05000354/LER-2016-003, Regarding As-Found Values for Safety Relief Valve Lift Set Points Exceed Technical Specification Allowable Limit

From kanterella
(Redirected from 05000354/LER-2016-003)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Regarding As-Found Values for Safety Relief Valve Lift Set Points Exceed Technical Specification Allowable Limit
ML16355A181
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek 
Issue date: 12/20/2016
From: Casulli E
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LR-N16-0227 LER 16-003-00
Download: ML16355A181 (6)


LER-2016-003, Regarding As-Found Values for Safety Relief Valve Lift Set Points Exceed Technical Specification Allowable Limit
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
3542016003R00 - NRC Website

text

LR-N 16-0227 DEC 2.0 2016 PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-001 Hope Creek Generating Station Unit 1 PSEG Nuclear LLC 10CFR50.73 Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 Docket No. 50-354

Subject:

Licensee Event Report 2016-003-00 In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), PSEG Nuclear LLC is submitting the enclosed Licensee Event Report (LER) Number 2016-003-00, "As-Found Values for Safety Relief Valve Lift Set Points Exceed Technical Specification Allowable Limit."

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Thomas MacEwen at (856) 339-1097.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

Sincerely, Edward T. Casulli Plant Manager Hope Creek Generating Station ttm Attachment: Licensee Event Report 2016-003-00

LR-N16-0227 Page 2 Document Control Desk cc:

Mr. Daniel Dorman, Regional Administrator-Region I, NRC Ms. Carleen Parker, Project Manager-US NRC 10CFR50.73 Mr. Justin Hawkins, NRC Senior Resident Inspector-Hope Creek (X24)

Mr. Patrick Mulligan, Manager IV, NJBNE Mr. Thomas MacEwen, Hope Creek Commitment Tracking Coordinator (H02)

Mr. Lee Marabella-Corporate Commitment Tracking Coordinator (N21)

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMS: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2018 (06-2016)

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />.

  • ~-\\

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

Reported lessons learned are Incorporated Into the licensing process and fed back to Industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections (See Page 2 for required number of digits/characters for each block)

Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to lnfocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory (See NUREG-1 022, R.3 for instruction and guidance for completing this form Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control ht!Q://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1 022/r3/)

number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person Is not required to respond to, the information collection.

13. PAGE Hope Creek Generating Station 05000354 1 OF 4
4. TITLE As-Found Values for Safety Relief Valve Lift Set Points Exceed Technical Specification Allowable Limit
5. EVENT DATE
6. LER NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED YEAR I SEQUENTIAL I REV FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NO.

05000 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 10 22 2016 2016

- 003
- 00 12 20 2016 05000
9. OPERA liNG MODE
11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: Check all that apply) 5-Refuel D 2o.2201(b)

D 20.2203(a)(3)(i)

D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

D 20.22o1(d)

D 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)

D 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

D 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

D 20.2203(a)(1)

D 20.2203(a)(4)

D 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

D 50.73(a)(2)(1x)(A)

D 20.2203(a)(2)(i)

D 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10. POWER LEVEL D 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)

D 50.36(c)(1 )(ii)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)

D 73.71(a)(4)

D 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)

D 50.36(c)(2)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)

D 73.71(a)(5) 0%

D 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)

D 50.46(a)(3)(ii) 0 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)

D 73.77(a)(1)

D 20.2203(a)(2)(v)

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)

D 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

D 73.77(a)(2)(i)

D 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)

D 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

D 73.77(a)(2)(il)

D 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C) 0 OTHER Specify In Abstract below or in I

SEQUENTIAL I

NUMBER

- 003 REV NO.
- 00 Technical Specification (TS) 3.4.2.1 requires that the safety function of at least 13 of 14 SRVs be operable with a specified code safety valve function lift setting, within a tolerance of+/- 3%. Action (a) of TS 3.4.2.1 specifies "With the safety valve function of two or more of the above listed fourteen safety/relief valves inoperable, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />." Therefore, this is a condition reportable under 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as an Operation or Condition Prohibited by TS.

The extent of condition for this event is to expand the scope of the SRV Group 1 valve testing, per ASME OM Code Section 1-1320 for Class 1 Pressure Relief Valves. However, since all14 SRV pilot stage assemblies were removed and replaced with tested spares during the refueling outage (H1 R20), the extent of condition scope was satisfied.

CAUSE OF EVENT

The cause of the set-point drift for the ten SRV pilot stage assemblies is attributed to corrosion bonding between the pilot disc and seating surfaces, which is consistent with industry experience. This conclusion is based on previous cause evaluations and the repetitive nature of this condition at HCGS and within the BWR industry.

SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS

There were no instances during cycle 20 that resulted in any of the fourteen SRVs being declared inoperable and there were no events during that cycle that required operation of the SRVs. All SRVs lifted well below the Safety Limit, providing reasonable assurance that accident analysis conclusions would remain valid. The industry has recognized that corrosion bonding occurs during the operating cycle. Once an SRV lifts, the corrosion bond breaks and subsequent openings occur very close to the set point as demonstrated during testing.

An evaluation is in progress to assess the aggregate safety significance of the as-found condition of ten SRVs. The evaluation will review the reactor pressure vessel over-pressure protection design function of the valves; the impact of higher relief set points on other safety systems (i.e., HPCI, RCIC, and SLC); and fuel considerations. The conclusions of that evaluation will be reported in a supplement to this LER.

SAFETY SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL FAILURE An evaluation to assess the aggregate safety significance of the failure of ten SRVs is in progress. The conclusion on whether this constitutes a Safety System Functional Failure (SSFF) as defined in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," will be reported in a supplement to this LER.

PREVIOUS EVENTS A review of events for the past four years at Hope Creek was performed to determine if similar events had occurred.

Similar events occurred during the 2013 (H1 R18) and 2015 (H1 R19) Hope Creek refueling outages when multiple SRVs were found out of the TS required limits of+/- 3%. These events were reported as LER 354/2013-007-00 (five inoperable SRVs) and LER 354/2015-004-00 (ten inoperable SRVs). Page 3 of 4 (06-2016)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2018 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET (See NUREG-1 022, R.3 for instruction and guidance for completing this form http://WNW.nrc.gov/readinq-rm/doc-collections/nureqs/staff/sr1 022/r3/)

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />.

Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry.

Send comments regarding burden estimate to the FOIA, Privacy and Information Collections Branch (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to lnfocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

3. LER NUMBER YEAR I

SEQUENTIAL I

NUMBER Hope Creek Generating Station 05000-354 2016 "003

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

1. All 14 SRV pilot stage assemblies were removed and replaced with pre-tested, certified spare pilot valves (H1 R20).

REV NO.

- 00
2.

Evaluate options for the replacement of the currently installed Target Rock two-stage SRVs with a design that eliminates setpoint drift events exceeding +/-3% and improve SRV reliability. The replacement schedule will be developed after a suitable valve is identified.

COMMITMENTS

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this LER. Page 4 of 4