, Class 1 piping systems will be in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1974 Edition, Summer 1975 Addenda and Class 2 piping systems will be in accordance with ASME Section XI 1977 Edition, Summer 1979 Addenda. The PSI year and Addenda of the Code was confirmed in the Safety Evaluation Report July 1981, 2.
Procedure and Plan Review The inspector reviewed the following:
SWR 1, Preservice Examination - Project Plan, August 1981,
.
Change No. 1 - April 1982, 78-DEC-EFP-2-1-1.
SWR 1, Preservice Examination Plan Class 1 and-Class 2 Piping
.
Welds, April 1982.
SWR 1, Deviations to Nuclear Projects Operating Procedures,
.
IX-FE-101-2.
SWR 1, Weld Joint Identification Marking on Nucicar Power Plant
.
Piping, IX-FE-103-2.
SWRI, Recording Data from Direct Visual, Liquid Penetrant,
.
and Magnetic Particle Examination, IX-FE-116-0.
SWR 1, Recording Indications from Ligaments, Bolting, and
.
Piping Weld Examinations, IX-FE-117-1.
SWR 1, Onsite NDT Records Control X-FE-101-1.
.
SWR 1, Control of Nuclear Inspection Equipment and Materials,
.
XIII-AG-101-1.
SWR 1, Data Storage and Retrieval, XVII-AG-101-1.
.
SWR 1, Liquid Penetrant Examination Color Contrast Method,
.
NDT-200-1, Revision 54.
_.. __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
~.
.-. _ _
-
_..
_
%
.
SWR 1, Dry Power Magnetic Particle Examination, NDT-300-1,
.
Revision 24.
.
SWR 1, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Pressure Piping Welds,
.
NDT-600-3, Revision 59.
SWR 1, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Ferritic Pressure Vessel
.
Welds, NDT-600-41, Revision 2.
SWR 1, Manual Ultrasonic Examination of Thin Wall Piping Welds
.
!
NDT-800-36, Revision 26.
!
!
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Material and Equipment Certification The inspector reviewed the certification documents relative to the following items:
l Ultrasonic instruments, calibration blocks, transducers
.
and couplant Liquid penetrant, magnaflux materials, penetrant, cleaner j
.
and developer
,
.
Magnetic particle, magnaflux materials and equipment.
.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
NDE Personnel Certifications and Observation of Work Activities The inspector reviewed several SWRI NDE personnel certifications in accordance with SNT-TC-1A, 1975 Edition.
i The inspector observed the work and had discussions with personnel during review of ultrasonic examination of the Recirculation Loop A, Weld #FW-RD-2-A9, 28".
These observations included calibrations, performance of the examinations, and the documentation.
5.
Review of Data Reports and Audits
.
The inspector reviewed data reports and determined that they demon-
'
strated that the QA/QC requirements were met.
The inspector also reviewed DECO surveillance reports of the PSI.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Exit Interview i
The inspector met with site representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspection. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection noted in this report.
-
.-_
-
.-
-
-
---.
...
.
-
.-
- - - - - -. -
..
-