ML20199H008

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Memo Forwarding Second Update to Tabulation of Facility Action Items.Update Provides Scheduled Actions in Area of Technical Review Team, Licensing,Insps & Legal.Significant Changes Listed
ML20199H008
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Comanche Peak
Issue date: 12/05/1984
From: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To: Eisenhut D, Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17198A302 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-299, FOIA-85-59, FOIA-86-A-18 861205, NUDOCS 8607030052
Download: ML20199H008 (58)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. N ' j# UNITED STATES o,, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o 7 ,N WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g~ \\"" / 0FC 5 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing FROM: Vincent S. Noonan, Project Director Comanche Peak Technical Review Team

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK ACTION ITEMS - SCHEDULE UPDATE Enclosed is the second update to the tabulation of Comanche Peak Action Items. This updates the tabulation of November 9, 1984, and provides scheduled actions in the areas of Technical Review Team Licensing, Inspections, and Legal. Significant changes are noted below: Civil / Electrical / Test Programs SSER completion is rescheduled to 12/21/84. Mechanical / Miscellaneous SSER completion is rescheduled to 1/11/85. These delays are due to additional work resulting from alleger feedback interviews and to assure coordination of QA aspects of these technical areas with the QA/QC Group. The Coatings SSER will incorporate TRT findings and the NRR technical review of the effects on containment emergency sump performance of paint and insulation debris. Completion of the NRR technical review will delay issuance of this SSER until 1/14/85. Presentation of the QA/QC findings to the applicant is tentatively planned for 12/19/84. Completion of the QA/QC SSER is rescheduled to 1/11/85. Delays are attributed primarily to the alleger feedback effort and coordination with other TRT Groups. Completion of the efforts by the Contention 5 Panel and Intimidation Panel are scheduled for 1/31/85. We expect the staff to be ready to resume hearings in mid-February.

Contact:

R. Wessman Ext. 28432 8607030052 860623 PDR FOIA [ GARDE 86-A-18 PDR-

Darrell G. Eisenhut Completion of various inspection activities, mostly dependent on

  • completion of applicant actions, has slipped to mid-January 1985.

Noteworthy are the large number of fire protection items to be completed by the applicant. t I will be pleased to discuss this with you at your request. s a, roject Director omanche P k T chnical Review Team

Enclosure:

As stated cc: R. Martin, Region IV H. Livermore, Region III (TRT) D. Hunter, Region IV J. Calvo, TRT L. Shao, TRT R. Keimig, TRT P. Matthews, TRT C. McCracken, TRT B. Hayes, 01 R. Herr, 01 E. Christenbury, OELD J. Scinto, OELD E. Case, NRR R. Vollmer, DE R. Bernero, DSI H. Thompson, DHFS T. Speis, DST B. J. Youngblood, DL T. Novak, DL R. Wessman, DL A. Vietti, DL R. C. Tang, DL W. Oliu, TIDC R. DeYoung, IE N. Grace, IE E. Jordan, IE J. Axelrad, IE T. Ippolito, AEOD J. Gagliardo

TRT ACTION ITEMS Areas: Civil / Electrical / Test Programs Allegations Note: Issues in these areas provided to applicant 09/18/84 Lead Completion Item Responsible Date Civil Executive Summary for SSER Shao (Electrical / Test Program sunnaries ~ Complete complete) Finalize 33 SSER sections Group Leaders 12/7 Complete major alleger feedback Jeng/Calvo/Zudans 12/14 interviews Integrate 33 SSER sections into SSER Tang /Hofmayer 12/14 Draft SSER to management Tang 12/14 Issue SSER LB#1 12/21 Complete evaluation of witness "F" Calvo/Keimig/Jeng 12/28 allegations and alleger feedback results Integrate final results of witness Tang 1/11 "F" allegations and alleger feedback contacts into supplemental SSER Pesponse to ASLB memo of 10/01/84 Keimig 12/7 on " Concerns on Startup QA" A'rea : Ceatings Allegations Note: Coat'ings SSER will integrate results o.' TRT evaluation and NRR Technical review of effects on containment emergency sump performance of paint and insulation debris. . Draft 7 SSER Sections on-Allegations McCracken 12/7 Complete alleger feedback interviews Matthews 12/14 Integrate TRT Findings with results Matthews (CSB, RSB, 12/21 of NRR coatings safety analysis CPB to assist) Finalize draft of SSER McCracken 12/28 s Coatings. Draft SSER to management McCracken 12/28 Issue SSCf/ Meet with Applicant LB #1 1/14/85 M i = 1

Lead Completion Item Responsible Date Area: Mechanical Allegations Note: Issues in this area provided to applicant 11/29/84 Identify applicant actions Shao/Hou Complete Draft 47 SSER sections Shao/Hou 12/7 Complete alleger feedback interviews Shao/Hou/Zudans 12/14 Mechnical allegations executive Shao/Hou 12/7 summary for SSER Evaluate results of alleger feedback Shao 12/21 Finalize 47 SSER mechanical sections Shao/Hou 12/21 Integrate Mechanical SSER section Tang /Saffell 12/29 with Misc. Section Area: Miscellaneous Allegations Note: Issues in this area provided to applicant 11/29/84-Identify applicant actions Bangart Complete Draft 21 SSER sections Bangart Complete Complete alleger feedback interviews Bangart/Zudans 12/14 Evaluate results of alleger feedback Bangart 12/21 Finalize 21 SSER Misc. sections Bangart 12/21 Miscellaneous allegations executive Bangart 12/7 summary for SSER Integrate Misc. section of SSER with Tang /Saffell 12/29 Misc. Section Area: QA/0C Allegations Draft 69 SSER sections Livermore 12/7 Identify applicant actions Livermore 12/14 Complete alleger feedback interviews Livermore/Zudans 12/14 Review tentative QA Assessments Noonan/Livermore 12/17 with DL management & Contention 5 Panel i Letter / Meet with applicant Noonan 12/19 Evaluate results of alleger feedback Livermore 12/21 QA Allegation Executive Summary Livermore 12/14 for SSER Finalize 69 SSER sections Livenmore 12/28 Draft QA SSER to management Tang 12/28 Issue SSER LB #1 1/11/85 e

PROJECT DIRECTOR ACTION ITEMS Lead Completion Item Responsible Date Establish alleger feedback procedure Tang /Hofmayer -draft-Complete and tentative contacts schedule -final-12/7/84 Respond to GAP letters Wessman 12/14/84 SSER Completion: Integrate 68 group inputs into Tang /Saffell 12/28/84 Mech / Misc. allegations SSER' Management Review of SSER Noonan 1/4/85 Publish SSER LB#1 1/11/85 s Obtain rest of T_ Zudans 12/14/84 Allegations (evaluation will be incorporated in Mechanical Group reviews) Complete Review of Several Vendor Allegations: Diesel Generatcrs Bangart 12/14/84 (applicants vendor inspection program) Grinnell Pipe Hangers Shao/Hou 12/14/84 Include vendor reviews in Misc. Tang /Saffell 12/14/84 section of SSER Develop Program for Handling Vietti/Zudans 12/14/84 future allegations at CPSES Provide Potential Enforcement Gagliardo 1/18/85 l Actions resulting from TRT effort l to Region IV for action Publish SSER addressing remaining 1/31/85 TRT issues and results of alleger feedback contacts Assess Applicant actions in response Group Leaders 2/28/85 to NRC " Requests for Information" resulting from TRT effort. Prepare SSER Intimidation Panel Gagliardo 1/31/85 Contention 5 Panel Vollmer 1/31/85 EGG Records Review Effort Poslusny 1/18/85 Actions resulting from McCracken 2/1/85 records review effort I 1 l

LICENSING ACTION ITEMS A. SER and SSER Unresolved Review Items NRR Staff Scheduled Open Items Assigned Completion (1) Preservice and inservice MEB/C. Hansner inspect'on and testing program for pumps and valves (not required for licensing as interim relief granted) (2) Safe shutdown system; ASB/P. Hearn 12/31/84 associated circuits (await applicant response) (3) Fire protection per CHEB/J. Stang 12/31/84 Appendix R (4) Impact of paint debris on CSB/C. Li 12/21/84 containment sump and long GIB/A. Serkiz tenn core cooling RSB/B. Mann (Must consider results of Coatings TRT Group) (5) Cygna Independent Assess D. Terao 12/14/84 ment Program (Phase 1 and 2) Confirmatory Items (1) TMI II.D.1 Performance MEB/G. Hammer testing of relief and safety valves (awaitingapplicant response) (2) TMI II.E.1.1 Test of turbine ASB/P. Hearn 12/21/84 driven AFW pump to operate without ac power (3) TMI II.E.4.2 Capability EQB/R. Wright 12/31/84 of containment purge valves to close in accident conditions (EQB evaluation of 10/24 has open items - need Applic. action) (4) Environmental qualification EQB/H. Garg 12/31/84 of N-16 detector and N-16 junction box

-2 NRR Staff Scheduled 4 Confirmatory Items Assigned Completion (5) Response to Generic Letter ICSB/T. Dunning 12/14/84 83-28, Salem ATWS Events (6) Response to Generic Letter RSB/J. Guttman 3/85 83-35, Small Break LOCA 2 Analysis (II.K.3.30) (license condition established in SER #6) License Conditions (1) Conformance with R.G. 1.97, LCSB/J. Joyce 12/14/84 Revision 2, Generic Letter (interim report 82-33 complete) 6/85 (final report) (2) SPDS, Generic Letter 82-33 HFEB/Lipinski 12/14/84 (3) Procedures Generation PSRB/J.Clifford 3/85 j Package (license condition established prior to OL) 2 B. Technical Specifications (1) Reactor System Branch RSB/S. Diab, B. Mann, 12/31/84 questions regarding C. Moon relationship between stated and measured process variables. (awaitin 1 applicant response) g (2) Accuracy of transient CPB/L. Lois 12/31/84 time flow meter (N-16) (awaiting applicant response) C. Board Notifications ^ (1) Cross index of Board LB#1/ unassigned 3-man wks. Notifications to SER and SSER sections. (a) Pump Seal integrity LB#1/Burwell 12/31/84 4 (2) Issue forthcoming LBf1/S. Burwell 2-man wks. Board Notifications (8 estimated)

~ D. Hearing Items - NRR Staff Support (1) Motions for Summary Disposition on Piping and Pipe Supports Scheduled Motion Subiect Assigned Completion a. QA for pipe support Teledyne/D. Landers 1/7/85 design process b. Pipe support stability MEB/D. Terao 12/7/84 (Applicant's response incomplete) c. Cinched U-bolts ETEC/H. Fleck, P. Chen 12/14/84 d. ASME/AWS Welding MEB/D. Terao 11/2/84-C Codes e. Upper lateral restraint SGEB/F. Rinaldi and 12/14/84 (Applicant's res onse Brookhaven raised new issue f. Use of generic stiff-EGCB/J. Fair 11/15/84-C ness in piping analysis. (Applicant's response incomplete) g. Richmond inserts EGCB/J. Fair 12/1/84-C (Applicant's response incomplete) h. Wall-to-wall and floor-ETEC/H. Fleck, P. Chen 12/14/84 to-ceiling piping supports i. U-bolts as 2-way EGCB/J. Fair 12/1/84-C restraints j. Force distribution in ETEC/H. Fleck, P. Chen 12/14/84 axial restraints k. Damping factors EGCB/J. Fair 11/13/84-C (Waiting on applicant's response) 1. Safety factors EGCB/J. Fair 11/15/84-C m. Friction due to small EGCB/J. Fair 11/15/84-C thermal movements

~ Scheduled Motion Subject Assigned Completion n. Local displacements ETEC/J.Brammer,P.Chen 12/14/84 and stresses (applicant's responseincomplete) o. Section property EGCB/J. Fair 11/15/84-C values p. Effects of gaps on EGCB/J. Fair 11/15/84-C seismic response of pipe support (2) Hearings on above Motions Staff reviewers Estimated for Summary Disposition and consultants 8 man-wks. listed above (3) Staff affidavits on Cygna MEB/D. Terao 11/15/84-C IAP (Phase 1 and 2) SGEB/F. Rinaldi RIV/D. Hunnicutt (4) Review of Cynga IAP Terao (Phase 3) EG&G review 12/14/84 Staff Review 12/21/84 (5) Review of Cygna IAP Terao Estimated (Phase 4) Contractor 6 man-weeks (awaiting CYGNA submittal) Tech Reviewers 18 man-weeks (6) Support 0 ELD in preparation Unassigned Estimated of staff testimony, re-Leader 18 man-weeks sponding to ASLB Memorandum and Orders, and in preparation of Proposed Partial Initial Findings E. Project Management Tasks (1) Correspondence, filing and information retrieval (2) Status tracking and reports (3) Meetings (4) SSER preparation (5) Technical Specifications (6) License preparation and concurrence (7) Regional Readiness (8) Briefing Book (9) Review for conformance with regulation and exemption requirements (10) FOIA actions

-5 F. Miscellaneous Scheduled Motion Subject Assigned Completion Obtain affidavits from Zech/IE IE Complete Vendor Inspection Branch Bangart/RIV 12/14/84 and Region IV regarding QA applicable to TDI Diesels (Awaiting Region 4 input) 9 e i

REGION IV ACTION NECESSARY F0E COMPI.8TI6N PRIOR TO FUEL LOAD l Description Responsibility Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan 1985. s,\\ i N s i i i II I I I H I I I il i i i I l. Complete Evaluation of Preop. Test Res. Insp. (0ps) Licensee Dependent Results 2. Witness " Mini" Hot Functional (Themal Res.Insp.(Ops) Licensee Dependent ~ Expansion) i i i l 3 Casplete Operating Staff' Inspection Res. Insp. (0ps) I i '4. Complete Inspection of Maintenance Res. Insp. (0ps) Licensee Dependent i j and Operating Procedures l 5. Fire Protection / Prevention Assessment.RIV(Murphy)ard seam Inspection BNL, IE, NRR: Staff i' 6. Complete Open Inspection Items on Res.insp.(0ps) i Preop. Testing QA l.' j 7. Close Out of Open Inspection Findings Res.Insp.'(Ops / Con),0ngoingFunction-PerformedasRequired Region Based Insps. ' ) 8. Complete Pre DL Issuance Requirements Res.Insp.(0ps) Licensee Dependent i of 2514 Program (Test Procedure Review) 9. CloseoutofRemainingHEDs(Numan Res.Insp.(Ops) Licensee Dependent 1 Factors) l

10. Emergency Preparedness Exercise and RIV (Baird) and FEMA -

l Evaluation

  • i j

11 Einergency Preparedness Appraisal Rly(Baird) Licensee Dependent ~ i Significant Deficiency Items (9) l Close Out

12. Radiation Protection and Radweste RIV (Murray)

Lt.censee Dependent i 1 OpenItems(6) Closeout i 13. Issue IE Proceduru 94300 Letter Fes. Insp. (0ps)

  • Emergency Preparedness Exercise Scheduled for 11/14/84' 1

= DictuteR 3, -iiO"EMOER 7, 1984 COMANCIIE PEAK HEARiflu ISSUES TECHNICAL STAFF HEARING ~ ITEM STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE A. PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN /QA 1) Letter to Applicants Letter drafted and 12/7/84 Requesting Information sent in May 1984 to Relating to A500 Steel Region IV. Letter was not sent to Applicants 2) Applicants' Summary Dispo-D. Terao. 5/17/84 11/2/84 10/31/84 sition Motion on AWS/ASi1E Staff completed Codes for Weld Design 3) CASE's Ar.swer to Motion on D. Terao 8/6/84 11/2/84 10/31/84 AWS/ASME Codes for Weld Staff completed Design 4) Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair 8/6/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 sition 110 tion on OBE/SSE Technical draft Damping Factors complete. Attor-neys preparing affi-davit for filing by 12/7/84 i CASE's Answer to Motion on 5/17/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 OBE/SSE Damping Factors 5) Applicants' Summary Dispo-Included in 5/21/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 sition tiotion on Safety part (4) Factors I

TECilNICAL STAFF llEARING ITEM STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DllE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE CASE's Partial Answer to 8/28/34 12/7/84 11/15/84 Motion on Safety Factors 6)() Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair. 5/21/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 sition Motion on Friction Included in (4) due to Small Thermal 11ove-ments CASE's Answer to Motion on 8/6/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 Friction Applicants' Reply to CASE 9/19/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 Answer CASE Reply to Applicants' 10/1/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 Reply 7,F) Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair. 5/21/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 sition Motion on Section Included in (4) Property Values l CASE's Answer to Motion on 8/13/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 Section Property Values t K) Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair. Technical 5/21/84 1/7/85 11/30/84 sition Motion on Effect of-draft in~ progress. Gaps on Seismic Response pass copy to TRT to coord. Attorney preparing affidavit. CASE's Answer to Motion on 8/13/84 1/7/85 11/30/84 Effect of Gaps 916) Applicants' Sunnary Dispo-Brookhaven/SGEB 5/21/84 1/7/85 12/15/84 sition Motion on Upper need added coord. Lateral Restraint with TET findings, discussion with GAH.

A_. a&4+--. m .a- ____n_.. ~ _ _..._ u.. .a. m ..m__.._. w h. 4 m ~__ _, _ _ ~ _ _ _ 4 _1h _a TECHNICAL STAFF HEARINd ITEM STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE CASE's Partial Answer to 8/28/84 Motion on Upper Lateral Restraint $Fr) Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair. Technical 5/22/84 12/7/84 11/15/84 sition Motion on Generic position complete. Stiffness Attorney preparing affidavit. CASE's Partial Answer to 8/28/84 l Moton on-Generic Stiffness e if) Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair. Technical 6/2/84 12/7/84 12/1/84 sition Motion on Richmond Portion c'mplete. o Inserts Attorney preparing affidavid. Coord, with TRT. CASE's Answer to Motion 9/10/84 on Richmond Inserts rb

ki)

Applicants' Summary Dispo-D. Terao. Draft 6/18/84 12/15/84 12/1/84 sition Motion on Stability in progress 'CASE's Motions and Answer Answer to Motion 10/15/84 to Motion on Stability sent on October 19, 1984 ~ 1 a 14) Applicants' Summary Dispo-P. Chen 6/26/84 12/15/84 12/1/84 sition Motion on Wall to Wall Supports CASE's Partial Answer to 8/28/84 Motion on Wall to Wall i 4 Supports l l i

TECilNICAL STAFF HEARING ITE11 STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE Applicants' Reply to CASE's 10/1/84 Answer 14 PS) Applicants' Sumary Dispo-P. Chen 7/11/84 12/15/84 12/1/84 sition tiotion on Torsional Resistance of Axial Restraints CASE's Answer to Motion on 8/28/84 Axial Restraints is 16) Applicants' Sumary Dispo-P. Chen 6/19/84 12/15/84 12/1/84 sition Motion on Local l Displacements / Stresses CASE's Answer to Motion on 8/28/84 Local Stresses Applicants' Reply to CASE's 10/8/84 Answer u, 17) Applicants' Summary Dispo-J. Fair. Technical 5/24/84 12/15/84 12/1/84 sition Motion on U-Bolts Draft comp 1 (2-Way Restraints) Attorney preparing affidavit. CASE's Answer to Motion on 8/20/84 U-Bolts (2-Way Restraints) er 18) Applicants' Summary Dispo-P. Chen. Still 6/30/84 12/15/84 12/1/84 sition Motion on U-Bolts need info. from (Cinching) applic. Preparing draft, based on existing material CASE's Answer to Motion on 9/28/84 U-Bolt Cinching

TECHNICAL STAFF HEARINd ITEM STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE C0tiPLETION DATE DATE ST 19) Applicants' Summary Dispo-D. Landers 7/10/84 1/15/84 1/7/85 sition Motion on Pipe Draft by 1/1/85. Support Design OA/ Weld Depends on getting Audit of Vendor copies,0f parts (1)-( W) drafts in week of 12/3. CASE's Partial Answer to 10/19/84 1/15/85 1/7/85 Sumary Disposition Motion on Pipe Support Design QA CASE Summary Disposition 10/11/84 1/15/85 1/7/85 Motion on Pipe Support Design QA B. WELDING 1) Close-out of welding fabri-cation items from hearing: a. preheat Letter sent to Affidavit contain-Applicants, and ing Staff assess-reply received. ment due 11/20/84 Staff assessment necessary. b. temp. indicating Letter sent to Affidavit contain-crayon use during Applicants, and ing Staff assess-interpass reply received. ment due 11/20 Staff assessment necessary. c. adequacv of support Letter sent to Affidavit contain-with aeged downhill Applicants, and ing Staff assess-weld reply received. ment due 11/20 Staff assessment necessary. j

TECHNICAL STAFF llEARING ITEtt STATUS OR C0h!1ENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE d. plug welds in cable Letter sent to spreading room; assur-Applicants, and ance that this is not reply received. generic Staff assessment necessa ry. e. contact Clay Andrews and Roger Trotter regarding weave welding ~ allegation byllllllll[ E __ f. Reverification of welder symbols on Class 5 hangers (CASE Exhibit 919,p.20) 2) Response to p.5 of CASE's 10/11/84 Telephone 7 C' finding regarding hold-conference call points for weave weld repairs C. PROTECTIVE COATINGS 1) Applicants' Summary Dispo-Completed: Resolved sition tiotion on Hear White in Applicants' favor Blast 2) Applicants' Protective Coat-tiay be affected by 1/15/85 12/28/84 ings Reinspection Program Applicants' Appli-cation to change Safety classifica-l tion of Protective Coatings

TECilNICAL STAFF llEARItid ITEtt STATUS OR C0!VtEtiT RECEIVED DUE DATE C0f tPLETION DATE DATE 3) Applicants' tiotion for Awaiting resulting 10/5/84 1/15/85 12/28/84 Surnary Disposition on of this phase of Deferred by Report TRT

br1, Order 4)

Applicants' Sumary Dispo-W. Wells - consultant 6/26/84 1/15/85 12/28/84 sition 110 tion on 11aximum (per P. !!atthews) Rcughness Surface Preparation See 3 above 5) Applicants' Surmary Dispo-S. Kirslis 9/16/84 1/15/85 12/28/84 sition Motion on Westinghouse (per P. flatthews) Components Coatings See 3 above 6) Board Notification 84-015, See !! arch 15, regarding adhesion testing T91i4 Order, of protective coating pp. 7-8 l' Brookhaven Ir.terim Report TRT evaluation is 12/28/84 scheduled for com-pletion by 12/28/84. Brookhaven Interim Report will by con-sidered by TRT D. OTliER C0!iSTRUCTIOfi ADEQUACY ISSUES 1) Results of Staff Walkdown Inspection reports 12/28/84 ]S Inspections issued re: Fuel Building Cable Spreading Room Por-tions of Containment Room inspection com-f

TECHNICAL STAFF HEARING ITEH STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE pleted, awaiting report re: Safeguard Building Auxiliary Building 2) Results of TRT Report 3) CAT Report Testimony concluded; proposed findings of fact currently i being drafted. Awaiting findings l of TRT 4) Polar Crane shim reinspec-Applicants filed tion response on 4/9/84 See Inspection

3 Report 84-08 5)

Undocumented removal of See 3/15/84 Order, cable trays p.9 6) Reactor Vessel Mirror Shield Staff Affidavit filed 12/28/84 on June 4, 1984. Awaiting Board Response. TRT SSER being prepared E. INTIMIDATION 1) Board's September 17, 01 responded on 9/17/84 1984 Memorandum Direct-10/25/84. Board ing Release of 01 Reports requests the Staff to advise it which reports are poten-

TECilNICAL STAFF IIEARIlld ITEtt STATUS OR C0!V1ENT RECEIVFD DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE tially relevant to licensing proceeding. See tiemorandum Request for Staff Analysis) dated 11/2/84 2) Reopening of Inspection Report Board request, See 11/30/84 79-15 (7/2/79) Involving Tr. 16,744. 11emo Welding of Stainless Steel to Reg. IV sent on Fuel Pool Liners October 5, 1984 3) Allegation re: Voiding TRT reviewing 12/28/84 of NCR by Applicants (QA group) regarding incorrect dates of inspection on a weld data card. l 4) Intimidation of Protective TRT Completed Coatings QCI 12/28/84 a. Closed by Board. Applicants submitted offer of proof. Board rejected offer. b. 00L transcript is record. Testimony,o M _ c. received at Septem-ber 10-19,1984 hear-ing session. Rebut-tal testimony filed by Applicants. TRT SSERs I should address his ______________ __ _ ___ ___ ____ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ _ erm rn s.

TECilNICAL STAFF llEARING ITEft STATUS OR C0!?1EtiT RECEIVED DUE DATE C0!!PLETION DATE DATE d. memoran-Testimony of J. J. Nov. 19-21, dum Norris received at 1984 October 1-2, 1984 hearing session. Further testimon from Norris 1 and Roth scheduled for October 29-31, 1984 hearing session. 5) -(Should also TRT Completed e re erre under OVERALL 12/28/84 QA/QC PROGRA!YtATIC ISSUES Category) a. rdered to l incorrec y approve traveller for valve I where valve disc number I did not raatch disc number on the data report. 4 b. 150 reviewers pressured to approve 40 150 packages per week. OC Superviso M _ c. W ~orddred a 7d reviewer to improperly approve a QES sheet. 7c

4. TECHNICAL STAFF HEARINb ITEM STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE 6) Witness F TRT raised to 01 a. ES-100/RG 1.75/IEEE-384 TRT (electrical) conflict; criteria involv-12/28/84 ing separation between conduit and cable trays b. Whether failure of TRT (test) Westinghouse Invertions 12/28/84 was timely reported in j accordance with NRC 1 regulations, including Part 21, and 5 50.55(e) I c. Adequacy of XCP-EE8 Procedure for energized functional testing d. Adequacy of prerequisite Set forth in and preoperational test October 1,1984 procedures

Order, e.

3 incidents of intimi-dation (See findings of fact) ~ f. Whether D. Casp approval required for STEs to I write-up NCRs (Witness F, l Tr. 14,629) g. Correctness of Witness F's prerequisite tests on Hestinghouse inverters. I

TECHilICA1. STAFF HEARIllG ITEli STATUS OR Colli 1EllT RECEIVED DUE DATE C01tPLET10tl DATE DATE h. Whether Applicants' pro-cedures specify " jump points" for testing of annunciators (Mitness F, T r. 14,538)

i. Whether SWA procedure, or other document, directs STEs to collect SWAs on the same system J.

Applicants' procedures (if any) for generating Start-up memoranda ) Termination of testified 4-by deposition of 7/3/84 that he was improperly tenninated for repoyting_ pipe gouge. JStinerdalso claims that Staff was not responseive to his allegation in a meeting following his termination. OI a. Ilole on Polar crane rail )( b. Rejectable Welding on doors

. ~ _ ~ - TECHNICAL STAFF llEARINE ~ ITEM STATUS OR COR1ENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE c. Inadequate welding on diesel generator skids - Programatic QA/QC aspects 9) EG&G Report on Climate of Offered as Staff Intimidation at CPSES Testimony at September 21, 1984 hearing session 10) T-Shirt Incident TRT (electrical) 12/14/84 a. Whether " destructive testing" (deliberately improper testing) of i electrical components / systems occurred in Safeguards building, both before and after T-shirt incident b. Follow-up on state-ments made to INtc by l' utility officials l' regarding "destruc-l tive testing." l c. Adequacy of Procedures i for conducting QC elec-l trical inspections, and i adequacy of implementa-tion 1

9 TECilNICAL STAFF llEARIllG ITE!! STATUS OR C0!t1EtiT RECEIVED DUE DATE C0tiPLET10ft DATE DATE ~ 11) ~ a. Interview Mike Robinson, Deposition, and other members of

r. 50, 00 his crew, to determine if a QC inspector was -

intimidated b. Adequacy of procedures for placing hold tags on cable tray supports, and adequacy of implemen-tation 12) a. Whether stainless steel M Deposition, welding was improperly ' Tr. 50,600 done while " arc gauging" was occurring in florth Valve Room b. I!hether QC inspector who saw the improper welding was improperly prevented from stopping the arc gouging from continuing at the same time as the welding ) F. OVERALL QA/QC PROGRAlittATIC ISSUES 1) Results of TRT Report

TECHNICAL STAFF 11EARINd ITEM STATUS OR C0fMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE 2) Management constitment to an See July 29, 1983 effective QA/QC program Order, pp. 21-22; Septesber 23, 1983 Order, p.42, n.100 l 3) Applicants new QA/QC program Identified as an l issue in ftarch 15, 1984 Order, p.19. Evidence presented during July 1984 evidentiary deposi-tions and September 10-21 hearing ses-sion. 4) Trending of Non-Conform-Open, see March 15, ing Conditions 1984 Order, p.20 5) Implications of Applicants' Open, see March 15 failure to develop QA pro-1984 Order, p.6 cedures for excavation acti-vities 6) Reverse classification of Open, see March 15, j "non-safety related struc-1984 Order, p.11 tures 7) Unqualified QA/QC P'ersonnel Open, See March 15, 1984 Order, p.12 8) Adequate Number of QA/QC Open, See March 15 Personnel 1984 Order, p.16 (

TECHNICAL STAFF llEARING ITEft STATUS OR COMMENT RECE1VED DUE DATE COMPLETICN DATE DATE 9) QC oversight of CB&I, as Open, See Itarch 15, raised in Inspection Report 1984 Order, p.12 82-25/82-13 10) QC oversight of NPSI, as Open, See March 15, raised in Inspection Reports 1984 Order, p.13 82-22 and 82-14 11) Ir.corporaton of CitC's open, see tiarch 15, at DCC 1984 Order, p.15 12) Computerization of Non-Open, See January 30, conforcances 1984 Order; Itarch 15, 1984 Order, pp. 17-

18. Applicants filed several filings.

Latest is "Appli-4 cants' Response Concerning Record Retrieval" (June 29, 1984) 13) Stainless steel fuel pool / T. Brandt testimony refueling canal liner received at September travellers, and procedures 10-21, 1984 hearing for conducting the QA/QC sessinn. CASE filed activities associated with brief (" CASE"s Evi-welds for those structures dence of a Quality (Originate:1 with. Control Ilreakdown") allegations of IIITs). listing all problems with travellers on September 27, 1984. Further testimony 7c I

g.. 1 TECIINICAL STAFF llE ARINr, ITEM STATUS OR COMMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE COMPLETION DATE DATE from T. Brandt expected for November 1-2, 1984 hearing session. Staff will need to respond to CASE's and Applicants' evidence on these issues. 14) Dccument Control problemq as brought out by 15) No response to Open, See September 23, 1984 allegation that c program for CB&I pipe whip Board Order, p.32, restraints was not taken n.81 seriously 16) Unstated canagement directive Open, See 25, not to report probleng (concern October 25, 1983 raised by Board Order, p.11; September 23, 1983 Board Order. pp. 34-35; July 24, .1983 Board Order,

p. 42 17)

~ pressured to Open, See approve ennessee wall, Tube September 23, 1983 and lietal Audit Board Order, p. 42 7c

g. ~ C TEClillICAL STAFF llEARIllG ITEM STATUS OR C0t71EtiT RECEIVED DUE DATE C0!!PLETION DATE DATE l 18) 1.dequacy of Applicants' Vendor Applicants filed 11/30/84 11/20/84 QA Program with regard to Response to Board's TDI diesel generators June 15, 1984 clarification on this subject. 19) Board's October 1, 1984 10/1/84 11/15/84 11/1/84 llemorandum (Concerns About Startup QA) G. CYGNA 1) Cygna IAP Report Applicants' and flov. 1983 (Phases I and III) Intervenors' testi-many concluded in April /May. Staff SSER and testimony required 2) Cygna Phase III Report. tio Staff review July 1984 initiated 3) Cygna Phase IV Report To be litigated only if Applicants ail to prevail on Sumary Disposi ion issues 4) Applicants' Motion to Set 10/5/84 10/25/84 Schedule on Cygna Phase III Report 7c i

g. y-19 - ~ TECHNICAL STAFF HEARINE ITEM STATUS OR C0fMENT RECEIVED DUE DATE CCMPLETION DATE DATE Ho MISCELLANEOUS 1) Whether IDI for CPSES Board questions 8/22/84 will be conducted; in telephone call whether SSER on pump to Staff counsel. seal integrity will Memo sent to NRR. be issued. e

L N -w -~. l }..'+ Osae .dWTING AND TRANSMITTAL SUP. April 4,1985 ~ ft 6mmn,s, Agency /FeeQtNeme emse symtel, mom namnhor, initiate Does ~ i A. Vietti g, s, s,' 4, i w on rue am ww aana l nos,e.es rer cieerence Per convasselea ne neouseess per Ceressmen

  • mpem Septr cleoeien.

For veer soformelsen see ese is.mese inveseisene sinnetwo - _^ _ ^f _ JustNr 6, MRAAAIES Attached is a list of the F0IA docunents that have 1 been sent to the Phillips Bldq. reproduction center. 4 I have ' asked that one copy. be nade for you and that the original be returned to me. ~These documents are in response to V..floonan's request dated Jan.' 29, 1985. i 1 i 4 1 I DO NOT use this form as a RECORD et eencerveness, disposels, esserenees, pas eeuene PROhk (Name, seg symbol, /f'est) lleem No.--Steg. ,L. Shao/DD/GET/Rf/ pnene no. \\ NN ", I 443-7909 \\ c W'a-tes ' V / 41 (now. 7-769

  1. 4 8 8-81 8
  • cm sus o - ut-us um

(- l ,'I. l. March 2, 1984 Memo to E. Johnson from R. Taylor Subj: More CPSES Allegations. 2. March 30, 1984. Consolidated issues list for CPSES. 3. May 25, 1984. Note to T. Ippolito /Subj: Comanche Peak-Telecon /H. Myers/ J. Simpson. l 4. June 1984 Technical Revie Team Guidance 1 5. June 12, 1984 Memo to Multi / Addressees from J. Dircks/Subj: Implementation of the Comanche Peak Plan for the Completion of Outstanding Regulatory Actions. j 6. June 21, 1984, Interoffice memo from Brown and Ruot/Subj: Construction Procedures Index List. 7. July 5, 1984 Memo for Richard Bangart, Reg. IV frem T. Ippolito/ Subject-Comanche Peak Technical Review Team Personnel 8. July 12, 1984 Comanche Peak Technical Issues / Review of Summary Dispositions. 9. July 12, 1984 Memo for T. Ippolito from J. Knight /Subj: Comanche Peak 10. July 12-19, 1984 TRT Activities at Comanche Peak

11. July 24, 1984 Mema to File from L. C. Shao/Subj: Status of Comanche Peak Allegations.
12. July 29, 1984 Memo for J. Knight from T. Ippolito/Subj: Comanche Peak -

Assianmont and Schedule for Completion of Summary Dispositions on ) Issues

13. Aug 13, 1984 Memo for D. Eisenhut from T. Ippolito/Subj: Technical Review Team Activities at Comanche Peak for Second Session.

14. Aug. 14, 1984 Status of Comanche Peak - L. Shao 15. August 17, 1984. Memo to Dist. from J. Tapia/subj: Meeting on Generic Implication of Control Room Ceiling Deficiencies of Comanche Peak, Indian Point, and Diablo Canyon to other Plants. 16. Aug. 24, 1984 Mechanical & Piping Status. 17. Aug. 29, 1984 Mechanical & Pip;ng Allegation Review Categories 18. August 31, 1984 Civil / Structural Subgroup-Work Completion Status 19. September 18, 1984 TRT Briefing (Slides) n 20. Sept. 18, 1984 TRT Briefing (Transcript) ("' ""J 21. September 9-21, 1984 TRT Activities at Comanche Pe l 22. September 26, 1984 Letter to D. Eisenhut from Billie P. Garde. I l t

7 s N . 23. October 2, 1984 Route Sheet to S. Hou/P. Chen/D. Jeng - Comanche Peak Response to 10 CFR 50.57(c) 24. Oct. 8, 1984 Letter to D. Eisenhut from M. Spence /Subj: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 25. October 8, 1984 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Units 1 and 2 Program Plan and Issue = Specific Action Plans 26. October 12, 1984 Memo for T. Ippolito from L. Shao/Subj: Potential Open Issues of Comanche Peak TRT Review in Mechanical / Piping area. 27. October 16, 1984 Memo to R. Wessman/L. C. Shao Subj: Procedures for closing Comanche Peak Allegations with allegers. 28. October 19, 1984 TUEC Meeting with NRC Staff 29. October 23, 1984 Memo for D. Eisenhut from V. Noonan/Subj: Comanche Peak Action Items. 30. November 1,1984 Memo for J. Scinto from V. Noonan/Subj: Comanche Peak Technical Review Team (TRT) and Region IV input to the Staff's Response to Texas Utilities 50.57(C) Motion to Load Fuel and Conduct Certain Precritical Testing. 31. Nov. 9, 1984 Status of Comanche Peak 32. No. 16, 1984 Route sheet memo to C. Poslusny from L. Shao/Subj: BNL Technical Assistanct contract for TRT Civil / Structural Staff. 33. Nov. 29, 1984 Memo for R. B. Baer from V. Noonan/Subj: Modification to Contract No. 05-82-249 Technical Assistance for Evaluation of Comanche Peak Allegations and Inspections. 34. Dec. 5, 1984 Memo for D. Eisenhut from V. Noonan/Subj: Comanche Peak Action Items Schedule Update. 35. December 19, 1984, Memo for V. Noonan from L. Shao/Subj: Comments on Action Items identified by A11eger of CASE during Nov. 7,1984 meeting. 36. Dec. 28, 1984 Letter to V. Noonan from TENERA CORP. subj: TRT Civil / Structural Issues Summary of Planned Inspection & Testing Activities. 37. Jan 7, 1985 Memo fro R. Baer from V. Noonan/subj: Modification to Contract No. 05-82-249 Technical Assistance for Evaluation of Comanche Peak Allegations and Inspections. 38. Jan. 17, 1985 Technical Review Team Briefing-Quality Assurance Concerns (Slides) 1 39. Jan 30, 1985. Suggested areas for Contention V Panel Site Visit in Civil / Structural Discipline.

,g ,' 40. Jan. 31, 1985. Note for G. Mizuno from L. Shao/Subj: NRC Staff Response to CASE's Motion on Crossover Leg Restraints. 41. Feb. 1, 1985 Memo for V. Noonan, from L. Shao/subj: Draft SSER in Mechanical area. 42. Feb. 5, 1985 Memo for V. Noonan, from L. Shao/Subj: Status of Comanche Peak Civil / Structural and Mechanical / Piping Allegations. 43. Feb. 4,1985 Memo for V. Noonan, from L. Shao/

Subject:

Resolution of 280 New allegations from Alleger A-45. 44. Feb. 4,1985 Memo for V. Noonan, from L. Shao/

Subject:

Status of Comanche Peak Civil / Structural and Mechanical / Piping alllegations. 45. Feb. 6, 1985 Note to Multiple addressees;from V. Noonan - Review and Commeist-Don Landers response to applicalits motion for summary disposition on Design QA. 46. Feb. 19, 1985 Letter for J. B. George from N. H. Williams re Stability of Pipe Supports Texas utilities Generating Company Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Independent Assessment Program 47. Feb. 25, 198r Memo for CPSES Structural / Mechanical TRT Members from L. Shao/Subj: Completion of CPSES Contention 5 Data base input sheets. 48. Feb. 25, 1985 Memo for V. Noonan from L. Shao/Subj: Review of Design QA Draft 1 49. Mar. 13, 1985 Memo for V. Noonan from L. Shao/Subj: CASE's Request for Admissions 50. March 15, 1985 Memo for B. Fisher from L. Shao;Subj: CPSES Contention 5 Data Base 51. March 19, 1985 Memo to Multiplc Addressees from S. Burwell/subj: CVGNA Open Items on CPSES 52. March 22, 1985 Memo for V. Noonan from L. Shao/Subj: Review of Staff Draft response to CASE's Request for Admissiors.

. i. ' REC TELECOPY: Gibbs 8 Hib.}snc. g 7/7/77 T0:(}ITT Id ll.., u.' ' jg,,,..A a" .. wena.,s. mens coa.wuers. L A ROUTIN 9 1 JOB NO. 35119g...f, = g" nr_ j [g f ,,_ m o,,,, p ECE1VE ,..,4450 L JUL 7 1977 ~3f fi / Jud.6, 1977 ECEIVE B & R DCC DM A e i . __._~ [t _ GTN-19823 ~ .. _.. i 9 g . _.. ] - DODD i _/ Texas Utilities Generating Company g-CHILDREEE l /- 't g 2001 Bryan Tower BUSSC#dM l / h Dallas, Texas 75201 n,- r3 .m.c:_g u c X ~~ *

  • WEttG M

Attention: Mr. H. C. Schmidt, TUGdOPA /~- !

  • )

Project Manager - Nuclear Plants \\ i LFN. h I \\ 'Gentis=cn: H l-- %q b* l '. TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY l 4 COMANCHE PEAE STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1980 2300 MW INSTALLATION T U(aC.O G&H PROJECT NO. 2323 03208.1 REACTOR CAVITY REBAR A Y.J l M M 5hM, REF. 1. Twx-762 ti l %cjmav 2. GTT-1259 j 'y Reference (1) G&H was notified that a series of rebars had been g B M omitted from the reactor cavity concrete between Elevations 812'-0" ry and 819'-0 ". The missing rebars were located adjacent to the neu-N tron detection slots and had been added only recently as a change 5 in G&H drawines 2323-51-0572, 2323-S1-0574 and 2323-S1-0575. G&H's fi purpose in writing this letter is to confirm for the record that 3 the omission of this additional reinforcement does not in any way M , impair the structural integrity of the reactor primary shield struc-h tt;re__under any postulated loading condition. The additional rebar; E had been added by G&H as a precaution against cracking which might-possibly occur in the vicinity. of the neutron detector slots follow-f! ing a LOCA. They provide a means of uniformly distributing accident El loading stresses around the slots precluding the possibility of local M cracking. } ] , As noted in Reference (2) we have suggested that stress distributing rebar be -included in the next lift above 819'-Oh". .This will serve a two purposes, neither of which is related to public safety. Firsti it will provide partial compensation for the rebar which was cmit-l N ted below and, second, it will minimi::e the overall area subject to @q possible cracking. Drilling into the existing concrete 'll not be required. Affected drawings are currently beingqlDEin d should 5 be reissued by July 15, 1977. is U ' ig77 u UL

7.. M 8.gL,)h g

f .,3.J . qt9 pi0 I n 7

9-( }' f.s July 6, 1977 y GTN-19823 $] Texas Utilities Generating Cor:pany i u These [. The omitted rebars do not cor: promise the safety of the plant. f :i bars were added to the design becausp in the judc3ement of the design engineer they provided a prudent improvement in the perforrince of the reactor cavity structure. p Although the field was notified orally of the iz:rpending change about two weeks in advance of the concrete placement, the notice i was not documented and did not reach all those whose activities To prevent recurrence of similar events in the would be affected. future we intend to notify the field by telex of all changes that would influence impending construction activities. l Please advise us if further information is required. Very truly yours, 9 i Glads P HILL,' INC. ~ .... - ) c s rd.V + R. E. Hersperger / Pr jcet Manager.' // { .) RM-REMcG:JRDo 1 Original + 5 Copies CC: J. T. Merritt (TUSI Site) 1L l f a e 5 ) j r

p IA TE, TILITIES GEtlEl:ATING CO:!PM:( b,r~~Sork h-S UTILITIES SERVICES INC. COMANCllE PER STEtJ1 ELECTRIC STATION QA NONCONFORMANCE REPORT r j !( ~ Date June 23, 1977 Report No; CP-_77-6 Item: Reinforcing steel omitted from concrete pour 101-4812-001 (5-25-77), Reactor Building fio.1. Dwg. 2323-SI-0572, Interior Wall, Elev. 812 to,Elev. 819. Responsib rennir.ation: Gibbs & Hill, Inc. (Report submitted by TUGC0 Site QA Su'pervisor) l MW Y23/77

== Description:== ' Concrete placement for the subject wall was completed (and inspected) to Dwg. 2323-S1-0572, Rev. 2 on 5-25-77. Revision 3 to this drawing (approved for construction on 6-6-77) shows a substantial increase in reinforcing steel over that shown on Revision 2. Preliminary drawings were not received on site in time to correct the problem and the design engineer did not noti.fy the field of the required design changes. cause: Apparent structural design error arid lack of communication between the designer and the field office. Disposition: Re: GTN-19823. This states in part that the bars were added to th'e design because in.the judgement of the design engineer they provided a p'rudent improvement in the performance of the reactor cavity structure. Omission of the subject reinforcement has no adverse. effec,t on plant safety. Recommend this be classified Not Reportable. Corrective Action: The cause of this problem was primarily poor documentation of verbal communication. To prevent r.ecurrence, telex communication will be used to notify the, field when such changes influence impending construction activities. 8/l'/77 8 A. Vega RECEIVED AUG 2 41977 i TimIIn A un A ROUTING __ Reportable Deficiency M /S 27#-ro g m as,ec(, Yes No l ll RPL ft erb h d& sh 14 f ed yl'i.gj.stagi ( k PU} l W fJ JTc i # 8f'l@.: /l JH 4s Yf~c.. OWw f,W }' E, ' W.S

  • l

[ _ Q y h((, JQg.Q>, g,7 humt.et, Quhl j t y Assuranec/Date 3 "[j - ~ i I Formal Report Submitted to N!!C ' NRC Notified H Project Manager-Nuclent Plants /Date Project Manager-Nuclcnr Plants:/D tth l FILE ~ i l f C9 77-l Verification of Corrective Acti nu p fe , w an T-Flanaccr. Ouality Annuranec/Date

ki [M[ ,6g / ) a d", NO.2 6/27/77 GTT-1259 J.J. MOOHHEAD S UBJECT: G WA * ;EG*N W "' l MEFEdEN iWX-<o l TO HEPLACE REGAR OMITTED IN dEACT0rt CAVITY CONCetETE PLACEMEN T AS DESC R ISED IN ABCUM ttEFEdENCE ADDITIO 9 AL MESAr.S KILL BE REQUIRED IMMEDIATELY ABOVE. IT DO ES NOT APPEAR THAT Dri!LLING ' ITH EXISTING CONCHETE *.ILL SE MEuuldED. HEUISED DdAW I NGS :/ILH BE P.-tEPArtED TO SHO% NEW ArlRA 4GEMEN r. PLEASE. ADVISE CONTHACTOR NOT TO FErfi OnM ANY AC T I

  • I TI ES THAT WOULD THECLUE PLACING ADDITIOVAL 'dE3An 9 Art EA aBOVE EXISTING H EAC T0ri CAVI TY CONCetETE PLACEMEW1 d.E.

H En 5 P EdG E:t/ rt. E. MCGnANE GISBS AND HILL NY TUGC0 GdSE GH ENG NY l l5 ~ ., s.; 1: . w

z..
  • **57 g

g.. ' i ?Rh AMLS_ltl0EXE0 00,1: Q.h /g77 pg p Msc;_g& # DI: WG A E 10: C 4 / 33in FROM:6 4/AfJf-

86G 133 JOB NO. 351195 ECEIVE t AUG 1s1977 E C E,1 V t. W CDiF.TN JE 1 GHEg gy TW3 Gd3E JM 23, 1977 i/ . m-- l* : Q& u&mSame % <a.s S U3Ja;T: jar be hh.,, p'4G.e.23'23-S't -05 72 Q...~4 HED 1) _.D*fGs 2324-SJ..0U.4%:s 2) DWG 2'il2323 -S t -0575:1.. = 3 )' CO.lFl?. MING TELEPHONE CONVEdSATI.ONS WI TH d. E. MC GRANE AND A*' AENARE THIS DATE, CONCRErE HAS GEEN PLACED TO ELEV. 519'-C 1/2 11 THE UNIT 1 CONT AINM.EN I PEDESTAL C0dE WIth0Ur IME MEINFO4C ING STEEL ADDED BY REVIS ION 3 TO THE REFERENCED D 0.A;tygg, P H Ei. (.*. I N A nY FINDINGS INDICATE FOUR VAS COMPLETED PRIOd TO ape.,0 VAL AND DISTRIBUTION OF REVISION 3 OF SUBJECT DdAVINGS. Y O U.4 REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF THE EXISTING CONDITION IS REQUESTED. I M5hCDRHEAD'.' ~.4 % ( y " "',h / .JJM/Dai1 W j g GH ENG NY /M ID l ...... ~ ~ f. e. s,m, ,m

- 19 I i-e e I g F G H m% i

  • Q y

v 4 i },1 84 1 .i___. / b. t T. .f_.. \\, 'W \\ 3 I it p ,2 D:,jn}i . ev' t A > ?* f

  • ( 'N N

[ 1* % l a.9.} S' ,y >o-g ( / ~\\ --{J ' \\ Y.- Y ? * 'h ', ' y$ - -- - T '6h ' Y \\ /} ' .L2 i' ' $ d - ,f-. (', \\ j f \\ s t +1-T~ > ? v \\ - j~ N- \\ x ) % is/:...- l g 'N \\\\ if'

h. r **,

l d j &gs \\ .-4. /- n i 6 I N' ha u 3, d pbmm: i y v; o O, s l k- 'N gs WsjtfG<!, j hM~i4 v P ik i i 4 i i-,

o it!;p-+

" vt 10:+' w 7 +;lll - 4 - b 0 5 13fj \\ MLM, fin 3&s 3 T\\,, d . r.~ c,'o / \\ h j /g, /J.'k */ .f,l. p \\. 24 i k;1 h.. n.. e. x

. b n _

v* - N N N ;f! W

  • 1:

m ,,D l .6 e 4 \\. f g .%g, $I, \\,/ l '. / 0/ }, gy',0.,! l,*.y " h,. ^ ,/ h, Nl{ s ,f ,'g '- ~-, ", = W e Bj; ;r<./f $#,/~ 7,/p * !I I f / A,

    • g Q

, M-li,sr:4u e Na ~* r-; i,; inly:i1 l ,s s g,s -r j s x '% 'N 8 p in: s

  • /

ix ri o. , f'. %e / O jh ' ect /

  • / N yA i

,N W,/, fH ,q: N xx pse F 'N.. y;O,, a =, ./ a t o..,p i / .1 s e g e'ha;l $g) y' \\ NY ~$ k U IU Ii j e c 4I .. 9M / / "l' a .t ) 5.) f, ,p, e, xsw 'r. 9 '( .a u~ ~.- N,'., ti f4 Ta i M -.. -+ i l 4 '. E! eg t-

  • g

_ _ - ).N... 3 FOR OFFICE AfD p TEI A5 UTillfill 5ERVICE5 IIIC. 5 w' a L w w*wy = = =.. NMp. D ) ! ! '. n..; E.i neac,. INTERNAL STR47. R. 8 .Q*,.y **

d. Cfd'.1 -*i*'e~ si

"'(,y'~Q-se-as aw )-y ~ ~ - -- on cavsrv nc.sv. p_.] SECTS. 8 DETS. Sd I _p r===4 * $h - .gm e.e uA - + *. i Qts w rrm.s's n- {, l E i F i G H I g .,,.5 = v.. e, , hj,, _, _g ". 4,, 4-g,,,,,,,_,,$_ g F

l - -- 7. 4 ' 4f. .,a

7. M41 3-Wi.

1 A B C t M

  • .3

.i. -') r 0 !) J

  • a P

,i Yi + !k i .s. 1 I r w\\n. g n w sx ,.3 y. A, ,7-f- @ il e, .w i d

F 11 l

I;!. /. n n / =f.y,y[, i 7'9 /r -f r e it .[UJplEEF:3; J:S ].- $n I E \\t !,# v y -A xi W, p y f., z N '}A' 4 ~-M- =~ g ?y .x Ml< ybn,.f, . X>9. %x L\\ iMjjl ~ '% ~

  1. vv e

y< m,s y v m L, a a 9,* \\

  • p Q k

H -4, ' l W 'N j?. 9 ) 5 I vx

  1. r

'uA.

  • , y f,,j Q {

,\\ 4. w _ f. \\ .. u ~,- b. N\\ f-N 'x AMk71}IVM.hPMi! el'e r;,,Q Q D' % n [% / @ .' h > e xe a' w m m s l J -1 g: .'@fe [ ~ r l 41t. m(' 'x y.4y,1. \\ c' jjf i r '. veu

r. y,,,;

- m x ~ h,! xl Jf0)f E hb q r i y wm y n ,h,Y'l l A&~'Y 9 s -------- - @; V f1 r ,y g ,p, v, i n,t e' ,4 l,Q.h$ $" kl h \\. ld ?? $f f 1-a c.3 p :i

u.. b.,,

, a 2 5 I Q, ]ti 'N d- ~8 'i 3 lI !g[j N %n ' D n=m-e i s k glI' # [ lD /I 9 k -2y g,j 4 r t J. g} .,-h N I I [I b ~ " - "*h. hh f m,," ! ! y w {i t, q,' h, 4 i

y. ;

i, s I.1 I L.,.. A I g i C i O ' "- ' T ^ -- ; J..,pe-7- IS U 14 Z5 14 13 11 6 29 ff 18 TF 14 17 4 rl, 11 11 3' 9 3 7 6 I 4 S ^ I,. o. Ei 3 ' ,a. E.

f

~

l E F G M ..~.'ll. 3.. d,. 111 es: 4 i .n as,. -,.,...*-s g L t - - g - -r ,m. s I a l l-. il I **r i v jl m-r- l -~ h, b

  • , - i 5?

? l'

i I.

t, l,. [ t..:. i -.m. ll s.. w----r c v= g=. = ; p ..c.. a e AA. g=1+ x r. m- =1= = = = = = _ _ _ I .u>.a 3

p 3..e a b

q f e' m-. L._n trr M*,

  • L-.

.-1 as-I ....,,,..,,m l .e.,,2-l l

    • t a. :...,..

r. s, .. o .e i ti f'4 N' _ ,o l -j m1.. 3,y,. L. i c .s..er_. _ wn, f g, c.; = rn=;g.u:. _. -1:.m.r THIS DOCUMENT = e'e*'7=*g#g Q t....c AFFECTED BY -l ' DESIGN CHANGES i ~4 r e. L,'g. Q _x ' < . v...r;v / ',&r,4 m ? M= a i_ ..._q.. ..l q 4 5 J,. s.4 m.. mo .. w__.. ..u .6, [ i.i: ::::.,- m ::--

g y y,.,.

ENGINEERING llSE ONI.Y = t..' ,L .. -. -4 ~ l

f ';;p.* _

C E [A. - tA 'L E ' t s e s.1 < s.=s,3 CE i *= - o; j i a g <,3. n ' -.- h fe 3 III A5 UTILi.l.ll5 51IVKillNC. l~~-- 6**** u Ent L t% R Pt4 6 E & l.It H I (~O%IP ts) u __L__ ,g., ns u Et t.o inn stas x a uniens v e s w m m e n a a i.n s s e 4'rog

w. a.s'a.'=. m 6

oaisu ** m.p, m 'u a- {;.7..y.. v E re J-4 e _ g R e WTEm sim >2,... . ?. _' _ -f_ e..,..f r * ' I * ?* _' 'h.. ~r;.yf__9 -._' " REACTCR CAVITY RE'NF zyg p. .'p-SECT 5 8 CETS SH 4 =, e

-e

..._..---=-a a, " = ~ ~ -g -;., ,,,, ' ' ~ 23:1 $1 C575

  • a E

F g g ii 11 13l t6 !5 '6 17 !g ~,9

o' 1ef **f L*

l "El j t 1 4 5 T% 0 1 'o t6 15 14 19 1s I i I l = 4 "8 484 $ _e m L e p .m oe. A 4

I a e e o t c-... -:i,, .1 -t ....u.,,w. ses z e* 's 'h.. 7. /.,3 . - - - - - - - + - - .z= e-as -- r . 1 ' at -. ppm,- % ). \\ ' L' l i, ,m, 3__ n 2 ., ~ l t e -- p.--.- m .e _1.4 a t j ,,3 ..a-y. - i ... i p ( s. a an , r:- mm. ~ _,... l

  • * *-f;l9,','

j

  • (
r

(,- ] r,,#.i ,. s._7,_ g gjit 1 [. g l Ji { i %i s 'i ' - l, s t I r. s h ;lt .-d e a s-.I .6. pers !-_.., ,3,. .. _.,.m_. 1 .4 a, i .,j j i . set. gu_ ,] r, ? L. l 2 t_l i I ,,e i m....

n. ". -

j =.y .. m. c } f. -*? g. ,1 1* .L*t*'*._ ..d. il 11 + ( y d .,_ J,5' u i LL,, '? w.w,-.-g !dw. 7 j L M. .., Q-a.e i __L-- l ,,,,,,,, stier_..- ^ l Lga g 3 1., e s-p.e ,,,,.g

';;,r-

. p** 1 i 1 i a i s.:.. t, arl.__ _. 8 '_d, t, n e $5 ~~ Z ! 5 i S E " * *N 3-4. -e.s. ' F l*- ~ 7* '~ ~ m a--- t, 7 7 4e e se e# ss' 1 4

  • ,- L
1..

1 __1 L_ . _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ ' ww. L_. d _ _ __h ', Im L'*M b JM., r m* _a g _..- ,r.q ,4 i-= = *, e. t p i i ...r--- -- n : _ t 1 6 8 4 s s } / e s 3-- $ 46 a!*y p. g..,,., .s / I 3 '*- } ,., m m

    • /

\\.+.-.f. i4 e ea e - I II." / u,,? I,n,T,.** - . - et m-e.s-I - r \\ \\ [ / i s w 5 ~ 1 I t.sza r .. ~. - { - i I j m ' N E s :.i. p 6 J l , l [ 'J dl. ......e ..rg a ... o. n..w s i l 6 y. MS-J' s I I l

3. a J. l
  • L

.e. s en r-I jl P I 8, ? j g 1 uns r l .I, ; f i

k. d,,,

I . w.... i .l ij i ..c.

  • l.'.'/. Q.;/.,s.'. *

~_ k I 3 D 1...-._- {..+ g., e, v. 2 ...,.w. b W '1* b "I D OS'92 6 . & 3.%S;2$' S 94 P.47E[ l.2 /s *'* t t 3 ^ m s.e. .J. s _ 4 e c o 4 g

l. 9 1*

27 ts

s 11 m

a it is n s ir

  • e is

,g is e 3 g g i = 7 - * = 0

y I f t a F s a 1 3 j ll *,....... .c..u..-- l. _1 ' ~ - ~~[.l., ' ' j'. 4' J t. {,;;,u.-.' r- ..p':7 ~ l .2.. _9. hm,* *u., -12_ 4 t ...__.__e ,= 3 I \\ %g I e i... u c. , _< a +,

L
jI @

_...4 'i l . [l[!J.u. - 7'"~ '~ i,

  1. .,p.

".,. 3; y. J e r p._ pm i... 1 : c u., r-- -r

    • +

y c .w. c ~.sn % Neta.i {r::- k; i e. a' i i .g ..,,g, ..+ c .u, Ju I .a;. S'i 4 s. m.,, k 3 r- .g , m..: i

I 4

t i

I 1

l l L i i 4 i i i DOC 4,m_ c,..,UMENT'

:, n._. :..,:

se: : = Ry I ~ L:tfJCj; (c..ANGE3 5 FOR OFFICE AND l ENGINEERING USE ONLY III A5 UTILi.f.lI5 5.ttvKillieC. c D g11.44 M.t I A N sD K% M E t tatF di ml3 & B FJsT (IMIPOV .L' 19 % ss i t. 16 % gs m itt e n & I P.H1 ( t e%tP t%% I'*i O. ,Q',','*",,",7,j_'.,,, 6 I n...n - ._4-4 ee

  • ^ ~,.~ sc I*

E R 8 tNTEME STET. ,;..,w..;...-. r....-

r. C ;%' - O.~ W~...,E c.F N.3 ? ~-

c.: ncacTen cuiTv nce <a sects a otTs. s'o _a

e. -

,+ .e * }; 3a-

1*t t *

. = .L;.. ..s..,- 232).$1-057', 3 E F G H ,n g 1 4 4 5 1 3 9 0 H n 13 16 15 N n 1~~ n M U M D D U t U M U k 6. O e. S e e-8 E .O* bl

4 I I a 3 C D I

  • .- + jb.. t.

....... i nj a p?.. _ - L, ' i - y; ln-

  • 11; *' * :. * ? *

[Q j + 7 . -J L y

n. m *.

t_ ,. ~. ~ *. l v. p- ._____r-l,l 4 /f i.i i i:

    • =e a

se rs- ,,,j -}/ a:n. 3 s.. e e --. .., ' f '

  • "' h =

,) n.*..- 1, ..,, i '. <ws 1 e em --4... es S f I i, j. s .t p-1 1 J r ~ ) 1 r 2_ l J* N* ' J, u___ l j . *- e. rL .s ' g --S u nu,. e i .a r* I i? _ e_.. i g e l - l

  • 4.,d-i

,I ..- F..1- ,.,.,,...m ,g. f - -f w -4 s -. f 12 $k t 't.. A-e e, ,f I'S* e.i s s = r a e: .s. o8 m.e sp, ~.h :;; i - 43.7,- s - = <

  • ,< c e,

1 t, l j,., </ ~ 5, : . ~ - ~

':, \\.

.k 4 <**,.,;)* l g, go --l 4% **f-l* Em 2LL L 1 5-ht1.g'.Q 2 t 3-O* 8f _ k wet i r -i { l, i.

e. b,

.a.i 6-l' ! 3 . c. sca e' !!I l6 . E.?*1*'.L_I. gg f'{ ? f 4 ---.,y i- .. 6 g: h t 9t ' ..y.wg S h 6 1 A B C D 9 13 17 26 M

r z3 11 21 10 it

'g 97

  • 6 If

'4 11 fl 11 is 9 3 7 6 5 4 5 1 ( 4 _._, _. ~ e e 0 ~ E

nu.1 e.- ; ;; 4 \\. E i F G M l t i . r. r. 4 -, 4 .5'.S. l ~... - / c.,..,,. ,,.a f,.,,.. e 5~.. -., v.,. __.4 e. . v..s e,. ,.. +. - ' % ;._y j s e .e

a. n a

s. m n.:n_t.. .,r. '?. n- .. / o*cm jI g~~. j__ L_3._. .s=.c..4 _. y C3 ext. m e i = :.,.Q. r I e . g. ( *3 t s,., - s.I-y Fe sc.

m..,_3..,,4q_

I, =j N _. _. 4 ; g. ..IL,2-JC L 4 o .g.<;,>7 y . qt g j. m. _,. _-- s i ~ - 1,: y gg, ........) gm . g g gj n _ a - _t p-a 9 q -g -a iccess covce car ym.....x I v.s, c e..,r> .c.........., i g ? I-i,, 2.~.D~*" i?2O.... ca<^ 5gcricn im <..> 3 ,.,.,.. ~ . u., z < ~ ca ,, m 77R. d, I H, 'M b & uu m _a ip'. i i nN N55-;f.~4 l k k l e n,.,u w N s,, s s, - 3 9. y.,- ~. 8 . _ wax l \\ntr J i..... _. n: c, i ,,s... n .,. m. ~... tc i r i R..F4P,...> o -, y,,.,, H 22 THIS DOCUMENT T rr. e :e -c.~- 3 AFFECTED BY 4 DESIGN CHANCES gj ' I agen d3 e.s.au. cus.aua a:. tr.ava v.. y a' J.& ps t sea.) a

  • are Aa.& 3.i_s.

...m. r,e ~.,,,,,,u.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, l mr ~. - .~ p i ,,.e..=..= coa...... .e . w: .a.e..a. ..n...c o.u-u.

w..,,,i..=.

=,o. .s.... p g,f, a c.e.e= t =u=a c 5 ow. e~. c . s ~., . s. e..,.o.. aj t n.e e. u. <- tn

o.,.e

== y. .- ~ . =.,.. =.. m a w.,. n,.cc.s.rs. m .,.m, :..,..., .~.: n i

.. u c..
s. n o m.. v

.o..e .v ae- . c. s, ac .. ~. e a :. r.... au. e . =.. -... aa, a a .m.a -~.c.. ...m e.n .a .n<~.: ca .r l T r13V. M., -M s.o.. .. :w. ~ .am.a.n,... -., s..c e w.

.

n s. e ..s.,...<,.sa,. ..e. e .. c a. . e.. -o s.a.= s.. e .,..r,.,..e. l .e :a cc c .u.. . a..o _ _c,...e. 4 m..u. ,.,., n .un m .'.:@ iL".'i' at.;;.;7;.' -~" [ng ((g g ENGINEERING llSE DW' ~ ~. m...w. wm.. ..,e.n.c:

  • c S

- m ..-n. . ~ _.... .m .... _. ~. . r,- y m, ..l CL ASS I Qt.T B, '. m.... .3 . e << d

a..

5'.'.'. 4* %*O] , _f,$,JM L:.,', fu A5 UTniTit,1,5j tVKIS INC. u p#p ouus mia a um msi, rnu m e n e i iarr msi.i,m ruu rocmc uawe ws m ,p m

_.__--g i,.,

. : i,.L.. W ' '., ,-.~..r.e.a.s u. e f m. ,4 m ....in. 'Mg--.pJ .ide.* -gg.r5..< = = a 7_"..u R. B. INTERNAL STRUCT , W,=., W+.. g.. .... q REACTOR CAVITYOUTUNE

== n M,3F n.J o -i. -f.FW** l l l l l j SECTS.8 DETS. SH. 5 ..**A.. . [. if, amur.==r,==.6 f M. :.. v.-4,.y e,*n M p_ _g. ,.,,,,,,,,m ^- 23255t OS49 7--.._,,.... ) E L F I e i se i u. ,._r. i. is a u is is n_.. _ _to .. -et tv .- ts r-t s i+ n ti u o n a, 3 1 \\ .s.. } D.~' ..~..-...-Q ^ G, k .b.w- ._orkw&* = - 4h..

  • de.

eli ,._.N f a ee. 9

pm WM y-oe ,,em y s.s>.a O% r .hN[/4 I A 3 i C 3 D I a.br% +.tN,;? -_#- e v--. ---.f, L...*?",% t'.'A* 's " $*:'4 .w-- u -. a wa. . w .. ~ - - -m.,y - -, t;;g;r_, M ,yp ~, s. u = ap r_ ' .... 3 -~r.e.c_,... s r-- - ~ ** s== w o o.

X -T A*J ',"i r i

.i I_ r* ? W.3 - a " *" I {' .[g,h,) l' W N ' M M hpg _ _v, # [ ,g 5 *E dI 6. f a==.- -u -+- i ~ 4,/ ,,,,,.o,.,'i__a .-s .p a .sk a t=xu &.. n --th m *,p , -p...t g' q .f, u,.c,v L r,c. ,...,.,.l t,,,.,,,,,,,;,.: m,v;,*J,3 4 Lga r -.m ~~ - o i ~,, m, _ ;, a.i_,,,,,,,, 4 c s.e n, i,,. 4' ' ~ - ~ * " * ' s .-ff.';I -.d. --r,.(, < *. l' ,.1 "TJ " -s I eff,*g% L,. sy3: n a ~. - =- Screy es.g 3 es w..... as _s-wer -'y w. ..s ' \\,,j,. ~ ~ t' -r - - g h-u %- ,.i'f's =

  • 7 a,

M,!? l k l r%;')' l -T.W,*, *, l Q.n'~~nas e p[ ..C y,L,?,, l ~ -= ~*M w 2 ,M J r Ep =1 l IN J a w_ t-n.!rr r 'l l e. j i l .+- m w= aw ,g cems 3 i l

  • ... g

% + EE,C7'CN SC SS

  • !:":4 !:-SC

+ -. a y g- ...r, .aa...> i a .) AS_O a'.,_ d g ,jd el y

      • g'*.

a \\ Fii a y <sf* t ^u en'. g -- - - _ - at U ~ agf:. l I =TUf," ; , m __3 1*?.J? 7.*.,,.,,#, a,.,. ' 74 t,_,,s. } z ( yn f pl< s (4n L.._,). r ~, ~ - ,e-.J f.. F,w, ; a 3- ----%..,,.. \\ y e, _. .m, -. ~. w I* '.,.?y' *7".:t.'" l y -..+a!"T!N' c5rn. V

r~

l

r.,.

~ t 3-**~ n. l 1 coa =

  • suor see co* *e a.s was r) Assiri

- ase+ ( ]' t UC SG t ,,n,.., \\ f.'*"..',. 4Z l !!:7/CN $-5 <m es*a mal l w* r a > ego 7p.y ea.ee ..... ~., i t r_. - _ _ r. I l i. i 'i M" ','_"a*J a s,r..- 7,_,*>.,., .J q - ;- .m,.~., .l._ 4 J .i -~ @"U 8 Ih*.?h--

=.- el-}

8.Tu'L mu 1 .4 L w,m,w.- a "N y_a4 ,&,f, slWai;" / 'g,.. % e _ . =

  • W

,; f i f, e r . s.- - s + /-. .s s s .t *c / x x/ ~ ~. .Tjl[h % Ne@Y2: y[, i/'

  • [*

l /[ O Y\\ ,[ / / % M\\s\\ /-A. t 3.*!b:_ A- -ha ,7 p-e _._ fgl rte,rr &g Lf, ]t, .b= f5 h* \\ ..! \\ W U ,shn ~ /\\* AMfp. g- -3 _t_.__ _.,a ,g i s _, ,, k /j, l \\ w ._} ewwq \\c/A %Q, / n, n, /,4R ~ n ;,7.J g we gg 7., fy# 4:., esso =.y / x r,u,y...m,,, e.,

m. ir.+

N.<. -,./ y% i [. e.,~,,. 9 .~.-..e ~ .m 1 ,g gup' - . _su ' 7e i

==w g..M N n L._ %y,",,9 x Cm &< * *+8 - ~ ,g 4 ..e g g amasa.e an.e [ees { ems ie.. SECPCN G-6 :n a.u n orLe l l SECT /C..N 77 o r..+ cmm=u ....e., (4 = A w s,a es,o a r.GC.e.,.t*0 3 Du rem es(4 *casronves t. ~ s=vn =wo, ~ man =.~ ****

  • s>,,,,,,

A I e I c i o 4 -d---

  • I N

O N N N N D 19 1$ 17 1$ II N () Q 11 9,, 8 7 4 y 4 3 2, 1.$ lJ 9 I r y ~.. e +

l. q E F G H 1 1 -i u.. u. s. a 73 i p_ LQ 2 - <1 - R i t p. i l FF' i I l j r. ~ -l ii e / 3 y', _.._ _.. ; w s 3l h i r% L i, - = - c-

y

~, cn ar tUWa / t ,- l 1 err T --4 i

f..

'N.. l

i. L

.,jc I 6 [M n p%y c y 4 g l4 i i -s ~ I kr ~ jl O g w: rn y j 3 4-1 I ' m- ,y_.__ n. 3 2 l (si 1 -l ~+z. i.f jji-1. ii ~._,. P. _..L= o 2 .4 i .Ia-g % e v- ._.t n ..Ifi l l i.g I -- ~~~ kb. 'h C ] . E, 3

s I

... I a s a.I i, 2.' ,f. = 4 s e ~:. V ,p e.. 3 g3 .3 ._ -.-{..,. -7 p 7 3 g o [",.- " ' 4 4 .o 5.

  • r3.(4

.1 4 vs._ a l 2 r . t i ,-t S.9-L J 1 IL .=; u.:.L -- .c t r g 3 i t c w.. 13, t 2 2 gf !.: a [3i 'E..#., k;,_, Q. T"~ y cx k [l p=(! ; I,,' l 0--

  • - ~

.9 - ' THIS DOCUMENT ci 'l - l 0 AFFECTED BY i ,h i. 9 y c,.,5., t 1 DESIGN CHANCES T.. n,, -1 3 ll b k E f g ,t i i a + r-F-, [ 8 p fe 'gL r* '{h i 5 ,f4 ') -k -(*

h.
  • III A5 UTILIT,1,E,5 5IRVICEllNC.

.I. 4 t _.__1. 3 A(,n f:a f, .,n m .,.. n. ...,u,,.,m n y t > \\ w o.u n w.m u.n.serm ' .us n m ase n a t to s .p.,. 49.. ...,. =.... .. in y O D {** Cl('( d M U . ; $14y gen. es.,. "Jts * 'w - - *= ' w a ss.*s fun ?.~m.. '. ..- -r: 1 - tUR I luL '( ' :~r - /*s?.'_?'_4. -

  • j:

i l. .a a w.u. _ _ _, _ e.g'.- I,,,,,. g a r s q. v..... 4 f ae. /4

? B o g( A ,Iit .U

!. SD

'4

d..

ta .q c. ~ ~} ks 858, EJ 5:j 18 2 n ~ bh ~h a f 'f '. E .....qd

4 Nk j Fi!-i

- - f., l L; _( I'_ ' j ,Lt L. ) t_ i ,3 .? l,,

  • j

., - ~i j (l.2 . a s ! L 'J f' 4.c l v. i ~~ ',4 1 1 3-I i, I e s }, 3 gi e 1 g 3 ( 3

[ i
i

!I ~ I ! I j: 1 Ii h ! i g i, y t l-j

r..

_J

  • a

+ is l1 .i gr .d ei 4. t+ fi I .d [ t il 2 -'~- g l! j d l l N \\ 1 ....: -.n. 1{ /_...-- f l - I 6 t I f b a i 3 ' A ~ = )

  • 9 4

j n ..,p**

  • }

l ,ss ,l, I U~ at 1 I} ma s -d/ s M

= 5=%

4 Ms-8 \\<C-. 9 g-s t ~~ k 4 r- .![ b ** ~t I

5. : 1

!3'i i 1 5 .b -s ( g 5 d b A ti i f f D ) 'e ur 7 q u 43 4 , ;,y u-

  • ?'.

.-A 1 e ! cg1 .,_, ) !g -DB V i ! 2 i s l l to-t i, } 3 01 .c; g. ...__.y .),_ _ ( { }4, r#=gn=.== m &. 1_4,._ 3 r c.,.,,, 3 1 b; 1 n. ~. g o;). a cm ) Ik ",4 ea 1.*g 3 s l ~ L 5 4 A E C D 4 .#w.rr.u - um ...,,l,. ,,; c1 F~ s e

4...

4 g F G H c. 3 / .b. -7T ~ [. 4" % 0.] g l. e. .N a, il -.;7 -[. ., -. j (.e p i h_.. r-e...... o. _._ __i. _/.

  • t i

,s . r s

y f ?], i t > =' l.
r, l

..e . I .s m -s * , re </. o -s, y ... '.d. : ',e' '.4 -e %,., . a .)

  • e-r

+P**3 0 ; ] .e N

3

,t u

p..tr e

.%f wa'= f-t,: a g:;=g---C.C, V.;, ' &v.,Y %'.n.~1 yh

? Q ~!

,' %p'// p;g~ lu,g_ )y J 8 c.,; ~.,. ~, y --+. = __ h. E' 3;a E-... ' / - !g , :Ne ,'d./< /u t _.h r.- ..' - Twyfy -/, - 9 i _i O 3l c i 3 f. v. r 'f l 'l ,h~- l %,y: ,7 .y e s , _ ~~, _ _ % v,- R; / i ~n s s s, s s x Of /

  • A r- -

h [, g\\ 3 / (' y'p. ' g, f'g a p p,1 z. y ,s ng, x,

z.,

l y 'y 2,7 : / 5 _ i; g W }s N N i! e t j; m y; > n .T f ~e_, n a et p

4. p ss. s j;

b. p' -,t s w s k. / [\\._ /' s f va l'~ 'dL,. 2 w \\ O L ' Na 3 ~ a ]D-1 _ i n+4 n 4 . r x ,m, x i p. .r w, i i 4 i 3 l, ' ~.. ! y g$ Q 3 337 y aoy b: r, P,' A.>~k. N. u + ,.A ' '/ N,.%r~'^A sg i o c, y a.i "

  • d

.i 'h -U~ .\\ OH I.',(;N'- / 'N; ip..: s] rH; ay$ 0% C ] j%/ I~ m @m - '{,. iJ '- ; - t--.ct p s l h o s l x, <w

t 1 Di i

.t ,e , / ' 4. ') ,l s (- lEI: < $ f, s ' 'l ./ if ji T;J,i f \\. . iC a N. li o t ,fp %3 N. i t , i

A 4

s . A, u. ., y. /.- i s s g _y I j j [ p' 'W' i : y +A ' - g i

i ;

i - 3 s t l m i n. L s..,__. (,- < s'. I v ys . a - .'. ~. - 8 - i T 3 e (.4 , are.e ase.s ...,.,. ~.n ,.,,.., a ~. ~ + e ~.. ~,, ..m s. i a ps. + -,:,.,.,,c,.a Tr c = -.~.:-,=,,. m i .r r.- .in.,~,...,-,.., y----- l i, .a: I u ,..r ~e ...,.n_,,m,...... i e.m._.,4.,....~,.,,..a ,, u m! . ;,f g I ,.=_-e.m: ', a __-._-..... _a g, e m ,m,, c.s s.,.,e.r.cre, e i i u o.

m...,. -

, i g 6..__,..____- , f- / . e:w a -- . sw ecewe e.r:, = o, =,m. ss.e r.e e w~ er :m e.m u.s% ~1 )., g_e.. i,9,I f _ a._ t.a ., b r. f a ve u.erun r.. = r.no , s,.: c r.e.se.,.re ,t s * .s c ,a vi h -r e,. n. - e e

i l,

r t. aa I, _.]I E E. l f h *fWl j} 5d, w w -<w,,n.T--..e., a, j r. 2,. .a,.., -}

  • ff;g l

C( ~_ } g e III A5 UTILI,TLE,5,5f tYlCl5181C. seiemen b 3 't -f-' osum mmea s uun courm I s - 3 o inu se rci,asc s,t aut E C.UMPW re m e m ae p,ni v aiem m-P.i~ y'.7bI

i. p, _--

' ?P.1*.c.%> 2f 2 * " ' " ** " <=..n=== e m, rea_- " - - t (s k { . D .3.[. M.. -e :5h*. R E INTERNAL STRUCT- [t M*.7 " '"*t' .,i e-=oo--.: r y s, g coup _ p s y. ~..,. e 5 III p-7 ( -%f *. .r,g*-" 4 DETS. Eb REINF. SH.S i } I f a y - **l,"'~**-_g" f.I,*eMeltN~i p-.- 1 G* g

  • .i..<-o'
    • n..--c-v er -

-s y,ggy . ---=-_.,.. p. s.. m, el E I F 1 6 M M34 m u n t. v u u a u u u n o

=

l. ~. - x- = 1

O ~ I u1.. y 'i 2 5 5 i 6 n a v e, 5 u e, 's or i u a u .i _.

  • r.

e 1 3 i e v t 1 sa g E "'e ' i y, ,(', e t. I A._,,,. : - -[ 7 -Q

  • - S M

<kp r 9 s 'j N ~.i q e I h... N

  1. $. 4

[ ~ N VD W s-. n 8,

f.,f.

ab,;; s i t f' bI.

  1. [
0. f4

'I G..e I l 'l /N y 2 i f^ j. s s ,q2 t,a . t, N ,i 4-e,# '. t. *., ~' A. . _.a ^ s p4<9 . S e.. / " g 3... . =. s. m g r 3 s 'r.*, }; T . ;_..... -_1 >?. i -Lt _ - 4. 5

  1. - y, /

an .%u F. 2,. ~% /, y .,' y 1 1.- MS-M- .x. ./ IJ r o, N -?.l$ f f( 4%.P 'pl I,,,.# s '^ MN, ) ,' j ( '" / .....a : N s t pn ( \\' k / \\'[ E% '. i j N ', t w. l __t1 s g' / y s .y r ,e _= r

1,, "
:[-

g ,. N N-l e i D I,,bh[' r I.' p-S.q ,u, { ", ! ' "J kq cs -*t, i S d'.e - + e ,Q N'. i ps - s o E

  • /.e 24 SS*

be i di I ..!,g

  1. F

')' \\ - h. i N, g t T n M.n t 1" - /. 1 1 s l ,=+ p . [* .u Q s'g. - f e

  • i2

\\ #pm++,4 s 4 j Art 7 I. R l .* i .2 i g Q, 1_.

  • \\

i t', i. ll!! "l } is m NC ',. r -~~ ..%,\\g ?j yg% ,3 ]Jj A' ' ; q l \\ )I n 0; ~ E r J W a T D 3 's '+ e + i-

b a

~ + \\: m. - x m 1 x' y; - sv' 4 i r [. ! 6 s* <2 (* ss - Q, s 8 l 5 s a s

  • '/.p )-

ai!h';f'dfV ' v2 w g . :fu i *i W& Q' 7f, / f' I 2 i 4* '

  • T.D.

2) i p< ,>[ ' % ;.;rs p ~ j;. 7 i g S. 0, y W 3 l ,d 4 $i G !!d d l!!j l,Ib,5[:f kl- ! .Ls Q1L tij l-l ,ht s 4 l.,.,.. <v L_,. ! - 1 \\ . // -' 5th $ h, Iy f eT - L '/* 4 / . et V r. h [ fh / [ [ bs,. 7 &. m 3. g . e,z s,. s. q_, y s k a / f,lat t- '% 3.],. to-3- e, n ey .-,s.f i + gt q, m.? p, .g .g p l. / -' 4 . A.1... ? - , r. ; n.-g '.,i i -I. 'I M'-{ 'g ( ',D d,- Ei n s "d. J.ig** ',, g I' f ] ' **. no.r b -. ge 4<a .;T 85-21---,-., 5,. T.. 2.=-r .. - - + r x v,. 6..l0., !.'.Q.-. ~ p i , l.- e x .[ re s,,. /, I / _A s 9' a,..,, -

  • .. ~
  • *C d ? y1.

e' \\ -? h

  • ' f-e e6

--(-tu,a ty[ f * ~ ' ~'l l - 4 y 8 l d-f g n 7,. 3 ",;.r 1 s; N. c . l:- i .;p g j ~ e r _ .?.. :q E k 45 tm ? b a; <J/ E -pj { V 0 3 e .m__ l oh \\

lR - ~ k A f i E F G H -I a e ~ ~ ~. g-1 I -1 / 2 8 4+ t 4 4tl ] h-G l W.. t ?< f J I N e t

  • )

5 's }}i <[< _l N i. 4a C +* O u b Q. _,b 5!; jam,... - c y N f li\\ t / x I 4 o+ .a..!s a.., a. n' / ! . t o E.,:.. ~ i M. f s , [ I' /f.Ndo i S1 y

  • l-Q C.

3 o.1, la D l .$ kks \\ S .g..>[ ^

  • *y' ~ ' d t

.j l 5 f ' C.- $ s,/ j:/ ?. %. re '. .c .~ e t .?W (4 e s . - $h / sg. 3 l, S V.dia ? l -f 'J. m.A A "+]- E 'I i

  • ,Ds4

>s _ p. '.s s a tr 1 ___.___i t. ! v. v c v 2-I i e t. p '#' t I 3*M a z , g -** K.\\. ~] 4 V~ ',y/ '. ' ~ { j

)

";' K. .i. .h ,/ l'! y l g'i ' L;3\\ ! " ~ ~J 1ll o.;' LM.,g.pja ^ j i... fec4 y ; g yfe

p o <. g t a: net +t.w':, S o a,.~

y s

ygll;.ag,;

,/ \\ ./ g 4 1..,..;r.. .u. :. qn e<n:l.,4

g w,

s e 1i = ~fg-l fi i* ,ih si ij'}*{!! j b h.f*N :

)

i 8) !i f ! !m; i. 1 ji i.. p..i. v+ i ij .s# o s!"' I Il*J.,3 M 5:,g($

j!J ad si P j*

.!,;p j g ) ,,,a 5 q. a. 4..:.nN.;p;,ba;:;I@N:.1 l?> IM j j .pn : l 11 2. w., u.v. $.:. 3 *, sj :.;" IIi', If,.m m.{f u. 5 n '~. A 't b I di a:m)!! H:!i'5 It ::: t ,3 :} f o, L l O FOR OFFICEAM C L A S S.I..- = =. - - = =.,, ..=. E l EE USED),Y "T*I E((.~' rius uiturias 51aviasinc. 1.m.,m,a,. m,m. o t,.,g mmm y A,, ,,u ...,m, mm u -. m b"7 ~~~~ U .THIS DOCUMENT -h w=gsc._;. n.e.. = = = - ~ 2 s -.AFFECTED BY .%*h " ' " * ' - ~ " a 8 'aTraa 5 =

  • c

%]"ar" ".so w"'- -. -- we o REACTOR CAMYCUTUNE v =hdie "~~' sects a cas. Sn i 3; DESIGN CHANCES i. r i-1.: nzx=.w. ~.tr a e e I P y .--3-... i, s E I P l 6 N 7 r_.. _ D.1 .g h . [.4___ m,.__ ,.. d..,. _,, i,.i, i...f_ _*T ~**. '. -.. l ".' n~ *'F,= = ~ 4-~' 3 ._.h 2 .b_ h j:u__L A r r. wsSh .n .m.. ..o m -,, . s m -1w w ~ .[ f-IIN1bd E. .I .I I.' k ).b I II-I I [.E N td "i -O.. n.. .+ . ~ - w. _.,. _ u, I ee. i

p, f-i 1 ) 1 ' I I A 3 4 C 1 D I 4!I

i I

1-r b-q, .g. N s .. v-. y,s dr i s ( .,v . -._ 7 1 I 4 ,},

. r..

4- - ic n st,3 !.![:;-- j ",7 L24xet._'y .g .4 x. .. ' ' ~ - - c n l

  • -,7 i

.' s

d.. y I

. ^Nl..' s w ..... n - -b c. 9 c ss. _ y-N v- ~ ---f I I - I 's y"%f*. M:ge-p s..I f .c. 4 34 i t,.:.,e,*)i. m - 1 rI.',N'f's..N:.:,- .e n - 4,ii: 4. .q, \\t ***. QI,' 3\\ 'N ,. $ 4) ' 6, p .. s M.v, -[ 7'dt9,1 %y,<.@w\\5 \\ M.; ! N., T,, x, i gt ,t ,e, '..,s,, g f l f ,v, a S6 4,

  • e e

fv s r, h *e \\ b$ D '* ;t l 1.g di g j.ig,,-,_ff b.9 / m 1=,rr i. 4.- a h...* / '>',g'.y fl*Q.i.j'y*-: *:. - lE 4 N ,i 4,,4 ~ /.

g-

~.. 4 /?{q <A. 2,, ~P 4 '[ .i 1. . s, [, f [.,...f.Q,,. : G,i T. - Q., jii [> e M

s. -

c / } ).) ti1 k" k$q.h3MM,.3 [ -Q. <., ' M y y \\> L b' bj 'A,,/# N y -

4) g.w% t '

,! rN,x b, 1 wxMa N [- <.. .?

p. h.
    • s.tk g\\ s ;;

P ' s, d,'+Cf'rH.-)W.,.. s a p Y =' N. g \\ s&.. 2, ~~, '/. [.t r s,e; f i 4. '>r '1 M. 1 e -7 .v4., s j e.. y/ [ f- .. -- (4f. ~. _ - . c,. - u ;/ 3<'- t i

r

,,.- e., ... m. W r iN3 k' g'% . p ',-- n..y

.p.g

'e .w q-r- 2 y l / y s$ p }, g. --. g.. ,s,4.y7 i s 4 A w' N N A l S~ > ~ s 6>'..+, ^+- .m. e./ u!'ji v-i J;, ..N ~Nd <.,,. 4. &.,.,' f,, I 'b E.J 5 b ~ } ,_ _ i. i aj x,.. w o gir < + p.-,m,, s_...... _....J_. , y' l 'i j g 3 h t a s---.. s .(..% gsi sI { 6 e . J. i.l v j a I t

  • [
  • .b l

5 s3 3 c-------- I \\ rg .1 4 e i ) Q l 'j "----~j-l . JV O,

  • -?

s i g I t b__________ ] [ hs a a s 1 s

e i

e. .e. .---o_ _ g - oo., y. 'ta . / l 's 5 9.' v .N

i 1

's.+ r 1 6 s s- ...' y.. _ f. .J f A B C 0 { ,a

  • b N' b

-I . 4. T_1~' !*I 6 i. i. 6f?Q ffSWZV P.1 f_,L;' A e gp,,t r.-frt r a m 6 f' r T 1.f 1' @,_,7 [- g u i _7-- i# a- ,_m. e ~.,___., g o.. .___ _._ m _, m e 15

j P vi ~ e Tq'-l kW -4 i~s i e i i se;:2 -.. x_ ZZ 5-4, F ey, D I.h w [/ ~ J5Er-M 25 h' Q R 2 3 g c j', f.. -

/

- r-- 5 m t ! ~: w.,~- ~. .s y, w. y 'i i

i. -

~ ' +,, 1 ---8 ..N@h,.

o., n 2-c,,,

o, o s; s ~:=..=. I - w., .c. ',r- ~, 9. ,,n .j a V I.. c, ,- m g s i

3. _..E l P

I; s. m,., ,m

  • _. I r

r 4ye s u h,

a. s,
3..

q. 1 3 js 1 f . ~, .,n i i = 1

.- -;.- :m.2.~.;:

g. , r'f 7 , ($. h { Q W', 4

  1. ~: T ~~~~' "* "" " '

t.- g n.' j [ ,. - rP - ed M Q~..,.l, Q::r'MS-s . - /gh-F.=2: t. o w mmm 2: ...... ~ _. - "' g6 g-c ,.v., y,.. e h.._f2_p.i.

c. a.- "'"

n

ma.r. -

.m.-. J. 'D .-',rp... ~ a j. .... - ~.. . - % -..-, nu m -. q,, .s .,as m ,_, e _v w. e, n ;,. ~ - _ ;} M 4 ,s = _- 'a ^ * -.. _ g-,_ 2 N..-. ah ' * ' " ' * * * * * * ' * * *

  • _,;

\\' ,bb"'s.* '* W== q.:= 'f T

    • p

.kM Qc h /,- ll f ~ ' - i r, [-'* % ~^.s ' **C

  • j "9

YM k i G. d# ..a. .I Y - Tf.f g aa. ~ mi o. ,,ss-+24 \\ C '~' s 5'T~~~.Q U:ist

[~

~ .i.f,. /~ =- j u _ m,o i.. + =~.:. . r :.:~.x=.>:.- x . q Q = = ~ ,d 2 /., p.v.* .:,.;.; -:;,c, -~ ,, j m J - ~ ~. n .si.c j c ri F.:i:,5 i....i '#lip' s#-. m

y h_L t'i=n- ]J h h

' p,,,-- - - - m m - 9.*y "~p"s-:- .~.- t ' "" "** ' ~~.'.*T!:'.M*.'.'y.I Sy c, k*NN Q ..-J e ",,, 4. m ~:e. }y ' 4ff js -3 ~-";*--* d su 9 p, - s.;;., D.

v..

n.u .o. g,.. y,,. .,,,,,,,,,e: w._:ne, n cm,:._ c.x. s 'I

,5

.<-6. f~, ' - '" " ". S. s . [ [ C c:=v*e.c..au ,. &-ft"I - l cc auns cu e c.ay 'i f W"" ,.g. .: p o - T D,=

  • y t

s m.,,,.,-~ O ? 4 .h.- J =* \\ 1 ~ ~ i r,

=

i i s.., y mn. . E

i tr h

M-d h.:. s ,nXJ. .T i e c. I .4-- wi .a re. .x- - ,,n r .us - t w m w-C'**.t m,,,-c.m.. r.". + -+- .n r r i ~ W g. .r ~;r:.m,x. s? u am m,, =- m - w L 1- ,a.,, m = e,.;, '--a ';#* J,

  • ;;ll p.

_m -;.-.----e- .i* 0 P g==***** ..-m . l'- -- w r.f--4 +3 _, w 4 ' M i **, e f.7.,,. n-m n.. u v., - -'q.m r.- -~-

rue,

,., n. + r .i i a fii14. .c i ..m.,,, i i !I c.LL ~ ; m-~ r_ E:~ E=' d, i .LL1.1 !.! 111,; N1 m -ha =- m u _a.:. w -.; -. su.au. s i l 1 an.s E Tus miaa. 4:ss.* e MILL. rec iss.1 _ l i THIS DOCUMENT..,l,a'"a"!!!F '. '.Tl m_ hf aty e ^-

  • ?

BY ,',,.,pM.S.'N ,. I$TD ~ n 3-MMl".D l

j 7-
;: :.:,,ml::::-

i ,r 4 T7 ,i. i i, DESIGN 6 t , ;- - ~ m_,..g: i-a. .= r,. o,6 /wy fr m i ggg g g ,, #(. r?,e... =,' TEXAS UTILITIES ~ i. .rfw /v f.,...a * "a SERVICES INC. t.. i an e_u.s-w.a s..' - %

  • s ~ -*=: W ~& ~ ~--~

J m.in'4We7 &. sam %8M [ f' pts.s a t < we e p.g 'w M r..... _ 9,..A m.,y e. r'd Coautos.s -etu s at 6 .:...c ( .. r

m a

. w - s **o e r - e > r w ._ r 9_'- w.; Z'Li % a. m t"' g 22" 3 M -.-- i i,. ; . :s :.s* **S*d.M s e r. I L- ' 48 k tyb,;.1 i. n.J.. _...,.._....._..m .g ff

.i a i e i c i' o tI am, n.csa a ~.. g 33 a- [%lI*@ -.42r g. <- ( l y \\ g rT 'n! N. % ) i L. m >3,a.. 1 T' c g Ei Cs - - 4 r\\~ T~ lT a L.... -= hz rd i > Q,7.:=.2,% / y Ow. a e. s 2; N j,a - p,, -w.. )t. n; 4 g m:. 9wy..,: ys.u .g;;. .,. _..:s i _g m _. m. ~ 2 Q.>.A....x.n.fi, pmn., A,

e..

e g o r u... a.q..q, wm..=.m c e,s ~ s s u ~. e, #y,. u

w. a n.

..<d2..%.d.,. Q.....=.L = +k.y 9 wt -w ~- n . %., _,. ~. n.., _.t,. :. .x** [ y ~ gfpg i.U., .l ;a; M a c/ .I t. e. ..-... = y,. =.:-..>, _ - - ~. g.:........ 4.s % ll m? a,1 =/.$. -.J: = ......a m_#* -.,_ 9) ,N, p.,., ; + g.1' - s,- . i h 6 < .~3., m,. s.. .............x.. , 4, g \\_-.,c, a

7... -

n. w. a. w W Q_s- .s P. +i w ei. iT,--4.,a.r--4 s n... e.g,Q,. ::,y rm m i g EM"2-{

h. %.. I'-

g[.M... Y"> h_.' p 4-k:i,i

  • ~

ye j644.'. / 4. I ,A. - n# _ ' 'T 3 r w u,m _y Sld- , c. anye . 4-a l . = m m-- ~' Mf3_ ~_ .ma ,~f~g 2^A k.lW4 Id M W: -.. t: O Q,e mv n,W X EC7.. --C ' ~ _. '~IW I i a ., m 8.5, 1 - -' l W !..T ~+ i - .4.-m _,.=s g 3 :r_-t'.gr: 6 p-l a-c.,: te n 4 '3-'",jd, y m L1

r_ r_j-Mc
,,.

9, J-r.ac +** u-e a:.u a m. U

..Cr" M 'L.

5;. i. h, G M ii 1 I.' l --=*C i (mt ys m u.. " =.=: --r._ i I i. yf ! = = - 4.; _f, w -:Wa d ;. q. U -'*, - ; ,t ou, a .,<.y 1 l .c _.. .e= ,,2 m ,b....... w,,- _........ . :. lll'.T== 's. 8._ l I i l ,J - ws i 1.... (;,.p>g -.g..... ri. 3, p .,rTO - i +>, j M'4.i

e...

l. w., _ n _,x .(,f. l =' \\, p.] 1 l .L,- ..l 7 b (_ m e s - ~ ' M~ - 91- @,s ,l. ..l.._ = w~

a. us en 6

+ e essumegt g .g x s ee e es _' J e _d EENEENDllSE DNLY ' ~

scms, e-j

..i* ................_..4_I, i-A f e i c. I o O S .e

    • e r.

/:

l R, - i,~$;h. s/ n d p., a,. e ,j I,$

t.

i, ~ _.p_ - D

I q) in l j'.

~ 3)1 ,/ qt i.g lF .y j;I j!. i g] @~+,r-9', M

's f.
    • [id 9 I.,' : n..

i y-s-u l.. s g :.,. .) . i 8 ' W' x <te./, / g% ,s e r n :2: .g m. sw' i,s, .e

r-b.t (.N eW,5hl ({y\\-a.; y&=..
=+={!*y $p:
.ry

$:3 $,a, a s g! ..Y . h e ]' ? $ f t t e ' %%2 -- -,*. V i.h

k.v I-

'N ' u /s "O. p. s .fr. 1 "P 'fih't /

jEi== i

- [ y <_c;,. G )K,x + -l ar e m Ii ,4 s 4 ka!. g

t 1

x. .7 . p: ( .g 1) 4 e a w jfr., Ai! i ,f j e g? D %j' -(;W\\x4 - p !s M eFh;l ! :=? % [I N up $ D!

M

@r w-r ,.. t ; ik p.;h2 e-n,. 4ga &.c s .t.- u i i c.v s _, x-s g 7l i, 3 .s,; -s xi. N.as te e qc-f, 4p th i I C ,S% .. -y,. / s'e q;,A /;) .,. / { t!! / .\\ e y h?/ E: T t~s. e,l. t gx.; g*s i 3 . n 3.., a (c., 2 h fV}}f 'I h '

  • NQ

,i. ~ .= c 9m/ o s \\ ,,..e s: )a y $ T' &, t fik'N 1.nY'\\ (\\s' . w..r,w. / gs%- s# yyy \\ .n.; i M,bQ f a! ' ' ~ Mg,Yci :I.= a v D':.QI- >.#J.-- ~!

  • i I'

i e. e, a;. qq b

3.,,

'y I .v %-y,.y fp /

  • t k.g

. N,, i 3 I.!, 4 ./1 2 u. d. .r. i 4.. .y QN ;i i,- l 2 4 y h ,g a p -a

r!

~

1

!!l}

;p-

\\ r .2 s,,h i Ie, u n ..~ .a Tyy3 DOCUMgI l.- t N. i s' i y j f__ CTEp gy 2 h CHANCE 9 FOROFF Sussg 2+ w & a n=- m U ilI AS Utilmil 5ttVKI5 mt. I EE,"I osu m uu p r rn u m,=.. e.i orr niss.,,tsi -36,.. s ucr a m . i< as., m ,n etenee .se r

4. reg

'7" +7" h_ %_%* LLI L R. S. INTERMI. STRUCI M. w.?x?.g"%..,.v1,,_. gf _.'4.. -/; M **" " '*Z 8 RE/ CTOR CAVITY OUTL.JNE seeTs.a octs. sa 2 ,k. g i-E,%f...fN/%E;m Mrfeb. a + i c-x... un sm \\ -A m u . 11 to....15,_18 17 19 19 3e 1 3 4 5 6 7 4 1 4 il 11 in to tl no 17 18 19 18 19,, it .z= W__ __ _ ". ::w ca - r __ f_ x u d

~ Y I ~ 9 O i' A 3 1 C .m _l - x,,3, s p j

3 [

~ + - - -+- ] Dd-f Q

r. '[

N g e.m ~ ',/ !i '.$N s s 4.g il - /- i 8 P ww. ; l '\\ p 9 t a ~ (*h, f M ,,f" h [ '%% g, ' \\ N $h b.' S ?hh~a s .u i s +, s s - \\\\ / a ,/. ( I?>- .g s,/ j PY Ab,,8' 'i, O.._. A :x N. 4,hq!..! -r' / sf t, g y,/ \\ 'N/ y 4- /s j 'I j!' / 3/ 4-s i } "*tf ,b \\ A' /yg & ,/ i Q \\ \\ l I, O

h. y, A )

g ,,0 j 7 j l x 3 N ~,i 5 I g /lF - l s W N' e k h y Ii jl N. N' $] s o .gf'N h-O [* -- ; y I z i 'I j / s I l h' ,s ./ + \\ 24 a -5 \\t,\\ d I/ N cl s / j 1 ii 3 i s .f- 'N

^

/: x {\\ % T4 / : 3 s x 'l N s j ~/ - g y a. 'g 4! g.' ,,Up ,' / / ( 4 ??'5 T s \\.,f ?-'f b o [ d,' d f Yl x,, 4 O,, ' y!!i;f f l ^ v i .xN

1. s[u

. \\ .g / i W. N/ I \\,-

.-^ !

7 ' p / _ ' - m o g$ g ' x, j g., J r y \\. ih E f3 V I \\ ~ / 4 wf.fy 1 !p/ 1 3 N t 4 di kN' i ,9 ( f[ h i ) c, .ry V 's.;n,' v/. $y,n, 'si ~ .v 7/ t i N .s 3 Tj s,, ':,b,- /' . V.N. t A r-t t g j / i .h l t V, p,q 9m. 4 r - e-+ ~, t s fEh lf h gj 4 3 ..c j a a .,11 s i i e i o ei m - J ,___ [ ,s. 3, e r s z n a i, e, rt s w a ze n ze a z. a _... ~. ./J.

s?$i N h-kg - --a - t E. Johnson 3/2/84 '*'h'a-e. THRU: D. Hunnicutt FROM: R. Taslor \\

SUBJECT:

More CPSES R11e9ations L. Gilbert and thi writer were in the Process welder who Possibl9 of interviewins ac2EF" E h has testified to inhad knowled9e of the " weave bead" we a the hearin91. The Person was identified from the QA/OC records. He could not remember the specifiic instance that ClDEERIB E D> discussed but havins worked on several Pipe supports in could reroember the area on overtime weekends. After the discussions on the specific instance and view of the area where the situation was a walk-around interviewee rather sudden 13 alle9ed to

occur, our CPSES which are sumroarized as follows: decided to unload his concerns about
1. The craft t3Pe People don't care what the9 supervison does not care,what is done.

do becsuse the

2. The Present EEASCO inst ectors often si9n of. weldin9 from the floor off i nsPectio' ns level when the welder is 15 or more feet above.
3. The B & R inspectors did not inspect the craft that the inspectors had become friendly thin 9s done b3 EEASCO era.

with Prior to the

4. The "backfit inspection" Pro 9 ram was a best because the PeoP1e involved only "50%"

Pro 9 ram at actual 19 inspected about i/2 the thin 9s thes were supposed to inspect. h 5 M431tib3nitrJtLEaexdQC3ited;UPMwatnectE6Mrrettri gep 4tcat,q st K Jg M JFK2nTGt2FJess y, _ m ~g ~~WcMswar..r,emddwy, ' a -Mrf Y $4t!Ltsgt,t,spqntagsfddggsjyF6. t'ttiltildyoit3mavE6HNI~deECittm g iostst EthN3 1 e

7. HILTI bolts would Probably s

! /t t-. work-tu ffdie ncth subjected to vibration over the fort 9 N ' f ther F3pr@E uhen 9 ear o i knows how to do but others (most)8. The alle9er has never done anythin work he don't because thes don't care.

~ f-F Y - hv i } M7/ VF f' 3' A -3 that Corrective Action Report No. 41 had been " pencil-whipped" (dispositioned without actually conducting the rework) tated he believed the above described instances constituted intimi-dation and harassment. Maid he had already testified to many of these concerns before the ASLB and that the NRC was already ayare of these issues. Q.ated that his discriminatory temination suit was presently before the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and that he plans to testify in the next CPSES hearings. Mtate~dih~eWasipreYintly-10poss6531pEnCtoloAm $turar of,tianaerrmd31rfp3ND}1evenwo6Td41eadito' tHFh5FenaryN A c o qe cti on - o fratric ast~rba i f-mieH i on-dol l a rs-uneth'47'EEEEWTEFIGETiiFdr s_g.ddanuMIEMTTTfoFd613XR wtritt~nf;ts&hfit:1tIEPS$f. g w stated he had not provided this material to the intervenor, CASE, and was un-willing to ' provide this information to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. %dicated he would present it to the CPSES ASLB hearing himself. ' f M: .A g/q, .sp f 1 \\ l

7' TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM GUIDANCE JUNE 1984 Prepared By: T 4-s/ / 4. 5f u% R. H. Wessman Approved By: @wd 4 -/jy T. A. fpkolito, Project Director FCA85-59 s cny s"~ wg-

  1. 9e e

.{... TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM GUIDANCE I. Introduction The Comanche Peak Plan for the Completion of Outstanding Regulatory Actions, was approved by R. DeYoung, H. Denton, and J. Collins on June 5, 1984. In accordance with the " Plan," a Technical Review Team (TRT) has been formed to evaluate and resolve technical issues and allegations presently identified. The TRT organizational structure and schedule for their activities are as shown in the " Plan" (Copies of these charts are included with this guidance as Attachments 1 and 2). The TRT will be broken into five technical groups, corresponding to the five technical issue groupings. These groups are: QA/QC, Electrical / Instrumentation, Civil / Mechanical, Coatings, and Test Programs. The groups will be comprised of a group leader and reviewers that are specialists in the particular technical area. The staffing of these groups will be drawn from the various NRC offices and/or contractors, as arranged between the Project Director and line management. The TRT may be called together for a specified period of time, dispersed back to the individual's parent office, and then reconstituted in whole or ) in part as needed to complete' resolution of like issues. The TRT will be under the direct supervision of the Project Director. The guidance contained herein will address the following: Method and approach for identification and disposition of allegations Preparation of Documentation and Records Allegations Tracking System Protection of Individuals Initiation of Special NRC actions, such as confirmation of action letters or 50.54(f) letters Manpower accounting for TRT members II. Technical Review Team Method and Aporoach The Technical Review Team method and approach to resolution and closecut of technical issues and allegations is described in the detailed " Instructions to Technical Review Team" which is provided as Attachment 3. The TRT will be mostly concerned with the resolution /closecut of approximately 300 allegations that are assigned to the TRT. Each member of the TRT is expected to understand and implement these instructions. When possible, the team activities will be planned so that at least partial credit can be taken for closecut of items in non-allegation areas. This approach shoulo result in the most efficient use of inspection resources. For example, in resolving and closing out a specific allegation, it may be possible to also close or partially close an open issue that falls under a separate (but related) category; such as, IEB closecut, room turnover inspection, routine preoperational program inspection module, etc. While this mode of operation will contribute to the completion of the routine inspection program, it is not envisioned that Region IV's resource needs to complete the routine inspection program will be significantly reduced.

C III. Documentation and Records An individual record file (work package) shall be developed and maintained for each open issue or group of like issues. The files have been developed by Region IV and will be maintained and used by the TRT. Each file will contain or reference pertinent documentation associated with the open issue. _ Resolution of each issue shall be supported with a clearly auditable record trail. Accordingly, the record file shall contain or make reference to all significant records relied upon to reach resolution. Records of personnel interviews shall be developed and retained in those instances where interviews are relied upon by the NRC staff for decisions of technical adequacy. Interview records.shall, as a minimum contain: the date, time, location of the interview; the name of the interviewer and interviewee; and a summary of questions asked and relevant information obtained. Upon issuance of reports (such as SSER's or Inspection Reports) which close out open issues, those records which are appropriately referenced in'the NRC reports and are traceable through some other means (e.g., meeting transcripts, permanent applicant records, etc.) may be removed from the record file as approved by project management. Files must be maintained in a careful form with attention to detail. They must be self-explanatory. Upon completion of the TRT effort, the files will be transferred to the appropriate line office for retentiori (e.g., allegations files will be transferred to Region IV allegation files). IV. Tracking Scheme All Comanche Peak allegations are to be identified and listed on allegations summary tracking sheets, as shown in Attachment 4. Although the TRT is primarily concerned with allegations, it may resolve other open technical issues, which are summarized on tracking sheets shown as Attachment.5. Open issues may come from (but are not necessarily limited to) the following areas: - allegations - hearing items - licensing items - inspection modules that are incomplete - inspection open items (non-compliances, unresolved items, etc.) SER followup items Part 21 or 50.55(e) items - investigative issues A fundamental part of the listing development is the estimate of resources required and the schedule 'for completion of each group of similar items. i The allegations tracking system will be maintained on the 5520 word Status of individual allegations will be updated biweekly by processer. the Project Director's staff.

5 To provide uniformity in tracking and ease in accounting, numbering and discipline codes are assigned to each items as follows: XQY - Z X Corresponds to the Task Code (Allegations, Hearing issues, etc.) Q Identifies those particular issues that are QA/QC related, irregardless of the discipline. Y Corresponds to a Discipline Code (Welding, electrical, etc.) Z Corresponds to a sequential number. The sequence of numbering starts over with I for each new discipline code. provides the table of task and discipline codes. V. Protection of Individuals The identity of persons providing allegations to the NRC shall not be disclosed as a. matter of practice. In addition, for those individuals expressly requesting confidentiality, all efforts shall be made to protect the individual's identity. Confidentiality reouests that seek an anenymous relationship with segments of the NRC will also be considered. This will includ'e: limited and controlled distribution of allegation documentation and corresponderice; minimal use of names, identifying titles, or position descriptions in written material; enlarged sampling of activities so that is is not evident to personnel outside tne NRC that the particular sample selection is related to the alleger; and other indirect approaches toward investigation / inspection of allegations. During the course of NRC reviews or inspection, similar efforts shall be made to protect the identity of licensee or contractor employees who provide information which may be construed as being critical of licensee or contractor activities. All interviews of allegers will be conducted by the TRT and/or 01, as appropriate. The Technical Reviewer (reporting directly to the Project Director) will coordinate alleger interviews involvin'g TRT and OI personnel. He will assure that technical issues are identified and passed to the TRT for resolution. VI. Special NRC Actions As part of the allegation review effort, it may be appropriate to initiate actions which are not routinely required for technical issue followup. These may include: issuing requests for information to the licensee under 10 CFR 50.54(f), Confirmation of Action letter or order; or requests to the Department of Justice to grant immunity for certain individuals. Actions such as these, if required, shall be handled with the concurrence of the Project Director and in accordance with established NRC procedures.

- e 4 VII. Manpower Accounting Offices shall implement established manpower accounting systems to monitor resource expenditures related to this activity. The new Regulatory Information System (RITS) will be used to track and account for all manpower expenditures, both technical and clerical, expended on the Comanche Peak TRT effort. Special activity codes will be assigned to all task force members to ensure accurate accounting and meaningful l management reporting. a e i 6 J i %-r-, r, --~.ym., r

w AC .e +4L + .a u a 5 w TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM (TRT) Project Manager T.A. Ippolito "U" Ass stant R. Wessman (NRR) .1. Gagliardo (IE) (Tentative) R.C. Tang (NRR) Civil / Mechanical QA/QC Coatings Test Programs i Instrumentation Leader i ~ Leader Leader Lead Leader P, Mat t$rews J. Calvo (NRR) L. Shao (RES) T*ConlokRII' R. Keimig (RI) (upp3 i i i I l' l l-i e i L __ _._ _ _ _ L _. _ _ _., _ _J L_ _. _ __ _. _ _ _.L - Technical Issues - Technical Issues - Programmatic - Technical Issues - Technical Issues and Generic - Allegations - Allegations technical issues - Allegations - Allegations and allegations - QA/QC Related - QA/QC Related - QA/QC Related to - QA/QC Related to to E. I&C to Civil / Mech - Integrate QA/QC Coatings Test Programs from other Groups g - Interface with other groups on QA/QC n oNsi

4 COMANCllE PEAK I i Allegations Resolution Schedule i April May ilune .luly August September October I l l 1_ 1 I I I I I I I I i l l l l 1 I i 1. Plan Approval X ?. Personnel X-----X Arrangement 3. Obtain Logistic X---------X Support 4. Develop Review X---------- ---X Packages 5. Task Force X b 6 '8riefing &

  • 8*

Assignments i 6 First Site Review Perind -X--X i 7. Second Site Revieu Period X-----X 8. Third Site Review Period X-----) i 9. Prepare Final Draf t SSER x----X 2 3 10 flanagement 8 Review X---X i

11. Final Report n

X----X I?. Sutelt Report to ASI ft X

INSTRUCTIONS TO TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM The followimg instructions are to be used by the Technical Review Team in the resolutiem/ disposition of technical issues and allegations. The instructions provide tean gaidance and sample document formats, as shown in the Annexes to these instructions. A. Each individual team member shall ensure that he or she understands the followimg general guidelines: 1. Preplan approach / method / rational to individual items. 2. Recrrd all pertinent discussions or interviews. 3. Veight documented evidence over oral representations. 4. Seek the generic implications of each item; consider implications of management performance. 5. He attentive to permutat' ions / ancillary issues. i' 6. Sire up allegations to put into perspective; address merit imdividually, collectively, and in conjunction with others' input, SALF, previous reviews, IDVP, LERs, IEBs; fit all pieces together fm emaprehensive picture. 7. Respond professionally, nondefensively, nonagressively, and eestrally in dealing with licensee and contractor personnel or allegers. Don't be defensive-minded: Do not prejudge or prejudice l the issue. Don't criticize or talk down to anyone. 8. Whem discussing issues with allegers, approach from alleger's perspective; seek to understand. Assume alleger credibility, honesty. 9. Assume where there is smoke, there is fire " attitude." 10. Ec set preannounce the item of concern to the licensee / contractors, whenever possible.

11. De met identify or cause the revealing of any source /date received.

Dewelop/ retain records of all interviews which are relied upon for technical / managerial adequacy decisions. Maintain record protection.

12. Protect allegers/ personnel contacted. Use indirect approach / mixing to, a2cid focusing attention on individual. Honor confidentiality (where requested).
13. Draft material is not to be provided to anybody outside the NRC.

Dficussion with group leaders is encouraged.

14. Frotect all information; do not prerelease conclusions prior to management review. Do not discuss conclusions with licensee.

.. m . --.m. m

1 E. Assume all your notes /recor.ds/ drafts / materials collected will be 3 subject to FOIA. M Make prompt notice to the Project Director of significant issues. 17/. In-progress receipt of a new allegation should be reported to site coordinatnr to get it into the system. New allegations will be + treated separately from the ongoing allegations. (See Section I). E Be visible. Wear NRC hard hats, etc. L9. i Individuals should maintain an orderly, mechanical and purposeful approach. Their efforts should be comprehensive, timely, thorough, and systematic, i

27. Keep it simple / understandable.

People with many different backgrounds.will need to understand what you have done. 4 ZL Consider a post effort critique. Keep track of lessons learned. 22. All media and " interested public" contacts will be directed to the i Project Director or his assistant. It is inappropriate to discuss the review of technical 1ssues and allegations with the media prior j their resolution and publishing of the SSER. R F%rpare work package (s) and related information. A work package cover sheet is shown in Annex 1. Group leaders should review allegation file-i 4 tro identify essentially identical allegations. The numbers of essentially identical allegations should be recorded in the work package and documented in the allegation tracking system. IL. Rewrite (if necessary) general thrust of the allegation in plain english. If necessary, discuss with alleger. 2 Develop and document approach to resolution. A draft outline of an approach to resolution plan is attached as Annex 2. i 3 Identify material that needs to be reviewed and documented. t+ Identify applicable regulations / requirements. 5 Identify the individuals who need to be interviewed. t 5 Acquire pertinent records. Do not remove records from site or region allegation files. Make single copy of each record needed for work package. Assure copies of appropriate records are sanitized to preserve confidentiality. i. t 77.. Consider generic / management implications. I o a: Identify related inspection items or technical issues (modules, i I s or portions thereof, followup items, noncompliance, etc.) that could be completed in conjunction with resolution of allegations e work package. 1 ~ I

-t C. The approach to resolution will be reviewed and approved by the responsible group leaders. The group and group leaders will identify open issues other than allegations (IEB followup, room turnover inspection, etc.) toward which the allegation resolution effort and findings can be credited. 1. Identify manpower needs by specialty (request help where needed). 2. Develop estimated completion of each allegation. 3. Group Leader shall specify individuals to do the work and approve the work package by signing the cover sheet. D. Conduct inspection in accordance with approach to resolution. 1. Document conversations that are used in resolution of technical issues or allegations. In inspectin make signed statements (if possible)g allegations, have individuals that indicate what was said, who was there, where, date and time, and purpose of the interview. These statements should be signed by all present. See Conversation Record form, attached as Annex 3. 2. Obtain copies of key documents. If important information is only on a few pages of a larger document, obtain copies of those pages and mark the copies with the information that should lead back to the original document (s). This information should be filed with the work packages. E. Group leaders should keep the Project Director or his assistant informed of significant developments. Meetings for this purpose will be held daily; however, important developments should be reported promptly. e F. Evaluate results of technical issue or allegation review. G. Prepare documentation to disposition the allegation. The allegation writeup format is shown in Annex 4. In preparing the documentation, keep in mind the following guidance: 1. Indicate that the allegation is understood. Briefly, but fairly, restate the allegation. If you discussed the allegation with the alleger, then say so. 2. Respond to the allegation. Is the alleger correct? Is there some merit to the contention? 3. Do not casually dismiss an allegation. Even if the alleger is "off the wall," someone may see some merit in the allegation. 4 Recognize and address (if possible) the underlying problem which you raise to the alleged problem; i.e., what management failure allowed 14,000 undersized bolts into the Class I system? Also address the generic implications and what was done to resolve them. 5. If there is no safety significane, say why. Remember, nonengineers will be reading and evaluating the analysis.

6. Avoid the suggestion that a. sample collected for review is a " representative" sample (unless it is at least close to a " statistically valid" sample). Simply state the size of the sample, without characterization. 7. If it appears that the problem was caused, even if in part, by a failure to properly implement QA or inadequate administrative / management controls, then address this aspect. An assessment of the overall QA program effectiveness will have to be addressed. i H. Other open issues, such as, IEB closecut, followup to 50.55(e) reports, followup to previously identified inspection findings (violations, 4 unresolved items, open items, etc.), and other open issues will be documented and closed out in an inspection report using the guidance of IE Manual Chapter 0610. I. New allegations may be received at any time, from any source. New ~ allegations will be treated as follows: i 1. Receipient shall report allegation to Project Director, via his Group Leader, and fill out allegation tracking forms. ) 2. NRR will make board notification, if appropriate. 3. TRT team member may be requested to provide technical assistance to 01 in taking statements from allegers. 4. } Review alleger's statements and identify additional technical issues. 5. The Project Director's staff will enter technical issues into i tracking system. They will assign all technical issues to appropriate group in TRT. 4 6. When required, a designated technical reviewer will prepare questions to applicant, based on technical issues'. 7 Obtain Project Director approval of proposed correspondence to applicant. 8. The Director, DL, will dispatch questions to applicant. 9. The TRT will review the applicant response and include it i in an evaluation. 1

10. Document results.
  • s 9

Annex 1 i i Comanche Peak Allecation Work Package Allegation Number Numbers of Similar Allegations Statement of Allegation: 6 Reference Documents: 1 i l Source of Allegation Date Received The above information prepared by Name Date Group Leader Name Date Assigned Team Members Date Assigned Date Assigned i Date Assigned Date Assigned

e p

  • p

) Annex 2 -- SAMPLE -- COMANCHE PEAK OPEN ISSUE ACTION PLAN Task: AQ-05, AQ-06, AQ-18, AQ-22 Ref. No.: 4-83-A-48, 4-83-A-81 Characterizations : QC inspector certification deficiencies. Past employment not verified. Inspectors not properly certified. Answers to exams given. Initial Assessment of Sicnificance: QC inspectors may have performed inspections wnile not properly qualified or certified - makes the validity of the inspections questionable. Source: QA allegations; unknown allegation Acoroach to Resolutions: 1. Review contractors certification program against NRC requirements and ANSI N45.2.6 (73/78), levels I, II, and III. 2. Determine whether records reflect verification of education and experience (past employment) - in writing (see Circular 80-22). 3. Interview a sample of previous contractor inspectors to determine if exam answers were routinely given to exams (if possible). 4 See QC inspector list for particular records to be reviewed. 5. Refer any examples of wrongdoing to 0I. 6. Evaluate allegations for generic / safety implications. 7. Report on results of review / evaluation of allegations. Related Ocen Issue Identification 1. Using system code, pull related allegations, open items, previous inspection findings, etc., from the tracking system open item list. 2. Review activities necessary to close or partially close related items, either based on inspection conducted above or reasonable additional i inspection while the inspector is familiar with the areas. 3. While performing physical inspections above, examine surrounding systems, components, and structures for any apparent defect or indicator of faulty workmanship. 4 If workmen are still in the area of a physical inspection, interview them for any knowledge of other potential deficiencies. Sta tus : Review lead: Suoport: O! Estimated Resources: 5 man-days J Estimated Comoletion: July 25, 1984 CLOSURE: l i Reviewed by: i lHi Leader

1 i Annex 3 J Conversation Record Allegation Number Time Date Type Visit Conference Telephone-Incoming Outgoing Name of Person (s) Contacted or in Contact With You Organization Telephone Number i

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

4 Name of Person Documenting Conversation i Signature Date Name(s) of Other Persons Who Were Present During Conversation 1 I have reviewed the summary of the conversation with the individual (s) named below and agree that it accurately represents the conversation. Signature of Person Providing Information File: Allegation Work Package cc: Project Director Group Leader Additional pages may be attached as needed. identified, signed, and dated. Additional pages should be . -. _,. - _.... _. _,, _ _ - ~. _ - - _

-p S Annex 4 Allegation Writeup (SSER) All allegation reviews and closecut will be documented in supplements to the SER. The SSER input will be submitted in the following format. 1. Allegation Group - Title of Work Package 2. Allegation numbers 3. Characterization - Statement of the allegation. Plain English l cnaracterization of allegation. Should be understandable to nontechnical people. If allegation clarified with alleger, then so state. l 4 Assessment of safety significance - Include what was reviewed (sample i size if appropriate). Persons and titles of individuals interviewed. l (Attach documentation of interviews.) Summary of findings. Statement of i significance of findings with regard to design, construction, operations, QA, or management controls as appropriate. 5. Conclusion and staff oosition - State if the allegation is substantiated in whole or in part (explain if necessary). If findings were discussed with alleger, so state. 6. Actions Required - Is future action required? Specify. Additional inspection, T5/FSAR change? 7. Potential Violations - Did this allegation involve a violation of NRC regulations? If yes, specify. be included on an inspection report.Writeup should be specific enough to Violation levels will be assigned by team senagement. Recommendations will be reviewed. 8. Attachments - Attachments should be clearly identified. 9. Reference documents

10. This statement prepared by:

Name Date Reviewed by: Group Leader Date Approved by: Project Director Date NOTE: This writeup will be prepared in the above format and typed on the IBM 5520 for retention in the NRC staff files. The same material, with items 7-10 suppressed, will be printed on the IBM 5520 to provide pages ready for publishing in the SSER.

~.. t l__ ~ -- - ,,e B* CONTRolifD COPY CONANCHE PEAK NUCtEAR POWER PLANT AttEEnrIrms Jum/Ull :mrt5IIGaIrrus 511PNARY TASK CROSS REF./OR COMPL ETION SOURCE ALLEGER-DATE RECEIVED NO. AttEGATION OR CONCERN ACTION / STATUS ANON CONFID BN/DATE SYSTEM NO. LEAD OPEN COMPIETE DOCllHENT PAGE TRACK 1hG CATEGORY l-7 SCHEDULE SOURCE e + l i l 2 a l 8 o l W O l 1 i l l

s. 1 Attachment $ i w W5 E 6 knd 1 = E >C = wa a 4 C C ( C i ame WE I W g= W 1E $ 1 5 m m I, i CU. E n= j-w ide kne C % Ewh Meu 8 ms

  • E g

o ge j 5 =E l 5 WW t g I W l. W w

  • C

= tem e es me t w g-m = --C f >= =C w w w

  • E and L

l W l_ WW f, ^ Y 6ed M WC> - at f CC wa MET } sad K w i j Wl >= WW WE E wt =v i W j ME w I _g M b l D i C W w- { e 8, h bed og. E u I i 4

--,1

,.-,-ra ,g ,p,.------p-g,m- >-w- ,ww.-n,-rw.-e ,.,..---.-,--y, ,. -, -,, - - ---n- ,,-n ,m_,n,e,<,------ ~, ~, - ~ ~r-

~. TASK AND DISCIPLINE CODES I. Task Codes A - Allegations B - IE Bulletins, Circulars, Information Notices C - CAT inspection findings 4 D - Deficiency Reports 50.55(e), and Part 21 Reports E - Inspection findings, (violations, unresolved items, and open items) G - Generic letter issues H - Hearing open issues I - Investigation Reports issues L - SALP open issues M - Congressional or Commission concerns 0 - Operator Licensing open items P - Inspection Program Status 0 - Final 0A Reinspection issues R - Room / System Turnover status (those done, those to do) S - SER open items T - Task force special inspection items U - Unfinished punchlist items V - IDVP open issues Z - Vendor open items II. Discioline Codes Q - QA/QC (General) B - Bolts C - Concrete /Rebar E - Electrical W - Welding P - Pipe (Construction) H - Hangers 1 - Intimidation 0 - Coatings T - Test Program 0 - Design of pipe / pipe supports M - Miscellaneous A - Independant Assessment V - Vendor / Generic S - Instrumentation R - Records N - NDE K - Cables / Terminations F - Fire Protection U - Procedures / Instructions Review f i~

..t.. '1 . @ TEC UNITED STATES ! p c (,,o ,4 g g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '/ l ,/- WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

g(

. s +' V....

  1. p JUN 121984 MEM0PANDUM FOR:

Harold R. Denton, Director, NRR Richard C. DeYoung, Director, IE Robert B. Minogue, Director, RES P Thomas E. Murley, Regional Administrator, R-I James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator, R-II James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator, R-III John T. Collins, Regional Administrator, R-IV Learned W. Barry, Director & Controller, RM FROM: William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMANCHE PEAK PLAN FOR THE COMPLETION OF OUTSTANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS Recently, Tom Ippolito, Project Dfrector for Comanche Peak, circulated for review and discussed with a number of us, the Comanche Peak Plan for the completion of Outstanding Regulatory Actions (Enclosure 1). This plan has been approved and I am now requesting actions by each of you, as specified below, to implement the plan. These actions are consistent with my discussions with Regional Administrators during the management meeting on May 17-18,1984, and my memorandum of May 25, 1984. The Plan describes regulatory actions in four major areas (licensing, hearing, inspection, and allegations) and identifies the resource requirements (including funding) needed to complete these regulatory actions. All activities are geared toward completion by October 1,1984, the Applicant's projected fuel load date. Most of the resources needed are to form a Technical Review Team (TRT) to evaluate and resolve a large number of technical issues, including allegations, presently identified. The TRT staffing and technical groups breakdown is shown in Enclosure 2. Approximately two-thirds of the TRT reviewers will be ) drawn from contracted resourcest toweve~r,7iRC~ stiff resources ~will be used to sti e_rvise each.technilal group and to intepate their activities with_ ongoing t ~ Reg 1,on Y activities. The resources will be distributed between the 'arious offices to minimize the v impact on any single organization. Where supervisory personnel are required for the lead of each of the TRT technical groups, I expect you to nominate individuals who can manage effectively in a demanding and visible environment. All' personnel should be fully qualified for the requested function and should have a proven capability of balancing a number of views to reach a conclusion. In adjusting internally for resource allocation, you should ensure that operating reactors are adequately covered. \\ 841315 ~ menv w ms

x . Resourc'e needs, by Office, are identified below. To the extent possible, re-sources identified should include i_ndividuals already familiar with-the-Comanche Pg_ak project, or those familiar with the_ regulatory _attions. completion.progr,am at Waterfor_d.,_, 1. NRR 2 Project Managers to coordinate additional licensing actions Technical Reviewer to coordinate 01 activities with the TRT Program Manager 2. IE l Assistant (Deputy) to the Program Manager of the TRT (Jim Gagliardo has already been designated to this function for both Waterford and Comanche Peak). 3. IE, NRR, RES and Regions I,II, and III Group Leader to manage the Electrical / Instrumentation group of the TRT. Group Leader to manage a joint Civil Engineering and Mechanical Engineering group of the TRT. Group Leader to manage the Test Program Group of the TRT. Group Leader to manage the QA/QC Records Group of the TRT. The assignment of an individual who previously participated in the Comanche Peak special review held in early April 1984, would be desirable. Group Leader to manage the Coatings Group of the TRT. 4. Region IV On an as needed basis and upon request of the Project Director, Region IV will provide 2-3 inspectors to support the TRT effort. 5. ORM Financial resources (as previously identified in separate correspondence from H. Denton) to support contracted activities. These needs include: approximately 2/3 of the staff of the TRT inspection personnel to augment Region IV inspection effort technical expertise for coatings issues FF'

\\ ~ Candidates are to be identified directly to J. Roe by June 14, 1984. Designated individuals should be available for commencement of their assigned tasks on about June 18, 1984. If there are any questions regarding this memorandum please contact me promptly. b illiam J. Dircks E xecutive Director for Operations

Enclosures:

As Stated cc: J. B. Martin, RV B. Hayes, OI P. Norry, ADM G. Cunningham, ELD T. Ippolito, DL/NRR D. Eisenhut, DL/NRR J. Davis, NMSS 9 1 S 4 l

ENCLOSURE 1 t I i i o 4 l COMANCHE PEAK PLAN FOR THE COMPLETION OF OllT. STANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS MAY 1984 I, l I Aoproval: k. Ybe4

  • Tdi t h T* TE m'.*e G 9 f4

] R. DeYoung', Dfrector, IE Date b^ W $Y$h' H.* T. Denton, Director, NRR Date" R. %,..t h,\\ reitee. n v.T, b. & 's 'rA J. T.* Co1 Mns, Administrator Date i Region IV 2 l ) b,Ix,[ C/ f [ / O M qt r e

- ~ _ _. ) COMANCug ptf,y ptpr. FCP THE COMPLETION OF. Oi~ST.WdK REG"LATORY ACTI0t!S I. PilPPOSE AND SCOPE On Itarch 12, 1984, the EDO direc+2a IIR9 to ranace all necessary ?!PC actions leading to licensing decisicrs for Cyranche Peak and Waterford. A copy of that directive is included as AttWr'ent 1. This plan establishes the progran for Comanche Peak, i The purpose of this plan is +.o assure the overall coordination and integration of the outstandire raculatory actions regardine Comanche Peak, and achieving their resolution prior to a licensing decision. This plan i encompasses all licensing, inspec' ion, bearing, and allegation issues. Further, this plan addresses the scope of the work needed, specifies the i critical path issues, identifies tne responsible line organization, the j schedule for completion, and (.#ere applicable)'the need for additional resources to meet the schedule. ) The planned completion date for all regulatory actions is assumed to be October 1,1984, and resource needs are predicated on that assumption. A status report will be issued to management every :wo weeke startinn two I weeks after the approval of the plan. II. BACKGROUND 1 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Unit 1 is in the final stages of the operating license review process. The Construction Pgrmitt fnr Ur4+ -1 ]. and 1_were issued.on December.19,.1914. Texas Utilities docketed their application for operating licenses on April 25, 1978. The Firal Envirormental Statement was issued September 24, 1981. The Safety Evaluation Peport (SER) was issued on July 14, 1981. Because of the large number of outstanding issues identified in the SER, the staff recommended delaying the ACRS review. SER Supplement flo. I was issued on October 16, 1981, and the AC95 meetire was held on November 13, 1981. The ACRS, by letter dated November 17, 17P1, supported issuance of an ooerating license. The lates* SER supplement was 3 issued on Novenb'er 23, 1983. / 'f d " -QWEnt nne enntantion nave Seen d'isMsse<1. Comanche Peak has been in a heav The redinino enntan* ion questions the ah414ty nT Ehe aoolicirFs Oualitv Assurance /Ouali+y Control i Program to Drevent deficiencies in the design ard construction nf the plan +.. [ The tiraneina Rnard nas acmtr*=d aeay =iian tiens or cesian and enne+rinc+4En ~ deficiaacies 4 ate the hearia; $s "eleu=at +n this enntantion. The Applicants are currently pro.iecting a fuel load date for Unit 1 to be j in late Septenber 1984. The basis for this prnjection was provided.to i 1 the staff on Pay 7, 1984 This fuel load date apoears achievable but allows no flexibility for unexpected avents in a very tioht sebedule. j The number of hearing issues and urcertainty regarding the timinn of the j Licensing Board's initial decision may impact the fuel load. i

.?- l { III. PLAN FOR THE C0ftPLETION nF OliTSTA"Dit'G REGULATORY ACTIONS This plan describes the mathed ir which coordinated regulatory actions are to be taken by the staff to h? ready to support an NRC decision i l regarding Comanche Peak licensing. As stated in the Purpose, the plar encompasses all licensing, hearing, inspection, and allegation issues. This summary addresses the scope o' werk needed, identifies the responsible line 'nrganization, the schedule for completion, and the resource needs to meet the schr.dule. The management organizational arrancament responsible for directing the overall effort and coordinating actions by the verious involved offices is shown graphically in the enclosure to the EDO memorandum of March 12, 1984 (Attachment 1). The management is under the overall direction of T. A. Ippolito, who reports to the* Director of the Division of Licensing. The managers responsible for implementing and directing this organization are the following individuals: Project Director (T. A. Ippolito) - - - - - -10 ELD Contact (J. Scintn H l - - - - -- -iOI Contact (B. Haves y NRR Action Region IV Actions IE Acticns j (T. Novak) (R. Bangart) (R. DeYoung) 1 The line offices will centinue to manage their own responsibilities i regarding Comanche Peak in accordance with the schedule and objectives i of this plan. Line office activities are to be coordinated with the precram management organization via their representative as identified i above. Additional rescutces_ar,q,e_x_pg.qtgd Jo ),e_necessary to sunoort licensing, nearing; rnd-infpection issues, and substintial resources 4 are necessary to respond to the approxinetely 406 aTTegations~regardinn Comanche Peak. i ^ This plan proposes the formation of an Technical Review Team (TRT) to evaluate and resolve a number of technical issues, including allegations, presently identified. A proposed organizational chart of the TRT is shown below. The groups identified will be assigned to evaluate and resolve technical issues and allegations that have been i grouped into five technical areas: 0A/0C, Electrical / Instrumentation l Civil /flechanical, Coatings, and Test Programs. The groups will be comprised of a group leader and reviewers that are specialists in the i particular technical area, i i i l l

r. !

Comanche Peak Technical Review Tean (TRT) Pro.iect Director Deouty Proiect Directnr i i t----- Office of i Investications GROUP LEADERS i CA/0C Electrical / Civil / chanical Coa' tings Test Program Records Instrumentation and Operational Readiness The staffing of these groups will be drawn from the various NDC offices and/or contractors as arranged between the Project Director and line manacement. The TRT may be called together for a specified period 1 of time, dispersed back to the individual's parent office, and then reconstituted in whole or in part as needed to corolete resolution of like issues. The TRT will be under the direct supervision of the Pro.4ect Director. In accordance with the EDO memorandum of i'ay 25, 1984, the TRT organization is scheduled to be in place and functioning by June 4, M84 Detailed guidance will be issued by the Project Director to the Technical Review Team and other oarticipants in this effort. This guidance will address the following: 1 f*ethod and approach for identification and disposition of allegations Tracking System Preparation of Documentation and Records Protection of Individuals i Initiation of Special NRC actions, such as Confinnation of Action Letters or SD.54(f) letters Manpower accountino The basis upon which the schedules and resource estinates have been developed is that the Comanche Peak fuel load date is October 1,1984 l Fioure 1 is an overall schedule and Figures 2 throuch 5 are individual j schedules for the resolution of Licensing, Hearing, Inspection, and Allocations Pegulatory Actions, respectively. l 1 4

o j i, i 4 -4 I r The ma.inr issues, schedules, and rescurce es+4riates needed to meet 4 the schedules are summarized as follows. A. Licensino Reculetory Actions l Licensing Actions are these things resulting frem the desian review of the FSAR. NRR is responsible for the resolutier qq i of these action items. The total number of outstanding action items is 37. Four of these action items are considered to have the po,.ential for impacting the schedule. These items relate tn 1) thq adecuacy of the TDI diesel generators, 2) the the Applicants' exemptionrequest fo I an indecendent assessment of desion and censtructien ard 4) e l electrical equipment environmenta4-ouaitrication. 4 NRR experience with other facilities involved in complex licensino i reviews (Diablo Canyon., Seabrook, and Shoreham) indicates that additional project management resources are necessary. Two additional project managers for the period from June-Septenber { will be needed, for a total of 8 man-months of additional effort. The technical resources presently assigned by NRR to evaluate and resolve the remaining open licensing actions are sufficient to meet j the schedule shown in Fioure 2. Additional IE' resources 'are rrt expected to be requirec as tne CAT inspection is complete and 0A/0C reviews and emergency preparedness reviews are essentially 3 complete. l 8. Hearino Reculatory Actions Hearing Actions are those issues in contention before the ASLP. There are three major sues each with a number cf sub-issues. The i three major issues a esion Adecuaev and Ouality Assurance,

  • Constructinn Adequac find ConstrMqtion Ouality Assurance.

i There are two critical path actions: Design A.ouacy and Construction l Adecuacy. The design adecuacy action conc IDVP being performed j by the Applicants at the staff's request. CYriNA is performing the review for the Applicants. This is curren.. nder review by the staff. Cygna personnel actions may have contributed to be prenotifi-0 cation of inspection areas to Applicant 0A/0C personnel. Resolution of this enncern may make it necessary to recuest additicral independent assessment activities. The critical path issue concerning Construction Adecuacy is l containment liner coating (painting).

, l. h l . The resources presently availab!e a e su'f cient to resolve all hearing actions with the exceptina e' the critical cath issues. It is estimated that 10 man-monfas are required to resolve the Desien Adecuacy Action, and 6 re -Tonths (o evaluate the Construction Adecuacy Action (paintine). The desian ac*eouacy review will roeuire. a tean composed of IE and NRR " personnel, similar to the Cvgra TDVP effort. Coordination of Hearing activities is expected to be extensive and involve integrating the activities of NRP, OELD, and Region IV with the Technical Review Team. An additional seninr ranager (SES-leveli is needed to manace this effort as it is expected that the Project Director will deucte full time effort to management of the technical review teaa actions gommencing.'une 4,19PA. These estimates assume that the reviews will cenclude that the existing circumstances are acceptable to the staff and/or no major corrective actions are recutied of the Applicants. Should this orove otherwise, additional resources will be required for resolution. See Figure 3 for Hearing Testinony Comoletion Schedule. C. Insoections Reculatorv Actions Inspection actions are those that assure that adecuate ccmoletion of plant construction and the readiness of the Applicants to operate the plant. These actions are the responsibility of Region IV, i The total number of outstanding action itens is 377. These may be grouped as follows: SER verification: 30 actions j Rnutine construction inspections, precoerational test l program and operational readiness inspectic'ns and i startup test progran: 121 actions Operating Licensirg: 20 actions Open itens insoections (unresolved items, violations, 50.55(e) items, inspector follow-up items and l Part 21 items: 201 actions Room inspections: TBD CAT follow-up: 5 acticns All the inspection items require resolution prior to OL issuance. Many recuire applicant actions prior to inspection or relate to hearing issues. Particularly significant is the retest inspection effort as the applicant plans to re-run approximately 25 preoperational tests to confirm systen readiness subsecuent to various modificatiors and design changes. Many of these tests will be witressed by the NRC and test results will be evaluated as appropriato. Systens involved include safeguards systems, reactor protective system, service water, component cooling water, and the diesel generatnr. The number of inspection itens represents e sizeable effort that could imoact fuel load. i

m. , 1 i D w l Some additional resources w'ill be recuired to ccrplete the routine inspecti'on progran and r that this crea could re wesolve the rany cpen items. It is expacted ire approximately 46 man-months. Considering the number of items anc *..ased on Waterford experience, the Region estimates that much of th s affort car be handled with exist 4rc { resources but that approximately 18 man-renths edditional resources will be required. See Figure a for the Inspections Schedule. [ 0.- Allecations Regulatorv Actions The Allegation Actions are those concerns reported by various individuals, intervenors and action groups reoarding the safety of construction of the plant. Concerns regarding wrongdoings, intimidation, etc. are not included in the technical review tean effort but are referred to 0I or CIA as appropriate. To date the number of individual actions is approximately 400. These actions are grouped into specific categories to facilitate their resolution. Resolution of these actiens will involva the 1 Technical Review Team, NRR, 01, and Region IV. The organizational group with primary responsibility for resolution of these actions is the Technical ~ Review Team (TRT). The resources required to resolve these actions are identified below acccrding to the Team functional group: Resource Functional Group , No. of Allecations Estinate (man-conths) OA/0C Records 180 17 Electrical /Instrum. 5 2. Civil / Mechanical 97 17 J i Coatings 11 ' ~4 i j Test Programs 14 ? Estimated Totals 707 42 The TRT effort is expected to reouire additional administrative support (secretarial) of approximately 3 man-months. Pence, the total TRT resource needs are 45 man-conths. l { .The total progran for resolving the allegations actinns is a \\h critical path item. See Figure 5 for the schedule for completion of the review of these allegations. g 7 o,r1b" 4 9- -6', L p s 9}J. 4 /

97) Q*

1 -po i (

. In addition, 97 allegations will be handled by the following offices: Responsible Furctional Group No. of Allegations Head Office Intimidation 30 OI Design Pipe / Pipe Supports 19 NRR Vendor / Generic 18 NRR/IE Independent Assessment Program 7 NRR Miscellaneous 23 RIV Desion of oice and oice suoports. and the indenandant assaet-art P_rocram alleSA.tions will he dispositioned_byJRILpersonnel_that are haRdling these issues for the hearings. Intimidation allegations will require additional 0I resources, as discussed later in this section. Existing resources in the Vendor Inspection Branch, IE and NRR will disposition the vendor / generic allegations. Existing resources in Region IV will be responsible for the miscellaneous allegations. E. Office of Investication Actions 01 actions are those actions necessary to support the resolution of allegations. They involve issues where wrong-doing, intimidation, or harrar,sment may be involved. It is clear that with the present resources assigned to the Cemanche Peak investigation (one investigator) the schedule for resolving the allegations and wrongdoing issues will not be met. We estimate several additional investigators will be required on full time basis from June through September, for a total of 12 man-months of effort. During this 4-month period 0! will recuire the full-time sucport of one individual with a technical background, as many allegations are a combination of technical and wrong-doing issues, for a total of 4 man-months. The NFC staff effort to complete the actions in the licensing, hearings, inspections and allegations areas will be substantial and the impact will be felt by several Offices. The foregoing summary lists a total of 821 separate actions-reouiring approximately 100 man-months of effort above the existing (budgeted) resources. Personnel for much of this effort will be obtained from contractors. It is estimated that approximately $1 million will be necessary to fund contractor assistance in support of Comanche Peak reviews during the remainder of FY 1984 The estimates are somewhat fragile and assume that no major new issues are raised, that the Applicants meet their projected schedule, and that staff review of the identified issues will conclude that the existing circumstances, or the resolution, is acceptable.

  • [.aas.,

/ o UNITED STATES ~,, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a {h ,I wasmacrom, o. c. nossa MAR 121984 ,c j< J MEMORANDUM FOR: John T. Collins, Regional Administrator Region IV Harold R. Denton, Director .-i '3!t j Office.of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Richard C. DeYoung, Director

  • Office of Inspection 8. Enforcement FROM:

William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

COMPLETION OF OUTSTANDING REGULATORY ACTIONS ON CDMANCHE PEAK AND WATERFORD Construction of the Comanche Peak and'Waterford facilities is nearing completion. There remain a number of issues that need to be resolved before the staff can make its licensing decisions. The issues remaining for these plants are quite complex and span more than one Office. In order to assure the overall coordination / integration of these issues and to assure issues are resolved on a schedule to satisfy hearing and licensing decision needs, I am directing NRR to manage all necesumNRC actions leading *.o oromat ifcensing decisions. Deu=i s ttsenhut, Director. Division d Licensino. NRR is being assioned the lead responsibility for this activity. He will coordinate the efforts of NRR, IE, and Region IV, and wfll coordinate this activity with OI and OELD. Prior to any of the affected Offices undertaking major activities (e.o., inspections) or making decisions on these plants, that activity should be concurred in by NRR. We are presently in the process of assigning a dedicated senior manager to assist Mr. Eisenhut in the management of these activities. The first phase of this program will be the identification of issues needed to be resolved for each plant prior to hearing and licensing decisions, i Once the issues have been identified a Program Plan for resolution of each item should be developed and implemented. The Program Plan should address the scope of the work needed, the identification of the responsible line organization, and the schedule for completion. In principle, this effort will therefore be similar to the effort undertaken regarding the allegation review on Diablo Canyon except that this effort should encomaass all licensing, inspection, hearing, and allegation issues.

2 Each affected Office will assign a full time senior manager to work with NRR to define, schedule and complete the issues. I expect these managers to be identified by each of you within a few days. All affected offices should provide dedicated resources and give their full support to this effort, to assure that all existing issues are expeditiously handled and all new issues are promptly provided to NRR so as not to delay the ifcensing decisions. In addition, copies of all information, documents, depositions, etc. should be promptly provided to NRR to ensure a coordinated approach. I anticipate that the approach utili:ed here will be necessary for a number of upcoming OL projects, and am directing NRR to take the lead for carrying out this activity. t s(' Willi J. Dircks Executive' Oirector for Operations cc: G. Cunningham, ELD

3. Hayes, 01 '

1 e l

r 1r >0VERAL!. PANAGEFENT COORDINATION (NRR) F 01 Contact ) j-ELD Contac: t I i i l Overall Review of ' Review cf Construction QA Adecuacy'(CAT) Review of Design and Oceration Issues (IE) Issues (Reg IV) (TiRR) i e O

_m flGtJRE 1 COMANCHE PEAK Major Regulatory Actions Schedule RECULATORY ACTiOflS May .1une .lul y August September October Licensinn(SERs) X--------------------------------------------------------------X Hearing Testimony Submittals tn Alt.Il X------------------------------------------------------X i X--------------------------------------------------------------X-Inspections X-------------------------------------------X Allegations Q I L 1 P -l 4 l 4 - " - ~ - = ~. ~ "t*"h* a*r't9W-+; +

  • w,p

i i FIGilRE ? C0ilANCHE PEAK LICEilSillG REVIElf SCllFDill.E Regulatory Responsible Action Organization May June July August September October I I I l I i l I I i i I i i i i i i l. FSAR Open Issues NRR/DE, DSI (-------------

)

4 Issues Remain DilFS, IE (Tril issue; 3 sub-items) 2. Confirmatory flRR/DE, DSI (-------------

)

Issues Required For linit 1 License; 10 Issues Remain 1 (TMI issue; 12 sub-items) 3. License Conds. NRR/DE t-------------

X 2 issues Remain A.

Technical Specif. NRR/DE,DSI t------------- ..-----------------y 5 Issues Remain l S. New issues Raised NRR/DSI, NHSS (----------- by NRC; 7 issues Remain. (including Financial Oualifications) 6 New issues Raised NRR/DilFS, DE (-------------

X by Applicant DL, DSI 6 issues Remain 7.

Oustanding Gen. IIRR/DS!, IE C-------------

y 1.trs; 3 Remain t

2 a 4 -m--

=__ 9 8 FII:llPE.1 (.f UANCllE' l EAK i

  • 01 Limiting

].

    • Technical Review Team (TRT) llEARit!G TFSTil10 fly PREPARATION AND SilllillTTAL SC:lEDULE L

i Regulatory Responsible Action Drqanization itay . lune .luly August September October 4 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i 1. Independent Assessment a. IAP-Cygna NRR/DE, DL, IE X----- ---X h. Applicant's Plan NRR/DE, DSI, IE (------------- M (W/D concerns)

2.
  • Intimidation /

NRR/DL, OELD (-------------- L q Harassment Issues 3.**0A/0C Program TRT (---------- M

~---------------

iss_ues _ i p 77g 7 v 4.** Pipe Support TRT

  • W 4

(--------- .- X Q ues i 5. Ifelding Issues NRR/DE, RIV, IE X------- ( 4 (Followup) ~ ) l 6.** Coating Issues R IV (LAHL), ilRR/DE (---------

X 7.

Vendor Generic a. Transamerica TDI Task Force (-------------- ------X Delaval Diesel Generators 8. Pliscellaneous i a.** Staff Walkdown TRT (-------------1 (includes Cable Tray) l h. Polar Crane RIV (---------..------X l Reinspection c. Mirror Shield RIV (- - - - - - - - - ( i

i

t l

FIGilRE 4 COMANClif PEAK SCilEDtlLE INSPECTION AND REGIONAL RESPONSIBil.lTIES 4 April May June July _ August September October i i I I I I I i i i i i i i i i l -- i ' Construction Inspec. X---------- --X MC 2512 Construction Inspec. X----------

X Items followup 50.55(e) Items, X-----------

X Part ?! Items Followup Primarily Preoperation X Prima rily-Test Witnessing,-Proc edures Review Test i

X Inspections MC ?513 Results Review Preopera tional Inspec. Items X-----------

x followup Startup Test X----------- Procedures R evi ew X-Post-OL----------X y

Program inspec. MC 2514 tiitnessing Operational X X X (Final Rpt) Readiness Report per Module 94300 SER Verification X-Itens from SSER's 1-4 -Items from SSER S X X ( IE Bulletins inspec. X------------

X liiscellaneous X------------

X Allegations i

Resolution Operator Licensing X-----------------X

FICllitE 5 C0fIANCllE PEAK A11coations Resolution Schedule April May June .luly August September October i i i l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1. Plan Approval X ?. Personnel X-- ---X Arrangement j 3. Obtain Logistic X------ --- X Support 4. Develop Review X---------- ---X Packages 5. Task Force X Briefing & Assignments 6. First Site X--X Review Period 7. Second Site X-----X Review Period f e 8. Third Site X-----) Review Period 9. Prepare Final X----X Draf t SSER 'l

10. tianagement X---X Review
11. Final Report X----X
17. Submit Report X

to ASI.R 1 1

'.~ : TECilNICAL REVIEll TEAM (TRT) STAFFIflG Program ifanager 01 Assistant Tech. Reviewer 1 -DAJOC ElectIrical/ Records Instrumentation Civil /lfechanical Coatings Test Program Leader Leader Leader 1.eader f.eader 7 Reviewers 2 Reviewers 7 Reviewers 2 Reviewers ? Reviewers Design Change Control Flectrical Engineer Mechnical Engr (2)I Pai,nt A Coatings Preoperational / Configuration lingmnt IAC Engineer Supports Engineer,!,,, Piping & Pipe by 9 Engineer Test Engineers OA Audt-Procedures ,Mechnical Engineer QA Audit-Document Welding & NDE Engr, Control / Records (2) Civil Engineer QA Audit-Oualif A Concrete & Rehar Training Engineer QC-ileld flDE Exmnr Structural Engineer .r QC-Concrete Exmnr (3 Sessions *) (1 Session) (3 Sessions) (? Sessions)"' (1 Session) E

  • Each onsite " session" is a minimum of IP days EL
    • In addition to Brookhaven National I.aboratory review currently in progress 8

5 (O h3 l

~ I a 'sanscy k g ;4 Is N ' ), (A f. O 'o UNITED STATES E [g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION /p r WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 4 , ![f # o %;%J4p$ July 5, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard Bangart, Director Region IV Comanche Peak Task Force FROM: Thomas A. Ippolito, Project Director p Comenche Peak Division of Licensing

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM PERSONNEL Attached is a list of personnel assigned to the Comanche Peak Technical Review j Team (TRT). You are requested to make arrangements with the applicant for site access and badging. Team members will be arriving on site Monday morning, July 9, 1984. Additional personnel may be added to the team, as conditions warrant. Site access for additional personnel would be requested at that time. / 1 vD ~ ~ Thoma . Ippolito, Project Director Comanche Peak Division of Licensing

Attachment:

As stated i cc: J. Gagliardo D. Eisenhut Group Leaders F0lA-85-59 itf(hnll$ - W \\\\ q- $95-

COMANCHE PEAK TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM Project Director Staff Name Social Security No. Title ~ Thomas A. Ippolito 091-20-7210 Project Director James Gagliardo Assistant Richard H. Wessman 536-38-5225 ' ~ Staff Annette Vietti 365-74-0850 Staff

  • Yvonne S. Terry 579-76-3338 Secretary
  • Kathy A. Baumann 220-74-6017 Secretary
  • Patrica A. Bj erke 212-66-9715 Secretary T.chnical Rev,iew Team Phone Numbers Trailer No.

Commercial Brown & Root 1 (817) 897-3164 (817) 897-4881 - Ext. 871 2 (817) 897-3166 Ext. 854 3 (817) 897-4683 Ext. 812 NRC Resident Inspector Office (817) 897-2201

  • Part-time o*

Late arrivals 1 ,.-,._.w..

~ COMANCHE PEAK TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM Group: Civil Mechanical 4 l Name Social Security No. Discipline Organization ,n Larry Shao 089-32-0304 Group Leader RES c* David Terao 358-44-2490 Mech. Engineer NRR/DE/MEB Shou N. Hou 225-54-5042 Mech. Engineer NRR/DE/MEB Dave Jeng 441 46-4633 Structural Engineer NRR/DE/SGEB Joe Tapia Civil Engineer Region IV R. Hubbard 044-18-7445 Mech./QA Sandstone Corp. R. Masterson 038-32-2638 Piping / Components Parameter / Engineering Anal. Service C. Hofmayer 131-36-3812 Seismic / Mech. Equip. INEL P. Chen 318-40-0433 Piping Design INEL/ETEC

  • R. Philleo 450-42-9821 Structural / Concrete Parameter V. Ferrarini 010-40-0970 Piping / Components Paramstcr/ Engr.

Anal. Service E. G. Tho=pson Mechanical Engineer ETEC John Devers 512-46-9783 Structural / Concrete Parameter /RTS 'l l Group: Quality Assurance Tom Conlon 568-34-2553 Group Leader Region II Louis Jackson 202-18-6261 Reactor Inspector Region II Cliff Hale Reactor Inspector Region IV Vern W. Watson 526-46-3736 QA/QC INEL 1 l Thomas E. Curry 216-36-3647 QA/QC INEL Victor Wenczel 156-32-7269 QA/QC (Supervisor) INEL Dean L. Summers 518-28-9981 QA/QC INEL i Milton G. Bullock 519-52-1792 QA/QC INEL l -W. Wade 227-32-9595 QA/QC LLNL

  • C. Morton QA/QC LLNL
  • Ernie Hill 546-28-4673 Systems Testing LLNL l
  • cG. Cu=mings 549-42-4183 Systems Testing LLNL

. -. ~. ., _ ~ _ _, _

~ COMANCHE PEAK TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM Group: Electrical & I6C Name Social Security.No. Discipline Organization Jose dalvo 437-50-8261 Group Leader NRR/DSI/ICSB Hubert L1 567-68-2434 _ Instrumentation Engr. NRR/DSI/ICSB Allen Johnson Electrical Engineer Region IV J. Marini 398-52-0609 Electrical Engineer Parameter George Myers Electrical Engineer Parameter Bob White 096-30-9563 Electrical Engineer Livermore Jim Selan 521-70-7020 Electrical Engineer Livermore Group: Coatings i Philip Matthews 573-14-3287 Group Leader NRR/ DST /SPEB Claude Johnson Reactor Inspector Region IV Stan Kirslis 017-18-7018 Chemical Engineer NRR/DE/CMEB John Taylor Chemical Engineer Brookhaven Vince Lettieri Chemical Engineer Brookhaven S. John Oechsle Coatings Consultant Brookhaven William C. Wells Coatings Consultant Brookhaven Group: Test Program Richard Keinig Group Leader Region I Ward Smith Comanche Peak Region IV Sr. Resident Ops. Arthur D. Mackley. 519-34-1244 General Testing INEL David Beahm 522-26-2829 Mechanical Testing INEL

?;; TEClifilCAL REVIEW TEAll (TRT) ~ Project Manage-T. A. Ippolito, AE00 l Starr Assistant 01 Interface I A. Vietti J. Gagliardo. IE R. Wessman, ilRR 1 R. C. Tang,flRR 1 l Electrical / Civil /Meclianical QA/QC Leader Coatings leader Test Programs I Ins trumen t.i t inn Leader Leader leader J. Calvo, HRR L. Shao, RES T. Conlon, R-il-P. Matthews,ilRR R. Keimig, R-! I l l l l u _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _. _ _ _ _ _ _.l, ____t_.___ A. Johnson - RIV

    • D.

Terao - NRR/DE ,**L. Jackson - RII S. Kirslis - NRR/DE A. Mackley-INEL C. Itale - RIV C. Johnson - RIV W. Smith - RIV

11. Li

- NRR/DSI S. Ilou - NRR/DE W. Marini - RTS D. Jeng - NRR/DE V. Watson - INEL J. Taylor - Brookhaven D. Beahm - INEL G. Myers - Parameter $J. Tapia RIV T. Curry - INEL V. Lettieri - Brookhaven R. White - LLNL R. Hubbard - Sandstone Corp. V. Wenczel - INEL S.J. Occhsle-Brookhaven J. Selan - LLNL R. Masterson -Parameter D. Summers - INEL W. Wells - Brookhaven

  • R. Philleo - Parameter M. Bullock

- INEL V. Ferrarino -Parameter W. Wade - LLNL C. Ilofmayor - INEL

  • C. Morton

- LLNL P. -Clien) O' - INEI% F7cq

  • E.

11111 - LLNL Eh Thompson - ETEC J. Devers - Parameter Site Phones: N, (r lw [Q[ } Commercial: (817)897-3164 3166, 4683 b 3

  • I, ate Arrivals

% /v[dm% { g' ,g Brown & Root:(817)897-4881, ext. 87 854 hoPart-time g A..(. [c/i(_, ( g_yC C ) 7 NRC Resident:(817)897-2201 T lnsyc N (E wc) j n p'>a 1/- L 3 I. / ,I

Ts, 3;w1 s G_ l ] o o P 4 s Ws fw sms b y u OiOOi p O ~n a SwC cs s a C a n gw~c ww gm p o s LI ou 4 u 6c s P ss u 6 psp / A W % w -(u4. i 1" P w h( o i wGm s [/ c 7 c A f c> " 4 s t-sS o. o '4 s O 4'u e s g l t D s F r. '74 c S m \\ C 0 Gy p s- "6P om c Lc 8 An %h t s sn1 "m Eu/ n o e S F sA D A 9a 4 A / ss ca S u u ws o e s m5 s E ^ H o% ow s N O e D P M )I hs d u w (sn @p E in C-o r b U c 6 _c c-w A z m r r= w s S A 5 p T 6 d 4 w ~ OE E 6 A E p p / E U" )/ a. u ) ( g/j 4 c s s f p u d A u k E g s d r g C w s [ )/ af h 8 h x a $) c o ( p a B lV h h L ll ll

Comments on J. Y. night's memo on July 12, 1984 on Comanche Peak 1. What are proposed in Knight's memo on July 12, 1984 are contrary to Dircks' memo on June 12 on " Implementation of the Comanche Peak Plan for the Completion of Outstanding Regulatory Actions." This plan presents the best course of action and clear division of responsibility, required to resolve all regulatory issues (licensing, hearing, inspection and allegations) in the most efficient and expeditious manner. 2. According to the plan, NRR/DE resolves W/D concerns, while TRT resolves other structural / mechanical allegations. This is very logical for the following reasons: a) The W/D concerns have been worked on by the NRR for 2 years. The TRT could not address these issues effectively within the time frame (end of August) consistent with the current plan to resolve them expeditiously. b) W/D concerns and other allegations are completely separable. Most W/D. concerns can be worked on off-site while the other Structural / Mechanical allegations have to be worked on on-site by the TRT team, c) The Lawyer thinks at this late stage, the introduction of new people into the hearing process will needlessly complicate the process. It will confuse the ASLB judge. paA-85-59 n

/ d) The Mechanical / Structural TRT effort was organized in accordance with the plan in Dircks' June 12 memo which does not include W/D issues. Right now all the Structural / Mechanical TRT team members have been commited full time to resolve other allegations.

Mechanical & Piping 7/19/84 Work in Draft SSER Draft SSER Next week done by end expected in (Mandays) of this week next week RWH 3 0 2 WPC 3 1 1 EGT/CDR 4 ca. I 1 RJM 4 1 2 VPF 5 1 2 JM lb 0 0 24h 4 8 = pelA-85 ' 9 6 i? O Q> i L

k .- ~, TRT ACTIVITIES AT COMANCHE PEAK JULY 9-20, 1984 General Approximately 50 people on team (some part-time) Approximately 440 allegatH being worked. (Many are general and vague. This is increase of about 100 allegations from " Plan") No major issues for applicant, yet QA/QC area may become critical Selected contractor personnel will continue inoffice effort while off-site Region IV completed 35 line items and 13 inspection procedures Allegations Breakdown Area Leader No. cf Categories

  • No. of Allegations Electrical Calvo 10 50 Civil / Structural Shao/Jeng 16 51 Mechanical / Piping Shao/Hou 36 122 QA/QC Conlon 26 125 Coatings Matthews 8

60 Test Programs Keimia 7 29 TOTAL liU TJ7 Each category will be separate SSER input

  • f**l 1.,

k t 7= p r; ., 3 l y\\; Q U1 %.E P '9 1

f l Potential Problems Getting QA/QC area caught up i 01 resource limitations prevent pursuit of several allegations Alleger interviews may yield additional allegations Non-TRT Matters Applicant schedule slipped 10 days Control room HVAC System turnovers, testing Painting Preparations continue for itimidation/ harassment hearings, scheduled for August 27, 1984 Next Session _ Meet with selected allegers Continue Review / Resolution of Allegations Complete Electrical area Complete Test Program area Begin integration of SSER draft Commence Region IV review of about 18 allegations IE:HQ Reviewing vendor / generic allegations 1 See attachments for details .}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20199H008&oldid=5488086"