IR 05000295/1993006
| ML20034H173 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zion File:ZionSolutions icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1993 |
| From: | Creed J, Kniceley J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20034H171 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-295-93-06, 50-295-93-6, 50-304-93-06, 50-304-93-6, NUDOCS 9303160130 | |
| Download: ML20034H173 (4) | |
Text
'
-
.
.
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.
REGION III
Reports No. 50-295/93006(DRSS); 50-304/93006(DRSS)
Dockets No. 50-295; 50-304 Licenses No. DPR-39; DPR-48 Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company Opus West III 1400 Opus P1 ace Downers Grove, IL 60515 Facility Name: Zion Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Inspection Dates: March 1-5, 1993 Type of Inspection: Announced Physical Security Inspection Date of Previous Physical Security Inspection: October 5-9, 1992 Inspector:
- b WAM 3fif 43 James R. Kniceley Date
Physical Security Inspector Approved By:
QWLbT lhi Janfes R. Creed, Chief 4 Date Safeguards Section
'
Insoection Summary Inspection on March 1-5. 1993 (Reports No. 50-295/93006(DRSS):
No. 50-304/93006(DRSS))
Areas Inspected:
Routine, announced physical security inspection involving:
f Management Support; Protected and Vital Area Barriers, Detection and Assessment; Access Control-Personnel, Packages and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and Communications; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures and a review of previous inspection findings.
Results:
The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements
!
within the areas examined. Two open items were reviewed and closed.
Management attention to and involvement in security performance continues to be good.
Licensee resources are good and the Training and Qualification is effective.
Security personnel observed were knwledgeable of their duties and responsibilities. Security equipment tested by the licensee performed as required.
9303160130 930309 DR ADOCK 0500
-
-
.
..
.
..
.
...
.-
.
-. _
.
.
..
.
DETAILS
.
1.
Kev Persons Contacted In addition to the key members of the licensee's staff listed below, the inspector interviewed other employees, contractor personnel, and members of the security organization. The asterisk (*) denotes those present at the onsite Exit Interview conducted on March 5, 1993.
- T. Broccolo, Services Director, Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO)
- G. Beale, Regulatory Assurance, CECO
- R. Morley, Jr., Nuclear Security Administrator (Corporate), CECO
- B. Gulley, Quality Verification, Ceco
- R. Milne, Station Security Administrator, CECO
- C. Claiborn, Security Force Manager, Burns Security
- K. Day, Firearms Training Instructor, Burns Security
- P. Lougheed, Resident Inspector, NRC Region III J. D. Smith, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC Region III 2.
Followup on Previous Inspection Findinas a.
(Closed) Open Item (Reports No. 50-295/92011-01; 50-304/92011-01):
This item was described in Section 5.c. of the above report and pertained to a s9curity plan review and update to remove-inaccurate statements and to update additions which exceed regulatory requirements. The inspector verified that the required
'
changes have been made and approved by the NRC by letter dated December 4, 1992. This item is closed.
,
b.
(Closed) Open Item (Reports No. 50-295/92011-02; 50-304/92011-02):
This item was described is Section 5.d. of the above report and-pertained to deterioration and replacement of three security doors. The inspector verified that the identified doors have been replaced and regulatory requirements are being met. This item is closed.
3.
Entrance and Exit Interviews a.
At the beginning of the inspection, Mr. T. Broccolo, Services Director, and other staff members were informed of the purpose of this inspection, it's scope and the topical areas to be examined.
b.
The inspector met with the licensee representatives, denoted in Section 1, at the conclusion of onsite inspection activities. A general description of the scope and conduct of the inspection was provided.
Briefly listed below are the findings discussed during the exit interview. The licensee representatives were invited to provide comments on each item discussed. Those comments are-included.
The details of each finding listed below are referenced, as noted, in the report.
...
-
.
-
s
.
.
(1)
The licensee acknowledged the inspector's comments that no
.
,
violations'were identified during this inspection.
]
(2)
The inspector commented that the security program is being
effectively implemented and managed.
(3)
The inspector commented that the contract security force members questioned and observed during this inspection were knowledgeable and proficient in their assigned duties.
(4)
The inspector commented that the two previously identified
'
open items were reviewed and are considered closed.(refer to section 2).
4.
Proaram Areas Inspected:
l Listed below are the areas examined by the inspector in which no findings (strengths, violations, deviations, unresolved items or inspection followup items) were identified. Only findings are described in subsequent Report Details sections.
The below listed clear areas were reviewed and evaluated as deemed necessary by the inspector to meet the specified " Inspection Requirements" (Section 02) of the applicable NRC Inspection Procedure (IP).
Sampling reviews included interviews, observations, and document reviews that provided independent verification of compliance with requirements.
Gathered data was also used to evaluate the adequacy of the reviewed program and practices to adequately protect the facility and the health and safety of the public. The depth and scope of
-
inspection activities were conducted as deemed appropriate and necessary
,
for the program area and operational status of the security system.
Additional testing of security systems was not requested by the inspector.
'
IP 81700-Physical Security Insoection Proaram for Power Reactors 01.
Manaaement. Plans. Audit:
(a) Degree of Management Support for i
Program; (b) Security Program Plans Changes; (c) Audits Program Corrective Action, Auditor Qualification.
02.
Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers. Detection and Assessment Aids:
(a) PA and VA Barrier Resistance; (b) Isolation
,
Zones Maintained; (c) PA and VA Detection Functional and Effective.
03.
Protected and Vital Area Access Control of Personnel. Packaaes and Vehicles:
(a) Personnel Access:
(I) Identification and Authorization Checked Before Access; (2) Trustworthiness, Reliability Determined By Background Investigation and are Part of Behaviorial Observation Program; (3) Changes Made for Terminations; (4) List / Computer Are Protected; (5) Personnel Are Searched; (6) Badges Are Displayed; (7) Visitors Are Escorted; (8)
1
, -.
. _.
.
.
..
-
Rapid Ingress and Egress in Emergencies; (9) Access Limited for
.
Need.
(b) Package Control:
(1) Packages Authorization Checked;
'
(2) Handcarried Packages Searched at PA; (3) Material Controlled at Containment.
(c) Vehicle Control:
(1) Vehicles Are Searched; (2) Authorization Verified Prior to Entry; (3) Two Officers at Open Gates; (4) All Self-Propelled and Towed Vehicles Are Controlled.
04.
Alarm Stations and Communication:
(a) CAS and SAS Are Manned, Equipped, Independent and Diverse and Can Call For Assistance; (b)
No Interference of CAS activities; (c) CAS and SAS Have Continuous Communications With Each Onsite and can Call Offsite.
!
l