ML20127D661

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:20, 10 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D661
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1992
From: Schmiechem J
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-57FR28645, RULE-PR-72 57FR28645-00049, 57FR28645-49, NUDOCS 9209150116
Download: ML20127D661 (2)


Text

__ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

J Ll i

'!;Ci'~.I yessoMsuui MEE ' ]: 7 ) -

-k-(59FV M Y 92 sti -9 ?O 9

~, i . , .

v, r- i To the Secretary cf the Commisst

__ ~

@$b a,0 Q 1R Sh4H W C

an a P.ichigan resident hign-level nuclear waste atopposedtadrycaskstorage$ I8 "ithout general public notification or Palisades nuclear opwer plant.

ieput we have been sited for a high-level 11chigan, 1/$. the wor ld 's vaste dump, 150 yds, from Lake

.nnot be stored safely anywhere, fresh war.cr. This deadly waste a

i termanent so we vill most likely be regional dump. !!O! The D.O.E. bas stated they will not be liabl .' for these vas t" if an interim site is h, r.o t built by 1998, a date t e Government Accounting Of fice states is unlikely. Theref, . 1.ask for ,

i

l. full democratic process _

in the crucial decision.

2. full public hearings held in the sited area.

3.- an enviremental impact statement 6 the State of Michivan. filed with the EPA and

4. a full cost / benefit analysis be done examing the cost of nuclear power and examine other sources of energy.

9209150116 920909

[57 2064S PDR [

SECRETARY OF Tile COFMISSION NUCLEAR REGULATORY COFNISSION WASilINGTON D.C. 20555 Attention: DocketingandServicQQranch lislillliinlilii}iIsalalisil} I s

i ..

l l'

~

\