IR 05000269/1992301
| ML15113A824 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 02/05/1992 |
| From: | Baldwin R, Casto C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15113A823 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-92-301, NUDOCS 9202240009 | |
| Download: ML15113A824 (2) | |
Text
R REG UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 ENCLOSURE 1 EXAMINATION REPORT NO. 50-269/92-301 Facility Licensee:
Duke Power Company Facility Docket Nos.:
50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 Facility, License Nos.:
DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55 Examinations were administered at Oconee Nuclear Station near Sencea, South Carolin Chief Examiner:
_/_
Richard S. Baldwin Date Approved By:
_>
Charis. Casto, Chief Date Operator Licensing Section 2 Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY SCOPE: A requalification retake (Job Performance Measures only) examination was administered on January 23, 1992, to one individual who had failed the requali fication examinations given during the weeks of July 22 and July 29,. 199 RESULTS:
This operator passed this examinatio PDR ADOCK 05000269 V
REPORT DETAILS 1. Facility Employees Attending Exit Meeting J. Hampton, Vice President, Oconee Site B. Barron, Oconee Station Manager L. Wilkie, Manager, Oconee Nuclear Station Training P. Stovall, Operations Training Manager D. Sweigart, Superintendent of Operations G. Rigdeway, Shift Operations Manager J. Byko, Nuclear Instructor 2. Examiners
- R. Baldwin, NRC, R1I J. Bartley, NRC, RII
+K. Poertner, Resident Inspector
- Chief Examiner
+Attended Exit Meeting Only Discussion Program Evaluation No Requalification Program Evaluation was made due to the small sample siz Reference Material The reference material supplied by the licensee was reviewed and determined to be adequate to support the examinatio Proposed Examination All the Job Performance Measures were important for plant operation Operator Performance During the performance of the Job Performance Measures the operator was unable to perform an off-site dose calculatio.
Exit Meeting At the conclusion of the site visit, the examiners met with representatives of the plant staff indicated in paragraph 1 to discuss the results of the examinations. This exit was conducted in conjunction with the initial examination exit that was given during the week of January 20, 199 The licensee did not identify any of the material provided to or reviewed by the examiners as proprietary.