IR 05000302/1976004
| ML19317G239 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 03/01/1976 |
| From: | Robert Lewis, Whitt K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317G203 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-76-04, 50-302-76-4, NUDOCS 8002280870 | |
| Download: ML19317G239 (4) | |
Text
a
-
-
-
y e
--
)
<
'
c,
UNITED STATES
- [
Qf. t$
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3I REGloN 11 g.
.
$
230 PEACHTREE STREET. N. W. SUITE SIS
,
g
.".
ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30303
.....
.
IE Inspection Report No. 50-302/76-4
'
Licensee: Florida Power Corporation r
3201 34th Street, South i
Post Office Box 14042
.
St. Petersburg, Florida 33733
'
Facility Name:
Crystal River 3 s
I Docket No.:
50-302
-
License No.:
CPPR-51
_ Category:
B1
'
Location:
Crystal River, Florida Type of License: B&W, PWR, 2452 Mwt n
Type of Inspection:
Routine, Announced I
\\
\\
'
w/
Dates of Inspection:
February 9-13, 1976 Dates of Previous Inspection:
January 20-23 and February 3-6, 1976 Inspector-in-Charge:
W. L. Britz, Radiation Specialist Environmental and Special Projects Section Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch Accompanying Inspectors:
None
. O ther Accompanying Personnel:
R. L. Bangart, Section Leader Environmental and Special Projects Section Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch
/
j'
- '//' -
.,
Principal Inspector:
/1 ' i /
' ~' / ~'- -
K. W. Whitt, Reactor Inspector Date Reactor Projects Section No. 2
,.
Reactor Operations and Nuclear a
[r J
Support Branch
? [. !?>
-c27 Sh//['
Reviewed by:
R. C. Lewis, Section Leader Date Reaction Projects Section No. 2 (]/
Reactor Operations and Nuclear
/
Support Branch
,xs iB0 02 280 77 0
.
-
.
D C
-
.
.
-
.
D IE Rpt. No. 50-302/76-4-2-
'
.
I
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS I.
Enforedment Matters
.
There were no item of noncompliance identified during the inspection.
,,
t II.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters Not inspected.
'
III.
New Unresolved Items
,
.-
None
.
IV.
Status of Previously Identified Unresolved Items
!
Not inspected.
V.
Unusual Occurrences
.
None VI.
Other Significant Findings
)
None VII.
Management Interview A management intarview was held on February 13, 1976, with Mr. G. P. Beatty, Plant Superintendent, and members of his staff.
,
The findings of the inspection were discussed.
'
>
l
. - -. -
-
..
,,. _
_
- - -..
..
- - _ -, - -. -... _
- -..,..
--
... - -
- _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _
_ __
..
,
_~
.
.
I M
r
{*
.I
'
T IE Rpt. No. 50-302/76-4 I-1 j
.
DETAILS I Prepared by:
Nc [a sf I. 8Am...u / /m
.2/.1/ h4
'
W.-L.
Britz, Radiation Specialist
- 'Date Environmental and Sp'ecial
!
Projects Section Fuel Facility and Materials
-
I Safety Branch Dates of Inspection:' February 9-13, 1976
!
Reviewed by:
[ a[ / 8a ve [
.2/.? (, /7/.
'
R. L. Bangart, Section Leader
' Date Environmental and'Special
]
Projects Section
_
Fuel Facility and Materials
Safety Branch
'
.
1.
Individuals Contacted
$
Q. B. DuBois - Acting Nuclear Operations Manager E. E. Froats - Manager, Site Surveillance G. P. Beatty - Plant Superintendent
.
('
J. R. Wright - Chem Rad Engineer J. L. Harrison - Assistant Chem Rad Engineer P. J. Daniel - Nuclear Support Specialist
-
f J. E. Barrett - Compliance Plant Engineer D. W. Pedrick - Compliance Engineer (Telecon on 2/18/76)
!
- ,
2.
Preoperational and Interim Radiological Environmental Surveillance Program n
(
The preoperational and interim radiological environmental surveil-j lance programs were inspected.
Onsite surveillance is conducted f
under contract by the University of Florida and offsite surveil-
'{
1ance is conducted by the State of Florida radiological laboratory.
'
The preoperational program was terminated April 10, 1975, and the interim program started as described in FSAR 2.6.4.
The NRC Direc-
{
torate of Regulatory Licensing was notified by letter on March 3, 1975. The requirements for the preoperational and interim
'
l programs were inspected against the monitoring data from the Univer-e sity of Florida and State of Florida for the period January through June,1975, and found to be acceptable and the program requirements
,
[
have been met.
t'
3.
Operational Radiological Environmental Surveillance Program
[t Discussions with the licensee's representatives revealed that contracts for the operational program are being completed with the
!
-;.
s'
_.
..
-
_
_
_ -.
._ _ __-_____- -.-
.
.
~
.
.
_
.
.
e
-
.
..
~
jj-~)
IE Rpt. No. 50-302/76-4 I-2
,
V i
-
University of Florida and the Florida Radiological Laboratory of the Stata.of Florida. The representatives stated the program will be in operation by fuel loading. _The status of the quality control for the operational program was inspected.
Volume I, Administra-tive Procedures, and' Volume X, Surveillance Procedure, of the Plant
'
Operating Quality Assurance Manual, were reviewed. Discussions were held concerning the advantages of upgrading the procedures for
,I the environmental surveillance program to include a complete quality
.
I control program. That portion of the program which is administered
,
by the FPC office in St. Petersburg and not covered by plant operating procedures was not yet included in a definitive program for adminis-a tration and quality ' control.
Audit Summary Sheets #75/11 for the'
d State of Florida and #75/16 for the University of Florida were.-
reviewed. The inspector inquired of the status of the followup for inadequacies noted in the audit.
The licensee's representatives i
stated they would be followed up with another audit.
The inspector stated he would return to complete the inspection before fuel'~
i loading when the program has been fully organized and is operational
.
or very near operational.
'
4.
Quality Control of Analytical Measurements
!
L The quality control for the radiation chemistry laboratory was
,
j inspected. Volume I, Administrative Procedures, and Volume VIII,.
l Chemistry and Radiation Protection Procedures, of the Plant Operating Quality Assurance Manual were reviewed.
Procedures which were e
)
completed were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
Licensee j
representatives stated that procedures which are being rewritten
'
should be completed by March 15, 1976. The laboratory was toured.
Equipment was in the process of being arranged in the laboratory i
and being put into operation. The exhaust hoods were not yet i.
completed. Discussions with the licensee's representatives revealed that the incomplete exhaust hoods were the primary cause of the delay in getting the laboratory operational.. Procedures for the laboratory operations will be included in the Compliance Engineer's quality control review schedule as the procedures are completed and put into operation.
Because of the present incomplete status of the laboratory, and procedures, the inspection could not be completed.
l The inspector stated he would return to complete the inspection before fuel loading.
5.
Confirmatory Measurements
!
The licensee has been provided with test standards to analyze for i
measurement comparison with the NRC reference laboratory.
The
licensee will report their measured values to the inspector for l
.conparison when the analyses are completed and well before fuel loading. This portion of the inspection is not complete until the
'
j measurements are in agreement or any disagreements are resolved.
-
l
. -
- - - -.
.-
-...
. -
- - - - -.
-. - - -