IR 05000311/1995004

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That CAL Item 1 Requires Serts to Be Conducted on Unit 2 Rx Trip.Pse&G Contends That 951102 Submittal of LER 50-311/95-004-01 Should Suffice for CAL Item.Nrc Disagrees & Requests Any Comments
ML20138G868
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 12/26/1995
From: Larry Nicholson
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
NRC
Shared Package
ML20138G636 List:
References
FOIA-96-351 NUDOCS 9701030041
Download: ML20138G868 (1)


Text

_. _ _.... _

.

_. _..... _. _ _.

_ _._

_.._ _._ _..._..

.

,

-

'

,

'

l-

$

Lar[Nicholson From:

,

To:

SAP

)

Date:

12/26/95 4:31pm

Subject:

CAL ITEM #1 CAL ITEM #1 REQUIRES A SERT TO BE CONDUCTED ON THE UNIT 2 RX TRIP.

PSE&G IS CONTENDING THAT THE 11/2/95 SUBMITTAL OF THEIR LER 50-311/95-004-01 SHOULD SUFFICE FOR THIS CAL ITEM. I HAVE REVIEWED THIS LER AND FIND IT VERY NARROWLY FOCUSED, WITHOUT REFERENCING TO SUCH PROBLEMS AS THE STATION AND EMERGENCY AIR CONPRESSORS, UNAVAILABILITY OF THE STATION BLACKOUT COMPRESSOR, EXCESSIVE RCS

'

COOLDOWN, USE OF AUX SPRAY AND THE ASSOCIATED DELTA-T, UNAVAILABILITY OF THE STA, EOP'S NOT IAW OWNERS GUIDE, ETC.

ADDITIONALLY,1 FIND THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THEY DO SPECIFY SOMEWHAT NARROW & VAGUE. FOR EXAMPLE, A BROKE PM PROGRAM WAS A MAJOR PLAYER IN THIS EVENT, YET THEIR ACTION IS TO CREATE APPLICABLE PM'S FOR THIS SPECIFIC RELAY. ALSO, THEY COMMIT ONLY TO

"A REVIEW OF THE CURRENT PROCESS..." TO ROUTE VENDOR INFORMATION, WITHOUT DUE DATES OR RESULTS.

'

PLEASE AS SAP MEMBERS READ THE LER AND HELP ME DECIDE IF WE SHOULD PRESS THEM MORE ON THIS CAL ITEM. I WASN'T INVOLVED WHEN THE CAL WAS BORN, SO MAYBE I AM LEANING TOO FAR. THEY AT FIRST ASK ME IF THEY REALLY HAD TO DOCKET THEIR SERT RESULTS. I CONTEND WE NEED THE RESULTS ON THE DOCKET, ESPECIALLY SINCE IT IS A CAL ITEM.

ANY COMMENTS ARE APPRECIATED.

THANKS LARRY

~

\\

9701030041 961226 EI-351 PDR

\\

'

.

-

- -

...

-

--