IR 05000250/1978014
| ML17338A192 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1978 |
| From: | Long F NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17338A194 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7810110247 | |
| Download: ML17338A192 (24) | |
Text
~p,q Rf0(
W~~g4 UNITEO STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
'l01 MARIETTASTREET, N.IV.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 In RepLy Refer To:
R:JE 0-25
?8-14 01/78-14 Florida Power and Light Company Advanced Systems and Technology Attn:
Dr. R. E. Uhrig Vice President P.
O. Box 529100 Miami, Florida 33152 Gentlemen:
This refers to your Letter of September 14~ 1978, concerning your application to withhold from public disctosure certain information appearing in the t
(
inspection report forwarded to you for review by my letter of August
1978.
/
e Your application to withhold c r tain information from pubLic disclosure been accepted.
Information has been deleted from the inspection report prior to disclosure as shown in the enclosure.
Please assure that your copy of the report shows these changes.
~ ICIN
Sincerely,
'J F. J.
Long, Chi Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch
Enclosure:
Inspection Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78"14
REGION II==
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 AUG 2l 197g In Re Refer To:
JE 0-2-14 and
/78-14 Florida Pover and Light Company Advanced Systems and Technology ATTN:
Mr. R. E. Uhrig, Vice President P. 0. Box 529100 Miami, Florida 33152 Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted, by Mr. J. E. Ouzts of this office on July 17-21, 1978,, of activities authorized by NRC Operating License Hos.
DPR-31 and DPR-41 for the Turkey Point Units 3 and
facil'ties, and ta the discussion of our findings held vith Mr. H. E.
Yaeger at the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed inspection report.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and, observations by the inspector.'ithin the scope of this inspection, no items of noncompliance vere disclosed.
One nev un"esolved item resulted from this inspection and is discussed in the enclosed report.
This item vill be examined during subsequent inspections.
In accordance vith Section 2. 790 of the NRC '
"Rules of Practice",
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the HRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that you (or your contractor) believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you mdre a vritten application vithin 20 days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure.
Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on. the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If ve do not hear from you in this regard vith'in the specified period, the report villbe placed in the Public Document Room.
AUQ 2 Z gyes Florida Power and Light Company Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, F. J. Long, Chief Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch
Enclosures:
Inspection Report Nos.
50-250/78-14 and. 50-251/78-14
REGION II==
101 MARIETTASTREET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos.:
50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 Docket Nos.;
50-250 and 50-.251 License Nos.:
Florida Power and Light Company 9250 West Flagler Street P.
O.
Box 013100 Miami, Florida 33101 Facility Name:
Turkey Point 3 and
Inspection. at:
Turkey Point Site, Homestead, Florida Inspection conducted:
July 17-21, 1978 Inspector:
J.
E. Ouzts Accompanying Personnel:
None Approved by:
P. J.
1Tpgg, CEie Nuclear Support Se tion No.
Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch
'Date Ins ection Summar Ins ection on 7/17-21/78:
(Re ort Nos.
50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14)
Areas Ins ected:
Routine, unannouced inspection of calibration, surveillance and procurement for units 3 and 4.
The inspection involved 33 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results:
Within the three areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
i
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 DETAII.S I Prepared by:
Ni~w J.
E
-
ctor Insp or Nuclear Support Sec ion N
. 2 Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch
, Date Dates of Inspectio-21 1978 Reviewed by:
P;
.
K
, 'e Nuclear/Support Se iou No.
Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Date 1.
Persons Contacted
+H. E. Yaeger, Plant Manager H. Answorth, Assistant Nuclear Maintenance Superintendent C. Baker, Shift Supervisor W. L. Chancy, Storekeeper M. T. Fowler, Area Stores Supervisor
- D. W. Jones, QC Supervisor G. Jones, Shift. Supervisor E. Knuckles, Plant Coordinator
.
+J.
P. Mandieta, ISC Supervisor
- J. E. Moore, Operations Superintendent R. Sontag, Associate Plant Coordinator
- R. J.
Spooner, QAO Supervisor-J, S.
Wade, Jr.,
Chemistry Supervisor P. White, Maintenance Superintendent
- G. D. Whittier, Senior I.icense Engineer (General Office)
Two Nuclear Control Center Operators, four technicians and two docu-ment control room personnel were also contacted.
- Denotes those attending exit interviews.
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Ins ection Findin s
Not inspected.
3.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether they are acceptable items, items of noncompliance or deviations.
One unresolved item disclosed during the inspection is discussed in paragraph 5.
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 I-2 4.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in para-graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on July 21, 1978.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection as discussed in paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
The licensee acknowledged the inspection findings, and agreed to provide segregated storage for nonconforming measuring tools as discussed in paragraph 5.
5.
Instrumentation Calibration Pro ram Verification The inspector conducted a review 'of the following calibration proce-dures and associated test results:
12307.3 - quarterly Calibration of the Nuclear Instrumentation Sys tems-14007.11 - Reactor Coolant Temperature Instrumentation Calibration during refueling 14007.5 - Rod Position Indication Instrumentation Calibration during refueling 14007.12 - Reactor Coolant Flow Instrumentation Calibration during refueling 14007.13 - Pressurizer Water Level Instrumentation Calibration during refueling 14007.16 - Steam generator feedwater flow and steam flow instrumenta-tion calibration during refueling 14007.26 - Steam line header and turbine 1st stage pressure instrumenta-tion 14007.18 - Residual heat removal pump flow instrumentation 14007.24 - Accumulator level instrumentation calibration during refueling 14007.22 - Containment pressure wide range/narrow range instrumentation calibration during refueling 11207.1 - Area radiation monitoring system calibration 14007.6 - Tref program recalibration
)4007.17 - Charging flow instrumentation calibration during refueling 14007.19 - Boric acid tank level instrumentation calibration during refueling 14007.20 - Refueling water stroage tank level instrumentation during refueling 14007.21 - Volume control tank level instrumentation calibration during refueling 14007.23 - Containment sump level instrumentation calibration during refueling
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 I-3 14007.27 - Boric acid blender control system instrumentation test during refueling 14007.7
>> Tavg alarm recalibration 14007.25 - Accumulator pressure instrumentation calibration during refueling 11107.1 - Process radiation monitoring system maintenance and calibration 1207.7 - Recalibration of pressurizer level program The procedures and calibration results were reviewed to verify:
Reviews and approvals were being conducted, and data was recorded and evaluated.
Test instruments were listed and identified in test results.
Adherence to Technical Specification requirements and Limiting conditions for operation were observed.
Technical contents were correct and verification of return of equipment to service and removal of test equipment was being done.
The inspector conducted an inspection of the following measuring and test equipment storage facilities and records:
Instrumentation and control standards laboratory Measuring and test tool storage and issuing room Refueling measuring and test tool cabinets These facilities were inspected to verify:
That standard test instruments were labeled and included in the calibration program.
Instruments were calibrated on schedule and labeled with calibration status.
Storage facilities were proper for protecting the equipment.
Nonconforming equipment was being tagged and provided with segregated storage.
Certification and calibration records were available and being maintained for measuring and test equipment.
The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for evaluating the aboe items in the calibration program Topical Quality Assurance Report - TQR 11.0 and TQR-12.0 Technical Specifications - Section 4.0
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 ANSI N45.2 (1971)
Inspector Judgement equality Assurance Program Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations wre identified.
In one area inspected the inspector found out-of-calibration equipment and equipment awaiting calibration, stored on the same shelf as equipment in calibration and ready for use.
The test equipment storage area was also being used as a general storage area and housekeeping in the area was poor.
The licensee acknowledged these findings and agreed to take corrective action.
This item will remain unresolved pending the corrective action and verification by NRC at a subsequent inspection (250/78-14-01, 251/78-14-01).
6.
Ins ection of Chemist Laborato An inspection of the chemistry laboratory and associated equipment was conducted by the inspector to verify that procedures and equipment were available for determining coolant chemical concentrations and status as required by Technical Specifications.
The method of pre-paration and verification of shelf life of chemicals were also reviewed.
The inspector used the requirements of the Technical Specifications for conducting this inspection.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Surveillance Test Procedures and Results Verifications The inspector conducted a review of test procedures and associated test results as follows:
1004 F 1 1004 '
1604.3 1604.8 1804.1 2500.1 3104.1 3206.2 4104.1 4304.1 4504.1
- Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Periodic Leak <<<< following RCS opening
- Reactor Protection System Periodic Test
- At Power Measurements of Moderator Temperature, Doppler and Power Coefficients
- CRDM/RPI Stepping and Drop Time Test
- Axial Flux, Rod Deviation and Rod Position Indication System, Monthly Test
- Heat Tracing System Periodic Test
- Component Cooling Water System, Periodic Test of Pumps
- Residual Heat Removal Annual Test
- Safety Injection System, Periodic Test
- Emergency Diesel Generator Periodic Test, Load on 4KV Bus
- Accumulator Check Valve Back Leakage Periodic Test
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 I-5 4704.6 - Emergency Containment Coolers, Periodic Test 7304.1 - Auxiliary Feedwater System Period Test 0/P 0204.2 - Schedule of Periodic Test, Check Calibrations and Operating Evolutions (7/10-10/78).
The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for the above items:
Topical Quality Assurance Report - TQR 11.0 Technical Specifications - Section 4.0 ANSI N45.2 - (1971)
ANSI N18.7 - (1072)
Inspector Judgement Quality Assurance Program The test procedures and test results were reviewed to verify:
Test prerequisites and plant conditions were specified and reviewed, and approvals had been performed.
Technical contents of the procedures were correct, and the tests were performed on schedule.
Test instruments were listed in the procedures and the instruments used identified in the test results.
Test results were recorded and. compared with acceptance criteria and the return of the equipment to service and removal of test equipment was verified upon completion of the test.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
8.
Procurement Control Verification The inspector conducted a review of procurement documentation and inspected storage of safety related equipment as follows:
Procurement Document Review:
P093099 - 39246P - Westinghouse Signal Summator, Nodel 111, Hagen 4111004-004, for Model 124 Controller P093099 - 51269P - Westinghouse Neutron Detector, WL23703 Compensated Ion Chamber P093099 - 61162P - Westinghouse Repair of No.
3 Seal for RC Pump, S/N 2505 - 9100670001 PO-93099 - 63915P - Westinghouse Motor Type RG, 100 HP Frame 404"TS-Class F
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 I-6 Items Inspected in Storage Hagen Simulator 4111084-004 - Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA Compensated Ion Chamber WL 51646P - Westinghouse Electric Cor-poration, Elmira, N.Y.
Reactor Coolant Pump Seal - 30353 No.
2 Seal, 34101P Seal 34101P Seal Assembly, Westing-house Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA Welding Electrodes Type LH - 718 Hobart Shock Arrestor - 50,000- - Model PSA-35, Pacific Scientific The inspector used one or more of the following acceptance criteria for the above items:
Topical Quality Assurance Report - TQR 4.0 and TQR 7.0 ANSI N18.7 (1972)
ANSI N45.2.2 (1972)
Regulatory Guide. 1.38 (1973)
Inspector Judgement The procurement documents and components were reviewed and inspected to verify:
Procurement documents had proper approvals Quality Control inspection requirements were included in the procurement documents.
Quality Control Records such as; certificate of compliance, certificate of Test and Analysis, results of vendor, tests and receipt inspection records were available for -equipment in storage.
Measures were in effect for properly controlled and separation of conforming and nonconforming materials, parts and components.
Components and materials were supplied by an approved vendor.
Within the areas inspected no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
9.
Ins ection of Control Room erations The inspector toured the control room to inspect the plants status and verify operations were in accordance with license requirements.
The status of safety systems and scheduling of surveillance testing were reviewed and discussed with the shift supervisor.
During this tour no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Report Nos. 50-250/78-14 and 50-251/78-14 These pages contained proprietary information and were deleted.
~
y b