IR 05000329/1979022
| ML19260C273 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1979 |
| From: | Knop R, Naidu K, Vandel T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19260C262 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-329-79-22, 50-330-79-2, NUDOCS 7912260137 | |
| Download: ML19260C273 (18) | |
Text
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-329/79-22; 50-330/79-22 Docket No. 50-329; 50-330 License No. CPPR-81; CPPR-82
'
Licensee:
Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, MI 49201 Facility Name: Midland Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Midland Site, Midlan'd, MI Inspection Conducted:
Oc ober 1,0-12, 1979 k
t 6::.-
'
Inspectors:
T. E. Vandel
/[-l"/ 'N-n p
!
K.R.Na'i[^
/C E 6,!N L77fI<...Yir~
/""
' "/' '
"~ * '""
- CN<
J.s E. I. Gallaghe
[C N' 73 g
/
/
Accompanying Personnel:
R. C. Knop D. W. Hayes f(
- fi ; t,
,
Approved by:
R. C. Knop, Chief
.
'
Projects Section 1 Inspection Summary Inspection on October 10-12, 1979 (Report No. 50-329/79-22; 50-330/79-22)
Areas Inspected:
Installation of safety related electrical and instrument components, and records review of electrical components; safety related and reactor coolant piping; qualification of QC Inspectors performing inspections 1616 249 79122 60 / 3 [
.
of containment post tensioning installation and follow up review of previously
.
identified unresolved and noncompliance items.
The inspection involved a total of 84 inspector-hours onsite by four NRC inspectors.
Results: One item of noncompliance (Infraction, lack of weld rod control)
was identified in one area of the ten areas reviewed.
s 1616 250-2-
.
DETAILS
.
Persons Contacted Consumers Power Company Personnel
- B. Marguglio, Corporate QA Director
- D. B. Miller, Site Manager
'
- T. C. Cooke, Project Superintendent W. R. Bird, Quality Assurance Section Head
- D. R. Keating QA Mechanical Supervisor B. H. Peck, Construction Supervisor
- D. D. Balinsky, QA Electrical Supervisor
- E.
L. Jones, QA Electrical Bechtel Power Corporation Personnel P. Corcoran, Resident Engineer
- 0. H. Holman, Project Superintendent
- W. L. Barclay, Project Field QC Engineer
- J. J. Gilmartin, Assistant Project Field Engineer
- R. C. Hollar, Lead QA Engineer K. L. Bishop, Lead Welding Engineer M. E. Velastequi, Assistant Project Engineer B&W Personnel R. Shope, QC Supervisor W. A. Willman, QC Engineer
- Denotes those prestnt at the various exit meetings held on October 11 and 12, 1979.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Items (Closed) Unresolved (329/79-10-02; 330/79-10-02): Unavailable quality records relative to performance tests on prestressing system; item 1 required certified tests at low temperature to substantiate that caps will not fail or leak when ti.ted to pumping pressure.
Inryco test report dated May 15, 1974 was made available.
Tests indicated no leakage or failure of grease can 170W18B when tested to pumping pressure. This item is considered resolved.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (329/78-04-02; 330/78-04-02): Class 1E components not uniquely identified to assure compliance with 10 CFR 50.55(h), (IEEE279-1971 paragraphs 1.0 and 4.22) and IEEE336 paragraph 5.1.1(12).
CPCo has 1616 251-3-
elected to use color as a means of uniquely identifying these components.
,
The inspector determined that the construction has started identifying the electrical class 15 equipment. Two 4.16KV switchgear sections and several junction boxes were observed to be identified with color coded nameplates. The progress of the identification program will be reviewed during future inspections as a part of the routine inspection program, however this item is considered resolved.
(Closed) Unresolved (330/78-05-01):
Confirmation was requested that the
'
weld details of two hangers indicated on sketches 1-657-1-23 and 1-657-6-1 met the design criteria.
Engineering calculations were available for review and it was determined that the welds were adequately sized.
The inspector observed the hanger installation in the field and determined that the hanger installation including the welds conformed to the drawings.
(Open) Unresolved Item (329/78-06-01; 330/78-06-01): The use of G-321-D forms relative to electrical class 1E equipment.
Licensee to audit Bechtel Ann Arbor on three items. The licensee has not completed the evaluation.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (329/78-06-02; 330/78-06-02):
Clarification of the proposed Bechtel disposition for Nonconformance Report NCR 1207 (con-cerning cable clearances within class IE electrical cabinets evaluation to QEV-16). The qualification test requirements of Underwriter's Labora-tories for 94V-0 to qualify for the TV Board was reviewed and determined acceptable. The TV Board has not yet been used in the control board to maintain separation criteria. The inspector has no further questions at this time. This item is considered closed; however, the progress of the wiring installation will be covered during routine inspections to verify that the separation criteria is met.
(Closed) Item of Noncompliance (329/78-15-01; 330/78-15-01):
Nelson Studs were repaired but not tested to AWS D1.1 requirements. As indicated in CPCo's letter, Howe-31-79 dated February 1, 1979, Bechtel Project Engineering concluded Nelson Studs which did not have 360 fillet welds were acceptable "as is."
Bechtel in a letter dated December 22, 1978, informed CPCo that to comply with AWS D1.1 code, the incomplete fillet welds were repaired and therefore even though they were not tested they are acceptable since they would meet the intended design requirements.
(Closed) Noncompliance (329/79-12-09; 330/79-12-09):
Inadequate Weld Procedure specification (WPS) review. The Zack WPS M-B-QC22 has been revised and Revision 3, dated May 25, 1979 correctly refers to paragraph 5A.
As a followup, CPCo reviewed other WPS used by Zach and documented their findings in a letter dated September 17, 1979 to Bechtel.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (330/78-16-02): Ultrasonic thickness examination for spool No. 2ELB-12-SE32-3-1. The inspector reviewed documents from Bechtel Power Corporation approving the use of the 2 1/8" thick wall pipe 1616 252-4-
based on the allowable tolerance of a 2 3/8" nominal wall thickness
-
required by the design specification. The document further stated that it is ITT Grinnell's practice rot to record the exact location of the measurement if the minimum wall thickness is met.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (330/79-17-01):
Postweld Heat Treatment Records.
The inspector reviewed the corrective action taken and the Reports of Nonconformity.
It was determined that proper corrective action was taken s
and the Reports of Nonconformity were closed.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (329/79'17-01; 330/79-17-02):
Welders Qualification Records. The inspector was informed that the welding department is reviewing all the welders qualification records and expected to complete by October 26, 1979 and the Quality Control Department will complete their review by November 9, 1979.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (329/78-04-01; 330/78-04-01): Electrical raceway system not included on the 'Q'
list.
NRR in a letter dated August 21, 1979 clarified the regulation that cable raceways and raceway supports for Class 1E cables are considered safety related and as such must be designed, fabricated and installed under the requirements of the Midland QA program. The unresolved item identified two areas of concern namely relative to electrical raceways and the other relative to the grounding one of electrical raceways. The latter is not considered safety related by NRR and this part is considered closed.
Pending the review of test results and other documentation to establish that the design and fabrication of the cable trays meets seismic requirements this item remains open.
(Closed) Unresolved (329/78-05-01; 330/78-05-02): Documentation on the
'O' ring seals used in the electrical penetrations was not available.
The inspector reviewed a letter from Parker Seal Company dated July 3, 1973 and a graph showing the relationship between the o/o compression set and radiation exposure for various material including silicone rubber type S 604. Additionally, a Parker Seal Company laboratory report K 10 U63A dated May 24, 1973 indicated that S 604 material successfully withstood the environmental tests.
(Closed) Unresolved (329/78-05-03); 330/78-05-04):
Information was requested whether the Spent Fuel Pool Liner Plate installation was safety related.
In a letter (I.E. G. W. Reinmuth to R. T. Carlson dated February 6, 1979 AITS F12193H1 and F30382H1) from IH: Headquarters, it was stated that the Spent Fuel Pool Liner Plate installation was not considered to be safety related.
(0 pen) Noncompliance Item (50-329/78-17-01; 50-330/78-1/-01): Personnel Airlocks improper welding of stiffeners.
It was determined that engineering and corrective actions activity is still in progress with nine separate items of corrective action outlined in Consumers Power Company memo to Bechtel Power Corporation dated September 27, 1979.
Further review will be conducted during future inspections.
1616 253-5-
(Opea) Noncompliance Item (50-329/78-03-01; 50-330/78-03-01): Welding
,
Voltage and current monitoring system.
Review established that; (1)
procedure modifications (procedure FPW-6.000 revision 1 approved August 14, 1979) appeared adequate, (2) completion of disposition and close out of (M-01-9-9-004, M-01-4-9-030 and M-01-4-9-011) also appeared to be acceptable with weld rod size apparent problems determined to be documentation errors and with acceptable voltage range having been adjusted in the welding procedures. During witnessing of a surveillance check of a welding machine in Unit 2 containment, the NRC inspector observed that
,
the voltage and current values were in acceptable range and that the weldor was qualified to the procedure in use and had been issued the correct rod.
However, the inspector was unable to establish the serial number of the welding unit checked.
In response to questioning, it was determined that there have been a number of instances where welding units do not have serial numbers.
It was understood that the licensee will give consideration to redeveloping a serial system for all welding units.
This item will be reviewed further during future inspections.
(Closed) Noncompliance Item (330/78-05-05): Welding electrode observed on Elevation 598' of Unit 2 Containment. A Bechtel Power Corporation letter dated July 27, 1978 from the Project Manager to all site Supervisors and Foremen reinstructing them that the weld filler material control must be complied with.
Noncomformance reports were reviewed for evidence of further activity regarding control and it was found that a total of eight NR's have been issue regarding enforcement of such control.
It was learned from the Lead Welding QC Engineer that weld rod control is included as a subject in all training sessions and that training sessions are held approximately once a month.
A tout was conducted of the 598' level of Unit 2 containment with the following results:
1.
All weldors observed had the portable weld rod holders with them (contaaining the issued rod) along with their stub buckets for proper disposal of used rod.
2.
No evidence was found of stubs or rod being scattered on the floor.
3.
Considerable welding was in progress in the area, mostly by B&W craftsmen.
4.
Discussions with weldors established that they were aware of the weld rod control requirements.
The inspector concluded that this item has been satisfactorily resolved.
1616 254-6-
.
Section I
,
Prepared by E. W. K. Lee Reviewed by D. H. Danielson, Chief Engineering Support Section 2 s
1.
ASME Certification The inspector established that (1) Bochtel Power Corporation (Bechtel)
is a NA certificate holder for classes 1, 2 and 3 at the Midland site and the certificate expires on August 12, 1980- (2) Bechtel is a NPT certificate holder for classes 1, 2, 3 and MC at the Midland site and the certificate expires on August 12, 1980; (3) Babcock and Wilcox Construction Company (B&WCC) is a NA and NPT certificate holder for classes 1, 2, 3 and CS at the Midland Site and the certifi-cate expires on August 3, 1982.
2.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and Safety Related Piping - Review of Quality Records (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector reviewed Bechtel Power Corporation pipe storage surveil-lance records for periods between January 1978 and September 1979.
It was determined that the records indicated inspection of stored piping were made at the required frequency and storage requirements were maintained.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Observation of Welding Activities (Unit 2)
The inspector observed welding activities of the Decay Heat Removal and Core Flooding System weld No. 6 on drawing No. M-611, sheet 2 and the Makeup and Purification System weld No. I on drawing No. M-604, sheet 3.
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with traveler; (2) proper welding materials were used; (3) welding procedure requirements were met; (4) work area was free of weld rod-stubs; and (5) physical appearance was acceptable.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Visual Examination of Welds (Unit 2)
a.
Visual Examination The inspector visually examined the following completed welds:
1616 255
.,_
.
(1) Decay Heat Removal and Core Flooding System line No.
,
2CCA-21, welds No. 12, No. 17 and No. 19.
(2) Decay Heat Removal and Core Flooding System line No.
2CCA-20, welds No. 3, No. 5, No. 6, No. 7, No. 8, No. 9 and No. 10.
It was determined that (1) weld surface and appearance were
,
acceptable and there was no evidence of wall thinning due to grinding; and (2) are strikes and weld spatter were not evident.
b.
Review of Records The inspector reviewed weld data sheets for the following welds:
(1) Decay Heat Removal and Core Flooding System, line No.
2CCA-21, welds No. 12 and No. 14.
(2) Decay Heat Removal and Core Flooding System, line No.
2CCA-20, welds No. 3, No. 5, No. 6, No. 9 and 10.
It was determined that (1) the records indicated specified inspections were completed, and (2) records are clear and legible.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping - Welder Qualification (Unit 2)
The inspector established that Babcock and Wilcox Construction a.
Company procedure for qualification of welders has not been revised since the last review.
(IE Inspection Reports No.
50-329/79-17 and No. 50-330/79-17, paragraph 3).
b.
The inspector reviewed qualification record of nine welders performed welding on welds stated in paragraphs 4.b. of this report.
It was determined that the above documents met the requirements of ASME B&PV Code Section IX.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6 256-8-
.
6.
Safety Related Piping - Observation of Work and Work Activities
(Units 1 and 2)
a.
Installed Pipe Run The inspector observed the installed Unit 2 Make-up and Purifi-cation System, line No. 4"-2CCB-1 from the Make-up Pump 2P-58B to valve No. 404-2-007.
It was determined that the as installed configuration does not resemble the one as indicated on drawing
'
No. M-604 sheet 6, revision 6/F2. Upon much research, it was established that the configuration was changed by a drawing change notice dated April 19, 1978, apparently after the pipe was installed in accordance with the old configuration. Detailed discussion was conducted with the licensee and his contractor relative to a mechanism of tracking such a change, other than depending on the final "workdown" to discover them. The licensee contractor agreed to study the matter. This matter is considered unresolved pending a review during a subsequent inspection.
(50-330/79-22-01)
b.
Work Activities The inspector observed the weld end preparation of Unit 1 Service Water System, welds No. 36 and No. 37 on drawing Nc.
M-619, sheet 12 and Main Steam System spool No. 1-ELB-9-S-631-1-9.
It was determined that work activities were performed in accordance with the applicable procedures and good construction practices were adhered to.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified 7.
Safety Related Piping - Observation of Welding Activities (Unit 2)
The inspector observed the following welding activities:
Fit-up of Feedwater System welds No. 9L, No. 9U, No. 16L and a.
No. 16U.
b.
Welding of Decay Heat and Core Flooding System welds No. 47 and and No. 50 on drawing No. M-611, sheet 1.
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with traveler; (2)
proper welding materials were used; (3) welding procedure requirements were met; (4) work area was free of weld rod-stubs; and (5) physical appearance was acceptable.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
1616 257-9-
8.
Safety Related Piping - Special Welding Applications (Units 1 and2 The inspector observed the following repair work activities:
Grinding of weld defect of Unit 2, Feedwater and Condensate a.
System, weld No. 36R1 on drawing No. M-639, sheet 14.
b.
Weld repair of Unit 2, Feedwater and Condensate System, weld No. 57R1 on drawing No. M-639, sheet 13.
,
c.
Grinding of weld defect of Unit 1, Decay Heat Removal and Core Flooding System, weld No. 2, on drawing No. M-610, sheet 1.
d.
Weld repair of Unit 1, Make-up and Purification System, weld No. 68C1 on drawing No. M-603, sheet 5.
It was determined that (1) work was conducted in accordance with traveler; (2) proper materials were used and (3) procedure requirements were met.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Control of Welding Materials (Unit 2)
While touring the Unit 2 Containment Building, the inspector noted two portable ovens containing E-7018 welding rods were not energized.
This condition is considered an item of noncompliance as stated in Appendix A.
(330/79-22-02)
1616 258
- 10 -
.
Section II
.
Prepared by K. R. Naidu Reviewed by D. W. Hayes, Chief Engineering Support Section I s
1.
Observation of Electrical Activities The inspector observed the cables stored in the Poseyville lay a.
down area and determined the following:
(1) All the cable reels were stored on dunnage off the ground.
(2) Cable reels suspected of having water in one of the phases were identified with a hold tag.
(3) The ends of the cables on the reels were capped.
b.
The inspector observed the installed cable trays in the lower spreading room, in particular one section of the cable tray in which two cable trays were welded with fillet attachment welds.
The installation reflects the requirements of drawings E-747 (Q) Sheet 1 sections A and D; the welds are per detail 3 of drawing E-795.
Instructions on the final touch up of the completed welds are given in Notes 6 and 9A of E-42 (Q) Sheet 2.
The inspector observed modifications in progress for two NEMA c.
size 3 starters manufactured and supplied by Gould. This item was reported per 10 CFR Part 21 by Gould and involves seisure or binding of the carrier assembly (P/N 401179) within the support plate (P/N 401178) of the stationary contact assembly because the required 1.392" dimension is undersized to 1.376".
d.
The inspector reviewed a procedure titled, " Drying Solid Dielec-tric Cable" which is recommended by the manufacturer to dry cables with water in them. The procedure suggests two methods; to either apply four psi Nitrogen pressure for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or to apply 15 to 20 psi Nitrogen pressure for six hours. At the end of the test, when no traces of moisture is observed, a desiccant is attached to the other end of the cable for a minimum period of 20 minutes.
The color of the desiccant, whether it remains blue or turns pink, indicates whether the cable is dry or contains moisture respectively. The results of these tests performed on cables on site will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
1616 259
- 11 -
.
No items of noncompliance were identified in the above area.
,
2.
Review of QA Records a.
The inspector reviewed the records relative to the cables supplied by Essex International to meet the requirements of specification E-22.
(1) Material Receiving Report #AE0-4611 dated October 2, 1977
'
indicates that 2194 feet of 3/C 350 MCM and 2280 feet of 3/C 2/0 AWG ethylene propylene insulated neoprane jacket were received on site.
(2) Quality Control Inspection Report R-1.00-2095 dated October 3, 1977 identifies no shipping damaga.
(3) Certified Test Reports from Essex International Wire and
~
Cable indicate that the following requirements were met:
(a) Bechtel Specification E-22, IPCEA 5-68-516 and IPCEA 5-19-81 section 4.13.3.
(b) Cable meets the radiation requirements specfied in IEEE 323-1974.
(c) Cable meets the vertical flame test requirements of IEEE 383-1976.
(d) Initial physical properties of the jacket, sheath and insulation materials were tested and were within the specified acceptable limits.
(e) The cable successfully withstood high voltage AC and DC tests.
(4) Supplier Deviation Disposition Request (SDDR) was initiated on June 10, 1976 requesting waiver to attaching the actual ambient condition test report and the Isomedrix/Essex report RSX-1; the prototype test reports were submitted to Bechtel on June 11, 1976.
The SDDR was approved.
b.
The inspector reviewed the documentation of the Battery Room Air handling units and determined the following:
(1) Specification 7220-M-149 (Q) Revision 6 dated April 20, 1979 for Air Handling units to cool the temperature of the battery room.
Demineralized water is used to cool ~the coils. The identifications of the battery room unit coolers are IVM-40A & B and 2VM-40A & B.
I616 260
- 12 -
.
(2) MRR #AE0-4487 dated October 10, 1977 indicates that the said equipment was received without shipping damage.
(3) QC1R-1.00-2136 dated October 10, 1977 indicates that receipt inspection was performed and identifies no adverse findings.
(4) Certificates of conformance from The Trane Company indicate
,
that the air handling unit meets the specification requirementr..
(5) Westinghouse Electric Company order #MP-61164 W18 indicates that the 211P TBEP model squirrel cage motor in the above equipment is an explosion proof Class 1, Group D motor suitable for use in hazardous atmosphere such as Hydrogen which may be present in the battery room.
The inspector discussed the accuracy of the statements in c.
paragraphs 7.2.2.2 and 7.2.2.2.3 on page 7.2.17 in the Midland FSAR for conformance to IEEE 323 and 1EEE 383. A Bechtel electrical engineer from the Ann Arbor office verified and informed the inspector that paragraphs 7.2.2.2 and 7.2.2.3 should refer the reader to subsection 7.1.2.4 instead of subsections 7.1.2.17 and 7.1.2.16.
It was stated that this error will be corrected in a subsequent revision.
No items of noncompliance were identified in the above areas.
1616 261
- 13 -
.
,
Section III Prepared by E. J. Gallagher Reviewed by D. W. Hayes, Chief Engineering Support Section 1 s
1.
Qualifications of QC Inspectors for Prestressing Work Activity During NRC inspection dated September 11-14, 1979 (Report Nos.
329/79-19; 330/79-19) an item of noncompliance relative to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II was issued regarding qualification of certain quality control inspectors performing inspection of the containment prestressing system.
Subsequent to that inspection, it was agreed that the individuals in question would be relieved from such duties until further evaluation of the requirements and their inspection functions by Consumers Power Company and the Region III NRC office.
On October 9, 1979 Consumers Power Company informed the RIII office that the QC inspectors had been given intensified on-the-job training of the specific inspection characteristics and prestressing system requirements. Consumers Power requested that the NRC visit the site and reviev the adequacy of this additional qualification.
In an effort to accomodate this request, the NRC inspector prepare 6 a series of questions based on the requirements of Quality Control Inspection Procedure (QCI) 9.10 and Field Installation Manual C.2 146-9 in order to evaluate the level of knowledge of prestressing inspectors.
Consu.ners Power Company and Bechte) agreed to administer these prepared questions to a total of eight QC inspectors of which five were Level I and three Level II.
These inspectors were directly involved with the inspection and review of the prestressing system.
Consumers Power Company administered the questions in the form of a written, closed book examination. All questions on the examination were taken directly from the field installation manual and quality control instructions.
It is recognized that these references are available and can be referred to during actual field inspections.
However, some criteria is required to be known so that an immediate direct go no go decision can be made.
The licensee indicated that all QC inspectors agreed to participate in the examination.
The results of that examination are included in Appendix A.
The general areas of the examinations dealt with tendon installation, button neading criteria, tendon stressing and tendon greasing operations.
The results indicate that certain QC inspectors, both Level I and Level II do not have the required level of understanding of the specific characteristics which they are required to implement routinely.
1616 262
- 14 -
..
.
In an effort to evaluate the previous field inspection performance
,
of the individuals in question, the following reinspection on selected completed work was performed as per Bechtel letter dated September 25, 1979.
Reinspection of Dome Tendons - The following dome tendon which a.
had prev,iously been stressed and complete were visually rein-spected for installation of shims, buttonhead count, bearing plate and shim placement:
'
D102-2 D-124-2 D-224-2 D110-2 D-128-2 D-228-2 D114-2 D-129-2 D-301-2 D118-2 D-208-2 D-302-2 D120-2 D-212-2 D-306-2 D121-2 D-216-2 D-310-2 D122-2 D-220-2 D-314-2 The results of this reinspection indicated no additional devi-ations that had not been identified during the original inspection.
b.
Accessible Tendon Not Stressed - Buttonheads on Tendons H-13-253, H-13-251, and H-13-249 that had repairs were reinspected for the buttonhead criteria. The results indicated no additional defective buttonheads.
In addition, the licensee reviewed the personnel qualifications record of all site QC inspectors and determined that the following procedural change be implemented:
The Bechtel certification procedure revised to require a person a.
be certified for each specific quality control procedure rather than the general discipline (i.e. civil, electrical, etc.) and that results from an oral and performance test be utilized for this certification.
b.
Procedure revised to establish methods for implementing oral and performance tests (e.g. type and number of questions and minimum oral and performance grades).
Procedure revised to require that formal training obtained at c.
sources other than Bechtel be verified and included in the certification package, d.
Procedure revised to indicate when an individual certification has lapsed and that the individual is no longer assigned to such inspections.
1616 263
- 15 -
.
Based on the foregoing examination of quality control personnel, it
.
remains the NRC position that:
Quality control personnel who have performed and currently are a.
performing inspections on the containment prestressing system are not qualified in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.58 and ANSI N45,2.6, in that, the required prior related education or related experience has not been satisfied.
,
b.
Suitable proficiency has not been demonstrated as evidenced by the results of the written examination administered by the licensee.
This item remains an item of noncompliance as previously identified.
(Inspection Report 329/79-19-01; 330/79-19-01).
Unresolved Matters Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompil-ance or deviations. An unresolved item disclosed during this inspection is discussed in Section I, paragraph 6.a.
Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in the Persons Contacted paragraph) at various times during their inspection activities.
The scope and purpose of the inspections were outlined along with the summarizations of the results of the inspections. The licensee represen-tatives acknowledged the indicated results.
Attachment: Appendix A, Results of Examination jfjf ]g4
- 16 -
.
APPENDIX A
.
RESULTS OF EXAMINATION Individual A
B.
C D
E F
G H
Level I
I I
II II II I
I s
Question No.
Results General Inspection Area
Bearing Plate
Tendon Installation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Quality Acceptance Level
Tendon Wire Condition
X Buttonheading Review Criteria
Y X
Buttonheading Review Criteria 7a X
X X
Buttonheading Review Criteria b
X X
X Buttonheading Review Criteria
X X
X X
Buttonheading Review Criteria 9a X
X X
Tendon Wire Cut-Off Lengths b
X Tendon Wire Cut-Off Lengths c
X X
X X
X Tendon Wire Cut-Off Lengths
Tendon Wire Cut-Off Lengths lla X
X Buttonhead Conditions b
X Buttonhead Conditions e
X X
X Buttonhead Conditions
X X
X X
Tendon Material
Buttonhead Criteria 14a X
Buttonhead Criteria b
X lX X
Buttonhead Criteria 1616 265 Attachment Page 1 of 2
.
Individual A
B C
D E
F G
H
,
Level I
I I
II II II I
I Question No.
Results General Inspection Area c
Buttonhead Criteria d
Buttonhead Criteria
'
e X
X X
X X
X X
Buttonhead Criteria
X X
Buttonhead Criteria
Shim Placement Criteria
Tendon Elongation
Grease Temperatures
Rebuttonhead Criteria 20a Buttonhead Definition b
Buttonhead Definition Note:
Blank - Correctly answered
"X" - incorrectly answered question 3 eliminated as not applicable to QC inspectors 1616 266 Attachment Page 2 of 2
,