IR 05000269/1978029
| ML15223A348 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 11/22/1978 |
| From: | Jape F, Robert Lewis NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15223A346 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-78-29, 50-270-78-21, 50-287-78-29, NUDOCS 7812140048 | |
| Download: ML15223A348 (6) | |
Text
j REGo UNITED STATES 0NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
0 2101 MARIETTA STREET, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos.:
50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29 Docket Nos.:
50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 License Nos.:
DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 Licensee:
Duke Power Company P. 0. Box 2178 422 South Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name:
Oconee 1, 2 and 3 Inspection at:
Oconee Nuclear Station Inspection conducted:
November 6-8, 1978 Inspector: F. Jape Accompanying Personnel: None Approved by:
r_*C-I
///Z& /_7_
R. C. Lewis, Chief Date Reactor Projects Section No. 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on November 6-8, 1978: (Report Nos. 50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of plant operations and restoration of systems following a refueling outag The inspection involved approximately 24 manhours on site by one NRC inspecto Results:
Of the two areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie O(Q
RII Rpt. Nos. 50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29-1 DETAILS Prepared by:
(
<:-
,
///Z-/22;>
F. Jape, Reactor Vspec'tor Date Reactor Projects Section No. 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Dates of Inspection: November 6-8, 1978 Approved by:,. ///12z/7'
R. C. Lewis, Chief Date Reactor Projects Section No. 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Persons Contacted J. E. Smith, Station Manager
- R. M. Koehler, Superintendent of Technical Services
- J. N. Pope, Superintendent of Operations
- D. J. Vito, Licensing Engineer
.
R. B. Fuller, Operating Engineer G. A. Ridgeway, Operating Engineer, Unit 1 J. T. Campbell, Operating Engineer, Unit 2 J. W. Herring, Shift Supervisor T. D. Patterson, Shift Supervisor D. W. Yoh, Shift Supervisor L. L. Howell, Assistant Shift Supervisor S. M. Pryor, Assistant Shift Supervisor E. A. Force, Assistant Shift Supervisor P. J. Chudzik, Assistant Shift Supervisor W. D. Reid, Assistant Control Operator R. K. Emory, Control Operator J. Gardner, Control Operator
- R. T. Bond, Licensing and Projects Engineer
- Denotes attendance at the Management Exit Meetin.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte.
Unresolved Items No new unresolved items were identifie RII Rpt. Nos. 50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29-2 Exit Management Meeting The inspector met with R. M. Koehler, Acting Station Manager, and those denoted in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on November 8, 1978, to discuss the inspection finding The findings were acknowledged by licensee management without significant commen.
Plant Operations The inspector reviewed plant operations to ascertain conformance with regulatory requirements, technical specifications, and administrative directive Station logs, such as the unit supervisors log, control room operators log and the removal and restoration of station equipment records were reviewe Interviews with a number of plant operations personnel were held on the day and night shifts. In addition, a tour was conducted of the auxiliary building, turbine building and the Unit 2 reactor buildin During the period of observation and inspection, and while on tour of the plant accessible areas, observations were made regarding the plant housekeeping and cleanliness, ongoing activities, radiation control practices and security practice Housekeeping and cleanliness were found to be satisfactory within the radiation areas and non-radiation area Security practices and radiation control practices were adhered to during the tou Supervisor and control room operator actions were observed during the shift and at shift change. The actions and activities were conducted as prescribed in Section 3.0 of the Station Directive Operators and shift supervisors were responsive to annunciator alarms and appeared to be aware of plant statu The number of licensed and non-licensed personnel on each shift was verified to meet the minimum required by TS 6.1. For each unit the following records were examined:
Oconee Unit 1 a)
Shift Supervisors log for the period of August 25, 1978 to November 7, 197 b)
Control Operators log for the period of October 2, 1978 to November 7, 197 RII Rpt. Nos. 50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29-3 c)
Unit 1 R & R Book d)
Computer Alarm Summary for November 7, 1978 Oconee Unit 2 a)
Shift Supervisor's log for the period of October 1, 1978 to November 6, 197 b)
Control Operators log for the period of October 1, 1978 to November 6, 197 c)
Unit 2 R & R Boo d)
Computer Alarm Summary for November 6 & 7, 197 Oconee Unit 3 a)
Shift Supervisor's log for the period of October 1, 1978 to November 8, 197 b)
Control Operators log for the period of October 1, 1978 to November 8, 197 c)
Unit 3 R & R Book d)
Computer Alarm Summary for November 7, 197 No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie.
Plant Operations -
Unit I Refueling Outage The inspector reviewed selected activities performed during the recently completed Unit 1 refueling outage and the licensee's provisions to test and realign specific systems which were removed from a normal operational status as a result of outage activitie The controlling procedure OP/1/A/1102/10, for-unit shutdown, and OP/l/A/1102/01, for unit startup were also reviewe The purpose of these reviews was to ascertain that systems disturbed during the outage were returned to an operating status prior to plant startup. Within the areas reviewed, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie RII Rpt. Nos. 50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29-4 The sample of procedures reviewed is as follows:
OP/1/A/1103/02, Filling and Venting RCS OP/1/A/1103/06, Reactor Coolant Pump Operation OP/1/A/1104/02, HPI System OP/1/A/1104/01, CF System OP/1/A/1104/04, LPI System OP/1/A/1104/05, RB Spray System 1P/1/A/305/3A,B,C&D, RPS On-Line Test 1P/1/A/310/12A&13A, HPI Logic Ch 1 & 2 On-Line Test 1P/1/A/310/12B&13B, LPI Logic Ch 3 & 4 On-Line Test 1P/1/A/310/12C&13C, RB Emergency Cooling and Isolation 1P/1/A/310/12D&13D, RB Spray Logic Ch 7 & 8 On-Line 1P/l/A/310/14A,B&C, ES Ch A, B & C On-Line 1P/l/A/301/3A through H, NI Calibration, Ch 1 through 8 Specific items verified included:
(a) Procedure properly approve (b) Procedure consistent with Technical Specification and administrative control requirement (c) Test prerequisites complete (d) Test equipment required by procedure within calibration interva (e) Required data properly recorde.
Refueling Outage - Unit 2 The schedule of activities for the Unit 2 refueling outage was reviewed and discussions were held with the outage coordinator to verify that plans exist to restore systems which will be disturbed during the outag The outage coordinator explained that a complete valve lineup or breaker status check is done prior to startup on the following systems: Normal Power Water Inventory Control Steam Seal System Stator Coolant System
RII Rpt. Nos. 50-269/78-29, 50-270/78-21 and 50-287/78-29-5 Hydrogen Seal Oil System Generator Isolated Phase Bus Coolant System Emergency Feedwater System Condenser Circulating Water System Recirculated Cooling Water System High Pressure Injection System Building Spray System Component Cooling System Condensate System Feedwater System Heater-Drains and Vents Vacuum System q. Electric - Hydraulic Control System The low pressure injection system is in continuous use throughout the outage and is realigned for power operation prior to startup by performing OP/2/A/1104/0 In summary the inspector had no further questions with the methods and plans to restore the plant safety systems to an operational status following the refueling outage.