ML20214W658

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:43, 3 May 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Daily Highlight.On 861204,notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amend & Opportunity for Prior Hearing Sent to Fr Re Util Spent Fuel Pool Rerack Request.Notice Did Not Address Significant Hazards Consideration
ML20214W658
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/04/1986
From: Olshan L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Harold Denton, Lyons J, Vollmer R
NRC
References
NUDOCS 8612100360
Download: ML20214W658 (1)


Text

Dectmber 4, 1986 Docket Nos. STN 50-454 and STN 50-455 MEMORANDUM FOR: H. Denton* R. W. Houston F. Rosa R. Vollmer* D. Crutchfield V. Benaroya J. Lyons* E. Rossi B. Clayton H. Thompson

  • G. Lainas L. Rubenstein F. Miraglia* T. Speis G. Lear R. Bernero* W. Russell B. J. Youngblood G. Holahan* J. Milhoan S. Varga T. Novak R. Ballard V. Noonan F. Schroeder C. Berlinger THRU: Steven A. Varga, Director , DISTRIBUTION ,

Project Directorate #3 J Decket f He-Division of PWP, Licensing-A NRC PDR PD#3 Rdg.

FPOM: Leonard N. Olshan, Project Manager L. 01shan Project Directorate #3 S. Varga Division of PWR Licensing-A

SUBJECT:

DAILY HIGHLIGHT Byron, Units 1 and 2 On December 4, 1986, a Notice of Consideration of Amendment and Opportunity for Prior Hearing was sent to the FEDERAL REGISTER concerning the Byron spent fuel pool rerack amendment request. Comonwealth Edison's request, dated September 3,1986, contained an evaluation of significant hazards considerations similar to that done for the Diablo Canyon rerack amendment. As a result of the September 11, 1986 U.S. Court of Appeals opinion regarding the Diablo Canyon rerack amendment, Comonwealth Edison was asked to expand its evaluation of significant hazards considerations. On November 7, 1986 a more detailed determination of no significant hazards considerations was provided. However, the OGC recommendation was that this submittal was still lacking in providing a basis for a no significant hazards consideration. Therefore, the Notice sent to the FEDERAL REGISTER does not address significant hazards considerations.

This approach is similar to that recently done for a Palisades rerack amendment.

Commonwealth Edison plans to begin reracking early in January 1987 so that much of the effort can be completed while the pool is dry. The first refueling outage at Byron 1 is scheduled for February 15, 1987. Commonwealth Edison supports the approach taken in the Notice, g2]ggggyg8js4 PDR Leonard N. Olshan, Project Manager Project Directorate #3 p

Division of PWR Licensing-A s DJ)han:mak 2/4/86

  • THESE COPIES MUST BE HANDCARRIED