Similar Documents at Hatch |
|---|
|
text
htNJ'Cld fI$t'i b@ [4 Wig' e
333 he.tnA A.ena-g-
Ma da Ge eg 3 3D3D4 wn,
m..oua3m e.w,gau.e mem cew e..s, raeow as w, B ' vnf a~! Autmna y '?
I d(*;dtWP 2% I(d} M.El t
- w v.
W. G. Hattston. ill
!e.a V a Pu. ave f
U. W ilfO(WT ' < t1 HL-932 000150 January 22, 1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 PL ANT HATCH - UNIT 1 NRC DOCKET 50-321 OPERATING LICENSE OPR-57 l
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT COMPONENT FAILURE RESULTS IN INOPERABILITY OF HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION SYSTEM Gentlemen:
1 In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73 (a)(2)(v), Georgia Power Company is submitting the enclosed Licensee Event Report (L:R) concerning a condition that could have prevented an Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) from fully performing its safety function.
This event occurred at Plant Hatch - Unit 1.
Sincerely, i
W./. A M W. G. Hairston, III
(
RPG/ct I
Enclosure:
LER 50-321/1990-001 i
i c:
(See next page.)
'I 1
1
.l I
l i
v 90013% h hi
,[
MRj 7*
//t 1
f U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 22, 1990 Page Two c: Sporaia Power comoany Mr. H. C. Nix, General Manager - Nuclear Plant Mr. J. D. Heidt, Manager Engineering and Licensing - Hatch GO-NORMS U.S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Washinoton. D.C.
Mr. L. P. Crocker, Licensing Project Manager - Hatch U.S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Reaion II Mr. S. D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator Mr. J. E. Menning, Senior Resident Inspector - Hatch i
l l
l l
000150 f
NRC peem aos W $ NUCLE AJ REOUL'. TORY COMueOSION P
LPPROvtD OMS NO 316601M LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
f.CILITY hAME fil DOCktitsVMDER UI PAGE 4 PLANT HATCH, UNIT 1 o is Io lo 1ol 3 2l1 i lor l 0; 4 1
tit a..
COMPONENT FAILURE RESULTS IN INOPERABILITY OF HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT ll0ECTION SYSTEM tVENT DAf t ill Lt fl NL. Met h 161 REPOft? oaf t 171 OTHER f ActLifit8 INv0Lvt0181 MONTH DAY YEAR VIAR "u$
f
[,LQ MONTH DAY V( Af(
D ACitiT Y h AMES DOCILE T NUMBERt$1 0istolojoi i l 0l 1 0l4 9
0 9l0 0l0 l 1 0l0 0l1 2l2 9l 0 o isso to io, I i
~~
~
tHis fit >Ont is susMittso PURSUANT to twa RtOU REMtNis Op 10 Ce A 1: ica.ca eae e,
.e et rew resi e siti s
Moot si
)
,3, n0 736.H H=>
73.7i mi R
20 40BleH1HO 60.3stell11 M 736elGHel 73.714sl 1] 0 i 0
.0 misin n..
ami.lai
.On.nin..i g 8gs;,gj.g,,
1101 60.736e Hf HQ to.736sH2Hvieill Al J66At 20 406teH1 Held 20 406IsH1Hiel 60.73. ell 2 Hel to 734aH2HvikH01 20 406teH1Hel 60.73mH2 Held to.73iaH2Hal LICENSlt CONT ACT FOR THit LIR 1176 NAME TELtPHONE NUMBER ARE A COD 4 Steven B. Tipps, Manager Nuclear Safety and Compliance, Hatch 9 l2 3,67 i 78 1 Sl i i 1 1 i
i COMPLif t ONE LINE FOR E ACH COMPONENT f ALLURE DESChittD IN THIS REPORT (131 MA AC.
n PORiA L
'AC REPORtA E CAU88
$YlitM COMPONEN1 CAust S v 8T E M COMPONINT pn g
pp X
B d RdX W2 90 Y
i i i i i i i
i i i l
i I I I I I I
I I I I I I SUPPLEMENT AL REPORT E RPECTtD (14l MONT H DAY YEAR YtS (19 v.n to.,oen ikPECTtO Sugw!5SION DATil NO l
l l
A..u A C,,t,.,,,e..
,0..-.
sy.
,.,..., n.,
On 1/4/90 at approximately 0739 CST, Unit 1 was in the Run mode at an approximate power level of 2430 CMW (approximately 100% of rated thermal power). At that time, the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI, EIIS Code BJ) system was declared inoperable because rated flow was not maintained during the performance of normal surveillance testing. An investigation later discovered that a failed resistor resulted in a loss of the power supply to the electronic governor controlling the HPCI turbine speed.
The defective resistor was replaced, procedure 34SV-E41-002-lS, "HPCI Pump Operability", was performed successfully, and HPCI was declared operable on 1/4/90 at appNximately 1130 CST.
The cause of this event is component failure. A failed resistor de-energized the electronic governor power supply.
This component failure appears to be an isolated event.
The corrective action was to replace the resistor assembly and verify HPCI pump operabili ty.
yR,c,,,. s
0 anc. aina u s nuctsan uoutuony camissimi LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT C"NTINUATION maovie ous No mo-cios tx*ints: ews 1
.4CILITV NAast (fe Docntt Nuentle tal ett Nunest A (6)
PA06 (31 i
vtaa
"#r.tt.rt'
'T3:
PLANT HATCH, UNIT 1 o l510 l0 lo 13l2 l 1 910 01011 010 012 0F 0 14 l
PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION
i General Electric - Boiling Water Reactor i
Energy Industry Identification System codes are identified in the text as (EIIS Code XX).
SUMMARY OF EVENT On 1/4/90 at approximately 0739 CST, Unit 1 was in'the Run mode at an approximate power level of 2430 CMWT (approximately 100% of rated thermal power). At that time, the High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI, EIIS Code BJ) system was declared inoperable because rated flow was not maintained during performance of normal surveillance testing. An investigation later discovered that a failed resistor resulted in a loss of the power supply to the electronic governor controlling the HPCI turbine speed. The defective resistor was replaced, procedure 34SV-E41-002-1S, "HPCI Pump Operability", was performed successfully, and HPCI was declared operable on 1/4/90 at approximately 1130 CST.
The cause of this event is component failure. A failed resistor de-energized the electronic governor power supply. This component failure appears to be an isolated event. The corrective action was to replace the resistor assembly and verify HPCI l
pump operability.
l
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT
On 1/4/90 at approximately 0739 CST, testing of the HPCI pump was in progress using procedure 34SV-E41-002-lS, "HPCI Pump Operability". Upon manual system initiation, pump flow increased to rated as required.
However, after approximately 20 seconds, the pump speed and flow began decreasing and continued to decrease until the operator terminated the test by manually closing the steam supply isolation velve, 1E41 F001. Operations personnel then declared HPCI inoperable and a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 1-90-006 was entered as required by the Technical Specifica tions.
l Instrument and Control (I&C) personnel investigating the. decreased flow discovered a failed resistor in the electronic governor power supply circuitry.
This resistor is part of a bank of resistors which reduce a 120 Yde power supply input to an output voltage of 48 Vdc to the governor. The failed resistor resulted in an open circuit, thus deenergizing the electronic governor and causing a decrease in HPCI pump speed. The defective resistor was replaced.
Procedure 34SV-E41-002-lS was performed successfully and HPCI was declared operable at approximately 1130 CST on 1/4/90.
geoma.
.u... m, i,..- m-s,wm
)
ne us nuet6:n 6oue.,oav commaissio
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION Acerovioousno mo-om exnato ewas
. ActLif v asAa.t th DOCEtt =utelatal ggs wy.ngga gg3 pAog (3)
La
- - am
= i:
PLANT HATCH, UNIT 1 o ls lo lo lo l 3l2 l 1 9l0 0 l 0l 1 010 0l3 oF 0 l4 itxt n c s m w nn I
CAUSE OF THE EVENT
The root cause of this event was component failure. A failed resistor caused a loss of the power supply to the electronic governor. The failure history of the resister was assessed, by reviewing the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System f
records and via discussions with the vendor of the electronic governor power supply, and this component failure appears to be an isolated event.
REPORTABILITY ANALYSIS AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT This report is required per 10 CFR 50.73'(a)(2)(v) because a component failure occurred in the HPCI system which would have prevented the system from functioning as designed to mitigate the consequences of an accident.
The failure would have prevented the HPCI system from reaching or maintaining design flow upon initiation of the system.
The HPCI system is provided to assure that the reactor is adequately cooled to limit fuel clad temperature in the event of a small break in the nuclear boiler system causing a loss of coolant which does not result in rapid depressurization of the reactor vessel. The Automatic Depressurization System (ADS, EIIS Code JE) is a backup for the HPCI system. Upon ADS initiation, the reactor is depressurized to a point where either the Low Pressure Coolant Injection (LPCI, EIIS Code B0) system or the Core Spray (CS, EIIS Code BM) system can operate to maintain adequate core cooling.
In the event addressed in this report, the HPCI system was inoperable. The LPCI pumps and their associated equipment, ADS, and both loops of CS were operable.
Based upon the Unit 1 Final Safety Analysis Report, either loop of the CS system or the LPCI system, consisting of two operable pumps in one Residual Heat Removal (RHR, EIIS Code B0) loop and at least one operable pump in the other RHR loop, can supply sufficient cooling to the reactor for any rupture of the nuclear safety l
boundary up to and including the Design Basis Accident (DBA).
Based on the above information.it is concluded that this event had no adverse i
impact on nuclear plant safety.
The above analysis is applicable to all reactor power levels in which the HPCI system is required to be operable. Therefore, it i
is concluded that this event would not have been more severe had it occurred under other reactor operating conditions.
CORRECTIVE ACTION
The defective resistor was replaced and the HPCI system was proven operable by.
successful completion of procedure 34SV-E41-002-lS.,LC0'l-90-006 was terminated on 1/4/90.
g eoa =..
.u... m, i,..
.. m u
h81C mer.1 gate US WUCLELO At0ULLTORY Ceamwegion
'UCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CCNTINUATION u*aovio ows ao mo-oion exmis-ersvu
' ACitif t haut til Docetti wuesten av gg, gyggg, gg, pagg q3, "001',"
"'JJ.70 va*a PLANT HATCH. UNIT 1 o l6 lo l0 lo l 3l2 l-1 9l0 0l011 0l0 014 0F 0 l4 text w
-. w e,
u nt, ADDITIONAL INFORi% TION No systems other than the HPCI system were affected by this event.
Previous events in which HPCI was inoperable were reported in LER's:
50-321/1988-012, dated 9/20/88 50-321/1988-017, dated 1/5/89 50-321/1989-006, dated 4/18/89 Corrective actions for these events would not have prevented this event because the previous events were caused by personnel error or failure of a different component within the HPCI system.
Failed Component Identification:
MPL (Plant Index loantifier): 1E41 -R764-3 Manufacturer:
Woodward Company Vendor Part Number: 8270281 Type: Resistor I
i i
e g,.o m.
..... m t
...u.,,,,,,,>.
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000321/LER-1990-001, :on 900104,HPCI Pump Declared Inoperable Due to Rated Flow Not Maintained During Surveillance Testing. Caused by Component Failure.Defective Resistor Replaced & Procedure 34SV-E41-002-1S Performed |
- on 900104,HPCI Pump Declared Inoperable Due to Rated Flow Not Maintained During Surveillance Testing. Caused by Component Failure.Defective Resistor Replaced & Procedure 34SV-E41-002-1S Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000366/LER-1990-001-01, :on 900112,reactor Scrammed Because MSIVs Were Less than 90% Open.Caused by Component Failure & Configuration of Condenser Vacuum Sensing Lines & Instruments.Valves Replaced |
- on 900112,reactor Scrammed Because MSIVs Were Less than 90% Open.Caused by Component Failure & Configuration of Condenser Vacuum Sensing Lines & Instruments.Valves Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000366/LER-1990-002, :on 900114,RWCU Experienced Partial Primary Containment Isolation Sys Isolation Involving Outboard Isolation Valve.Caused by Component Failure & Less than Adequate Mounting of Relay.Relay Replaced |
- on 900114,RWCU Experienced Partial Primary Containment Isolation Sys Isolation Involving Outboard Isolation Valve.Caused by Component Failure & Less than Adequate Mounting of Relay.Relay Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000321/LER-1990-002-01, :on 900131,discovered That Functional Test of Turbine Stop Valve Position Limit Switches Not Performed. Caused by Personnel Error When Writing Recent Rev.Rev to Procedure 34SV-C71-001-1S/2S Written |
- on 900131,discovered That Functional Test of Turbine Stop Valve Position Limit Switches Not Performed. Caused by Personnel Error When Writing Recent Rev.Rev to Procedure 34SV-C71-001-1S/2S Written
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-003, :on 900212,determined That Surveillance Procedures for Monthly Functional Testing of Drywell High Pressure Instrumentation Logic Channels Less than Adequate. Caused by Personnel Error.Procedures Revised |
- on 900212,determined That Surveillance Procedures for Monthly Functional Testing of Drywell High Pressure Instrumentation Logic Channels Less than Adequate. Caused by Personnel Error.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-003-02, :on 900328,reactor Scram & Group II Containment Isolation Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedure Will Be Changed to Require Instruments to Be Pressurized to Process Pressure Before Valved Into Svc |
- on 900328,reactor Scram & Group II Containment Isolation Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedure Will Be Changed to Require Instruments to Be Pressurized to Process Pressure Before Valved Into Svc
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000321/LER-1990-004, :on 900219,trip Setpoint for Isolation of Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line on Low Dilution Flow Not Set Correctly.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedure Revised Temporarily |
- on 900219,trip Setpoint for Isolation of Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line on Low Dilution Flow Not Set Correctly.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedure Revised Temporarily
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000366/LER-1990-004-03, :on 900521,personnel Error & FSAR Deviation Occurred & Resulted in Tech Spec Violation.Procedure 62CI-OCB-031-OS Incorrectly Directed Personnel to Periodically Open Airlock Doors.Memo Issued |
- on 900521,personnel Error & FSAR Deviation Occurred & Resulted in Tech Spec Violation.Procedure 62CI-OCB-031-OS Incorrectly Directed Personnel to Periodically Open Airlock Doors.Memo Issued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-005-03, :on 900719,determined That Component Failure Caused HPCI Inoperability.Auxiliary Oil Pump Would Not Operate Because of Open Circuit in Motor Armature.Oil Pump Motor Replaced |
- on 900719,determined That Component Failure Caused HPCI Inoperability.Auxiliary Oil Pump Would Not Operate Because of Open Circuit in Motor Armature.Oil Pump Motor Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-005-01, :on 900329,safety Relief Valves Experienced Setpoint Drift in Excess of Tolerance.Caused by corrosion- Induced Bonding of Surface Between Pilot Valve Disc & Seat. Valves Refurbished |
- on 900329,safety Relief Valves Experienced Setpoint Drift in Excess of Tolerance.Caused by corrosion- Induced Bonding of Surface Between Pilot Valve Disc & Seat. Valves Refurbished
| | | 05000321/LER-1990-006, :on 900418,discovered That Wiring Error Existed in Junction Box Leading to Strip Recorder That Resulted in Inadequate Tech Spec Surveillance.Caused by Personnel Error. Wiring Error Corrected & Personnel Counseled |
- on 900418,discovered That Wiring Error Existed in Junction Box Leading to Strip Recorder That Resulted in Inadequate Tech Spec Surveillance.Caused by Personnel Error. Wiring Error Corrected & Personnel Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-006-02, :on 900802,received Annunciation That RWCU Experiencing High Differential Flow,Indicating Possibility of Leak in Sys.Caused by Spurious Actuation & Less than Adequate Mounting for Relay.Design Completed |
- on 900802,received Annunciation That RWCU Experiencing High Differential Flow,Indicating Possibility of Leak in Sys.Caused by Spurious Actuation & Less than Adequate Mounting for Relay.Design Completed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-007-01, :on 900419,determined That Errors in Calculations for Measuring Feedwater Flow Resulted in Nonconservative Calibr of Flow Transmitters.Caused by Error in Design Calculation.Transmitters Recalibr |
- on 900419,determined That Errors in Calculations for Measuring Feedwater Flow Resulted in Nonconservative Calibr of Flow Transmitters.Caused by Error in Design Calculation.Transmitters Recalibr
| | | 05000366/LER-1990-007-03, :on 900918,personnel Error Resulted in Inadequate Procedure & Missed Tech Spec Surveillance |
- on 900918,personnel Error Resulted in Inadequate Procedure & Missed Tech Spec Surveillance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-008-03, :on 900928,component Failure Causes Unplanned ESF Actuations.Failed Relay & Blown Fuse Replaced |
- on 900928,component Failure Causes Unplanned ESF Actuations.Failed Relay & Blown Fuse Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-008-01, :on 900505,determined That Reactor Vessel Head Vent Valves 1B21-F004 & 1B21-F005 Closed Contrary to Tech Spec 3.7.C.2.a(2) Requirements.Caused by Cognitive Personnel Error.Reactor Vessel Head Vent Valves Reopened |
- on 900505,determined That Reactor Vessel Head Vent Valves 1B21-F004 & 1B21-F005 Closed Contrary to Tech Spec 3.7.C.2.a(2) Requirements.Caused by Cognitive Personnel Error.Reactor Vessel Head Vent Valves Reopened
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-009-03, :on 901023,trip of Area Radiation Monitor Caused ESF Actuation |
- on 901023,trip of Area Radiation Monitor Caused ESF Actuation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-009-01, :on 900522,determined That Requirements of Tech Spec 3.14.2,Actions 105 & 107 Not Met.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Normal Range Monitoring Sys Restored to Operable Status & Procedure 64CH-SAM-005-OS Revised |
- on 900522,determined That Requirements of Tech Spec 3.14.2,Actions 105 & 107 Not Met.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Normal Range Monitoring Sys Restored to Operable Status & Procedure 64CH-SAM-005-OS Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000321/LER-1990-010, :on 900530,two Unplanned ESF Actuations Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error Involving Noncompliance W/Procedural Requirements & Unpreplanned Testing of Valve Logic.Personnel Counseled |
- on 900530,two Unplanned ESF Actuations Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error Involving Noncompliance W/Procedural Requirements & Unpreplanned Testing of Valve Logic.Personnel Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000366/LER-1990-010-03, :on 901030,personnel Error Results in Missed Surveillance |
- on 901030,personnel Error Results in Missed Surveillance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(ii) | | 05000366/LER-1990-011-03, :on 901105,inadequate Procedures & Personnel Error Resulted in Missed TS Surveillance |
- on 901105,inadequate Procedures & Personnel Error Resulted in Missed TS Surveillance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-011-01, :on 900601,full Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred When Mode Switch Moved to Run Position, Resulting in Scram Signal on MSIVs Less than 90% Open.Caused by Personnel Error.Individual Counseled |
- on 900601,full Reactor Protection Sys Actuation Occurred When Mode Switch Moved to Run Position, Resulting in Scram Signal on MSIVs Less than 90% Open.Caused by Personnel Error.Individual Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000366/LER-1990-012-03, :on 901203,main Control Room Environ Control Sys Automatically Transferred to Pressurizer Mode of Operation,Resulting in Trip of Area Radiation Monitor. Caused by Radioactive Contamination |
- on 901203,main Control Room Environ Control Sys Automatically Transferred to Pressurizer Mode of Operation,Resulting in Trip of Area Radiation Monitor. Caused by Radioactive Contamination
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-013-03, :on 901220,three Valves Found Misaligned in Offgas post-treatment Radiation Monitoring Sys.Cause Inconclusive.Valve Lineups Verified,Standing Order Issued & Appropriate Procedures Revised |
- on 901220,three Valves Found Misaligned in Offgas post-treatment Radiation Monitoring Sys.Cause Inconclusive.Valve Lineups Verified,Standing Order Issued & Appropriate Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-014-01, :on 900718,determined That Instrument Check of Neutron Monitoring Sys APRMs Not Performed at Required Frequency.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure 34V-SUV-019-1S Revised |
- on 900718,determined That Instrument Check of Neutron Monitoring Sys APRMs Not Performed at Required Frequency.Caused by Personnel Error.Procedure 34V-SUV-019-1S Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000366/LER-1990-014-03, :on 901219,discovered That Channel Check Surveillances on Reactor Water Level Instruments Not Performed During Last Refueling Outage.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled & Procedure Revised |
- on 901219,discovered That Channel Check Surveillances on Reactor Water Level Instruments Not Performed During Last Refueling Outage.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled & Procedure Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-015-01, :on 900730,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Malfunctioning Flow Controller.Caused by Defective Control Amplifier.Defective Control Amplifier Replaced |
- on 900730,HPCI Sys Declared Inoperable Due to Malfunctioning Flow Controller.Caused by Defective Control Amplifier.Defective Control Amplifier Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-016-01, :on 900821,Train B of Standby Gas Treatment Sys Automatically Started & Refueling Floor & Reactor Bldg Ventilation Sys Isolated.Caused by Failed Relay.Second ESF Actuation Occurred During Replacement of Relay |
- on 900821,Train B of Standby Gas Treatment Sys Automatically Started & Refueling Floor & Reactor Bldg Ventilation Sys Isolated.Caused by Failed Relay.Second ESF Actuation Occurred During Replacement of Relay
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-017-01, :on 900829,discovered That Diesel Generator 2R43-S001A Would Not Energize Emergency 4,160 Volt Bus within 12 S.Caused by Inadequate Design Documentation.Time Delay Relays Set to Min Value |
- on 900829,discovered That Diesel Generator 2R43-S001A Would Not Energize Emergency 4,160 Volt Bus within 12 S.Caused by Inadequate Design Documentation.Time Delay Relays Set to Min Value
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) | | 05000321/LER-1990-018, :on 900907,personnel Error Results in Inadequate Procedure & Missed Tech Spec Surveillance. Procedure Permanently Revised & Appropriate Personnel Counseled |
- on 900907,personnel Error Results in Inadequate Procedure & Missed Tech Spec Surveillance. Procedure Permanently Revised & Appropriate Personnel Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-019, :on 900925,main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Settings Exceeded Tech Spec Setpoint |
- on 900925,main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Settings Exceeded Tech Spec Setpoint
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-020, :on 901006,main Turbine High Vibrations Result in Automatic Scram |
- on 901006,main Turbine High Vibrations Result in Automatic Scram
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-021, :on 901015,unit Manually Scrammed Due to High Vibration of Main Turbine |
- on 901015,unit Manually Scrammed Due to High Vibration of Main Turbine
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-022, :on 901019,Group 5 Primary Containment Isolation Occurred on RWCU High Differential Flow |
- on 901019,Group 5 Primary Containment Isolation Occurred on RWCU High Differential Flow
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-023, :on 901214,radioactive Liquid Effluent Sample Analyses Did Not Meet Tech Spec Requirements for Lower Limit of Detection.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedures & Forms for Recording Sample Results Revised |
- on 901214,radioactive Liquid Effluent Sample Analyses Did Not Meet Tech Spec Requirements for Lower Limit of Detection.Caused by Inadequate Procedure.Procedures & Forms for Recording Sample Results Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000321/LER-1990-024, :on 901228,pretreatment Monitoring Station Offgas Samples Not Collected & Analyzed within 4 H of Increased Fission Gas Release.Caused by Misinterpretation of Tech Specs.Personnel Instructed |
- on 901228,pretreatment Monitoring Station Offgas Samples Not Collected & Analyzed within 4 H of Increased Fission Gas Release.Caused by Misinterpretation of Tech Specs.Personnel Instructed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) |
|