ML12334A394

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:11, 1 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (98) of Alice Bartholomew on Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12334A394
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/2012
From: Bartholomew A
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch
References
77FR65137 00098, NRC-2012-0246
Download: ML12334A394 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 As of: November 27, 2012 Received:

November 21, 2012 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: P'encllng_yost PUBL C S BM IS IONTracking No. ljw-8244-5all Comments Due: January 02, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration on Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On: NRC-2012-0246-0001 Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation

/Document:

NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-0100 Comment on FR Doc # 2012-26295

//- .,-/O/Submitter Information

_Name: Alice Bartholomew

.:')Address: iT-415 Wall Street .Elmira, NY, 14905 <Submitter's Representative:

Reed -19%.n1 I-r-n Cl)-~fl~-' ~m C-)General Comment I am very concerned about the temporary storage of radioactive waste because of the horrible damage it causes to the environment, humans and sentient beings. For the sake of ourselves and future generations we need to address this issue. I agree with all the points made by Beyond Nuclear as listed below.The preferred alternative is to stop making irradiated nuclear fuel. NRC should cease licensing atomic reactors, which inevitably generate high-level radioactive waste, deadly for at least a million years. This includes the rejection of any more combined Construction and Operating License Applications (COLAs) for proposed new atomic reactors.

For the nearly 70,000 metric tons of irradiated nuclear fuel currently stored at U.S. atomic reactors, Hardened On-Site Storage (HOSS) should be required.

The risks of pool leaks into groundwater, which then flow into surface waters downstream

-- as have occurred at Indian Point 2 & 3 (NY/Hudson River), The risks of pool fires must be considered in this EIS. The risks of pool fires must be considered in this EIS. The risks of current dry cask storage must also be considered in this EIS.Thank you considering my comments.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= S. Lopas (SLL2)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064...

11/27/2012