IR 05000302/1981017
| ML20010H426 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1981 |
| From: | Belisle G, Fredrickson P, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010H421 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-81-17, NUDOCS 8109240449 | |
| Download: ML20010H426 (9) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _
_
___ ____
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
3a ne:
,
/
UNITED STATES o
8'
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
$
I REGION 11 b[
101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o,
%.....o ATt.ANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report No. 50-302/81-17 Licensee:
Florida Power Corporation 320134th Street, South St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Facility Name: Crystal River 3 Docket No. 50-302 License No. DPR 72 Inspection at the Crystal River sitie near Crystal River, Florida J/ //
Inspectors:
m
<-
,,
G.
eli rde{N Date Signed
.
,
\\1 l
}-Ph/
P. E. Frehfckson
..
x-Da'te S'igned Approved by:
[xD44
[
. Upright,jSedtion lef pte S(gned
.
Engineering Insp,ectio ranch Engineering and Techn cal Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on August 17-19, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 40 inspector-nours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters; QA Program - annual review; organization and administration; design changes and modifications; onsite review committee; audit program and implementation; calibration; surveillance; maintenance; maintenance program; offsite review committee; offsite support staff; receipt; storage and handling of equipment program and licensee action on previously identified inspection findings.
Results Of the 14 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
0109240449 810901 PDR ADOCK 05000302 O
.
- _
.
.
,
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees D. Bienkowski, Nuclear ISI Specialist
- P. Brown, Nuclear Compliance Supervisor
- J. Bufe, Nuclear Compliance Auditor
- J. Cooper, NQA/QC Manager
- K. Lancaster, Sr. Quality Auditor R. Mathews, Chief, Nuclear Technical Support Technician
- 0. Poole, N a. lear Plant Manager
- R. Rogers, Nuclear Materials Stores Other licensee employees contacted included technician, and office personntl.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- T. Stetka
- B. Smith
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on August 19, 1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowledged the inspection findings.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection' Findings i
An item of noncompliance from IE Inspection Report 50-302/80-19 was reviewed with respect to the licensee's letter dated June 11, 1980.
a.
(Closed) Infraction (302/80-19-02): Control of Vendor Manuals.
The inspector reviewed the program established for the control of vendor-l, technical manuals as delineated in the Nuclear Operations t
Administrative Services Manual, Procedure 2, Control of Manufacturers
Manuals, Requirement Outlines and Specifications, dated 6/81.
This procedure now establishes -positive control for the location and updating of vendor manuals. The inspectors _randemly selected several manuals and verified that the latest revision of the manual is being l
stored in the Document Contro; File Room and the Machine Shop' Library.
b.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (302/80-30-05):
Acceptability of current l
practices for locking certain valves.
The inspector reviewed SP-81, I
Locked Valve List (Positioi' Verification of Locked Valves) and i __.
,_
.
- --
~.
-
.-
--
..
.. -
-. --
- - _ _ _ -_
.
.
'
P l
i
discussed this surveillerce procedure with the NRC Resident Inspectors on site. The licensee's current practices relative to locking certain valves appear to be adequate.
c.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (302/80-30-06): Gaseous release of August 12, 1980.
The inspector reviewed two complete work requests (WR). These WRs (17430 and 17431) were completed on September 9, 1980 and March 9, 1981 respectively. Upon completion of these WRs the waste disposal system components on which work had been performed were functioning g
properly.
'
d.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (302/80-30-07): Implementation of QC-200, QC inspector training, The inspector reviewed QC-200, Training and Qualification of Nuclear Quality Assurcnce/ Quality Control Inspection Personnel, dated January 1980. This procedure details guidelines to be
used for qualification of QC inspectors. The inspector reviewed a memo from Mr. J. Cooper to Mr. Q. Dubois dated October 24, 1980 (CS-80-260)
'
confirming completed corrective acticr. related to indoctrination,
,
training and determination of proficiency of QC personnel.
The inspector reviewed the training and qualification records for four QC personnel.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
QA Program Annual Review (35701)
The inspector reviewed the references used throughout this report and
'
verified they met the requirements of the licensee's accepted QA Program.
The licensee has not made any revisions to the QA Program since the last inspection in this area conducted in August 1980.
i Bas 9d on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Organization and Administration (36700)
d References:
(a) Technical Specifications (b) AI-200, Organization and Responsibility, Revision 21 (c) MI-02, Organization and Responsibilities, Revision 04 (d) QPP-11, Organization Structure and Functional Responsibilities, Revision 6 g
(e) QP-1.50, Quality Program Organization-Operations Phase, Revision 4
'
The inspector reviewed references (b) - (e) to verify they met the requirements of reference (a). During this review the inspector noted that the facility organization is not as required by Technical Specification
6.2.2. due to facility or anizational changes. The licensee has submitted s
P L
.
. _.
_
. _._ _
_ _
_
-. _.
_
__
- > _ _ _ _ _ _ __
.
.
.
3 i
Revision 51 and 55, Revision 2 dated March 3, 1981 to the NRC for approval of these organizational changes.
The organizational changes are being followed by the NRC Senior Resident Inspectors.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
7.
Design, Design Changes and Modifications (37700)
This functional area was reviewed by the Performance Appraisal Section team inspection and is documentated in IE Inspection Report, Management Appraisal 50-302/81-1 (PAS) dated June 3,1981. The inspector reviewed the results of
this report and determined that this functional area is similar to that
normally inspected by Region II, consequently no additional inspection is required at this time. Discussions with the NRC residents also identified that their inspection effort routinely includes monitoring of selected design modifications in progress.
The _ resident inspectors document their
inspection activities in their monthly inspection reports.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Onsite Review Ccmmittee (40700)
This functional area was reviewed by the Performance Appraisal Section team inspection and is documented in IE Inspection Report, _ Management Appraisal 50-302/81-1 PAS) dated June 3, 1981. The inspector reviewed the results of
this report and determined that this functional area is similar to that i
normally inspected by Region II, consequently no additional inspection is
'
required at this time.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
9.
Audit Program and Implementation, Audit Program (40702, 40704)
,
This functional area was reviewed by the Performance Appraisal Section team i
inspection and is documentated in IE Inspection Report, Management Appraisal 50-302/81-(PAS) dated June 3, 1981. The inspector reviewed the results of
,
this report and determined that this functional area is similar to that normally inspected by Region II, consequently no additional inspection is required at this time.
,
Based on this review, no violations or dev'ations were identified.
10. Calibration (56700)
.-
References:
(a) CP-107, Test Equipment, Standards and Calibration
!
Control, Revision 11 (b) Test Equipment List (Computer Printout), dated 8/81 Utilizing the licensee's calibration program as described in references-(a)
and (b), the inspector verified that selected instruments and measuring and
., _
-
- -.
-
--
.
.
.
.
,
test equipment (M&TE) had received the proper calibration according to the followlng criteria:
For completed calibrations, the documentation was complete, acceptance
-
criteria met, proper revision used and calibration conducted by qualified individuals
-
For calibration procedures, reviews are as required by Technical Specifications, controls are established to meet limiting conditions for operation, equipment is retured to service, calibration equipment is traceable and acceptance values are within required limits For M&TE, equipment is controlled by site procedures, calibration
-
frequency is maintained, storage of equipment is proper and accuracy is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards or other independent testing organizations.
The inspector determined that implementation of several program areas had previously been reviewed by the NRC resident inspectors. Discussions with the residents revealed that a review of the M&TE program implementation had not specifically been conducted. Consequently, the inspector selected several torqte wrenches, micrometers, and electronic test instruments and verified that the required calibration controls had been imposed.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
11.
Surveillance (61700)
References:
(a) Proposed Inservice Inspection Program, dated 7/79 (b)Section XI, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1974 Edition through Summer 1975 Addenda Utilizing the licensee's surveillance program as described in reference (a)
the inspector verified that selected plant surveillances met several required criteria:
Technical Specification surveillance and inservice inspection (ISI)
-
tests were covered by approved procedures which contained applicable-prerequisites and preparations, acceptance criteria and instructions to insu.o that system ar comporsts are restored to operation following testing
-
Complet9d surveillances were reviewed in accordance with facility administrative requirements, were performed within the required time frequencies, were properly handled when tested items failed acceptance criteria and were cerfomed by qualified individuals.
The inspector determined that implementation of several program areas had previously been reviewed by the NRC resident inspectors. Discussion with L
_ _.- _,____
_. _, _ _. _ -
_
---
- - - - - -
.
.
..
.
- _.. -
_
_~ _. - -
- _ -. - - -
---
.
1..
.
.
t
)
the resident inspectors revealed that the ISI program implementation had not
specifically been reviewed.
Consequently, the fcilowing ISI surveillance -
procedures (SP) were selected for review:
!
SURVIELLANCE PROCEDURE DATE i
!
SP-370 10/80-7/81 SP-381 1-7/81 l
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
'
12.
Maintenance (62700)
This functional area was reviewed by the Performance Appraisal Section team inspection and is documentated in IE Inspection Report, Management Appraisal 50-302/81-1 (PAS) dated June 3, 1981. The inspector reviewed the results of this report and determined that this functional area is similar to that normally inspected by Region II, consequently no additional inspection is required at this time. Otscussions with the NRC resident inspectors also identified that their inspection effort routinely includes monitoring of selected maintenance activities in progress.
The resident inspectors document their inspection activities in their monthly in;pection reports.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
13. Maintenance Program (62702)
This functional area was reviewed by the Performance Appraisal Section team inspection and is documented in IE Inspection Report, Management Appraisal 50-302/81-1 (PAS) dated June 3, 1981. The inspector reviewed the results of this report and identified that this functional araa is similar to that normally inspected by Region II except in the areas of equipment control, spt ial processes, cleanliness controls and housekeeping controls.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
14. Offsite Review Committee (40701)
This functional area was reviewed by the performance Appraisal Section team inspection and is documented in IE Inspection Report, Management Appraisal 50-302/81-1 (PAS) dated June 3,1981. The inspector reviewed the results of this report and determined that this functional area is similar to that normally inspected by Region II, consequently no additional inspection it required at this time.
Based on this review, no violations' or deviations were identified.
t
_
m _ - _. _ _.. _ _ _.
._
_.._
_ - _
__
_.-_.
_
.
'
'
.
,
f
!
15. Offsite Support Staff (40703)
This functional area was reviewed by the Performance Appraisal Section team inspection and is documentated throughout IE Inspection Report. Management l
Appraisal 50-302/81-1 (PAS) dated June 3, 1981. The inspector reviewed the results of this report and determined that this functional area is similar to that normally inspected by Region II, consequently no additional i
insrection is required at this time.
[
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
16.
Receipt, Storage and Handling (38702)
References:
(a) QOP 6.0, Receipt, Quality Receiving Inspection and Identification, Revision 13 (b) QOP 8.0, Handling, Storage and Shipning, Revision 9 (c) QOP 9.0,In-Storage Maintenance and Inspection, Revision
(d) QOP 10.0, Maintenance and Control of Records, Revision 5 (e) QOP 15.0, Lack of Documentation, Norconformance and i
Correction Action, <evision 6-i l
The inspector reviewed the licensee's program for the receipt, storage and
handling of equipment and material with respect to selected elements of the licensee's accepted QA Program.
The inspection was to verify that administrative controls had been established for the following areas:
,
receipt inspection of safety-related materials; preparation and retention of f
required documentation; control of acceptable, nonconforming and conditional release items; control of items in storage including levels of storage,
identification of items, inspections, and maintenance; and control of
,
handling activities. The inspector, determined that the implementation of i
this program had previously been reviewed through the resident inspector program.
l Based on this review, no violation or deviations were identified.
17.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Findings (92701)
a.
(Closed) Open Item (302/79-23-08):
Licensee. response to IE Bulletin 79-10. The inspector reviewed the licensee's revised response to IE l
Bulletin issued June 26,-1979.
This revised response corrected the previously identified errors in the licensee's original response dated May 21,1979.
b.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (302/80-19-03):
Microfilming of Records. The inspcctor reviewed a random sampling of Plant Operating Quality Issurance Manual (P0QAM) procedures and identified that they L
_ _
_.
_.
.
.
.
_
.-.
..
.-..
'
s.
)
i
were being microfilmed and stored ' properly. As changes are made to P0QAM procedures they are being~ microfilmed.
The following P0QAM procedure changes were selected for review.
P0QAM PROCEDURE REVISION AI-300 1-13 AI-1000 0-10 MP-125 00-04 SP-130 00-10 OP-403 00-08 c.
(Closed) Open Item (302/80-30-08): Facility organization. There have been several changes to the iacility organization since the date this item was opened (August 1980). The licensee has submitted Revisions 51 and 55 (Revision 2) to the Technical Specifications to ' NRC for approval.
These revisions contain changes in the facility organization.
,
d.
(Closed) Open. Item (302/80-30-09):
Updating of prccedures.
The licensee has submitted Revision 51 ~ and 55 (Revision 2) to tne Technical Specification to the NRC for approval.
Procedures will-be changed upon stabilization of the facility organization.
~
e.
(Closed) Open Item (302/80-30-10): Incorrect drawings. The inspection reviewed drawings FD #302-011, Revision 31 and FD 302-014, Revision 21 and identified that the drawing discrepancies had been corrected.
f.
(Closed) Open Item (302/80-30-11): System for trackinn audit findir.gs, responses and corrective' actionc. Discussions with ccgnizant plant compliance personnel identifidd 'that a computer system had.been established to track audit findings, responses and corrective actions at the company offices.
g.
(Closed) Open Item (302/80-30-12):
Training records control.
The inspector reviewed a memo from S. Breedlove to J. Cooper (File 3-0-6-a)
dated October 17, 1980 stating that a change to the FSAR had been submitted to licensing for submission to the NRC and that the trainir.g depa 'tment has training matrices pending to file completed training accomplished by plant staff employees.
h.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (302/80-30-13):
New/ temporary empicyee training.
The inspector interviewed the Nuclear Training Manager and identified that all personnel subject to badging are'
!
required to pass sp?cific area tests.
These tests are given.-in security protecti0n radiation protection, fire protection and quality assurance. The ' training courses take a total of approximately eight-hours. Personnel inust pass 711 area tests prior to badging.
'
....
.
-
__
_ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-..
.
1.
.
t
1.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (302/80-30-14):
Changes in the compliance audit program. The inspector reviewed CP-110, Procedure for compliance audit of Plant Quality Assurance Program, Revision 13. This procedure contains the guidelines for performance of compliance audits.
The inspectcr reviewed three audits conducted during 1980 (80/6, 80/7 and 80/8) and verified that the requirements of CP-110 were being adhered to.
F J
l l
J
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _