IR 05000302/1985040

Insp Rept 50-302/85-40 on 850930-1004.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters,Qa/Qc Administration, Procurement & Receipt,Storage & Handling

ML20134A185
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	10/22/1985
From:	Belisle G, Moorman J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134A183	List: IR 05000302/1985040 ML20134A179
References
50-302-85-40, NUDOCS 8511040255
Download: ML20134A185 (9)

Text

,

,

l

'-

UNITED STATES

-.[/p'2 f tig*o,$

-

,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION il-g I MARIETTA STREET, * t ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323 .I

'+9 . . . . . hd Report No.: 50-302/85-40 Licensee: Florida Power Corporation

'

3201 34th Street, South St. Petersburg, FL 3373 Docket.No..: 50-302 License No.: DPR-72 Facility Name: Crystal River 3 Inspection Conducted;, Se tember 30 - October 4, 1985 Inspector: .

-7A 6 / O!) >!fd~

J. H. Moorma IE' / Date Signed Approved by: e s &

G. M Belisle,Wting Section Chief

/D!22-Dite Signed

[

3' A Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope: ~ This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 35 inspector-hours on site

.in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters; QA/QC admini-stration; procurement; and receipt, storage, and handlin Results: No violations.or deviations were identifie .

Y

/

i -(

.

/

.O ,/

8511040255 02 PDR AN 85 PDR O

- .. , - , - - . . . - - - . , . . . . . - . . - - - - , - . . . - . - - -

,

.

.

REPORT DETAILS . Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

.H. Barbour, Senior Quality Auditor

• P. Breedlove, Nuclear Records Management Supervisor

• J.'Bufe', Nuclear Compliance-Specialist-J. Davis, Storekeeper-

• D. Green, Nuclear Licensing Specialist

.

• V. Hernandez,- Senior Nuclear Quality Assurance (QA) Specialist

• K. Lancaster, Site Nuclear QA Manager

'W. Nielson, Senior Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) Supervisor

• G. Oberndorfer, Procurement QA Supervisor

• E. Renfro, Director, Nuclear Operations Material and Control

• C. Tillman, Nuclear Material Control Manager

~

• L.-Tiscione, Supervisor, Site Nuclear Engineering, Procurement Section D. Truett, Nuclear Calibration Laboratory Clerk i F. Wohlfahrt, Nuclear Material Inspector 0ther licensee employees contacted included technicians, and office personne Other Organizations

• Belisle, Acting Section. Chief, Division of Reactor Safety W. Dender, Project Engineering Services .

'1 NRC Resident Inspectors

• T. Stetka, Senior Resident Inspector

• J. Tedrow, Resident Inspector

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The' inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 4,1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected. The licensee acknowledged the inspection findings. The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or -

reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio , _ - . . . . . . - , - - . , , ,

.

. 2 Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters (92702)

(Closed) Severity Level IV Violation (302/85-13-01): Failure to Control

' Environmental-Conditions in the Calibration' Laborator The licenseec response dated May 17, 1985, was considered acceptable by Region II. .The inspector verified that NCL-01, Test Equipment, Standards, and Calibration Control, Revision 7, was revised to include requirements for control of . temperature and humidity in the calibration lab during the time that calibration - activities are being conducte The inspector also verified that . temperature and humidity in the . calibration lab were being monitored and recorde The inspector concluded that the licensee had determined the full extent of the violation, taken action to correct conditions, and developed corrective actions needed to preclude recurrence of , similar problems. Corrective actions stated in the licensee response have been implemented.

. QA/QC Administration (35751)_

References: (a) 10 CFR 50.54(a)(1), Conditions of Licenses (b) Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 1.7, Quality Program (Operational), Revision 5-(c) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for. Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants (d) Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)

(e) ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (f) Technical Specifications, Section 6 The: inspector reviewed the licensee QA/QC administration program required by references (a).through (f) to determine if the program had been established in - accordance with regulatory requirements and industry guides and standards. The following criteria were used during this review to determine the overall acceptability of the established program:

--

The QA program documents clearly identified those structures, systems, components, documents, and activities to which the QA program applie Procedures and responsibilities were established for making changes to QA program document .

,

-

Administrative controls for QA/QC . procedures required review and approval. prior. to implementation, control of revisions, and control of

. distribution and recal Responsibilities were established to assure overall evaluation of the effectiveness of the QA progra Methods existed to modify the QA program to provide increased emphasis-on identified problem area The documents listed below -were reviewed to determine if the previously listed criteria were ; incorporated into the . licensee's -QA/QC administration program:

Nuclear Quality Assurance Plan IADT Quality Program Including Audit and Follow-up Action Program, Revision 0 MGTR Management and Technical Review Program, Revision 0 PCDR Instructions and Procedures Requirements, Revision 0

-

Quality Programs Administrative Procedures

_

'

QAP-1 Organization and Responsibilities, Revision 5-QAP-2 Preparation and Control .of Procedures and Instructions, Revision 6 QAP-3 Writing Nuclear Quality Assurance Practices, Revision 9 QAP-16 Control of Quality Program Deficiency Reports, Revision 5 Safety Related Engineering-Procedures SREP-0 Introduction to Safety Related Engineering Proce-dures, Revision 6 Florida Power Corporation Safety Listing, Volume 1, 7/16/85 Florida. Power Corporation Safety Listing Supplement,. Volume 2 To . verify implementation of this program, the inspector interviewed members of the QA/QC staff and reviewed surveillances referenced in paragraphs 5 and It appeared that responsibilities were understood by personnel inter-viewed and that the surveillance program had flexibility to provide increased' emphasis on problem area Within this area,~no violations or deviations were identifie .

. 4 i Procurement Program (38701)

References: (a) 10 CFR 50.54(a)(1), Conditions of Licenses (b) ' Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 1.7, Quality Program (Operational), Revision 5 (c) '10. CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants (d) 10 CFR 21, Reporting of Defects and Noncompliance (e) Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)'

(f) ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (g) Regulatory Guide 1.123, Quality Assurance Require-ments for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Plants (h) ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants The inspector reviewed the licensee procurement program required by references (a) through (h) to determine if the program had been established .

in accordance with regulatory requirements, industry guides and standards,

- and commitments made in the applicatio The following criteria were used during this review to determine the overall acceptability of the established program:

-

Administrative controls were established to assign departmental responsibilities for procurement activitie Administrative controls were established to identify safety related equipment, supplies, consumables, and services to be procured under the licensee's QA progra Procedures were established to control the preparation, review, approval, and changes to procurement document Procedures were established to assure that vendors conform to procure-ment document requirements, industry standards and codes, and that nonconformances are reported and correcte Controls .were established to provide for audits and surveillances of procurement activitie l

.

. 5

'

.The .following documents were reviewed to determine if these criteria had been incorporated into the licensee program for- procurement of safety-

- - ~related items and services:

Nuclear Quality Assurance Plan

.PCMT Procurement, Revisio VADT Vendor Qualification Audit and Surveillance Program, Revision 1 Safety Related Engineering Procedures SREP-12 Applicability of 10 CFR Part 21 to Procurement Documents,- Revision 3 SREP-13 Safety Related Procurement Requisition Preparation, Review and Approval, Revision 6 Nuclear Procurement and Storage Manual, Revision 3 Approved Nuclear Supplies List (ANSL), 9/20/85-The -inspector examined the following procurement documents to determine if requirements specified in the above procedures had been implemented during the initiation, review, approval, and processing of purchase requisitions:

Purchase Order Date F9036246 8/7/85 F9030951 -2/22/85 F9033889- 6/5/85 F9036042 8/1/85 F9032095 9/9/85 F9030106 1/29/85 Vendor Audits Limitorque Corporation Hub In Joy Manufacturing C Quality Procrams Surveillance Reports Date Subject 83-TWC-12 3/30/84 Spare Decay Heat Pump DHP-1B 85-CHL-07 4/8/85 Overview Surveillance of Internals and Plenum Support Stand Fabrication, -

P. O. F9026398X

.

E

.

. 6 Quality Audit- ~QP-253, Procurement.(Purchasing and pre-receipt, handling,-storage and shipping) 7/3/84 Examination of the_above documents and interviews with licensee personnel

- confirmed that' licensee administrative controls and measures . were being implemented during the procurement of safety-related items and service Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie . Receipt,-Storage, and Handling of Equipment and Materials Program (38702)

References: (a) _10 CFR 50.54(a)(1), Conditions of Licenses (b) Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 1.7, Quality Program (Operational), Revision 5

.

(c) 10 CFR;50, Appendix B, Quality' Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing

~ Plants (d) Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)

(e) ANSI N18.7-1976, Administrative Controls' and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants (f) Regulatory- Guide 1.38, Quality Assurance Require-

'

ments for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plant (g) ANSI N45.2.2-1972,- Packaging, Shipping, Receiving,

• Storage, and Handling of Items for Nuclear Power -

Plants The inspector reviewed the licensee program and procedures required by references (a) through (g) to determine if controls had been established for receipt inspections, initiation' of nonconformance reports, disposition of nonconformances, handling, storage, and issue of safety-related equipmen The following' criteria were used during this review to determine the overall acceptability of the established program:

-

Administrative controls were established for conducting and documenting receipt inspections and reporting nonconformance Administrative controls were established for disposition of items, marking, storing, and protection of items during storag .

.

- ~7

-

Administrative controls were established for limited shelf-life items

and.for performing audits and surveys of storeroom activitie ~

-

Administrative controls. were established for qualification of Linspection personne The.following licensee documents were examined to. determine if the licensee had prepared procedures to control receipt inspections, handling, storage, maintenance, and protection of r'eactor plant items:

Nuclear Quality Assurance Plan INSP Inspection and Examination, Revision 0 MTLS . Materials, Parts, and Components _ Control, Revision 0 NCO Nonconforming Item Control and Corrective Actions, Revision 0-Quality Programs Administrative Procedures

'

QAP-29 . Source Surveillance Inspeciton of Nuclear- Fuel Assemblies and Related Parts, Revision 2 QAP-35 Quality Programs Department Training, Revision 1 Quality. Programs. Instructions QPI-2 Training Instruction for Inspection Planning, Revision'0 Nuclear Procurement and Storage Manual, Revision 3 S.ite Nuclear Quality Control Procedures Manual, Revision 18

A walk-through inspection of the following storage areas was performed to

- determine if equipment was being adequately stored

Storage Areaf Protection Level Environmental Warehouses (Old and New) B Oil Storage C Mes-Tex Warehouse C, D Yard Storage D Sto. age 'of parts ~in the above areas . appeared adequat QA items were clearly marked with green tags stating shelf life control and purchase order number. Equipment was -stored either above floor level on racks, on pallets, or in bins. In general, all storage areas -were found clean and provided with appropriate environmental . conditions relative to assigned protection leve l

.

.

'

-

.

During this tour, the inspector randomly selected six items to verify that the attached identification provided traceability back to the original procurement document Documents for all items were available and retrievable from the microfilm file The inspector reviewed the following surveillances and audit conducted in the inspected area:

Quality Programs Surveillance Reports Date Subject 84-TWC-17 7/16/84 Storage of Structural Steel 84-DCN-22 9/7/84 Control of Safety-Related Material Returned to Stores 85-PGP-16 7/19/85 Item Custody Form Evalua-tion Quality Audit QP-240, Materials, Parts and Components (Post-Receipt),

10/7/83 The surveillances and audit reviewed appeared to be of sufficient depth to cover the areas surveye Some nonconformances were identifie The nonconformances were well founded and indicative of a thorough audi Nonconformances were responded to and corrective action for the nonconformances was accomplished in a reasonable amount of tim Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.