IR 05000334/1982015
| ML20055B987 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 07/23/1982 |
| From: | Crocker H, Wojnas E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20055B985 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-334-82-15, NUDOCS 8208100017 | |
| Download: ML20055B987 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ - _ - _ _ _
.
O U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Region I Report No. 82-15 Docket No. 50-334 License No. DPR-66 Priority Category C
!
Licensee: puquesne Light Company Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Facility Name: Beaver Valley Power Station Inspection At: Shippingport, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted:
July 14 - 15, 1982 Inspectors:
A.d.
h Ao 7/73/E9-Edward J. Wojnas, EPS', RI date' signed Approved by:
M Ch D h --
H. W. Crockeh-Ch'ief, Emergency
' 'date !I1gned Preparedness Section, DEPOS Inspection Summary:
Inspection on July 14 - 15, 1982 (Report No. 50-344/82-15)
Area Inspected: Special, announced emergency preparedness inspection and observation of the licensee's small scale exercise with Columbiana County, Ohio. The inspection involved 12 inspection hours by one Region I inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
"
8208100017 820727 PDR ADOCK 05000334 G
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
__
_
_
___ _. _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
___
_-_
- __ - _____
.
s.
l
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Exercise Function J. Maracek, Senior Licensing Emergency Planner Engineer, Emergency Planning Supervisor J. Sieber, Manager, Nuclear Safety Emergency Recovery Manager and Licensing R. Vento, Radiological Programs Environmental Assessment and Dose Coordinator Projection Coordinator S. LaVie, Senior Health Physics Environmental Assessment and Dose Specialist Projection. Assistant A. Maken, Associate Health Environmental Assessment and Dose Physicist Projection Assistant H. McCohy, Health Physics Environmental Assessment and Dose Specialist Projection Assistant J. West, Engineer, Station and Records and Communications Coordinator Testing C. McFeaters, Engineer, Station Records and Communications Assistant and Testing B. Tracey, Engineer, Station and Records and Communications Assistant Testing T. Dometrovich, Engineer, Station Records and Communications Assistant and Testing
.
A. Burger, Engineer, Station and Status Board Keeper Testing 8. Huston, Engineer, Station and Status Board Keeper Testing C. Makowka, Engineer, Station and Status Board Keeper Testing B. Collins, Engineer, Station and Status Board Keeper Testing F. Skelepar, Director of Community Public Information Department Programs
.
.
Persons Contacted Exercise Function B. Kukovick, Community Relations Public Information Department Representative J. Sasala, Nuclear Information Public Information Department Specialist K. Jurkovic, Copywriter Public Information Department C. McCarroll, Emergency Response Public Information Department Facilities Display Material T. Palmieri, Editor of the Public Information Department Duquesne l.ight News J. Lukehart, Security Security Coordinator S. Brown, Security Security Assistant B. Mishka, Security Security Assistant 2.
Emergency Exercise The Beaver Valley Power Station small-scale Emergency Exercise was conducted on July 14, 1982, from 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
a.
Pre-Exercise Activities The licensee indicated that essential operational personnel wmld not participate in the exercise because of the limited scope of the exercise and the plant was in operation.
The licensee coordinated the exercise scenario with the various participating agencies.
The scenario included a primary to secondary leak in the "B" steam generator, an operational basis earthquake, and a fire in the diesel generator building which caused a station blackout.
Based on the above findings, this portion of the licensee's exercise program appeared to be acceptable.
b.
Exercise Observations During the conduct of the exercise, one NRC auditor made detailed observations of the establishment and staffing of emergency response
facilities, as well as actions of emergency response personnel during the operation of the emergency response facilities.
The following activities were observed:
J
,
_.,, -
.e.,
-
e
-, - -
-
- -,
a
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
-
.
.
'
(1) detection, classification, and assessment of the events making up the scenario; (2) direction and coordination of emergency response; (3) notification of licensee personnel and offsite agencies (Columbiana County, Ohio) of pertinent information; (4) assessment and projection of radiological (dose) data and consideration of protective actions; (5) performance of technical support; and (6) provision of information to the public.
The NRC auditor noted that the licensee's activation of the emer-gency organization, establishment of the emergency response facilities, and actions and use of the facilities were generally consistent with their emergency response plan and implementing procedures.
c.
Exercise Critique The auditor met with the licensee on July 15, 1982 and identified areas for improvement which included the following:
1.
Siren operability (twelve of 13 activated sirens did not work);
and 2.
Coordination of news releases between the licensee and public information personnel in the Columbiana County E0C.
The licensee indicated that the problem encountered with the siren system i
had been corrected.
The auditor also attended a critique conducted on July 14, 1982 by State and County officials at the Columbiana County EOC in the Negley Elementary School, Negley, Ohio.
l 3.
Exit Meeting and NRC Critique t
l The auditor met with Mr. J. Sieber on July 15, 1982, and summarized the purpose scope and findings of the inspection, as well as the deficiencies described in Section 1.c of this report.
The licensee was also informed that their performance in the exercise demonstrated that they could implement their Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures in a manner which would adequately provide for the health and safety of the public.
Licensee management acknowledged the findings and indicated that evaluation and resolution of the identified deficiencies would begin immediately.
- - -
.
-.
-
-