05000289/LER-1978-008-01, /01T-0:on 780202,facility Flooded once-through Steam Generator Feedwater Nozzles During Operation Below 5% Full Power Per B&W Recommended Procedure

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:04, 3 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/01T-0:on 780202,facility Flooded once-through Steam Generator Feedwater Nozzles During Operation Below 5% Full Power Per B&W Recommended Procedure
ML19261F260
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 02/16/1978
From:
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19261F259 List:
References
LER-78-008-01T, LER-78-8-1T, NUDOCS 7910250698
Download: ML19261F260 (2)


LER-1978-008, /01T-0:on 780202,facility Flooded once-through Steam Generator Feedwater Nozzles During Operation Below 5% Full Power Per B&W Recommended Procedure
Event date:
Report date:
2891978008R01 - NRC Website

text

February 16,1978 GQL c'%

NARRATIVE

OF LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 78-08/1T

'n' hen the Main Steam Line Break Analysis was originally performed, the B&W recc== ended operating procedure required a 30" vater levs1 in the CTSG's at low power levels. As B&W gained operating experience, flood-ing of the feedvater nozzles at low power levels was recce= ended to prevent thermal shocking of the nozzles.

'IMI-1 has been following the latter B&W recoc= ended operating procedure and operates with the second-ary side feedvater nozzles submerged when belov 5% full power in order to avoid kng-term feedvater nozzle ther=al degradation.

Operation vith feedvater nozzles submerged, when below 5% full power was apparent,

ly not considered for the Steam Line Break Analysis and is therefore reportable per section 6.9.2.A(9).

Since these conditions occur during startup and shutdown, which constitutes a small percentage of total operating time, the probability of a steam line. break occurring during startup or shutdown is significantly less than the probebility of a steam line break occurring as analyzed.

Preliminary Met-Ed analysis indicates that should a main steam line break occur during operation belev 5", full power with OTSG nozzles flooded, no return to criticality vill occur following reactor trip. However, the TMI-1 shutdown and cooldovn procedures have been changed to prevent opera-tion below 5". full power vitb the OTSG nozzles flooded. Met-Ed is atte=pting to verify the above preli=inary evaluation, and to obtain B&W's concurrence with Met-Ed's analysis.

4 1481 27I 791gggy

(URM 366 v. S UL. 6An hvULAl OrtY COMMlZION

)

LINNSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLUCK: l l

l l

l l lh (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

] lol3lmlvltl,l@l 01 0l -l Ol0 l0 l0 0 l-l0 l0 l@lL l1 lil1l@l l

l@

8 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 15 LICENSE N6M8ER 25 26 LICENSE TY PE J0 57 CAT 58 (T

3

"'3"C l L l@ 0 l 5101010121819 l@l 01210121718 l@l012 li 16 I? lA l@

O 8

60 61 DOCK ET NUMB ER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPCRT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROB ABLE CONSEQUENCES h 1 lIn accordance with a B&W reccenended overating trecedure. mvI-1 kog wa - c1 mm.

I e

y 10TSG feedvater nozzles during operatien belev 5% full power.

This cenditien was not I

g analyzed in the FSAR and is therefore reportable ter 6.9.2. A(9).

Because this utm-1 y

tien occ;rs only during startup ar.1 shutdown, the erobability of a steam line break at1 4

9 l such times u significantly less than the probability of a steem line break cecurrinc !

]

as analyzed.

I 1.l I

80 8 9 SYSTEM

CAUSE

CAUSE COMP.

VALVE CCDE CODE SUSCODE COMPONENT CODE SUSCODE SUSCODE I

I z 12 l@ l_qj@ l Zl@ l Z I Z I z l Z I Z I z l@ LZ_J@ LZ_j @

8 9

10 11 12 13 18 19 20 SEQUENTIAL OCCURRENCE REPORT REVISION LER RO EVENT YEAR REPORT NO.

CODE TYPE N O.

@, reg U l8 l l-l l0 0l 8l [d

l0 1l Tl

[-j l0l u

21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

( KEN AC ON ON PL NT ME HOURS S8 I FOR B.

SLPPLIE MANUFACTURER IC l@lz l@

lz l@

l Zl@

l 0] 0l 0l 0l l Ylg Nl@

l Zl@

l Z l 9 l9 9 l@

33 34 35 36 31 40 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE DESCRITTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS lWhen the Main Steam Line Break Analysis was originally performed, the B&W recc= mended l o

(cperating procedure required a 30" vater level in the OTSG's at lov tower levels.

As I i

lB&W gained operating experience, flooding of the feedvater nozzles at low power levels 7

lvas reccc= ended to prevent ther=al shocking of the nozzles. The shutdown and cooldevnl 3

l procedures were changed to prevent floeding the nozzles when <:5% full power.

[

4 8 9 80 ST

% POWER OTHER STATUS Dis O RY DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION B LF,_J@ l,Inlnl@l u I

Iz l@l NA I

'5

'8

'o A!TiviTY CATE~T aELEASED OF REL E ASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOCATION OF RELEASE B la_] @ Lz_i @

NA l

l

'M l

8 9 iO 11 44 46 80 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUM8ER TYPE

DESCRIPTION

B 101010 l@lz l@l NA PERSO~~Er.Na s I=481 272 8 -

oESCRiPTiO~@

NUMBE.

B 10 10 10l@l NA l

9 9 11 12 80 LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO FACILITY TYPE D ESCHiP TION NA l

h 8 9 10 80 PU B LICITY NRC USE ONLY 2 [J_j@ DESCRIPTION ISSUED l

weakiv news release IIIIIIIIIIIIl!