ML22195A226

Nov 2021 Ile Es 301-4 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist-Signed

ML22195A226
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	09/19/2021
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Baker R
Shared Package
ML21055A859	List: ML22195A222 ML22195A226 ML22195A228 ML22195A231 ML22195A234 ML22195A237
References
Download: ML22195A226 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301*4 Facility: Dresden Station Date of Exam: 11/1/21 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: 2021-302 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c'

~ /111

1. The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. ~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. ~ hl1 ~

3. Each event description consists of the following:

• the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

~

• the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

~ MM

• the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

• the expected operator actions (by shift position)

• the event termination point (if applicable)

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. I~ MM ~

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ~ MM ~

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. ~ /1f1 ~

Cues are given.

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. ~ '1H ~

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that fundional ~ 11'1 ~(.I(]

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly modifted in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ~ 11M e~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). ~ HM ~

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) ~ 1111 ~~

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

~M ~

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible. ~ Hl1 ~

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~ l1J1 ~~

Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section 0.5.d) Actual Attributes -- -- --

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 / 1 I 1 I 1 1£' Mt1 . v'fltl

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 5 / 4 I 4 I 4 ~ Mh l..o..

3. Major transients (1-2) 2 / 2 I 2 I 2 ~ nn ~

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 2 I 1 I 2 ~ Ml1 ~

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario 2 / 1 I 1 I 1 5.

set) ~ 11j,J ~

6. Preidentilied critical tasks ~ 2) 3 / 3 I 2 I 2 ~ Hfl-r ~ea

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items In column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.