ML13177A180

Comment (132) of Joan Ashton Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3; Extension of Public Comment Period

ML13177A180
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	06/03/2013
From:	Ashton J - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00132, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13177A180 (1)

Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES Ae!r DWRECTIVES

.As of: June 25, 2013 Received:

June 03, 2013 Status: PendingPost PU L3J 25 AM 9: 36 Tracking No. ljx-85pf-ltto Comments Due: June 03, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0063 REQr J\/!ED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3; Extension of Public Comment Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0122 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792

.3 Submitter Information Name: Joan Ashton Address: 15 Crumitie RD Loudonville, NY, 12211 General Comment The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.12 OS r 'ý ,6 Tee)FlaIe4e

-?Dr~L-o/3 A.4d.- D. Plakeý (dupo https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064813089df&for...

06/25/2013