IR 05000313/1978002
| ML19320A053 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 02/07/1978 |
| From: | Madsen G, Morris E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19320A050 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-313-78-02, 50-313-78-2, NUDOCS 8004140671 | |
| Download: ML19320A053 (2) | |
Text
..
-
.
....
.a
-
'O.
'
~~
._
p-p
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
-
.
Report Nos. 50-313/78-02; 50-368/78-0%
Docket Nos. 50-313 License No. DPR-51 50-368 Construction Permit No. CPPR-89 Licensee:
Arkansas Power & Light Company
-
P. O. Box 551
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Facility Name: Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 Inspection At: Corporate Office, Little Rock, Arkansas Meeting Conducted: January 31, 1978 M[
h I7/7#
Conducted By:
x li. Morris Howard, Director Date j
.
h$$4
' /7l79
.
J
<
G. L. Madsen, Chief, Reactor Operations &
Date
'
Nuclear Support Branch Summary:
_
-
Meeting on January 31, 1978 (Report Nos. 50-313/78-02; 50-368/78-02)
Scheduled meeting to discuss IE/AP&L interface experience and concerns. The
meeting involved four (4) hours at the corporate office by two (2) NRC personnel.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified.
,
!
.
a
'
e
%
i
,
8004140g
.
.
.
-
..
- -
-
e
.
_
-
.
U
.
DETAILS
.
,
1.
Meeting Attendance Arkansas Power and Light Company
W. Cavanaugh III, Executive Director, Generation & Construction D. A. Rueter, Director of Technical & Environmental Services D. R. Sikes, Director of Operations
,.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission E. M. Howard, Director, Region IV G. L. Madsen, Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch, RIV 2.
Purpose of Meeting Discussion of Inspection and Enforcement and Arkansas Power and Light in?.erface experiences and problems.
3.
Top'cs Discussed a.
The results of the recent GAO audit.
b.
The timeliness and content of responses to IE Bulletins.
c.
The timeliness of completion of 30 day LER reports.
d.
Problems associated with the constantly changing scheduled fuel loading date for ANO-2.
e.
Status of completion of ANO-2 test and operating procedures.
,
f.
The fuel inspection program for receipt of new fuel, during reshuffling of fuel at ANO-1, and Cycle 1 fuel to be used in the Cycle 3 operation of ANO-1.
g.
The need for more comprehensive responses to Notice of Violation letters. The experience regarding timeliness and incomplete status of previous correspondence was reviewed.
-
,
h.
The concern relating to the 24 a~ddenda to the approved Hot Functional Test procedure, which did not receive the same depth
-
of review as the original procedure.
a
.
.
.-
..
.
-.