ML20199H129
| ML20199H129 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1984 |
| From: | Hudson J TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17198A302 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-299, FOIA-85-59, FOIA-86-A-18 NUDOCS 8607030151 | |
| Download: ML20199H129 (6) | |
Text
_ - -.
=
j NN
\\
STATEMENT OF JUANITA HU650N MPF
~
Hy true and correct name is Juanita Hu' son.
I am presently employed as-a clerk in Satellite #306 cf the D.C.C. at Comanche Peak.
I have been employed at Comanche Peak since September,1983.
At the end of October. I was working in a Subsatellite to Satellite i304.
I was given a list of drawings, DCAs and CMCs and was told that these documents were to be in the files in the Subsatellite.
Suzi Brown, who was the head of Satellite f304,gave me the list of documents.
I understood that this was the list of documents Cygna would be reviewing when t1iey checked D.C.C.
I understood that they would be visiting us the following day so I stayed late that night to check my files.
I my Subsatellite things were in pretty good shape.
However, there were some n*<
CMCs and DCAs which were missing. This was not unusua], c:; :i;lla lz-~ A. 4 f;r :ld r ecM;n Jmuse dec =:.t;.
- i -6;;;tci that Satellite f306 mMpy provide me with these documents.
I had two copies of them made and gave one of them to Sate 111te-f304.
I assumed that if I did not have them that Satellite f304 would not have them either.
..n I believe that during the next day a gent 1.eman (who I assume was from Cygna) was in Satellite f304 and requested to see documents which should
~'
have been in the Satellite files. They were not there, which I found unusual because I had given copies of these documents to Satellite #304 (When we couldnf t find them buzi rennected them from Ine dubsatelliteD 4c the night before, atter I received them from Satellite #306.g p
l The Subsatellite to Satellite f304 served.;only engineers, who would request specific drawings or' design change documents. ' We did not prepare design change packages.for them. Because of this, the Subsatellite was not required to keep design change logs like the other Satellites.
[t3k 8607030151 860623 PDR FOIA l
GARDE 86-A-18
- PDl3,
\\
t e
Statementof.JuanitaHukon(2)
Except for this two week period when I worked in Satellite !304 and its Subsatellite, I worked exclusively in Satellite. f306.
I I
I moved backed to Satellite f306 in.early November.
I will now explain l'
the procedure I followed when working in Satellite f306 before I was transferred to Satellite f304. Normally, if someone requested a drawing, I would check the computer to make sure the drawing in our file was current.
If it was not or if the drawing was not in the file I j
i would order one through the phone bank in DCC. The design changes (e.g.,
i l
CMCs and DCAs) would be put with the drawing and a package would be ready l
)
to go. To make sure we provided only current documents, we checked the computer to make sure our drawing was the most up-to-date and to make sure e
that all design changes were included and current. We would also check i
all necessary l
the.onmeric and.a)ph.a logs to.make.sure that ranua11y 15gged: design changes f
I were included in the package and current.
L IMEIHHX1NXHMX)HXXgMXWHHXINEIHHXXHXHHMM11X When we prepared a w - &~*3 g:o.=f -
sometimes u
n J
- a A / package for use in the field,g
- would prepare a traveler,% &
~ %
t: t r e m : n y...
~4 "
we A
- - {== e & y onn --_ _-
,% L.% A4. y d :e, -,,. a e 4
.,-6 3
. e,r e-+e a4e -4x..+-a.4+w +w4r n eu c
l would be marked "for use with traveler XXXXXX." This allowed us to ' send only L
design document documentation 6eeded by the craft to complete a specific job
{
l u 7- - - JA = ' aa. Q p,= -d.,
m - - n L';=" --f$
i
- .....d."'.* E"*!N#L 1.s.x4 & A -- *4 S/4A 711 l F
Before I was transferred out of Satellite f306, !.::d d 2:y: -M cr &
t g ~... A..-L.)
eQ p that the design change logs werejupdated. However, there was a two week period A
(and possible other periods) when filing in the numeric logs was not kept up.
W i
These logs were needed to determine the current.revisiontof d design change document. They listed all design change documents received by the Satell'ite i
in numeri. cal order. These logs were also needed when someone requested a specific CMC or DCA but did not know the drawing.against which it was written.
~
~
z --
~
,. ~
.u.* ^ %. -.~.~..:. -- ::..
m
\\
Statement of Juanita Hu son (3)
In addition to the numeric logs, we also manually maintained " Alpha logs."
The Alpha logs were arranged.by drawings and listed all of the design changes YY written against those drawings.
There was a t:0 ':9 period when I know k
that the alpha logs for cable tray hanger drawings wer.e not maintained, I
fV N
.p found out that we should have been maintaining these logs when a QC 4 E
cr-requested a package of design change documents.
I checked the computer because Dobie Hatley, who was then my supervisor, told me that the manual Y&?
logs m.cc gets to become obsolete and that whatever was on the computer was what should be distributed.
I knew this was wrong since the computer had deleted all DCAs which I knew had been written against the' drawing.
I gave the package to the QC inspector.' He was not happy when he was given the incomplete package and we went to DCC.
I was then told by DCC (I do not N remember by whom) that we should have been using the manual logs to prepara design change packages involving cable tray hangers.
g Iris Paperwell was then in change of updating the numeric and alpha.
manual logs. After she stopped filing the alpha logs at Dobie's instruction she then resumed filing them.
She also stopped filing:the numeric logs at JN-Dobie's instruction but also resumed doing that.
It was obvious to ma that Dobie was confused as to what documents would be processed thrgbgh -the computer and what documents would be processed manually.
e En O
e
~
-hm
=
- z% Ate x.
3%,
t Statement of Juanita Hudson.(4)
There,were two other areas whe,re procedures were not
. followed'in Satellite 306 in my opinion.
First, we did not have k
a normal means to update drawings in our file or distributed to the craft through satellite 306.
This was because we were told to request drawings through the telephone bank but were not told that we were responsible for informing the CRT that we had requested a drawing because we never told the CRT that we requested a drawing.
Th'e drawing was never pu't on a Drawing Routing Control List, which lists those holding controlled copies of drawings.. As a result, the computer didn't know we had requested a drawing so it didn't know to send us a revision to that drawing.
I ash.ed Dobie about this' several times but I never really
?
got a response.
Many times I was told that it was not my job and.
~
that I shouldn' t worry about it.
I'took her instructions at face
.meus e
ee m
l G
.+
f
.~
6=
..aw
... e., 65 p,,._
- Statement of Juanita (5) l
.j
^ -~ ~ I value but I continued to wonder and worry about this." I never considered going to someone other than Dobie,to ask about this.'
~~
You would have to know Dobie to understand.
A few pe'ople have probably gone above her but 'they are no longer here.
I would try to keep our drawings current by checking our own files against the computer.
Everything that we had checked out plb was recorded on a log sheet.
That sheet listed the holder of the drawing, the revision of the drawing and the date the holder checked out the drawing.
These lists were kept in log books.-
Periodically I would go through the log 'sooks and check theIn against the computer for the revision of a particular drawin'g.
~
If the revision was higher than the one that was checked out, I would order a new drawing and. recall the old drawing.
The other time I believe that we violated procedures
[I concerned calling the DCTG.
Sometimes sehen we. would look at the computerized design change logs we would see an error in the .
computer program.
For example, the program' would show a CMC or DCA written against the wrong drawing.
I knew that someone was entering this information and that if they made a, mistake they could correct it.
I asked Dobie if there was a person I could call if I saw these mistakes.
She said that it! was not my job to do that.
I eventually learned that you could call the Design Change Tracking Group if you had a. question-about what. wa,s shown on the computer.
I called' the DCTG' one time without permission and got d
- - - " - ;.-. C'.~;r. I....
,s,,g.g3
.- p -.- -, -..
- - -3. tat.ement of Juanita Huis:n (6)
~
cheded on a bit from Dobie for calling,'the'm.
She was also unhappy because I went to the DCTG to get a CME when I couldn' t get it through normal channels.
4&,- ^ ^ *==gM
&pH Y I have reviewed the foregoing statementAconsisting of sixjtypewritten pages with no attachment: of appendices.
I. have made this statement freely and coluntarily, and not as a result of any threats, intimidation, fraud or promise of reward. This statement is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
L=/./Aafj n c=L% th. N
[.. Jw fifM.~
j g g.... ~ -
~]~p M#
3 J
g y.1. pJ J:-J 2
,ad. bk )
)-JY-8Y e
Witness:
^ - - - -
-^^ )
tr
., avid L. Andrews Sanford L. Hartman, Esq.
Director of Corporate Security [
Texas Utilities
-r w m i
~-,.--~wr
- ~ ~
~mn--
=a--
w wr
- -