IR 05000269/1978003
| ML19316A156 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1978 |
| From: | Alderson C, Bradford Wh NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19316A154 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-269-78-03, 50-269-78-3, 50-270-78-03, 50-270-78-3, 50-287-78-03, NUDOCS 7911280696 | |
| Download: ML19316A156 (3) | |
Text
_. _ -
_
_
-. - - - -
k,
.
.
'
- p ** "' 4 s
UNITED STATES
,
- o, NUCLEArt REGULATORY COMMISSION
$
)c REGloN ll
. /-
e 230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.W. SUITE 818
,
%,*.V /[
I o
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
..*
Report No.:
50-269/78-03, 50-270/78-03 and 50-287/78-03 Docket Nos.:
50-269, 50-270 and 50-287 License Nos.:
DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 Licensee:
Duke Power Company 422 S. Church Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28242 Facility Name:
Oconee Units 1, 2 and 3 Inspection at:
Oconee site, Seneca, South Carolina Inspection conducted:
February 8-10, 1978 Inspector:
W.
Bradford L!L 7[
Reviewed by:
.
\\L o. 4
,
C. E.'Alierson, Acting Chief
' Date Nuclear upport Section No. 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Inspection Summary Inspection on February 8-10, 1978 (Report Nos. 50-269/78-03, 50-270/78-03 and 50-287/78-03)
Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounced inspection of quality assurance program annual review and licensed operator requalification training program.
The inspection involved 24 inspector-hours on site by one NRC inspector.
Results: Of the two areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were found.
gS
.
!
.
{<
.
'O j
RII Rpts. Nos. 50-269/78-03,
,
50-270/78-03 and 50-287/78-03 I-l Prepared by:'[(.7 N 4 o e bb 511/'P DETAILS I W.H.Bradford,Re['etorInspector
/ ate D
Nuclear Support Section No. 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Dates of Inspection:
Februtry 8-10, 1978 Reviewed by:
A wk 7.[tM W Nuclea}rSupportSectionNo.2 C. E.
derson, Acting Chief IDa": 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch 1.
Individuals Contacted Duke Power Company
- J. Ed Smith, Station Manager
- J. N. Pope, Superintendent of Operations J. T. McIntosh, Director of Administrative Services
- 0. S. Bradham, Superintendent of Maintenance
- Roger Nichols, Administrative Assistant / Training and Safety
- R. T. Bond, Technical Services Engineer Richard Bugert, Training Coordinator
- Denotes those present at exit interview.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings _
Not inspected.
3.
Unresolved Items None identified during this inspection.
4.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on February 10, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings-of the inspection.
j
'
i i
.
-
,,em-
~me
-.- -
-
-
._
.. _ -
..
__ __. _ _.- _ _ _ _ _ _.. _. _ _ _ _
_. ____. _ _ _.
__
$
.
',
.,*
- ,
. r')
RII Rpt. Nos. 50-269/78-03, 50-270/78-03 and 50-287/78-03 I-2
5.
Licensed Operator Requalification Training The inspector reviewed licensee documents to verify that a requalification training program for NRC licensed reactor operators (R0s) and senior reactor operators (SR0s) had been established and was consistent with the requirements of the licensee's approved Requalification Program, Section 6.1.1.5 of the Technical Specifications, and Appendix A to 10 CFR 55.
The inspector reviewed individual training records for twelve licensed operators and held discussions to determine whether the program had been implemented. Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Quality Assurance Program Review The inspector reviewed the licensee's QA Program to determine whether recent changes to the program were in conformance with Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, as well as applicable codes, standards, guides and licensee commitments. Within the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were disclosed.
The Duke Power Company Quality Assurance Program changes over the past year consisted of revisions to reflect organizational changes and responsibilities to add 10 CFR 21 evaluations and reporting requirements and to define frequency of audits.
The inspector had no further questions.
l
..
.