ML13170A323

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:01, 16 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (81) of Dolores Baldasare Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point Unit 3
ML13170A323
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/30/2013
From: Baldasare D
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00081
Download: ML13170A323 (1)


Text

Paae 1 of I RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH LIJSNRC As of: June 11, 2013 Received:

May 30, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSION2013

]um M 5 6 Status: Pending Post Tracking No. ljx-85md-vsvp Comments Due: June 03, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RECFIVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0070 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 13 Submitter Information 3 Name: Dolores Baldasare Address: 252 Treetop Circle Nanuet, NY, 10954 General Comment Regarding Docket ID number: NRC-2013-0063, I think it is high-time that the NRC make public safety a priority at Indian Point and that it should do everything possible to safeguard Indian Point from a catastrophic fire. To my knowledge, the current system has only demonstrated 24 minutes of protection.

Please stop providing exemptions to nuclear power plants like Indian Point. Please do not sacrifice public safety for the sake of making it easier for these plants to exist.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= D. Pickett (dvpl)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=0900006481300b09&for...

06/11/2013