ML13170A135

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:33, 1 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (55) of Dr. Nathaniel Floyd Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point Unit 3
ML13170A135
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/29/2013
From: Nik Floyd
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00055, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13170A135 (1)


Text

Page 1 of I RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH ISNRC; As of: June 11, 2013 Received:

May 29, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSION I .tatus:PendingPost lracking No.1ljx-85m0-n5m Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0044 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 Submitter Information Name: Dr. Nathaniel Floyd '- 4 d Address: 126 Sharon Road P.O. Box 1571 Lakeville, CT, 06039 Submitter's Representative:

NA Organization:

NA Government Agency: NA General Comment NRC has failed to enforce regulations governing nuclear plants like Indian Point. These NRC "exemptions" from regulation now seriously expose nearby citizens to the risks of nuclear leaks and fires. It is incumbent on the NRC to act on behalf of the safety of vulnerable communities rather than to protect the nuclear industry.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl)https ://www. fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=09000064812ffc I 3&for... 06/11/2013