IR 05000324/1980009
| ML19323G489 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 04/14/1980 |
| From: | Blake J, Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323G486 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-324-80-09, 50-324-80-9, 50-325-80-10, NUDOCS 8006020575 | |
| Download: ML19323G489 (23) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:__ _- __-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ f
- o UNITED STATES g
p$ ( y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o E REGION 11 a# o
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 . J'g ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
- "*
APR 141980 Report Nos. 50-324/80-09 and 50-325/80-10 Licensee: Carolina Power & Light 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 . Facility Name: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Docket Nos. 50-324 and 50-325 License Nos. DPR-62 and DPR-71 Inspectio ru s c site near Southport, NC ~ Inspector: "U Y7
_,. J B R'e Da'te Signed Approved
- [[
9/4 A. R. Herdt W eo(io ief, RCES Branch Dat'e Yigned SUMMARY Inspection on March 17-20, 1980 i Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 25 inspector-hours on site in the j areas of Inservice Inspection Work Observation and Data Review, Inservice
Inspection Program Review, Torus Modification Work Observation.
Results > Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.. t
+.a k ~ & $,===< s s .I , 8006020 (7T . _ _ _ __ _ _ _.... _ _. _.. _
-. -. - -- . . DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- A.
C.. Tollison, Jr., General Manager -
- W. M. Tucker, Tech. and Adm. Manager
- R. M. Poulk, NRC Coordinator
- J. A. Padgett, Safety Director J. Hewett, Inservice Inspection Coordinator D. Allen, Operations QA Supervisor D. Watkins, Construction QA G. Chappel, Inservice Inspection Coordinator B. Hall, Construction QA
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on March 20, 1980 with i those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
The inspector expressed a concern about the weld inservice inspection (ISI) program (particularly the Class 2 and 3 systems) and the need for CP&L to establish a formal functional , alignment for the implementation of the program.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Item (50-324/80-07-02): Approval of procedure for safe-end inspection. The inspector verified that the unsigned procedure observed during the inspection of March 5-7, 1980 was being submitted for filing purposes. This item is closed.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Recirculation System Inlet Safe-End Inspection (Unit 2) 'a , ( ' The i'nspector reviewed the data and the interpretations of the results of I the safe-end inspections. There does not appear to be an appreciable changeinanyofthesafe-endssincethepreviousinspe,c, tion.
{ There were no items of noncompliance or deviations in this area of inspection.
a 6.
Inservice Inspection (Unit 2) , ! The inspector reviewed the status of the Class I weld inspections being conducted by Southwest Research Institute (SwRI). These inspections were being conducted . )
'~~ -_ -. - - - .. - ---.--,:--- - -- -- -- . -2- , in accordance with ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, 1974 Edition through summer 1975 addenda. The inspector reviewed the results of the inspections which had been completed by SwRI and verified the methods used in analyzing refectors which were greater than 100% of DAC. Data reviewed included the following: B-21-PS-24B weld 7 E-21-CS-10B Weld 11A E-41-HPCI-10 Supply weld 4
E-21-CS-10B Weld 5 There were no items of noncompliance or deviations in this area of the inspection.
7.
Inservice Inspection Program (Units 1 and 2) The inspector discussed the program for the inspection of both units with the site inservice inspection coordinator and the inservice inspecti(n i coordinator from the corporate offices. The primary topics of discussion (1) the status of the inspection program for the Class 2 and 3 were: systems; and (2) the results of a meeting held in the Raleigh Corporate Offices during the week of March 10 where the licensee decided to assign lead responsibility for inservice inspection to the individual sites.
These two items were of concern to the inspector because the Class 2 and 3 system program has not yet been implemented, and the assignment of lead responsibility to the site may require some reorganization on the part of site management to properly define the position of Inservice Inspection Coordinator. These concerns were addressed in the exit interview with site management where the inspector stated that the inservice inspection program would be considered incomplete without proper definition of the personnel and the functional alignment required to implement the program. The general manager agreed with the inspector and stated that the matter was in the process of being reviewed and defined.
8.
Torus Modifications (Unit 2) The inspector observed welding and inspection activities inside the unit 2 To rus. The observations included the welding of new structural supports, measuring of support alignment and weld size on structural fillets, and the methods used to record all inspection results and document items to be , ., corrected.
There were no items of noncompliance or deviations in,this area of the inspection.
, ' . - ! }}