LER-2015-001, Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments |
| Event date: |
|
|---|
| Report date: |
|
|---|
| Reporting criterion: |
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications |
|---|
| 4582015001R00 - NRC Website |
|
text
-En terg Entergy Operations, Inc.
River Bend Station 5485 U. S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225 381 4374 Fax 225 381 4872 eolson@entergy.com Eric W. Olson Site Vice President April 16, 2015 RBG-47556 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Licensee Event Report 050-458/2015-001-00 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 RBF1-15-0052
Dear Sir or Madam:
The enclosed Licensee Event Report is hereby filed in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73. This document contains no commitments. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Joseph Clark at 225-381-4177.
Sincerely, EWO/dhw Enclosure cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 1600 East Lamar Blvd.
Arlington, TX 76011-4511 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Central Records Clerk Public Utility Commission of Texas 1701 N. Congress Ave.
Austin, TX 78711-3326
'; c--
Licensee Event Report 050-458 / 2015-001-00 RBG-47556 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Alan Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS O-8B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 INPO (via ICES reporting)
NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 0113112017 (02-2014)
Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />.
Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.
- , Vg" Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections LBranch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) internet e-mail to lntocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and (See Page 2 for required number of Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB digits/characters for each block) control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
- 3. PAGE River Bend Station - Unit i 05000 458 1 OF
- 4. TITLE Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments
- 5. EVENT DATE
- 6. LER NUMBER
- 8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV M
YEI NUMBER NO.
2 18 2015 2015 001 00 DOCKET NUMBER 05000 DOCKET NUMBER 05000
- 9. OPERATING MODE
- 11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check all that apply)
El 20.2201(b) 0 20.2203(a)(3)(i)
[] 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)
F] 50.73(a)(2)(vii)
[] 20.2201(d)
[] 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)
[] 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)
[]
50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)
El 20.2203(a)(1)
El 20.2203(a)(4)
El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)
[
50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)
_ []20.2203(a)(2)(i)
[] 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
El 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)
- 10. POWER LEVEL
[] 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)
[
50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A) 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)
[
50.73(a)(2)(x) 9E 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)
[] 50.36(c)(2)
[] 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)
[] 73.71 (a)(4) 98
[]20.2203(a)(2)(iv)
[]50.46(a)(3)(ii)
[]50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)
[]73.71 (a) (5)
El 20.2203(a)(2)(v)
El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)
El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)
El OTHER El 20.2203(a)(2)(vi)
[] 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)
El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)
Specify in Abstract below or in
REPORTED CONDITION On February 18, 2015, while the plant was operating at approximately 98% power, it was discovered that four local leak rate surveillance test procedures (STP) each contained a similar error that resulted in an improper test configuration. This deficiency in each procedure erroneously required the closure of the respective motor-operated valve in the packing leak-off line for the outboard main steam isolation valve being tested, when the proper test configuration would require the valve to be open. This condition had existed since the procedures were revised in 1992 to add specific valve lineup checklists, where the error existed. The net effect of the error was to partially negate the effectiveness of a surveillance test required by Technical Specifications.
This condition is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v) as operations prohibited by Technical Specifications.
BACKGROUND The function of the primary containment isolation valves, including the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) is to limit fission product release during and following postulated design basis accidents. The main steam positive leakage control system (MS-PLCS) supplements the isolation function of the MSIVs. The MS-PLCS consists of two independent subsystems: an inboard subsystem, which is connected between the inboard and outboard MSIVs; and an outboard subsystem, which is connected between the double disk of main steam line shutoff valves and the valve stem packing glands of the outboard MSIVs. The system supplies pressurized air to those components following system actuation to provide positive sealing of each penetration. Each subsystem is powered by the respective emergency diesel generator.
Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.6.1.3.10 requires the verification that the total leakage rate through the valves served by each division of main steam penetration leakage control system (MS-PLCS) is less than or equal to 150 standard cubic feet per hour (scfh) per division. The test frequency is governed by the primary containment leakage rate testing program. The valves tested in the affected procedures are the outboard main steam isolation valves (MSIVs), and the test boundary includes the MSIV packing leak-off lines.
The MS-PLCS system is designed to seal the various primary containment penetrations isolated by power-operated valves, and would be manually initiated following an event postulated in the site accident analysis, as documented in the Updated Safety Analysis Report. Periodic verification of the leakage rate through the individual containment penetrations serves to validate the radiological assumptions supporting the accident analysis.
If the MS-PLCS system is placed into service, the MSIV packing leak-off isolation valves would be open. Having the valves closed isolates the outboard MSIV packing glands leak-off lines, and thus artificially confines the boundary of the potential leakage paths.
INVESTIGATION and IMMEDIATE ACTIONS This condition was discovered as the station was preparing to enter a scheduled refueling outage. The plant was taken offline on February 22, and entered cold shutdown later that day.
This condition was discovered during development of a new procedure for combined steam line MSIV and outboard drain isolation valve leak rate testing. During development of the new STP, it was recognized that the existing procedures specify an incorrect position for motor-operated valves B21-MOVF027A, B, C, and D (main steam isolation valve stem leak-off drain). Because these
were specified to be in the closed position, outboard MSIV stem packing leakage, if any, was not included in the leakage total for the outboard MSIVs, and has not been included in past testing as required to support the 150 scfh limit documented in SR 3.6.1.3.10. The Division I (outboard) main steam line and steam line drain penetration leakage rate summation documented at the end of the previous refueling outage was 101.35 scfh, compared to an allowable rate of 150 scfh indicating a margin of approximately 48 scfh.
The incorrect valve position for the subject test procedures was caused by lack of attention to detail when the procedures were developed. The procedure preparer and reviewers failed to recognize that the closed position for the subject valves would not allow for inclusion of potential packing leakage in the total leakage summation for the outboard MSIVs.
The affected procedures were revised and performed to establish the correct test configuration and confirm compliance with the applicable surveillance requirement.
PREVIOUS OCCURRENCE EVALUATION No similar occurrences have been reported by River Bend Station in the past five years.
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE
An assessment of effects of the procedure error was conducted. Reasonable assurance was established that the safety function of the outboard MSIVs was not compromised by this condition. Additionally, since the outboard MSIV packing leak-off isolation valves were required to be open by the system operating procedure, this condition did not adversely affect the ability of the MS-PLCS system to perform its design function. This conclusion is based on review of test results for the previous three operating cycles.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000458/LER-2015-001, Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments | Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000458/LER-2015-001, Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments | Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-002, Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments | Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Deficient Local Leak Rate Test Procedures Containing Erroneous Valve Alignments | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000458/LER-2015-002, Regarding Emergency Diesel Generator Start Circuit Actuation Due to Loss of Power from Reserve Station Service No. 2 | Regarding Emergency Diesel Generator Start Circuit Actuation Due to Loss of Power from Reserve Station Service No. 2 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-003, Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications and Loss of Safety Function Due to Inoperability of Division 2 Containment Penetration Leakage Control System | Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications and Loss of Safety Function Due to Inoperability of Division 2 Containment Penetration Leakage Control System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C), Loss of Safety Function - Release of Radioactive Material 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000458/LER-2015-003, Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications and Loss of Safety Function Due to Inoperability of Division 2 Containment Penetration Leakage Control System | Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications and Loss of Safety Function Due to Inoperability of Division 2 Containment Penetration Leakage Control System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000458/LER-2015-004, Regarding Potential Loss of Safety Function of Onsite Ac/Dc Distribution Systems Due to Postulated Main Control Building Heat-up Following Loss of Ventilation Cooling System | Regarding Potential Loss of Safety Function of Onsite Ac/Dc Distribution Systems Due to Postulated Main Control Building Heat-up Following Loss of Ventilation Cooling System | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-005, Regarding Automatic Reactor Scram Due to Low Reactor Water Level Following a Loss of Instrument Power | Regarding Automatic Reactor Scram Due to Low Reactor Water Level Following a Loss of Instrument Power | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-006, Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Error in Initial Operability Evaluation | Regarding Operations Prohibited by Technical Specifications Due to Error in Initial Operability Evaluation | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-007, Unit 1 Regarding Potential Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Failure of Main Control Building Ventilation Chiller | Unit 1 Regarding Potential Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Failure of Main Control Building Ventilation Chiller | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) | | 05000458/LER-2015-008, Of River Bend Station, Unit 1, Regarding Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Failure of Main Control Building Ventilation Chiller | Of River Bend Station, Unit 1, Regarding Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Failure of Main Control Building Ventilation Chiller | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-009, Regarding Automatic Reactor Scram Due to Partial Loss of Offsite Power Caused by Fault in Local 230K Switchyard | Regarding Automatic Reactor Scram Due to Partial Loss of Offsite Power Caused by Fault in Local 230K Switchyard | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000458/LER-2015-010, Regarding Potential Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Failure of Main Control Building Ventilation Chiller | Regarding Potential Loss of Safety Function of High Pressure Core Spray Due to Failure of Main Control Building Ventilation Chiller | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), Prevented Safety Function in Multiple System 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) |
|