ML091310178

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:01, 26 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Unit 1 - 2008 Annual Nonradiological Environment Operation Report
ML091310178
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/2009
From: Brandon M K
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML091310178 (14)


Text

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Gentlemen:

In the Matter of the ) Docket No. 50-390 Tennessee Valley Authority )

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) - UNIT 1 - 2008 ANNUAL NONRADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (ANEOR)

In accordance with Section 5.4.1 of Appendix B, "Environmental Protection Plan," of the

WBN Operating License, provided in the enclosure is the 2008 ANEOR for WBN. This

report addresses the period from February 7, 2008 through February 6, 2009.

There are no regulatory commitments in this letter and should there be any questions

regarding this letter, please contact me at (423) 365-1824.

Sincerely,

M. K. Brandon

Manager, Site Licensing

and Industry Affairs

Enclosure

cc: See page 2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2

Enclosure

cc (Enclosure):

NRC Resident Inspector Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. John G. Lamb, Senior Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation MS O-8 H1A Washington, DC 20555-0001

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 446 Neal Street Cookeville, TN 38501

E-1 of 12 Enclosure 2008 Annual Nonradiological Environm ental Operating Report (ANEOR)

E-2 of 12 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT ANNUAL NON-RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FEBRUARY 7, 2008 THROUGH FEBRUARY 6, 2009 T VA E-3 of 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................E-4 II. REPORTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AS SPECIFIED IN THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYST EM (NPDES) PERMIT................................E-4 III. SPECIAL BIOLOGICAL MONITO RING REPORTS...........................................E-5 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN NONCOMPLIANCES.........................................................................................E-6 V. CHANGES MADE TO APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS AND CERTIFICATIONS....................................................................E-8 VI. CHANGES IN FACILITY DES IGN OR OPERATION.........................................E-9 VII. NON-ROUTINE REPORTS.............................................................................E-12 VIII. CHANGES IN APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN SPECIFICATIONS...........................................................................................E-12

E-4 of 12 I. INTRODUCTION The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Annual Non-Radiological Envi ronmental Operating Report is provided for the period of February 7, 2008 through February 6, 2009. This report was prepared in accordance with Appendi x B to facility operating license NPF-90, "Environmental Protection Plan (EPP)," Section 5.4.1, "Rout ine Reports." This report includes a summary of:

A. Reports previously submitted as s pecified in the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant National Pollutant Discharge Eliminat ion System (NPDES) Permit Number TN0020168.

B. All special reports submitted per EPP Se ction 4.1, "Environmental Monitoring."

C. All EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them.

D. Changes made to applicable state and federal permits and certifications.

E. Changes in station design that could in volve a significant environmental impact or change the findings of the Final Envi ronmental Impact Statement (FEIS).

F. Non-routine reports submitted per EPP Section 4.2, "Unusual or Important Environmental Events."

G. Changes in approved EPP.

II. REPORTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AS SPECIFIED IN THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE

ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT The following reports were submitted as specified in the WBN NPDES Permit Number TN0020168 and the Tennessee Sto rm Water Multi-Sector General Permit (TMSP) Number TNR051343:

A. As required by the NPDES permi t, Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) were completed and submitted monthly prior to the 15 th of the month deadline to the Tennessee Depar tment of Environment and Conservation (TDEC).

B. DMR Quality Assurance (QA)

Laboratory Performance Evaluation Study 28 was completed by and submi tted to Environmental Resource Associates, the TDEC, and the Envir onmental Protection Agency (EPA) prior to the October 29, 2008 deadline.

E-5 of 12 II. REPORTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AS SPECIFIED IN THE WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE

ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT (continued)

C. The annual Biocide/Corrosion Tr eatment Report was completed and submitted to the TDEC prior to the February 15, 2008 deadline.

D. The "Winter 2008 Compliance Survey for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Outfall 113 Passive Mixing Zone" was completed and submitted to the

TDEC prior to the semi-annual require ment deadline. The field work for the "Summer 2008 Compliance Survey fo r Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Outfall 113 Passive Mixing Zone" was completed August 28, 2008. The data is

currently under analysis with plans to submit the reports to the TDEC, Division of Water Pollution Control no later than May 29, 2009. This issue

is being addressed in TVA's Correct ive Action Program as Problem Evaluation Report (PER) Number 169819.

E. The annual sampling and analysis required by the TMSP TR050000 for storm water was performed and the annual report was submitted prior to

the March 31, 2008 deadline.

III. SPECIAL BIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORTS A. EPP Section 4.1.1, "Aquatic Monitoring"

1. Routine semi-annual Whole Effluent Toxicity (a.k.a. chronic biotoxicity tests) were conducted on plant effluents and the appropriate reports were

submitted as part of the DMR in May [Outfall Serial Numbers (OSNs) 101, 112, 113] and November (OSNs 101, 112, 113), as required by the NPDES permit.

2. An annual report on the "Biologica l Monitoring of the Tennessee River near the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 2007" was submitted to the TDEC in

May 2008 indicating no adverse impact to aquatic life due to WBN

operation. This report is not requir ed in accordance with Part III,Section I of the WBN NPDES Permit, but was a recommendation in the "Watts Bar

Nuclear Plant Supplemental Condenser Cooling Water System Fish Monitoring Program, 2001" report to be consistent with other required annual reporting programs at Tennessee and Alabama nuclear plants.

E-6 of 12 III. SPECIAL BIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORTS (continued)

3. In accordance with the prov isions of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 69-8-301 et seq., the Water Resources Information Act, WBN

submitted the Water Withdrawal R egistration Form for Calendar Year 2008 to the TDEC prior to the February 15, 2009 deadline. Although federal agencies are not subject to laws and regulations promulgated by state governments unless Congress has clearly waived the federal government's sovereign immunity, in 2003 TVA voluntarily agreed as a

matter of policy to provide the registra tion information in order to assist both TVA and the TDEC in carrying out their water management

responsibilities.

B. EPP Section 4.1.2, "Maint enance of Transmission Line Corridors"

Listed below are the 500 kV transmission lines associated with Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and information regarding the maintenance that was

performed on each line:

500 kV Line Identifier Maintenance Performed Bull Run - Sequoyah Watts Bar - Roane Watts Bar - Volunteer No major clearing was performed on these line corridors using herbicides. Sequoyah - Watts Bar 374 acres were treated with the following mixture of herbicides: 4% Dow AgroScience Accord XRT 25 ounces of DuPont Lineage Clearstand 0.5% surfactant 0.1% dye IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN NONCOMPLIANCES WBN received zero Notice of Violati ons (NOV) from February 2008 to February 2009. In accordance with the NPDES permit, the following noncompliances were

reported to the TDEC.

1. WBN reported to the Chattanooga Fiel d Office on February 20, 2008 that an iron cut-off concentration was exceeded at sample point SW-9 in

Drainage Area 11. WBN did not rece ive a NOV from the TDEC. A separate notification was provided to the Field Office for each occurrence (refer to table below). While the October result indicates continued improvement, the November result i ndicated that continued monitoring and remediation efforts are needed. These results are summarized in the

table below:

E-7 of 12 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN NONCOMPLIANCES (continued)

Date Collected Analytical Results January 29, 2008 13 mg/L April 11, 2008 9.6 mg/L October 24, 2008 6.4 mg/L November 13, 2008 11 mg/L As described in correspondence to the TDEC, the SWPPP characterizes this drainage area as one associated with industrial activity. Since the last

required 2007 Storm Water sample for iron, collected on March 16, 2007

(0.78 mg/L), there was considerable activity relating to movement of industrial materials in this drai nage area which created soil disturbance directly upstream of the sample point, SW-9. WBN increased the Best

Management Practices (BMPs) in this area (soil stabilization and silt fences) to reduce iron analytical result s to below the cut-off concentration limit. In addition, soil stabilizat ion via increased vegetation density remains in progress. The downwar d trend from the January through the October sample analytical results indi cate that the BMP's are reducing the mobilization of iron and WBN will continue to monitor this storm water

outfall. The SWPPP was also reviewed but determined that changes to

the plan are unnecessary at this time.

2. OSN 112 NPDES samples collected on June 16, 2008 at 10:30 yielded a dissolved oxygen (DO) of 3.9 mg/L. The back-up sample analyzed

June 17th yielded a DO of 3.9 mg/L. This is a NPDES violation as the

minimum daily permit limit is 5.0 mg/L. Chemistry/Environmental verbally informed the Chattanooga Field Office of the noncompliance on June 18, 2008. In addition, per Part II.C.2.

b. of the WBN NPDES permit, the noncompliance was reported on the June Discharge Monitoring Report which was sent to the TDEC Nashville office and the Chattanooga Field

Office on July 9, 2008 via certified mail. WBN did not receive an NOV

from the TDEC. The corrective action was to reinforce the need for timely

communication of all limit threats to permit noncompliance.

3. A Biological Oxygen Demand sample collected July 14, 2008 at OSN 111, the sewage treatment plant, was not analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation within the 40 CFR 136 48-hour hold time requirement. As the analytical lab did not notify WBN of the hold time exceedance, WBN was unaware of the hold time exceedance until the following week when the

results were received. Since WBN did not have the opportunity to collect

an additional sample for the week of E-8 of 12 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN NONCOMPLIANCES (continued)

July 14 th , this resulted in a missed NPDES sample. In accordance with Part II.C.2. b. of the WBN NPDES permit, the noncompliance was

reported on the July Discharge Moni toring Report which was sent the TDEC Nashville office and the Chattanooga Field Office on

August 7, 2008 via certified mail. WB N did not receive an NOV from the TDEC. The corrective actions were

(1) Provide WBN expectations for NPDES sample analysis and immediate notification of issues to

Environmental Science Corporation, (2) Revise the governing procedure, 0-PI-ENV-3.1, NPDES Plant Effluents, to include an action step to contact the analytical lab in the event the analyt ical results were not received by the requested date, and (3) WBN reques ted a two-day turn around time for all weekly NPDES samples fr om the analytical laboratory.

V. CHANGES MADE TO APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS AND CERTIFICATIONS A. NPDES Permit TN 0020168

1. The NPDES permit renewal application packet consisting of EPA Form 1, site map, Form 2C, Form 2C addendum , flow schematic, Form 2E, and a permit address form submitted to the State of Tennessee on May 3, 2006

is still pending. Sampling for permit renewal occurred in December 2005

and historical data were compiled fr om the period of October 1, 2004 through September 30, 2005.

2. In accordance with the TDEC Environmental Permits Handbook, WBN submitted an Application for Information Regarding a Subsurface Sewage

Disposal System Permit and Certification of Completion for the security

training building septic tank in dr ainage area Number 13 in April 2008.

TDEC Division of Groundwater Protec tion inspected the septic tank on April 28, 2008 and approved the construction. PER Number 143393 was

written to document that a permit was not applied for prior to construction

due to an error in understanding betw een county, state, and federal policies which govern the installation.

The TDEC reported that the issue had been corrected and WBN did not receive an NOV.

3. During June 2008, WBN re-evaluated its industrial activity in drainage areas and in accordance with the TMSP notified the TDEC of the removal

of Storm Water Outfall 5 (SW-5) and Storm Water Outfall 7 (SW-7). WBN believes coverage under the Tennessee Multi-Sector General Permit for

Industrial Activities Sector L and O is appropriate, consistent with the previous Notice of Coverage E-9 of 12 V. CHANGES MADE TO APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL PERMITS AND CERTIFICATIONS (continued) issued for this facility. An up to date SWPPP and supporting documents are available at the site. In a previous SWPPP, SW-5 was incorrectly

described as representative of the discharge from Storm Water Outfall SW-2. As SW-2's drainage area is associated with industrial activity and

SW-5 no longer has industrial activity associated with it, SW-5 could not

be representative of SW-2. Inspecti ons and monitoring continue at SW-2.

A change occurred in the land use fo r the drainage area associated with SW-7. While previously used for laydown activities (industrial), this area

has now been converted for use as office space (non industrial). SW-5

and SW-7 were removed from the Notice of Intent.

4. On September 10, 2008, WBN subm itted a minor modification to the TDEC Nashville office for termination of discharges from NPDES Internal Monitoring Point (IMP) 111. The WBN sewage treatment plant had been

connected to the Spring City Publicly Owned Treatment Plant effective August 9, 2008 with October 3, 2008 (date the effluent box was completely filled with gravel) as t he actual termination date of the discharge from IMP 111.

B. Air Permits

WBN is currently operating under Air Permit Number 448529. No changes to this permit were made during the reporting period.

VI. CHANGES IN FACILITY DESIGN OR OPERATION In accordance with EPP Section 3.1, "Pl ant Design and Operation," facility design and operational changes were reviewed fo r potential effect on the environment as described below. A review of facility design and operational changes

proposed from February 7, 2008 through February 6, 2009 was performed.

Projects considered as having potent ial impact on the environment included those that:

Could have caused waste st ream generation/alteration.

Required the acquisition/modification of permits.

Involved the use of hazardous material.

Required physical construction.

E-10 of 12 VI. CHANGES IN FACILITY DESIGN OR OPERATION (continued)

The review, performed in accordance wit h the guidelines of the Tennessee Valley Authority's National Environmental Po licy Act (NEPA) Program, documented that design and operational changes did not involve an unreviewed environmental question. The following criteria were used to identify those projects with a potential for environmental effects:

A. Waste stream generation/alteration (Air, Hazardous Waste, Solid Wast e, Polychlorinated Biphenyl, Asbestos, Wastewater)

B. Permit Acquisition/Modification

[NPDES, Air, Inert Landfill, Other (316b, 404, etc.)]

C. Hazardous Materials (Hazardous Materials that are envir onmentally unfriendly and are likely to generate a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act hazardous or Toxic

Substances Control Act waste)

D. Physical Construction Involved (Erosion/Sedimentation Effects, Tr ansportation Effects, Noise Effects, Groundwater Effects, Surface Water E ffects, Floodplain Effects, Wetland Effects, Prime Farmland Effects, Unique Natural Features Effects, Aquatic Ecology Effects, Terrestrial Ecology Effects, Protected Species Effects, Sensitive Habitat Effects, Visual Effects, Historical, Cultural and Archeological Effects, Changes in Site Land Use, and Controversy)

E. Special Tests There were no special tests conducted during this period that met the environmental impact criteria.

F. Temporary Alterations There were no temporary alterations conducted during this period that met the environmental impact criteria.

G. Design and Operational Changes Most of the design and operational changes conducted during this period did not meet the environmental impact cr iteria. There were eight facility design and operational changes made dur ing this report period with a potential impact on the environment.

The appropriate environmental reviews were completed and all changes were found to be within the

scope of existing environmental permits and in compliance with NEPA

regulations. Those Categorical Exclus ion Checklists written to document the site changes reviewed are as follows:

E-11 of 12 VI. CHANGES IN FACILITY DESIGN OR OPERATION (continued)

(1) 19929-Installation of Power & Communications Fiber Optic Line & Fence repositioning at the Unit 1 Staging Area (2) 19869-Generic Nuisance Tree Removal (3) 19554-Yard Holding Pond (YHP) Boat Ramp (4) 19540-Installation of Power & Co mmunications Fiber Optic Line Between the Unit 2 Work Control C enter and the Railroad Trailer (5) 19506-Installation of Communications Fiber Optic Line Between the Switchyard fence and Trailer Number 12 (6) 19474-Installation of Communications Fiber Optic Line Between Unit 1 Warehouse A and Warehouse B (7) 19395-Chain Link Fence Between Unit 1 Warehouses A and B (8) 19392-Paint Shop Addition (9) 19273-WBN Training Center Cooling Tower Blowdown to Catch Basin Number 97 (10) 19194-Unit 2 West Parking Lot Light Poles (11) 19063-Transport Generator Rotor fr om and to WBN via Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (12) 18902-WBN Unit 2 Tree Removal (13) 18868-WBN Unit 2 Warehouse Telecommunication & Fiber Optic Service Construction (14) 18591-Quality Control Office Traile r at the Unit 2 Receiving Warehouse (15) 18532-Sewage Treatment Plant Building Hook-Up to Spring City Line (16) 18415-WBN Unit 2 Condenser Bundle Storage Area & Haul Route (17) 18414-Generic - Chain Link Fenc es Outside of the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF), Probable Maximum Prec ipitation (PMP), and Protected Area (PA) (18) 18413-Generic - Cooling Tower Perimeter Fill Replacement (19) 18378-Generic - Surfac e Preparation via Sandblasting (20) 18344-Generic - Temporary Wa rehouse Complex and Loading Dock (21) 18271-Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 500-kV Switchyard Startup Unit 2 - Project No. Z0172 - Work Orders 62189, 62190 & 62191 (22) 18270-Firing Range Trailer, Septic Tank & Field (23) 18268-Dean Building Sidewalk Extension (24) 18217-WBN Unit 2 Powerline Upgrade (25) 18149-Security Shelter (26) 18134-Asphalt Existing Safe Walkway From North Portal Parking Lot to North Portal Entrance (27) 18092-Engineering Quality Building (EQB) Safe Walkway (28) 18088-Drainage Area Number 14 Chain Link Fencing (29) 18087-Drainage Area Number 11 Chain Link Fencing (30) 18079-Drainage Area 2 Chain Link Fencing E-12 of 12 VI. CHANGES IN FACILITY DESIGN OR OPERATION (continued)

All other facility design and operati onal changes made during this reporting period with a potential impact on the envir onment were found to be within the scope of existing environmental permits and in compliance with regulations.

In summary, there were no facility design or operational changes from February 7, 2008 to February 6, 2009 which resulted in an unreviewed environmental question.

VII. NON-ROUTINE REPORTS No non-routine reports for EPP Section 4.2 were issued during this reporting period. VIII. CHANGES IN APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN SPECIFICATIONS No changes were made to Appendix B, "EPP," of the WBN operating license during the reporting period.