ML22089A164

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:59, 5 April 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
301 ADAMS 2B
ML22089A164
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/2022
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
Duke Energy Carolinas
References
50-369/22-301, 50-370/22-301 50-369/OL-22, 50-370/OL-22
Download: ML22089A164 (28)
v • d • e


Text

ML22089A164 ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: McGuire Date of Examination: Feb 2022 Developed by: Written: Facility NRC // Operating: Facility NRC Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiners Date*

Initials

1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a-b). For NRC-prepared exams,

-240 MAB arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

-210 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.f). MAB

3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the facility

-210 contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written examination MAB outline, with a description of the facilitys prescreening process (ES-401, D.1.b).

-210 4. Reference material due for NRC-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3). MAB

-210 5. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.e). MAB

6. NRC-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2 and ES-401-3 or

-195 ES-401N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C.1.e-f; C.2.h; MAB C.3.d-e).

7. Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1,

-150 MAB ES-301-2, ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as applicable (C.1.e-f; C.3.d-e).

8. Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h;

-136 MAB C.3.d-e).

9. Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2, and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3); MAB

-75 supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due (C.1.e-h; C.3.d).

10. Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for

-75 MAB facility licensee review (C.1.i; C.2.h; C.3.f-g).

-60 11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202). MAB

-50 12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.f). MAB

13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and facility licensee (C.1.i; C.1.k-l;

-35 MAB C.2.h; C.3.g). The NRC and the facility licensee conduct exam preparatory week.

14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398) due

-30 MAB (C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202).

15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398), due and

-14 MAB Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202).

-7 16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.j-k; C.3.h). MAB

-7 17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2.l). MAB

18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if more than 10) applications audited to confirm

-7 qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k; MAB Attachment 5; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).

-7 19. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k). MAB

-7 20. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i). MAB

  • Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: McGuire Date of Examination: 2/2022 Initials Item Task Description

  • a b* c*
1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. 1- "' MB w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. U_llll MB I

T T

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ""' MB N

E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

W"' ., MB V

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major MB s transients. Su\.

I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule V

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

MB T {U"I 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and V

R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,'" of ES-301 (including MB overlap). ScJ"I

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

y L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. MB T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

y R

0 b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified. MB (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations. $tr V

H

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. re,-, MB y
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. MB Sir\.

V G

,II', /

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. l<LLl't. MB N

R E c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. G.- ,'r v MBMB A d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. $u-L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. l{W'-

MB

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). I MB P,m: Da (et' l-I 11 l.L
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*) Z, ' i,1-
c. NRC's Chief Examiner (#) MarkA. Bates/ Mark A. Bates 2/3/22
d. NRC Supervisor Gerald J. McCoy / Gerald J. McCoy 2/3/22
  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 11

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: McGuire Date of Examination: 2/2022 Operating Test Number: N22-1 Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c#
a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplino requirements (e.o., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). SU\ V MB
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durino this examination. V MB
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a.). ,,,. V MB V
d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. tOAA MB V MB
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level. Ju-.
2. Walkthrough Criteria -- -- --
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

.. initial conditions initiating cues

. references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits(average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include-

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable 9,1" V MB

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walklhrough ouUines(Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. V MB
3. Simulator Criteria - -- --

v

.-L-/or The associated simulator operating tests(scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a copy is attached. MB Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Author "tJ, Iz.z..
b. Facility Reviewer(*)

., J<:0-\.e./

Mark A. Bates / Mark A. Bates

-z.} I/ l.Z.

C. NRC Chief Examiner(#) 2/3/22

d. NRC Supervisor Gerald J. McCoy / Gerald J. McCoy 2/3/22
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 11

MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (Rev_013122)

Facility: McGuire Date of Exam: 2/2022 Operating Test No.: N22-1 A E Scenarios P V N22-1-2 N22-1-1 T M P E (Day 1) (Day 2) O I L N T N CREW CREW CREW CREW I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C L M A T U N Y M(*)

T P S A B S A B S A B S A B R I U E R T O R T O R T O R T O O C P O C P O C P O C P RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 2,3, 2,3, 10 4 4 2 SROU-1 I/C 4,8, 4,6, 8,9 MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 2,3, 5,7 5 0 2 2 4

RX 0 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 2,3, 2,3, 10 4 4 2 SROU-2 I/C 4,8, 4,6, 8,9 MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 2,3, 5,7 5 0 2 2 4

RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 2,3, 7 4 4 2 SROU-3 I/C 4,8, 2,6, 8

MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 2,3, 3 0 2 2 4

RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 2,3 2,3, 8 4 4 2 SROI-1 I/C 4,6, 8,9 MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 5,7 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must service in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

NUREG 1021 Revision 11

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (Rev_013122)

Facility: McGuire Date of Exam: 2/2022 Operating Test No.: N22-1 A E Scenarios P V N22-1-2 N22-1-1 T M P E (Day 1) (Day 2) O I L N T N CREW CREW CREW CREW I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C L M A T U N Y M(*)

T P S A B S A B S A B S A B R I U E R T O R T O R T O R T O O C P O C P O C P O C P RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 2,3 5 4 4 2 RO-1 I/C 3,4, 9

MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 3,4, 6 4 4 2 RO-2 I/C 8 2,6, 8

MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 2,3 3,4, 5 4 4 2 RO-3 I/C 9 MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 3,4, 2,6, 6 4 4 2 RO-4 I/C 8 8 MAJ 5 7 2 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must service in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

NUREG 1021 Revision 11

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 (Rev_102521)

Facility: McGuire Date of Examination: 2/2022 Operating Test No.: N22-1 APPLICANTS SRO (U/I) RO/ATC BOP Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 Interpret/Diagnose Events and 1-10 1-8 1-11 1-10 1-8 1-11 1-10 1-8 1-11 Conditions Comply With and Use 1-10 1-8 1-11 1-10 1-8 1-11 1-10 1-8 1-11 Procedures (1)

Operate Control 1,2, 1,2, 1,3, 1,3, 1,3, 1,2, Boards (2) NA NA NA 6,7, 4,7, 4,5, 3,5 6,7 5,7 8 9 8 Communicate and 1-10 1-8 1-11 1-10 1-8 1-11 1-10 1-8 1-11 Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability 1-10 1-8 1-11 NA NA NA NA NA NA (3)

Comply with and Use 2,3, 2,4, 5,7 NA NA NA NA NA NA TS (3) 4 5 Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

NUREG-1021, Revision 11

MAB MAB MAB MAB MAB MAB NRC Grader: Jason Bundy / Jason Bundy 3/7/22 Mark A. Bates / Mark A. Bates 3/7/22 Gerald J. McCoy / Gerald J. McCoy 3/23/22

October 27, 2021 To Whom It May Concern Pursuant to 1 O CFR 55.40(b)(3), an authorized representative of the facility licensee must approve the examination outline(s) and the proposed examination(s) before they are submitted to the NRC regional office for review and approval. The outline(s) and examinations(s) must be forwarded to the NRC regional offic e with a cover letter signed by the facility representative.

As a McGuire facility representative, I have reviewed and approved the NRC examinations to be administered in February of 2022. I have determined that the outlines and examinations are accurate, operationally valid and ready for NRC review.

McGuire Operations

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: I Student Docket Number:

Student Question Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response YES .

J:+ 1 rc..+e-C>fi_j 1b t-'he e.5oflll5 f\arr-h've l lj.

t p rc:,u1*.Je -ro ev,e_c'/Dn-.-.

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: I Student Docket Number:

Student Question t.

\

,. I*J Qrre ,-\,.e_

Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response y 5 . 1. l Cj, X-+ 1 :S (c:__+c..c'!' i"'_j f-l'\e e.5oflll5 na.rra.-;.'ve t pf6u1*.Je -l--o euc'fDn-_.

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: I Student Docket Number:

Student Question Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response y ES, .

J:--1-- 1 r+c.c-r i f"I_j 1"b {-he e. 5 o/Vl5 narr-nveI. l tj .

t pf 6u1*.Je -l-o e\J<'fDn-_.

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: J Student Docket Number:

Student Question h...

Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response y Es, J:..J-1 (r::_+c..c't' i_j t-'he e.Soflll5 narr-hve l Cj.

t p (6u1.de o e.)J<"'fDn-._.

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: j Student Docket Number:

Student Question l I

"" Ou.,*

,, Q oMS o" 1

.;r,_ I I

Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response y ES, .

J:+ 1 :S rc:..+c.tYiri_j t-'he e.Sofl!l5 Aarr-hve l l::j.

t p rcu1*.Je -l-o euie..cyDn--.

j ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions I Student Docket Number:

Question Number: iJ Student Question

/tf-1 I I ru,kf+ f'1 c,.c+,4'15" 5'ra:r.*eJ .i, Cf '2, anj D, 2.. need -lo 6t ,erFormttf -for 1/.e

'u,S wf 'fo CotJ,*.f-: c:.f.J, l-/owet.1et; -fyrio fly ol/e rf"ew t#te,,,'<' c,,/r. 'es -f/.u flie (l8t- D-f -f t,Pf,,1/ co,,-/-:-<7ue';' ;11 £...o, 1-s #,'5 q,,ttS'r.'{)(I tP.§'k-'.rry :+' /c,f,/o/-l---dlCl-,:V,p 4u/J Lo (tef-wlll!l ( {JP. .s- :r <<->/c:,, ;f +lip ifew WaqfJ w<<,

1 w- %e5e .P.J,td

<Q. l-+,0115' frr'o< --/ro et1'/.tr,., -IJ f Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response T-1,(.. , 1!-sffzH, ; s °'Jd. <e..sri ""-' -I-he p-e.,<b.fot" .s i "-*+io.. +,-n.3

.f.-he. 0\c.11" ta e,L.osE m.stv.s °'"'°' 1 As- :J.... prr*r k 3ofn::,

..,-o £- 0 V'S. I M"'11eol.fa./-ely jain.j-k £-o

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions I St udent Docket Number:

Question Number: fl, Student Question 1<:' -rJ.e w,J (fo/ly 11

,I) ({+o f<<ltd1 6V1J, f<JWff t;&,(r:tf,// ."n,J;;/

-to J;ffen'r.f:'a..te l:err.vee1 df,,,r.v f'°vvf!r)'/ Ml cr,,

f9~ec>:

5. 3. I, 1-/"'Hs +t.e er :ncr{IP.c./2 /glow P-' / ,J..e f1J<fef:e of- /.e /. Tr,p

,r; <661cPtv,'+y etcurS'io0 S- of- hc.v fewer lei1e/f Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: I Student Docket Number:

Student Question

\ ,.e_

,, t j CH re. -,-\

Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response YE=:S- . I X+ 1 rc:..+c..c-r i r-,_j ft, t-\...e e. Soflll.5 f\arr-h-ve Llj _

t p 16u1*.Je -l-o e.)J,e_cyDn-_.

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: J Student Docket Number:

Student Question

,, I \ I C,

f* Jq r re -,-\ ,.

Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response y £5- .

J:+1 ri=..+c.c1jr1_j 1'b t-'he e.5oflll5 narr-h've l lj*

1:- p (6u1*.Je -l-o e:JcyDn-...

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions I Student Docket Number:

Question Number: \ "\

Student Question F'cr r + 1, J. s CA..SS\

r"-0 c>((., UA.+- 0 /" +\.""'- e>r .f-+" r 0-.L e>--

. V'A l f v +u r c. \ II"- co +,or

'---l ,\-\- +-"', f"V.,-\- ( ( C."'4.. ..,_,,e. b:. tw (. t "'- ,_ -ti f, .,_'Q ( +o ,.,..__\.,\.l- ...\-o G' \

Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response

ILT 22-1 NRC Exam Student Questions Question Number: j Student Docket Number:

Student Question l

,. ,J. C}frc.+1 1 ,.,.__*

I

t-::.c..

J o..,.. re*"", *,, ";....,. I 7b Proctor Initial Response Chief Examiner Response y ES, .

J:-t 1 :S r c::_{e..c1 i "'_j 1b t-'h e e. So JIil 5 f\ar r--h've l Cj ,

i p r c,Ll 1*.J e -l-o ev'/D n-...

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML22089A164&oldid=3434123"