05000321/LER-1979-079-03, /03L-0:on 790909,reactor Water Level Surveillance Test Grace Period Had Been Exceeded.Caused by Personnel Error.Test Was Performed Satisfactorily.Personnel Counseled on Timely Completion of Tests

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:05, 5 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0:on 790909,reactor Water Level Surveillance Test Grace Period Had Been Exceeded.Caused by Personnel Error.Test Was Performed Satisfactorily.Personnel Counseled on Timely Completion of Tests
ML19209A529
Person / Time
Site: Hatch 
Issue date: 09/24/1979
From:
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19209A505 List:
References
LER-79-079-03L-01, LER-79-79-3L-1, NUDOCS 7910040286
Download: ML19209A529 (1)


LER-1979-079, /03L-0:on 790909,reactor Water Level Surveillance Test Grace Period Had Been Exceeded.Caused by Personnel Error.Test Was Performed Satisfactorily.Personnel Counseled on Timely Completion of Tests
Event date:
Report date:
3211979079R03 - NRC Website

text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

7CMM 364 LICENSEE EVENT REPOFlT

{

  • CONTROL BLOCK: l l

l l

l l

lh (PLEASE PRINT 09 TYPE ALL RECUtRED INPORf.tATION)

M J A l E l I l H l l l@l 0 l O l 0 l O l 0 l 0 l 010 l 0 l 0 l 0 l@l 4 l 1 l 1. I I I I l@l l

[

s, c T s. g l

3 uct~sEE Coat

.4 is ucEsst ~u-.E.

2t, uc ~st TTPE,a

"!'?"' Lt_]@l0 15 to I 0101312 I 1 l@t 0 I 9 i O 19 I 719 l@l0 is 12 L' 17 19 l@

6d 63 EVENT oATE 14 7.

REPO.tToATE 8J s

5 60 65 occKET *iuM4Em EVENT CESC tiPTION AND PPC8 ABLEl JNSECUENCES h a

yl While in shutdown, it was discovered that ne Reactor kater Level (ADS) Serveillance l l

Test' (HNP-1-3251) grace feriod had been c.xceeded. The Lest was completed ten (10) j l

hours later than the grace period allows. When the surveillance test was performed. l i

, l the level switches were found to be operating satisfactory.

3 g hk b b

i.

I a 1

.3 CE CoOE Su C E CCVPoNCNT Coc.E SLS co'E E

II IB l@ [Aj@ {C J Q l Zl Zl Z l Z l Z l Z l@ [Z J@ [Z J Q s

8 9

10 11 12 I3 13 19 20 sEcutNTI AL OCCURRENCE P 2 Po*ti e4EV151oN LER EVENTYEAR R EPoRT No.

CooE T4PE

.40.

^

@,agg/Ro I7 I9 I l-J l 01 71 91 M

i oi3I LI l-1 W

g

,,,,. 2 8 22 23 24 26 27 25 29 30 31 32

  • 5 s' M I U Po E "aS e.

"s'u"p'e8 E7 uf0uIOETu"n'sa l0 l0 l0 @j 0] [ Nlg l N [g l3Zl@

l Z l Z l Z l Z l@

TNr" 'EcEo"5 ofa72d7

    • S?:7 s

souns u

[HJglJ4Z lg lJsZ lg l3aiZ]@

41 42 4

44 47 31 40 33 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS o l rae cause was_ personnel error. The lim!t of the grace peri.od was overlooked. Th t. J surveillance test was perf ormed satisf actorily.

Personnel was counseled on the I

l I

importance of cocipleting surveillance tests within their grace periods.

,7

)

I i3 I I

e4 l 80 8 9 sTA s

% power oTHER$7ATUs isCo ERY oascovtHY oEscRIP Tion NA l

l B l@l Maint. Supr. Observation l

b @ l0l0l0l@j I5 LocATies or aELE AsE @

' c'Tivity co'0 TENT AuovNT os ActiviTv @ l A

mEtt..sto or aELEAst NA l

NA 15 Iz_] @ lZl@l 8J 44 4s S 1 10 t1 PERsoNN EL. E X PosuR E s l

Nu'AS E R TYPE oisCRIPTioN NA 87 101010 l@l El@l

,Easo~~ A'iN,vLs oEscRiefioN@

l Nuvet a NA

_L 10 lo lo l@l 83 W,5

" s^c"^,'rio' " c" @

lO'!O 110

_ 9 11 12 l

E NA LE j@l s

8 9 to

""C"'

7 910 04 0 A &

lllIllll1f[lj:;

isdsuE @SEscai,rio, 4 l NA l

e3 s o

se es