IR 05000324/1980017

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-324/80-17 & 50-325/80-20 on 800428-0501 & 06-08.Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Maintain Clear Isolation Zone & Inoperative Locking Device on Protected Area Barrier.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML19330B815
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  
Issue date: 05/22/1980
From: Gillespie F, Moore D, Tobin W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19330B806 List:
References
50-324-80-17, 50-325-80-20, NUDOCS 8008070024
Download: ML19330B815 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. }STFW.t TPr*/".TD ICJ'UITH , (_)/ C0!n.".3 2.73 i,J.2:. i!DN ... ' o UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

r REGION 6

'* 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o% / ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 .....f .. Ui AY 'i. '<3 10be Report Nos. 50-325/80-20 and 50-324/80-17 Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Facility Name: Brunswick 1 and 2 Inspection at: Southport, North Carolina Inspection conducted: April 28 - May 1, and May 6-8, 1980 . Date of Last Physical Security Inspection Visit: June 6-8, 1979 Type of Inspec n: Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors _ _ h f 8'd D. E. Moore ' , ' ~ Matd bl4L WW - 'J.

in / 'Date .- L 53M[[lO Approved by: F.7. Gill (spie, AcKng Chief, Security Section 'Date Inspection Summary Areas Inspected: Included review of security plan; protected area physical barriers; vital area physical barriers; lighting; access control (identifica-tion, authorization and badging); access control (searching); access control (vital areas); detection aids; communications; testing and maintenance; compen-satory measures; power supply; response; records and reports.

, . ~ The inspection involved 91 inspector hours onsite by two NRC inspectors. Fifteen inspector hours were accomplished during offshif t periods.

Results: Of the fourteen areas inspected, no apparent items of noncompliance were disclosed in eight areas; six apparent items of noncompliance were identified in thr a areas.

1.

Physical Barriers - Failure to maintain isolation zone clear of objects (325/80-20-1).

2.

Physical Barriers Inoperative locking device on protected area (PA) - barrier (325/80-20-2).

d s-72~50.__r - Copies ' cerg 8008070 g 21/ M ' " rot to be IWar.t TU5'~~TG 13l5TH yre- "t :rxifi C0;ilaii'3 2.70 GiU2iaATlDii apprccalc: E.:n

~' -,_.~ _._. _.

. _. -... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _... _. _ _.. _ . ltaTGillTSP. TITE 3 !!-~1BYlT!{

  • -

... - c:.y.T;', :.T' '. ' !20:1 A ' -2- ' 3.

Access Control - Failure to search hand-carried packages (325/80-20-3).

4.

Access Control - Failure to follow procedures for vehicle access into PA (325/80-20-4).

5.

Detection Aids - Intrusion alarms at certain locations along the PA inoper-ative (325/80-20-5).

6.

Detection Aids - Tamper indicating devices did not perform in accordance with specifications (325/80-20-6).

. f I .

,

i ,. _ , MATRIALTRA.?!SEiiTTED !!UlB7lTil C0! TA!! 3 2.750 ii:70?.f.aT101 . _ -. _ _ }}