ML20106D226

Rev 2 to QA Program for Facility

ML20106D226
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	07/31/1984
From:	POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
Shared Package
ML20106D218	List: ML20106D215 ML20106D226
References
NUDOCS 8410250048
Download: ML20106D226 (51)

Text

-c :r JAF FSAR UPDATE

_.n1-

.I U

CHAPTER 17 Q UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Title Page 17.l (NOT APPLICABLE) 17.1-1 17.2- QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM - OPERATIONS 17.2-1 17.2.0 Introduction 17.2-1

' 17. 2.1 - Organization 17.2-1 17.2.1.1 General Description 17.2-1 17.2.1.2' QA Responsibility Descriptions 17.2-3 17.2.1.3 . Authority Operating Organization and Special Committees 17.2.3 Di 17.2.1.4 QA Program Management 17.2-4 17.2.1.5 Delegation of QA Activities 17.2-5 17.2.1.6 Autnority Controls 17.2-5 17.2.2 Quality Assurance Program 17.2-7 17.2.2.1 General Description 17.2-7 17.2.2.2' QA Program Applicability 17.2-9 17.2.2.3 Establishment and Management of the Authoritf's QA Program 17.2-9

17.2.2.4 Quality Assurance Program Documentation 17.2-9 17.2.2.5 Indoctrination and Training 17.2-10 17.2.2.6 Qualification Requirements of QA Management 17.2-10 17.2.2.7 Control of Activities Affecting Quality 17.2-10 17.2.2.8 Management Review of QA Program 17.2-10

,f m).

\/ 17-1 8410250048 841022

, -PDR ADOCK 05000333

.P PDR Rey. 1 7/83

JAF FSAR UPDATE h):.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 SECTION- Title Page 17.2.2.9 Authority Controls 17.2-11 17.2.3' Design Control ' 17.2-11 17.2.3.1- General Description 17.2-11 17.2.3.2 Design Policy 17.2-11 17.2.3.3 Design. Control deasures 17.2-12 17.2.3.4 Design Review 17.2-12 17.2.3.5 Design Interf ace Control 17.2-12 17.2.3.6 Design Change Control 17.2-13 17.2.3.7 ~ Authority Controls 17.2-13

p. 17.2.4- Procurement Document Control 17.2 '

x- 17.2.4.1 General Description 17.2 -13 17.2.4.2 Preparation, Review, Approval and Issue of Procurement Documents and Changes 17.2-14

'17.2.4.3: Vendor QA Program Requirements 17.2-14 17.2.4.4 Authority Controls 17.2-15 C

17.2.5 Precedures, Instructions, and Drawings ~ 17.2-15 17.2.5.1 General Description 17.2-15 17.2.5.2 Acceptance Criteria 17.2-15 17.2.5.3' Authority Controls 17.2-16 17.2.6 Document Control 17.2-16 17.2.6.1- General Description 17.2-16 17.2.6.2. Review and Approval of Documents 17.2-17 17.2.6.3 Authority Controls 17.2-17

_/ l L7-Li Rev. 1 7/83

i JAF FSAR UPDATE

, l-~r

(

. N_-) -'

TABLE OF CORIENTS

'SECTION Title Page 17.2.7[ fControl of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services. 17.2-18

-17.2.7.1 General Description 17.2-18 17.2.7.2. Major Supplier Evaluations 17.2-13 17.2.7.3 Source and vendor Evaluations 17.2-19 17.2.7.4 Authority controls 17.2-19

~17.2.8 Identification' and Control of Materials, Parts and Components 17.2-20

=17.2.8.1 General Description 17.2-20 17.2.8.2 Authority Controls 17.2-20

-17.2.9 Control of Special Processes 17.2-20 s ,- 17.2.9.1 General Description 17.2-20

~

17.2.9.2' Authority Controls 1/.2-21

'17.2.10 Inspection 17.2.21 17.2.10.1 General Description 17.2-21 17.2.10.2 ' Authority Controls 17.2-22 17.2.11' Test Control 17.2 -22

'17.2.11.1 General Description 17.2-22 17.2.11.2 Authority Controls 17.2-24 17.2,.12 control of Measuring and Test Equipment 17.2-24 r

17.2.12.1 . General Description 17.2.24

-17.2.12.2 Authority Controls 17.2-24 17.2.13 Handling, Storage and Shipping 17.2-24 1-17.2.13.1 General Description 17.2-24 17-111 i-Rev. 1 7/83

~

s JAF FSAR UPDATE

[\

(_ / -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

-SECTION Title' Page 17.2.13.2- Authority Controls 17.2-26 17.2.14 Inspection, Test and Operating Stctus 17.2-26 17.2.14.l' GeneralLDescription 17.2-26 17.2.14.2' Authority Controls 17.2-27 17.2.15 Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components 17.2-27 17.2.15.lf General' Description 17.2-27 17.2.15.2 Authority Controls 17.2-28 17.2.16. Corrective Action 17.2-28

'17.2.16.1 General Description 17.2-28

, 17.2.16.2 Significant Deficiencies 17.2-29 te D\ v .17.2.16.3 Authority Controls 17.2-29 A_/

17.2.17' - Quality Assurance Records 17.2-29 17.2.17.1 General Description 17.2-29 17.2.17.2 Authority Controls 17.2-29

' 17.2.18 -Audits 17.2-30

- 17.2.18.lf General' Description 17.2-30 i

17.2.18.2 Authority Controls 17.2-31 Appendix 17.2A ARCHITECT-ENGINEER / CONSULTANT 17.2A-1 l Appendix 17.2B CONFORMANCE WITH NRC REGULATORY GUIDES 17.2B-1 Appendix 17.2C PLANT ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES GENERAL LIST 17'.2C-1 Appendix:17.2D QA PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION 17.2D-1

~

17-iv Rev. 2

, 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE r~

.(

CHAPIER 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 4

LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title 17.2-l~ Authority QA Organization Interface with Operating c Organizations ,

7 17.2-2. Authority QA Organization 17.2-3 Aathority and Major Contractor Interf ace 4

17.2-4 Aathority QA Organization and QA Related Organizations 17.2-5 Cross Reference Matrix of Implementing Documents  ;

I i:

O L) 4 1

J O

17-v Re v. 1 7/83

JAF FSAR UPDATE

. q( J-

! 17.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM * - OPERATIONS 17.

2.0 INTRODUCTION

The New York Power Authority, he reinaf te r called the Authority, has the l

ultimate responsibility to assure safe and efficient production of-electrical energy at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. To meet this responsibility the Authority has e stablished a comprehenaive Quality Assurance Program which applies to those structures, systems, and components of the Nuclear ~ Power Plant that prevent or mitigate the consequence s of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public. . The Program has been developed to provide adequate confidence that the ' plant and its - components will perform satisfactorily in se rvice .

The Program requires that activities such as operations, testing, design changes, modifications, . maintenance, repairs and refueling are accomplished in -accordance with applicable codes, specifications and regulatory requireme nts.

This Program has bee n developed - into 18 sections to comply with the l respective NRC management principles delineated (n Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and Section 17. 2 of '. the NRC Standard Review Plan NUREG-75/087 (11-24-75).

It also complies with the guidance set forth in WASH 1283 (Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Design and Procurement Phases of Nuclear Power Plants), dated May 24, 1974, WASH 1309 (Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power h

D' Plants), dated May 10, 1974, and WASH 1284 (Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements Curing the Operations Phase of Nuclear Powe r Plants), dated October 26, 1973.

The Quality Assurance Program require s that personnel of the Authority act in accordance with applicable requirements of this program and the procedures which . support its implementation. Authority management chall give support to maintaining and implementing an effective Quality Assurance Program. Outside organizations that are delegated activities which fall l within the scope ' of the Quality Assurance Program are required to establish and implement a Quality Assurance Program that is in compliance with applicable portions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix.B, and requirements of the Authority.

• The Quality Assurance Program has bee n changed by an organizational modification which requires a Technical Specification Amendment submittal to be approved by the NRC. The proposed amendment to the Technical Specifications was submitted in our letter dated February 8, 1983, JPN-83-15. So that the . organizational description will be as up to date as possible, the organization change s have been included in this 1983 update.

O 17.2-1 Rev . 2 7/84

{

JAF FSAR UPDATE 17.2.1 ORGANIZATION 17.2.1.1 General Description The Authority has established the organizational structure shown in Figure 17.2-1 for the Quality Assurance (QA) Aspects of nuclear power plant operation. This figure shows the lines of administrative authority and communication as it relates to the Authority's organization.

The President and Chief Operating Officer, hereinafter referred to as the President, has the ultimate responsibility for the Authority's QA Program and has final approval of Program requirements. The Vice President-Quality Assurance r .3 Reliability (VP-QA&R) has overall responsibility for the implementation and maintenance of the Authority's Quality Assurance Pr mram for the nuclear power plant. The VP-QA&R has delegated the day to day responsibility and authority for development, implementation, and maintenance of this Quality Assurance Program to the Director-Quality Assurance who shall report conditions adverse to quality or in conflict with program requirements to the VP-QA&R and affected department heads, as necessary and appropriate, to ensure corrective action. .

Figure 17.2-1 shows the managerial and Quality Assurance lines of direction, responsibility and communications between the Authority's QA and operating organization. Figure 17.2-2 shows the Authority QA organization interfaces at headquarters and the plants. Figure 17.2-3 shows the Quality Assurance lines of responsibility and communication between the Authority and the Architect Engineer (A-E) or Consultant. Figure 17.2-4 depicts the independence of the Authority's VP-QA&R and his staff from all other Authority departments.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program is described in Section 17.2.2 l The lines of authority and comraunication from the Authority's VP-QA&R as depicted on Figure 17.2-1, are normally used to resolve impasses which may arise at the plant between Authority Quality Assurance personnel and personnel of the operating organization. Impasses which may arise at the plant between the Authority QA personnel and operating organization personnel are normally resolved between the Quality Assurance Superintendent and Resident Manager.

Impasses which may arise between Authority Quality Assurance personnel and other Authority project personnel are normally resolved on the project level whose organizational relationships are shown in Figure 17.2-4 Impasses which may arise between Authority Quality Assurance personnel and A-E/ Consultant personnel will normally be resolved between Authority's Director-QA and a designated member of A-E/ Consultant QA staff as shown in Figure 17.2-3. As depicted in Figure 17.2-3, the Director-QA has direct access to high levels of A-E/ Consultant management, as may be required, to resolve impasses.

17.2-2 Rev. 2 O

7/84

F JAF FSAR UPDATE The Director-QA will bring to the attention of the VP-QA&R impasses which l

73 are not resolved at this management level. The President is the final

) authority when impasses cannot be resolved through normal channels.

The Authority may delegate portions of their Quality Assurance Program to an A-E/ Consultant during plant operations. For information relating to the A-E/ Consultant QA program, see Appendix 17.2A. The Authority may elect to delegate other portions of their Quality Assurance Program to other organizations during plant operations, and in either instance, the A-E/ Consultant and other delegated organizations' Quality Assurance Programs will be considered extensions of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

The A-E/ consultant and other delegated organizations' Quality Assurance Programs will be reviewed and approved by the Authority prior to the delegation of work. The Authority may waive a QA program review for those organizations which have a Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved Quality Assurance Program.

Portions of the Quality Assurance Program which may be delegated to an A-E/ Consultant and/or other organizations shall consist of quality related activities such as, design changes, modifications, repairs, inspections, refueling, procurement, etc. Conformance to approved requirements and programs will be assured through liaison between the Quality Assurance organizations of the Authority and the A-E/ Consultant, as applicable. l The Authority's and delegated organizations' Quality Assurance Programs are described by written procedures contained in the appropriate company QA/QC manuals. Assurance by the Authority that those programs are properly imple-mented is gained by (1) audits conducted by the Authority of other delegated KJ organizations, (2) Authority audits of other delegated organizations which may include A-E/ Consultant participation, (3) surveilla-:e and audits of the l plant operating organization, (4) Authority participation in vendor audits and surveillance performed by the other delegated organizations.

Managerial and administrative controls to ensure safe operations are described in Chapter 13, Conduct of Operations.

17.2.1.2 QA Responsibility Descriptions The President, VP-QA&R, and Director-QA as described in Section 17.2.1.1 has the responsibility for the Quality Assurance Program during the operation phase including administrative control such as salary review, hire / fire and position assignment. The President has overall responsibility for the operation of the nuclear power plant meeting quality, operation, and budget requirements.

Detailed day-to-day quality related activities performed by affected Authority organizations are described in to Chapter 13 and applicable departmental procedures.

10 17.2-3 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE Detailed nuclear power plant operations responsibilities are de scribed in Chapter 13.

17.2.1.3 Authority Operating Organization and Special Committees

. Details related to Nuclear Ge ne ration, operating organizations, Safety Review Committee (SRC) &nd Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) are delineated in Chapter 13 and in the Technical Specifications.

17.2.1.4 (A Program Management' The Authority's Vice Pre sident-QA&R reports to the President and is responsible for establishing, administrating and coordinating the l Authority's Quality Assurance Program. The Director-QA has the responsibility, authority, and organizational freedom to identify quality problems; initiate, recommend, or provide solutions through de signated channels; and to verify implementation of solutions. He has the authority to initiate stop work action when such work is considered unsatisfactory and also control further processing, delivery or installation of nonconforming material.

As depicted in Figure 17.2-2, at the Authority headquarters, the Authority Quality Assurance management r sintains a staff of support and specialist QA e nginee rs to provide the direction and control for establishing, impleme nting and monitoring a uniform and effective QA Program for the Authority, and to support the nuclear power plants.

Also, as depicted in Figure 17.2-2, the Authority Quality Assurance and Quality Control supervision at the plant maintains a staff of QA engineers and QC inspectors to provide for inspection, audit and surveillance of plant ope rations, including the following:

1) Providing surveillance or inspection, as appropriate, of operations, refueling, maintenance, modification, repair and testing of the plant.

2) Providing for evaluation of results of nondestructive examinations performed on materials, equipment and components.

3) Providing for indoctrination of plant personnel in the duties and functions of Quality Assurance / Quality Control operations.

4) Monitoring the in-service inspection program.

5) In situations requiring special expertise in nondestructive examination, coordinating the work of outside consultants and/or technical personnel.

To remain cognizant of plant activities, the QA Superintendent, or his designated representative, attends and participates in plant staff meetings.

O 17.2-4 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE The plant Quality Assurance and Quality Control Supervisors have the

. /7, authority to initiate stop work orders through both the Quality Asst.rance

(,/ Superintendent and the Resident Manager or other appropriate authorized personnel when r"'h work is not being performed in accordance with approved drawings, specir2 cations, procedures or regulatory requirements.

Various departments of the Authority assist the Vice President-QA&R staff in the Authority Quality Assurance Program. Assistance from other Authority departments is available to Quality Assurance staff, whenever necessary.

17.2.1.5 Delegation of QA Activities The Authority may delegate to an A-E/ Consultant, and to other organizations, the administration and execution of portions of the Quality Assurance Program.

The interface between the Authority and A-E/ Consultant is depicted in Figure 17.2-3. The communication between the Authority Quality Assu ance and the A-E/ Consultant for day-to-day operations is as shown in Figure 17.2-3. As depicted, the Director-QA has direct access to high levels of A-E/ Consultant management, as may be required.

17.2.1.6 Authority Controls The Authority maintains control of the overall Quality Assurance Program whether or not quality related activities are delegated or performed by the l Authority.

The Authority departments involved in the implementation of quality related activities are required to perform such activities in accordance with written approved procedures which are in conformance with the Authority's Quality Assurance Program. l Activities performed by the QA organization are to ensure that quality requirements have been included / accomplished, as appropriate, in all quality related activities. These activities include, but are not limited to

1) Establishing and maintaining a Quality Assurance Program including objectives and Jcope.

2) Establishing and maintaining a Quality Assurance organization with clearly defined duties, responsibilities, authority, reporting level and relationship to other internal organizations that have been delegated QA activities.

3) Reporting to Authority management the

• status and adequacy of the QA Program.

O 17.2-5 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE l

l

4) Establishing inte rf ace relationship and maintaining controls I between Quality Assurance organizations of the Authority and major hj contractors. I

5) Control of materials on a conditional release and establishing a system by which the Authority may initiate stop work action at the plant, when necessary, for safe ty-re late d st ructure s , systems and compone nts.

i

6) Requireme nts for examination and certification of the Authority's nondestructive examination (NDE) personnel.

7) Qualification requirements, duties and training of the Authority's Quality Assurance personnel as auditors.

8) Indoctrination and training of QA personnel as well as pe rsonne l from othe r departments assigned to perform quality related activities.

9) Assessing the Authority's Quality Assurance Progran to assure its implementation and effectiveness,

10) Review of procureme nt documents and changes the reto, in order to assure that Quality Assurance provisions ha~e been adequately incorporated for material, equipme nt and se rvice s that a re safety-related or to an extent consistent with their importance to safety.

11) Preparation, processing and control of Quality Assurance Procedures and Program documents and revisions thereto.

12) Processing and control of QA documents e ithe r ge ne rated or received by the QA organization.

13) Participating in vendor selection and evaluation.

14) Receiving inspection.

15) Contractor / vendor surveillance inspection.

16) Inspection of plant quality related activities.

17) Monitoring the activities of external A-E/ Consultant and consulting organizations.

18) Monitoring control of special process (e.g., welding, cadwelding, heat treating, surface finishing).

19) Monitoring test control to assure that testing is being satisfactorily performed.

O 17.2-6 Rev. 2 7/84

r JAF FSAR UPDATE

20) Monitoring control of nonconforming material parts or components.

i m/ 21) Corrective action control at the plant and the Authority's headquarters for nonconformances identified by the Authority QA staff.

22) Establishing and maintaining a record reteation system for QA documents generated by the Authority QA personnel.

~

23) Estaalishing and maintaining an audit program at the plant.

24) Establishing Quality Assurance requirements and providing for onsite Authority audits and QA program reviews of contractors l performing work at the plant.

25) Measures necessary to perform audits of major contractors delegated QA activities being performed "of fsite".

26) Internal audits at t.he Authority's Headquarters of quality related activities that are performed by Authority personnel at Headquarters.

17.2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 17.2.2.1 General Description n The Authority's Quality Assurance policy is to control those activities

( ) needed to provide assurance that quality objectives are satisfied during the operation phase of the nuclear power plant. To achieve this end, the Authority has establ.ished a Quality Assurance Program. This Program has been developed to comply with the NRC requirements delineated in Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and Standard Review Plan NUREG 75/087, and is organized in 18 sections which correspond to the management principles outlined therein.

The Program complies with the guidance set forth in WASH 1283 (Guidance on l Quality Assurance Requirements During the Design and Procurement Phases of nuclear power plants, Rev.1) dated May 24, 1974, WASH 1309 (Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants), dated May 10, 1974, WASH 1204 (Guidance on Quality Assurance During the Operation Phase of Nuclear Power Plants) dated October 26, 1973.

The Quality Assurance Program also complies with the Quality Assurance related NRC Regulatory Guides referenced in the WASH documents or with an acceptable alternative. The Authority's position on these regulatory guides is delineated in Appendix 17.2B.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program is supplemented by Quality Assur-ance Procedures. All Quality Assurance policies, manuals and procedures are mandatory requirements, including their control and distribution.

m

{ )

v 17.2-7 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE Responsibility for implementation, execution and approval of the Quality Assurance Program during operations is described in Section 17.2.1.1. The l Director-QA is re sponsible for ide ntifying and incorporating ne ce ssa ry changes to the QA Program.

Section 17.2.1 describe s t he Authority's Quality Assurance organization l Managerial and which administers the total Cuality Assurance Program.

administrative controls to be used to ensure safe operations are de scribed in Chapter 13.

l The Director-(A, through a comprehensive system of audits and surveillance of internal, plant and delegated organizations, quality activities, assesses the scope, implementation and e f fective ne ss of the overall QA Program and reports results to the VP-QA&R and the Safety Review Committee (SRC).

The Director-QA is re sponsible for the training and indoctrination of Authority Quality Assurance personnel. This includes, as applicable, training as to purpo=e, scope and implementation of quality re lated documents, and both training and qualification in the principles and technique s of activitie s being performed. Proficiency of QA pe rsonne l is maintained by retraining, reexamining, and/or recertifying, as required.

Training se ssioas are documented to re flect the re sults of the training, attendees, date, etc.

The ope rating organization will perform quality re lated activities at the plant which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program imposes on delegated organizations the requirement to establish adequate programs for their internal operations and, in turn, to impose applicable QA Program requirements on suppliers of saf e ty-re late d materials, components, equipment or services. The Quality Assurance Programs of delegated organizations (e.g., A-E/ Consultant, NSSS, Contractor) are conside red extensions, to the extent necessary, of the Authority's Program and, as such, are subject to review and audit by the Authority for the activities being performed. For organizations which have a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (l'RC)-app rove d Quality Assurance Program (i.e. Topical Report) review and approval by the Authority will not be mandatory.

An A-E/ Consultant may be delegated the work of performing quality affecting activities re lated to plant operation not normally pe rf ormed by Authority pe rsonnel or othe r Authority contractors, or to supplement Authority pe rsonne l activities. Any work so delegated shall be accomplished in accordance with the inf ormation delineated in Appendix 17. 2A.

The Program in effect has been reviewed and approved by the Authority, and audits will be performed to asce rtain A-E/ Consultant compliance in applicable areas. The work assigned to an A-E/ Consultant shall be through Authority direction on a case by case basis. The following is a summary of major quality affecting a rea s that an A-E/ Consultant may O

17.2-8 Re v. 2 7/84

JAF L FSAR UPDATE

(O) ~ ' undertake when authorized by the Authority; this does not preclude the possibility that these delegated activities will be expanded or diminished in scope:

1) Design modification and reviews

2) Procurement document preparation

3) Vendor qualification

4) Vendor surveys and audits

5) Source inspection

6) Shipment release

7) Document Control

8) Nonconformance and corrective action

9) Control of special processes

10) Shipping

11) Installation (b/ 12) Fabrication and/or construction

13) Record Retention 17.2.2.2 QA Program Applicability The Quality Assurance Program is applied to those structures, systems, equipment and components tha' are necessary to assure the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary and primary containment, the capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shut down condition, and the capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential offsite exposures exceeding the limits of'10 CFR 100.

The safety-related structures, systems and components controlled by the Quality Assurance Program are identified in the FSAR.

17.2.2.3 Establishment and Management of the Authority's QA Program The Authority's Quality Assurance Program has beep established prior to the Authority assuming operation activities. The requirements are reviewed , as required, to improve impleme ntation of the Quality Assurance Program as activities warrant.

17.2.2.4 Quality Assurance Program Documentation The Quality Assurance Programs of the Authority and other delegated organi-O zations establish written policies, procedures, instructions, for compliance i

17.2-9 Rev. 2 7/84

_ j

JAF FSAR UPDATE with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, applicable codes and specifications, regulatory requirements, regulatory guides and standards.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program and implementing Quality Assurance Procedures and their relationship to applicable criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 are refe renced in Figure 17.2-5. The operating organization has prepared administrative procedure s which will be utilized to impleme nt portions of the QA Program at the plant. A ge ne ral list of types of plant administrative procedures are shown in Appendix 17.2C.

17.2.2.5 Indoctrination and Training The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that personnel performing activities affecting quality are appropriately trained in the principles and techniques of the activity being performed. Personnel performing activities affecting quality are instructed as to purpose, scope and implementation of gove rning manuals, policies, and procedures. Appropriate training and indoctrination procedures are established and included in Quality Assurance l Proce dure s.

l The Dire cot r-ki is re sponsible for the training and indoctrination of Authority Quality Assurance personnel.

17.2.2.6 Qualification Requirements of QA Management (A qualification requireme nts of Authority pe rsonnel are indicated in Appendix 17.2D.

17.2.2.7 Control of Activities Affecting Quality The Authority's Quality Assurance Program specifies that design and purchase specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions shall be prepared with the nece ssary test and inspection re quire me s.ts and crite ria. Tb- Program require s that only qualified personnel and appropria e and properly calibrated equipment be used snd that results be adequate l, docume nted . The Program require s that special processes and qualification testing be perf ormed under controlled conditions.

17.2.2.8 Mana ge me nt Review of QA Program T he VP-(A&R is responsible for assigning the responsibility to an organi-l zation within the Authority or to an outside a ge ncy for independently assessing the Authority's QA Program on a regula r basis. If an internal group pe rf orms this activity, they shall be independent of any quality related activities which they must assess.

The Direcotr-(A is responsible for reviewing the status and adequacy of the LA Program on a continuing basis including activities delegated to othe rs and for notifying the VP-QA&R of any noted program deficiencies.

O 17.2-10 Re v. 2 7/84 e

JAF FSAR UPDATE

', 17.2.2.9 Authority Controls

]

The Authority reviews and concurs with Quality Assurance Programs of delegated organizacions for the quality affecting activities which they may implement, as applicable.

The Authority performs planned and periodic audits of delegated organiza-tions to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.3 DESIGN CONTROL 17.2.3.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that there be written procedures to perform design activities in a planned, controlled and orderly manner, and that applicable regulatory requirements and design bases be correctly translated into specifications, drawings, written procedures and instructions.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program also requires that Authority staff responsible for design reviews and other design verification activities have their authority and responsibility identified and controlled by written procedures.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that design documents

[]

~ _/

specify appropriate quality standards and provide methods for controlling deviations and changes from the standards.

The Authority's internal design review system is devised to control procure-ment documents, design changes and modifications, and selected drawings.

The Authority's Engineering and Nuclear Genera *. ion staff reviews comment 1 and concurs with specifications and selected drawings, and revisions thereto.

The Authority, through planned and periodic audits of its internal design review activities, assures conformance with the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.3.2 Design Policy The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires tnat adequate review and selection for suftability of application be conducted for materials, parts, l equipment and prccesses that are essential to safety-related functions of the structures, systems and components.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program does not differentiate between safety-related naterials, parts and equipment that must be specifically designed to meet functional requirements, and "off the shelf" safety-related r3 r

lV} 17.2-11 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FZAR UPDATE mate rial, parts and equipment that meet e stablished functional requireme nts. In either case, the Authority's design control requirements are applied in accordance with the measure s e stablished in the Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.3.3 Design Control Measures The Authority's Quality Assurance Program require s thet design control measures, as applicable, be applied to such items as: stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation and accident analyses; intended pe rf ormance ; reactor physics; compatibility of materials and systems; accessibility of materials and systems; and accessibility for in-service inspection, monitoring of operation, maintenance and repair. Compute r programs used in the design process shall be reviewed and approved prior to initial use in accordance with Engineering Department procedures.

Design documents are reviewed by technical and quality personnel to assure that design characteristics can be controlled, inspected and tested.

Inspection and test criteria are also ide ntif ied. The review also as sure s that documents have been prepared reviewed, and approved in accordance with approved procedures. Review results are appropriately documented.

17.2.3.4 Design Review The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that design verification or checking such as design reviews, alternate calculations and qualification l testing be properly selected and performed.

NOTE: The qualification test of a prototype unit under adverse design conditions would not be practical or realistic when verifying the adequacy of a design change or modification to an existing system of an operating plant. Design change s will constitute the majority of engineering work when an operating plant is involved.

In such cases the Authority will depend on an indepe nde nt review to assure the necessary adequacy verification.

However, if analysis de te rmine s that testing is the only acceptable method of ve rficiation, the testing shall be pe rformed unde r conditions that simulate the most adve rse ope rational conditions. This testing, to the maximum extent possible, shall be performed prior to installation.

The individuals or groups who perform design verification or checking are other than those who pe rf orm the original design. Design ve rification activities are performed in accordance with approved procedures that define the responsibilities of the verifier, the scope, areas, and feature s to be verified including pertinent conditions and reporting documentation require me nt s .

Errors and deficiencies in the design and the design process, including the use of computer codes that could adversely affect safe t y- re lated st ructure s ,

systems and compone nts identified during design review in accordanca with approved procedures, are docume nted, and corrective actior. is taken to correct the deficiency and preclude repetition.

17.2-12 Fev. 2

'/n4

JAF FSAR UPDATE 17.2.3.5 Design Interface Control EJ

~} The Authority may delegate to an A-E/ Consultant design control measures for The A-E/ Consultant method of design any delegated design activities.

interface control is delineated in the document referenced in Section 17.2.2, Paragraph 17.2.2.1.

Design documents and revisions thereto, related to the design interface, are distributed to the responsible organizations in a timely and orderly manner, and controlled to prevent inadvertent use of superceded documents. Design documents are collected, stored and maintained in a systematic and controlled manner.

17.2.3.6 Design Change Control Procedures are established to assure that design changes, including as-built information generated during plant modification activities, are appropriately documented, ani submitted to the appropriate organizations for review and approval by design organization prior to incorporation in the plant record documents.

17.2.3.7 Authority Controls The Authority monitors interfaces between organizations performing design activities, review specifications, and revisions thereto.

The Authority perfoms planned and periodic audits of delegated p organizations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

()

17.2.4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 17.2.4.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program provides for procurement documents of safety-related equipment to be controlled within the requirements established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, in accordance with the guidelines of applicable codes, standards, regulatory requirements, and regulatory guides.

The Authority's Quality As surance Program requires that purchase specifications contain or reference, as applicables design information and technical requirements including component and raaterial identification requirements including drawings, specifications, codes and industrial stand-ards, regulatory guides and regulatory requirements; tests and inspection requirements; and special process instructions for such activities as fabrication, cleaning, erecting, packaging, handling, shipping, storing, and inspecting. The specification contains, as appropriate, requirements whi:h identify the documents to be prepared, maintained, submitted, and made available to the purchasing agent for review and/or approval. These docu-ments include drawings, specifications, procedures, inspection and test records, inspection and fabrication plans, personnel and procedure qualifi-cations, materials, chemical and physical test results. The specifications contain applicable requirements for the retention, control and maintenance (V) 17.2-13 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE of records, and the purchasing agents rights of access to the vendor's facilities and records for source inspection and audit.

Procurement documents for spa re or repla ce me nt parts shall be subject to requirements at least equivalent to those used for the original procurement.

The original procurement docunents may be used as a basis for purchase of spare or replacement parts.

The specifications contain provisions for e xte nding applicable requi reme nts of the document to subcontractors and suppliers including purchase r's right of access to such subvendor's facilities and records.

17.2.4.2 Preparation, Review, Approval and Issue of Procurement Documents and Changes The Authority's Quality Assurance Program require s that procedures be esta-l blished that clearly delineate the seque nce of actions to be taken in the preparation, review, approval, and control of procurement documents.

The Authority's Quality Assurance requirements for procurement docume nt control require s that docume nt re view proce dure s be established. The reviews of procureme nt documents in accordance with these procedu re s a re perf ormed by knowledgeable Quality Assurance personnel who can determine if quality requireme nts are complete, corre ctly defined, and inco rpo ra ted , so l

that the procured iteru can be prope rly inspected and controlled, and that acceptance Criteria are adequately specified.

The review and approval of procurement docume nts are documented prior to release and are available for verification.

The Authority's purchase spe cifications , and changes the re to, are reviewed by the Authority's Enginee ring /Procureme nt and Contract Administration /

Nuclear Ge ne ration / Plant Technical Se rvice s , as applicable, in accordance with requirements containe d in the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

The Authority's Quality Assurance reviews purchase specifications and change s the re to, for quality requireme nts in accordance with the Quality Assurance Program. Purchase orders are processed following approval of the specification by the Authority's Enginee ring / Procurement and Cor.t ra ct Administration /Nuclea r Ge ne ration / Plant Technical Services / Purchasing Coordinator, as applicable, and Quality Assurance. Changes and/or revisions to procurement docume nts shall be subject to the same degree of control as utilized in the preparation of the original document.

17.2.4.3 Vendor QA Program Requirements The Authority require s that delegated organizations have documented Quality Assurance Programs and that subcontractors have and implement documented Quality Assurance Programs for materials, equipment and se rvice s to an extent consistent with their importance to safety and scope of activities.

f The ope rating organization will pe rform Procureme nt Document Control activi-ties at the plant in accordance with approved written procedores which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2-14 Pe v . 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE fQ 17.2.4.4 Authority Controls The Authority reviews, comments and concurs with preliminary procurement documents, final bid documents and any changes thereto, to assure that the applicable requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 are included.

The Authority will review recommendations for contract award and will assure that any exceptions to the contract will not affect quality requirements. ,

The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-zations to verify program implementation' in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

l INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS l 17.2.5 l

17.2.5.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program require s that documents such as instructions, procedures and/or drawings which prescribe quality affecting activities be controlled and that quality af fecting activities be pe rformed j in accordance with these instructions, procedures -and/or drawings, as l applicable.

The ope rating organization will control instructions, procedures and drawings at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which

.p conform to the requirements in the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

.V Quality affecting activities performed. by the operating organization shall be accomplished in accordance with the se instructions, procedures and/or drawings, as applicable. 1 The Authority and/or delegated organizations shall have established measures for the control and implementation of instructions, procedures, and drawings for quality-related activities applicable to the scope of their responsibi-lities. The described measures by a designated A-E/ Consultant, if l applicable, are delineated in the document re fe renced in Section 17.2.2, Paragraph 17.2.2.1.

l 17.2.5.2 Acceptance Criteria The Authority through planned and periodic surveillance and audits of delegated organizations as well as selected audits of their vendors and subcontractors assure s that the instructions, procedure s , drawings and l checklists used on safety-related equipment are controlled and implemented to meet the requirements of applicable codes, standards, regulatory guides, and the QA Program.

Activities affecting quality are defined in specifications, drawings, proce- i dures and instructions and include criteria for the acceptance of specific l activities. The se instructions, procedures or drawings shall delineate the i

l p

17.2-15 Fev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE applicable requirements of codes, standards, re ulatory requirements and regulatory guides, and shall specify acceptance criteria. Accomplishment of tasks shall be documented, and shall include appropriate information that acceptance criteria have been met when required.

17.2.5.3 Authority Controls The Authority will control and impleme nt instructions, procedure s and

. drawings for c.aality related activities as follows:

1) Review, comment and concur with enginee ring specifications, selected drawings, procedure s and instructions prepared for the performance of a quality related activity.

2) Prepare procedures related to the activities of this section which identify individuals or groups responsible for these activities.

3) Review procedures for design changes, maintenance, modifications, procureme nt , re f ue ling, fabrication, installation, inspection, in-service inspection and cleaning.

4) Establish format and procedure for the preparation, review and approval of the Authority's Quality Assurance Procedure s.

l The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-l zations to verify program implementation in accordance with QA Program re quireme nts .

17.2.6 DOCUMENT CONTROL 17.2.6.1 Gene ral Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that documents affecting the quality of safety-related structure s , systems and equipment during the operation phase of the plant be controlled.

The program e stablishe s controls such thats obsolete or superseded documents shall not be inadvertently used; changes shall be approved by the l

same group or individuals having authority and responsibility for the initial issue, or by other qualified responsible organizations delegated by the Authority; a method of revision level verification shall be provided; approved changes shall be promptly distributed; and applicable docume nt s shall be available prior to the start of the work for which they are re quire d.

The operating organization will control documents affecting the quality of safety-related st ructure s , systems and equipment at the plant in accordance with approved writte n procedure which conform to the requireme nts of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

O 17.2-16 Re v . 2 7/84

L ,

JAF TI" FSAR UPDATE

~

17.2.6.2 Review and Approval of Documents

- []

,The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that procedures and instructions be prepared to control the preparation, review, concurrence or

. approval, change or revision, issuance, and distribution of documents such

~as the following:

1) Quality Assurance manuals, operating procedures and instructions

2) Design specifications and drawings 3') Manufacturing, design, construction and installation drawings 4). Manufacturing and inspection, test, and special process procedures and instructions

.5) Procurement documents

6) Administrative Procedures

7) Maintenance Procedures

8) FSAR and related design criteria documents

9) Design change requests

/ 10) Nonconformance reports

' w.)

Figure - 17.2-5 itemises the Authority's Quality Assurance- Program and QA Procedures and their; relationship to the 18 criteria of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B.

17.2.6.3 Authority Controls The Authority will control the preparation, review, approval and distribu-tion of Authority documents including changes thereto which prescribe activities affecting quality performed by- Authority personnel and assure that the' latest issue of such documents are used. The Authority will provide for distribution of correspondence, which address quality affecting activities, to affected Authority personnel. The Authority will maintain a master list or equivalent of issued. Authority documents affecting quality

-related activities such as, procedures, instructions'and drawings. ,

- The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-zations to ~ verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES

-i

,j 17.2-17 Rev.1 7/83 e

E-he __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _

JAF FSAR UPDATE 17.2.7.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program establishes controls to assure that purchased safety-related material, equipment and services, whether purchased directly or through contractors and subcontractors, conform to the procurement document requirements. These measures include, as appropriate, provisions for source evaluation and selection of equipment vendors, objective evidence of quality furnished by contractors or subcontractors, inspection and audit at *Te source, and examination of products upon delivery.

Vendor selection and evaluation is based on qualifying data, such as the seller's QA Program and past performance data of similar items and vendor surveys, to determine the adequacy of the facilities and the effectiveness of the QA Program.

Objective evidence of quality furnished by the contractors or subcontractors shall identify the purchased material (e.g., codes, standards, specifica-tions met by the materials or equipment). The contractors or subcontractors are also required to identify any procurement requirements which have not been met together with a description of those nonconformances dispositioned

" accept as is" or " repair" as part of this objective evidence of quality.

Source inspection shall be required when the conformance of materials, parts and components to procurement documents cannot be verified upon receipt or the service contracted is of a nature requiring a witnessing or verification function.

Receipt inspection includes verification that the required documentation has been received and that the items conform to the procurement documents.

Receipt inspection shall be performed in accordance with written procedures and instructions, and receiving activities shall be documented to assure that the material, component, or equipment is properly identified, including the receiving documentations acceptance records are inspected with predetermined inspection instructionst inspection records or certificates of conformance are available at the plants items accepted and released are identified as to their inspection status.

The operating organization will perform activities related to control of purchased material, equipment and services at the plant, in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Operation Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.7.2 Major Supplier Evaluations The Authority's Quality Assurance Program provides for the evaluation of Quality Assurance Programs of major suppliers and delegated organizations.

These evaluations assure that they are capable of providing equipment, material and services which meet the applicable regulatory guides, codes, industry standards and regulatory requirements. Audits will be performed to verify that the major suppliers and delegated organizations are satisfactorily implementing approved QA Program requirements.

17.2-10 Rev. 2 7/84 t

JAF FSAR UPDATE The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that qualified personnel O

V evaluate the supplier's capability to provide acceptable quality services and products before the award of the procurement order or contract. QA and engineering personnel participate in the evaluation of those suppliers providing critical components. The results of supplier evaluations are documented and filed.

17.2.7.3 Source and Vendor Evaluations Based upon complexity of purchased items and supplier performance history, source inspections or audits of vendors shall be performed, as necessary, to assure that the required quality of the purchased items is obtained.

Surveillance of suppliers' fabrication, inspection, testing, and shipment of l materials, equipment and components will be planned, performed and reported  ;

in accordance with written procedures which assure conformance to the 7

purchase order requirements. Source inspections, surveillances or audits of ,

supplier activities shall be performed by qualified personnel from quality assurance, engineering and/or operations as determined necessary during the procurement phase.

Suppliers' certificates of confornance are periodically evaluated by audits, source or receiving inspection activities, independent inspections, or tests to assure their validity. Results of these evaluations are documented in appropriate reports.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that the effectiveness of the control of quality by suppliers be assessed at intervals consistent with their importance and compicxity.

The Authority's Quality Assurance Program requires that spare or replacement parts of safety-related structures, systems and components are subject to controls at least equivalent to those used for the original equipment.

The Authority may delegate control of purchased material, equipment and service activities for plant structures, systems and components, and pro-curement quality control and activities, including plant receiving inspection, to an A-E/ Consultant in accordance with Section 17.2.2, Paragraph 17.2.2.1. A-E/ Consultant responsibility may include the preparation of, specifications, drawings, and requisitions for the purchase of materials, equipment and services by the Authority. Included in this activity will be the quality evaluation of those vendors recommended for  :

l procurement. A-E/ Consultant may provide inspection, surveillance and audit service at vendor facilities for plant equipment and on established notification points of selected delegated organization items.

17.2.7.4 Authority Controls The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-zations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2-19 Rev. 2 ,

7/84 i

JAF FSAR UPDATE 17.2.0 IDENTIFICATIOrl AND COflTROL OF MATEPI ALS, PARTS AND CO*iPONENTS 17.2.8.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Progran requires that all organizationo performine, safety-related activitios establish proceduros to provide ilentification and maintain control of materials, parts and components, including partially f abricated ascenblies to provent the use of defective, unapproved or incorrect materials and equipnont. Those proceduron, as appitcable, shall provide for the unique idontification of itonn by norial numbers, part number or other appropriato means. The idnntification nhall be placed on the item whenever practical and shall not dogra.to the quality or function of the iten or on recordn directly and readily traceable to the item. Verification of identification nhall be accomplished at appropriato stages throughout manufacturing, shipnent, receipt and innta11ation.

The progran providos meanures which annure that traceability of itens to records, which will verify confornanco of the matorials, parts and conpon-ents to specified requirononts (e.g. chomical and physical proportion, tests, inspections, etc.), shall be provided fron initial rocnipt of matorials to installation, use, testing, and throughout the life of the iton during oporation, modification and repair. For consumablo items traco-ability requirenonts shall be not by documentation hich indicaton that only acceptable natorials havo boon used.

The operating orgsnization will identify and naintain control of natarials, parts and compononts at the plant in accor<tanco with approvoI writton procedures which conform to the Authority's Quality Assuranco Program.

17.2.0.2 Authority Contro1n The Authority will perform planned an:t porlodic audits of dologata1 orgini-zations to vorify program inpinmentation in accordinco with approvol QA Progran requiremonta.

17.2.9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 17.2.9.1 Gnnnral Dagir17 tion, Thn Authority'n Quality Assuranca Progran requirns that 9pecial procannen be adequatoly controlled.

A apncial proconn is definnt an a uniquo manufacturing, innpontion or tant procar.n whnro thn annnannant of quality by dirnet innpoetton of tho procnnn or product in dinalvantagnous or impractical after thn oporation in compinto. Procn9snn of this naturn rnquirn thn applicatton of offnctIvo contro1n on tha procnn1 as on9eribo,1 lator in thig Snction. Spacial procognon includo, but are not limitad to, walding, cadwn1 ding, ntudwalding, hnat trnating, non-4nitructivo nxanination (UDE), protoctiva coating application, concreto placomant, and chemical clnaning.

17.2-20 Dav. 2 7/H4

l JAF FSAR iJPDATE The Authority's program requires that all organizations performing special processes on safety-related equipment at the plant or at manufacturing p plants shall do so in accordance with approved procedures under controlled U conditions, and that procedures, equipment and personnel shall be qualified ,

in accordance with applicable codos, standards and specificationst such qualification records fer plant personnel shall be maintained at the plant I and kept current. Special process procedures shall reference the applicable codes, standards or specifications and provido methods of documenting accomplishei activities.

The opotating organization will control special processes at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the require-monts of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.9.2 Authority Controls The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-zations to verify program implomontation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2,10 INSPECTION 17.2.10.1 Conoral Descriyt ton i

i he Authority's Quality Assuranco Progtam defines the program requiremonte that are applicable to inspections performed on safety-related equipment throughout all phases of oporations.

l The Quality Assurance Program shall provido for inspection during manufac-

! ' turing, shipping, receiving, storage, handling, installation, testing, t operations, repairs, maintentico and modifications, as applienble.

Inspection requirements shall be translated into writton proceduros, instructions and/or chocklists. Those documents shall govern the conduct nd the dogree of inspection activity to onnure that the required quality is (

obtained and objectivo ovidence of the inspections is available. I t

The Authority's Quality Assuranco Program requires that design spacificationn, drawings, proceduros or instructions shall include the necessary inspection requiromonts, including acceptance critoria to provido assurance that items and work conform to the design requirements.

Where direct inspection is not practicable, control of processing, equipment and personnot nFall be used to dotormino acceptability.

When sampling plans are used, they nhall bo based on recognized standard simpiing plans.  ;

i l

Ds 17.2=21 Rev. 1 7/03 1 i

l

JAF FSAR UPDATE Inspection procedures, instructions or plans shall be made available where the activity is to be performed prior to the start of work. When notifica-tion or hold points have been established, either contractually by purchase documents or internally by the fabricator, or at the plant by the ope rating organization, the inspection program or plan provides, and the process control procedure shall include provisions to ensure that work doe s not progress beyond the notification points until relea sed by the designated authority. The method of inspection used shall be consistent with the complexity and nature of the work pe rf orme d, i.e., nonde structive examingation (NDE).

Scualified inspectors shall pe rf orm inspection using proper equipment that has been calibrated in compliance with the requirements of Section 17.2.12.

Inspectors shall be qualified in accordance with appropriate crite ria and applicable codes, standards, and training programs. Inspector qualifications and certifications shall be kept current.

Routine in process inspections required during maintenance and operations shall be pe rf ormed by qualified personnel of the plant staff or delegated organizations. Specific elements of work requiring quality acceptance shall be identified by the (A staff who shall perform the inspection and witness testing either at the plant or vendor f acilities.

Acceptance inspection activities are performed by qualified inspection personnel who have not performed the work to be inspected. Inspection l results are evaluated to determine that requirements have been satisfied.

Inspection requireme nt s , based on applicable requirements of codes, stand-ards and regulatory guides, are translated into inspection programs or plans by the manufacturing activities, to provide docume nte d records of the inspection ef fo rts required to assure quality. Inspection plans shall make use of in p ocess and final inspection operations, as required.

Mainte nance and modification procedures are reviewed by qualified personnel to determine the necessary requirements related to such items as inspection, designation of inspection personnel and the need for documenting the results of subsequent inspections. Inspection of a repair or modification shall be pe rf ormed by the same method and to the same criteria as the original inspection, or by an approved alternate method.

Inspeccion operations, including monitoring, witne ssing and/or auditing, shall be documente d and validated by inspection stamps and/or inspectors sign-off.

O 17.2-22 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE a

17.2.10.2 Authority Controls

("N The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-zations and participate in inspections at selected vendors' facilities, to verify program ' implementation in accordance with approved QA Progran requirements.

! 17.2.11- TEST CONTROL

'17.2.11.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program defines the basic requirements for all organizations performing tests on safety-related materials, equipment, components, systems and structures throughout all phases of operation.

Tests performed after modification, repair or replacement shall be in accordance with the original design testing requirements or acceptable alternatives. The extent of testing shall be based on the complexity of the modifications, replacements or repairs. Acceptable alternatives must be approved by an appropriately designated organization.

The Authority's program requires that tests necessary to demonstrate that l materials, equipment, components, systems and structures will perform satisfactorily in service shall be undertaken in accordance with written l procedures, as required. These procedures are based on codes, standards, and applicable regulatory requirements. The test procedures, to the extent applicable, shall include provisions to assure that all prerequisites have l been met- prior to further processing, such as the availability- of hd appropriate calibrated equipment, completeness of the item, condition of the item, proper environmental conditions, and arrangements for witness of mandatory tests by the Authority, contractor or authorized inspector. Test procedures shall be sufficient'in detail, and will include caution or safety notes, so that the test operator interpretation is not required.

Test personnel will be trained, qualified and certified, as necessary, for the various test functions. Test results shall be documented with sufficient . detail to prevent misinterpretation. The organization that develops the design objectives or test limits, or other duly authorized l organization, establishes the acceptance criteria. Test results ' will be evaluated in accordance with the established criteria by a qualified, responsible individual or group. Test records will be filed and stored in an appropriate manner upon completion of the test and evaluation.

The operating organization will conduct tests and test control activities at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

4 i .

s

_ , , M N.

4 AA -

M.

s N 17.2-23 Rev. 2 7/84 k h M g 4

% .xi -s 1 y b" s

JAF FSAR UPDATE 17.2.11.2 Authority Controls The Authority will review, comment, and concur with selected written test procedures and specifications related to : testing, instrumentation and its maintenance and calibration, environme ntal conditions require d for the performance of the test, and the acceptance limits relating to the test.

The Authority will review, comne nt , and concur with the tests specified in procurement documents.

The Authority will review and comment on methodc of docunenting and recording test data and results.

The Authority will witness sele cted tests at vendor facilities and witness selected tests at the plant.

The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organi-zations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements. I 17.2.12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 17.2.12.1 General Description The Authority's (guality Assurance Program defines the requireme nts fcr the control of measuring and test equipme nt throughout all phases of measureme nt, inspection and monitoring of safety related materials, compone nts , systems and structures during operations. The Authority's program require s that all organizations pe rf orming me a sureme nt , inspection and testing of safety-related materials, compone nts , systems, st ructure s, and installation have written procedures that are based on applicable requireme nts of codes, standards and re gulatory guides, describing the ide ntification, control, maintenance, and calibration of all measuring and test equipme nt. The procedure s must include calibration techniques, calibration frequency, and refe re nce transfer standards that are require d.

These procedures are for measuring and test equipment used in checking, repairing, maintaining, modifying or installing safety-related systems or compone nts. It also includes permanent plant instruments whose calibration is a pre requisite of system surveillance and te sting as required by Technical Specifications.

All measuring and test equipment shall be uniquely identified and have tr.aceability to the calibration records and technical data. Identification shall include the use of labels , tags, decals, etc., affixed to the equipme nt , when practical, denoting the date of calibration and the due date of the next calibration.

O 17.2-24 Re v. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE D.

(d Calibration f requency shall be dependent on the required accuracy, purpose, degree of usage, stability characteristics, manuf acture r's recommendations, or other conditions af fecting the measurement.

The reference and transfer standards shall be traceable to nationally recognized standards and, for any exceptions, provisions shall be made to l docume nt the basis for calibration. Calibration standards shall have an uncertainty (error) requirement of not more than 0.25 of the tolerance of the equipment being calibrated. A greate r uncertainty, limited by the

" s tate -of -the -a rt" , may be acceptable.

In the event measuring or test equipment is determined to be out of calibra-tion, an investigation shall be conducted to determine the validity of pre vious inspections pe rf ormed with this equipment. The results of this investigation shall be documented and, if required, previous inspection requirements will be repeated using calibrated equipment.

The operating organization shall control measuring and test equipment used l at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Operation Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.12.2 Authority Controls The Authority will pe rform planned and pe riodic audits of delegated p)

(

%d organizations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.13 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 17.2.13.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program de fine s the requirements for handling, storage and shipping activities performed on all safety-related equipment. The Authority's Program requires that organization's performing l handling, storage and shipping activities do so to written procedures, as appropriate. These proce dure s, based on applicable requirements of codes and standards, have provisions for handling, cleaning, preservation, storage, packaging and shipping of equipment, as required.

The written procedures include detailed requirements for cleaning, coating and specifying environmental conditions for handling, storage and shipping. l

! The written procedures describe special handling and precautions required during unloading or storage at the plant and other storage locations. The procedures contain the inspection instructions necessary to verify conformance with established criteria using qualified personnel, as required. l o /

- 17.2-25 Rev. 2 l 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE l Whe n necessary, the procedures specify the inspection and the inspection frequency of items in storage to preclude damage, loss or deterioration from environments such as corrosive atmosphere, moisture and temperature.

The operating organization will control handling, storage and shipping activities at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.13.2 Authority Controls The Authority will review specifications, drawings, procedures and inst ruc-tions which contain the requirements for handling, storage, shipping, cle aning, preservation and maintenance of material and equipment whether in storage or installed at the plant as structures, systems or components.

The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organizations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 17.2.14.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program describes the requirements for the control of inspection, test and operational status of all safe ty-re late d material, equipment and structures.

The organizations that perform tests and inspections on safety-related items of nuclear power plants have established measures for identifying the test, inspection or operating status of these items. Such measure s conform to applicable codes and standards, and are implemented by written procedure s which describe the use of indicators, such as tags, markings, shop travellers, stamps, route cards or inspection checklists that identify the status of the items at any given time.

Only authorized personnel are permitted to apply or remove tags, markings, or stamps to or from the equipment and/or the documentation. Stamps, such l

as for welding, inspection of test, are controlled and documented such that the individual using the stamp is readily and uniquely identified.

l The program assures that inspections and tests performed out of sequence are adequately documented and do not compromise system integrity.

l The procedure s provide for positive identification and control of nonconforming items in accordance with Section 17.2.15 to prevent their inadvertent use.

O 17.2-26 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE

[ ) The program require s that whe n bypassing or waiver of a de signated QC inspection, test or catical work operation is required, it shall be controlled under congnizant QA personnel.

The operating organization will maintain the inspection, test, and operational status of all safety-related material, equipment and st ructure s at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.14.2 Authority Controls The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organizations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS 17.2.15.1 General Description The Authority's Operation Quality Assurance Program de scribe s the requireme nts for the disposition, handling and ' control of nonconforming material during operation. The Authority's system for control of nonconformances provides measures for nonconformances, observed by Authority personnel, to be documented, reviewed, dispositioned, and transmitted to the responsible delegated organization for corrective action. The documentation (q shall fully identify the ite m,- nonconforming characteristics, inspection C/ requirements, the specific requirements violated, the disposition of the nonconformances, and the appropriate approval of the disposition.

The program provides for the identification of pe rsonnel or group (s) responsible for assigning dispositions to nonconforming items. Dispositions authorizing a change in requirements shall be made by the same personnel or group (s) respcnsible for establishing the original requirement or by another authorized organization.

The Authority's program also requires that nonconforming items be clearly identified by appropriate means (tags, labels , stickers, marking, etc.) and segre gated, if practical, until the disposition instructions for the nonconforming item have bee n received. The description of nonconformance identified as "use as is" or " repair" are reviewed for acceptability by Quality Assurance and/or cognizant technical personnel.

Measures have been established in the program to assure that nonconformance data related to work performed at the Contractor / major vendor's f acilities, relative to "use as is" or " repair" dispositions are reflected in the inspection records and forwarded to the plant to be retained as part of the plant records following a review for acceptability by Quality Assurance and/or cognizant technical personnel.

Acceptability of rework or repair of materials, parts, components, systems, y

and structure s is verified by reinspe cting and retesting the item as

originally inspected and tested or by a method which is equivalent to the 17.2-27 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE original inspection and testing methods and inspection, testing, rework , and repair procedures are documented.

The program require s identification, classification, resolution and follow-up of material nonconformances which are detected during the course of operation activities. Pe riodic reviews are made of material rionconformance l reports by Authority Quality Assurance personnel. The se reviews are performed and results are documented and reported to appryriate management.

The Authority's program provides measures to prevent inadvertent use or installation of safety-related materials, parts and components when determined to be in noncompliance with the requirements of applicable codes, standards, drawings, specifications and procurement documents.

The operating organization will control nonconforming items at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.15.2 Authority Controls The Authority will review and comment on selected deficiency reports generated by delegated organizations at vendor facilities.

The Authority will verify, at the plant, that rework and repair activities are accomplished in accordance with disposition instructions.

The Authority will pe rf orm planned and pe riod3 0 Audits of dele gated O organizations to verify program implementation in :ccordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.16 CORRECTIVE ACTION 17.2.16.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program de scribe s the requirements for a corrective action program and assure s that conditions adverse to or affecting quality are promptly identified, reported and corre cte d. The Authority's Program provides for systematic analysis of deficiencies, including nonconformance reports, the determination of the need for corrective action and the reporting to an appropriate level of the management, the condition, cause and corrective action taken.

The Authority's Procram require s identification cf the significant conditions adverse to or affecting quality and the need for corrective action to be docume nted. The circumstances creating or contributing to the adverse condition, the action nece ssary to correct the condition, and measures taken to preclude recurrence are determined and documented by the organization responsible for implementing the needed correctim action.

O 17.2-28 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE k) m Follow-up action is taken to verify that specified corrective action has been - properly implemented. Verification of proper implementation, or any action taken which is not considered acceptable, is documented and distributed to appropriate levels of management. This distribution includes management of the. organization responsible for implementation of the specified corrective action.

Reports of the conditions adverse to quality are formally issued to appropriate levels of management of affected organizations.

Records are maintained to substantiate that these corrective action measures have been properly implemented. This corrective action system is implemented through the use of approved written procedures.

If the specified disposition for corrective action affects design of structure s, systems or equipment, a technical review shall be made by the organization that 9stablished the original design criteria, or by . othe r qualified responsible organizations delegated by the Authority to verify adequacy of the stated disposition.

' A corrective action system will be implemented at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the requirements of the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.16.2 Significant Deficiencies

'v In accordance with NRC regulatory requirements, significant deficiencies which are determined to be within the scope of the Code of Federal Regulation, 10 CFR 21, will be reported to the NRC Directorate of Inspection and Enforcement 17.2.16.3 Authority Controls The Authority will review and concur with corrective action in conjunction with nonconformance documents.

The Authority will pe rform planned and pe riodic audits of delegated organizations to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

7.2.17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS

'17.2.17.1 General Description The Authority's Operation Quality Assurance Program requires that quality records of safety-related items and activities shall be ide ntified, reviewed, retained and retrievable. These requirements are imposed on all organizations performing safety-related functions during ope ration. The n

(v) 17.2-29 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE quality program describes the requirements for record storage facilities which shall be constructed, located and se cured in such a manner as to p re ve nt destruction of the records through f i re , flooding, theft and dete rioration by environmental conditions. Records generated during the design, procurement and construction phases, shall be maintained and stored in the same described manner.

The Authority's program requires that records generated during the operation phase, documenting evidence of quality of items and activities, include such items as: operating logs; principal maintenance and modification activities; results of reviews, inspections, tests, audits; abnormal occurence s ;

monitoring of work performance and material analysis; the qualification of pe rsonnel, procedure s , and equipment; and othe r documentation such as drawings, specifications, procurement documents, calibration p rocedure s, calibration reports, design changes, and nonconforming and corrective action reports.

Requirements for identification, transmittal, retention, maintenance, and review of quality related records are indicated in specifications, quality programs and procedures. Documentary evidence of these activities shall be available at the plant prior to release of material or equipment for instal-lation.

The quality program specifies the type of information and data to be compiled for the inspection records, such as: description of operation; evidence of completion or verification of manuf acturing, inspection or test operation; inspection and test results; information concerning nonconformances; and acceptability of the item tested or inspected The qualifications training records of test and inspection personnel shall also be documented.

The operating organization will maintain and store records at the plant in accordance with approved written procedures which conform to the Authority's Quality Assurance Program.

17.2.17.2 Authority Controls The Authority maintains records ge ne rated by Authority personnel, both onsite and offsite, in accordance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Program.

The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organizations to verify implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

17.2.18 AUDITS 17.2.18.1 General Description The Authority's Quality Assurance Program includes a comprehensive system of O

17.2-30 Rev. 2 7/94

d JAF FSAR UPDATE P l anned and periodic audits to be carried out by the Authority Quality Assurance organization to . verify compliance with all aspects of the Program. This audit system provides data for a continuing evaluation of the effectiveness of the program. In addition, surveillance audits are conducted routinely on an- unscheduled basis of ongoing or day-to-day activities to verify satisfactory completion of the activity.

The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated organizations to verify program implementations in accordance with appropriate QA program requirements. Specific program areas are i subsequently audited, consistent with the project schedule or where quality concerns are noted, so that the total program is reaudited within a scheduled period of time.

Audits are performed in accordance with pre-established procedures, check-lists, etc., and conducted by trained personnel not having direct

-responsibilities in the areas being audited.

The Authority's audit program requires audit results to be documented,

! reviewed by or with management . responsible for the area audited, and i appropriate action initiated to correct any deficiencies. The organization t

conducting the audit is responsible for conducting the follow-up actions

- including reaudit of deficient areas to assure correction of the discrepancies. Results of audits are summarized in audit reports which are reviewed by Quality Assurance.

O The Authority's audit program, as defined in the Authority's Quality Assurance Program, includes the following types of audits to provide a l comprehensive, independent verification and evaluation of all quality i

related procedures and activities to assure they are in compliance with the

- Authority's established program requirements:

1) Audits of delegated organizations

2) Audits of selected vendors and contractors

3) Audits of plant operation activities

4) . Audits internal to the Authority Independently, or concurrent with the audits and inspections by delegated organizations, the Authority may conduct audits of vendors and contractors such a= equipment fabricators, material suppliers, consultants and various contractors working on plant activities.

17.2.18.2 Authority controls The Director-Qh, based on his review, reports audit findings and the actions to be taken to correct the deficient conditions to the Vice

• President-Quality Assurance and Reliability. These reports also serve as a O

17.2-31 Rev. 2 7/84

~ ,y v-,--, , - w --,,,----w ,w v% ,, y  :,,-,,--,w y------ve w e, -~.ww -y .-.v----re--mw-,--,.---m m,-w--,-vrw----,-v------.---wr,,w ve ,-v s

JAF FSAR UPDATE source of information for the Authority's Quality Assurance Program evaluation by management.

The Authority will perform planned and periodic audits of delegated O organizations and participate in audits at selected vendors' facilities to verify program implementation in accordance with approved QA Program requirements.

O r

l l

l 17.2-32 Rev. 1 7/83

JAF FSAR UPDATE APPENDIX 17.2A ARCHITECT-ENGINEER / CONSULTANTS The ' . Authority may . delegate .to Architect-Engineers / Consultants quality l

j. W affecting activities ' f or- modifications and/or additional facilities or services. . Any work so delegated shall be in accordance with an approved Quality Assurance Program and implementing procedures as may'be required for the' performance of such tasks..

J, A

v s

j 5

4

-O J'

i s

y e

4 ,

Y p-i i.

i 4

5 6 i

8 17.2A-1 Rev. 2 7/84 i

j. i 7

JAF FSAR UPDATE APPENDIX 17.2B G

CONFORMANCE WITH NRC REGULATORY GUIDES

1. Personnel Selection and Training (Regulatory Guide 1.8, March 1971)

The selection and training of personnel used at the Nuclear Power Plant conforms with Regulatory Guide 1.8.

2 Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Design and Construction)

(Fegulatory Guide 1.28, June 1972)

The design and construction of safety-related structures, systems, and components resulting f rom modifications or design changes are subject to quality assurance requirements that comply with the positions defined in Regulatory Guide 1.28, which endorses ANSI N45.2-1971,

" Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Powrtr Plants".

Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and

3. Luality Assurance Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment ( Regulatory Guide 1.30, August 1972)

The installation, inspection, and testing of all IEEE Class IE electric instrumentation, control equipment and systems, including power, auxiliary equipment and associated mate rial, comply with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.30.

I I

'd 4. Quality Assurance Program Requireme nts (Operation) (Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972)

The Quality Assurance requirements for the operation of the nuclear power plant comply with Regulatory Guide 1.33.

5. Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants ( Regulatory Guide 1.37, March 1973)

The Quality Assurance requirements for cleaning of fluid systems and l associated components comply with Regulatory Guide 1.37, with the following exceptions:

Regulatory Position C.3 - Safety-related systems othe r than the followings

a. Reactor coolant pressure boundary

b. Systems required for reactor shutdown

c. Systems required for emergency core cooling

d. Reactor vessel internals that are relied upon to permit adequate core cooling for any mode of normal operation or under credible postulated accident conditions, q

r i

V 17.2B-1 Rev. 2 7/84

{ _ _

JAF FSAR UPDATE a re flushed with water in accordance with ANSI N45. 2.1-73, except that the quality of water is as close as practical to that of the operating ll system water. The systems listed comply with NRC Regulatory Position C.3. These are the most critical systems in a plant and must be care-fully protected from contamination, especially for stainless steel systems. For other QA Category I systems it is adequate to use water defined by ANSI N45. 2.1-73, except that the flush water is matched as close as practical to that intended for system operation. For example, demineralized wate r is used for systems that operate with de mi ne ra li ze d /de io ni ze d /conde nse d wa t e r . It is not necessary to flush such systems with water containing 0.15 ppm chlorides when the 1.0 ppm maximum chlorides required by ANSI would be adequate to prevent contamination.

6 Quality Assurance Requireme nts for Packaging, Shipping, Re ce iving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Wate r-Coole d Nuclear Powe r Plants (Regulatory Guide 1.38, March 1973) l The Quality Assurance re quireme nts for p. Iging, shipping, receiving, storage, and handling comply with Regulatory Guide 1.38, with the f ollowing exceptions :

a. Regulatory Position C. 3 - Tapes, dessicants and dessicant bags do not contain the following as a basic and essential chemical constituent: lead, zinc, copper, me rcury, cadmium and othe r low melting point metals, their alloys, and/or compounds.

b. As pre scribed in ANSI N45.2.2-1972, maximum levels of wate r l

leachable chloride s , total halogens, and sulfur and their compounds are imposed upon tapes,

c. Dessicants and dessicant bags contain nonhalogenated and nonsulfur bearing materials.

7. Housekeeping Requireme nts for Water-Cooled Nuclear Powe r Plants (Regulatory Guide 1.39, March 1973)

The housekeeping program complies with Regulatory Guide 1.39.

8. The Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Plant ( Regulatory Guide 1.54, June 1973)

The Quality Assurance requirements for protective coatings comply with Regulatory Guide 1.54, with the following exceptions:

In lieu of the inspection defined in Section 6.2.4 of ANSI N101.4-1972, inspection is in accordance with ANSI N5.12-1974 Section 10, Inspection for Shop and Field Work.

Regarding the extent of coverage, the following offers clarification of paragraph 1.2.4 of ANSI N101.4-72:

O 17.2B-2 Rev. 2 7/84

. . _ _ - . - _ . _ _ _ m __ m_.

JAF FSAR UPDATE t .a

. Regulatory _ Guide 1.54 will be applied as follows: ,

.x .

/ a. . Surfaces within the primary containnent liner boundary:

.Q)

i) -For large : surface area components,. the documents shall be retained by . the Authority as required by_ ANSI .N101.4-72.

These ' components include such items as the reactor building

= crane, containment,_ structural steel (including miscellaneous steel and handrails), concrete, ductwork, uninsulated pipe, ..

exterior of .uninsulated tanks and vessels, and major equipment. supports.

+

ii) For manufactured equipment such as pumps, motors, pipe

. hangers .and supports, the documentation required by ANSI N101.4-72 shall be maintained in the Seller's files for the complete duration of the contract warranty / guarantee

-period. A certificate . of compliance - signed by responsible management personnel shall be furnished by the Seller.

~

t g b '. Other surfaces where coating failure could compromise the design  !

function of equipment or- components intended to prevent or i mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents which could affect the public health and safety.

Be'cause of the' impracticability of imposing the Regulatory Guide

. requirements on the- standard shop process used in painting valve bodies, handwheels, electrical cabinetry and control panels, f

loudspeakers, emergency light cases and like components, the Regulatory Guide will not be' invoked for these items since the total surface of such items is relatively small when compared to the total surface area for which the requirements will be imposed.

The reference substitution of ANSI N5.12 as the basis for inspection, rather than-ANSILN5.9 reflects a revision to a standard referenced in

- the based document, ANSI . N101.4.

9 Qualification .of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and I

Testing Personnel (Regulatory Guide 1.58. Revision 1, September 1980) and J

of. nuclear power plant inspection, examination, Qualification testing personnel complies with Regulatory Guide 1.58, . which. endorses ANSI N45.2.6-1978, " Qualifications of Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel for the Construction Phase of Nuclear . Power Plants",

with the following exceptions:

a. Regulatory Position C.6 -

Education and Experience -

Recommendations ,

s-F O '

t_) -

' 17.2B-3 Rev. 1 8 7/83 i

y ...e. v. ,gn. .--n . , , . . - , , . . , _ , - , , , , - - - . - - - - - . . -.---m. vs, n,--.,--.n..,,..,_.-,, - -.m m n , ym

JAP FSAR UPDATE An individual's technical training, experience and performance capability are the more significant paramete rs for establishing qualifications. The Authority will comply with the requirements of the ANSI Standard, in lieu of Regulatory Position C.6.

b. Regulatory Position C.10 - Determination of Initial Capability and Evaluation of Performance De termination of the qualifications of a new Authority employee will be accomplished in accordance with the requireme nts of Section 3.5 of the ANSI Standard amplified by the following: all new Authority employees are assigned a probationary period. During this period, new employees receive on-the-job training and assigned work tasks. An ongoing evaluation of the employee 's pe rf ormance is conducted by appropriate supe rvision and, at the end of the probationary period, the evaluation is documented.

Depending upon education, experience and day-to-day pe rf ormance , a person may or may not be qualified until the probationary evaluation has been completed. The Authority utilizes this evaluation process as the measure for determining an individual's competence prior to formal certification. In addition, written or oral tests may be used in conjunction with the evaluation as determined and directed by the appropriate supetvisor to verify satisfactory experience.

Authority personnel and personnel provided by a contractor to the Authority for plant quality assurance services comply with the above mentioned Regulatory Guides and their associated ANSI standards including the alternative provided herein with regard to qualifications.

10 Quality Assurance Requirements for the De s ign of Nuclear Power Plants (Regulatory Guide 1.64, October 1973)

The Quality Assurance requireme nts for the design or design change resulting in modification of the nuclear power plant comply with Regulatory Guide 1.64.

11. Quality Assurance Te rms and Definitions ( Re gulatory Guide 1.74, February 1974) l The nuclear power plant Quality Assurance Program degree of compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.74 is as follows:

The Authority uses the appropriate definitions of ANSI N45.2.10-1973.

12. Preoperational and Initial Startup Test Programs for Water-Cooled Powe r Reactors (Regulatory Guide 1.68)

Not applicable for our phase of operations.

O 17.2B-4 Rev. 2 7/84 e

U JAF FSAR UPDATE

13. Collection, Storage, and ' Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality y - Assurance Records (Regulatory Guide 1.88, Revision 2, October 1976)

L /:

Regulatory Guide 1.88 Revision . 2, endorses the . requirements and guidelines as specificed in ANSI N45-2.9-1974. The Authority, however, has taken an exception to the four hour fire-rating criterion used in the ANSI' standard for the construction of an archival storage facility. A two hour fire-rating criterion, as specified in a revised ANSI standard (ANSI N45.2.9-1979), will be utilized.

Collection, storage and . naintenance of nuclear power plant Quality Assurance records will continue to conform with Pegulatory Guide 1.88, Rev. 2. The one exception is the utilization of a fire-rating of two hours for constructing archival storage facilities instead of four hours.

14 Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Pe rsonnel for Nuclear Power Plants (Regulatory Guide 1.146, August 1980)

Qualification of Quality Assurance pe rsonnel for nuclear power plants conforms with Regulatory Guide 1.146 with the following exceptions:

Certifications for lead auditors shall be accomplished and documented in accordance with ANSI N45.2.23 with the alternative of satisfying paragraph 4.2 as indicated below. The need for certification in accordance with the~ requirements of paragraph 4.2 shall be determined 4 on an individual basis commensurate with previous experience and training. The Authority designated Quality Assurance supervisors may waive the requirements for paragraph 4.2 and utilize the following type data for purposes of certification of a lead auditors a) Experience records which include identification of the performance of audits necessary to fulfill the requirements of paragraph 2.3.4 whether performed through previous employment or with the Authority.

b) Ce rtification records to N45.2.23 from a previous employe r, if applicable.

c) On-the-job training with the Authority s taf f to become knowledgeable of our audit program and related procedures.

d) Participation in audits with and under the direction of Authority lead auditors.

The objective evidence of qualification in such cases would be maintenance of the experience records from previous employment, records of on-the-job training, and identification of the audit reports performed with and under the supervision of an Authority lead auditor in lieu of a specific examination. Final authority for certification shall be the responsibility of the Authority designated Quality Assurance-supervisors.

b] -

17.2B-5 Rev. 2 7/84

APPINDIX 17.2C PLANT ADMINISTRATIVJ PROCEDURES GENERAL LIST Title

_.O  !

'(] Plant Organization Plant Operating Review Comunittee Procedure Control Security Emergency Radiation Safety Reporting of Significant Occurences Work Requests Work Permits Wasta Kelease Permits Plant Modifications Jumper Control Training Quality Control Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment Document Control Operations Surveillance Test Procedures Maintenance Procedures Operating Procedures Instrument Surveillance Procedures Instrument Maintenance Procedures Special Nuclear Material Controls Conduct of Operations Conduct of Maintenance Conduct of I & C O' Conduct of Radiological and Chemical Services Conduct of Technical Services Plant Safety Warehouse Controls Start-up Test Controls Preoperational Tests Controls Control of Equipment Markups, Etc.

Maintenance of Plant Records Administrative Controls l

l l

17.2C-1 Rev. 1

! 7/83 1

.O V

i 1

l i

c_ _ . -

JAF FSAR UPDATE APPENDIX 17.2D 7

QA PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION

- (v(

Qualification requirements , have , been established for activities requiring various levels. of proficiency and training for personnel on an individual basis. _ Personnel assigned to perform Quality Assurance activities will have qualifications that are commensurate with the responsibilites with which they . are charged. Quality Assurance personnel will have demonstrated their ability .to perform competently in' those areas for which they will be held responsible. Qualifications of personnel performing QA functions shall be determined f rom the following data:

Education

a. A degree in engineering or a related field of study.

~b. Where a college degree' has not been obtained, two years of l experience' in the paragraph "Expe rience Requirements - Area" below, will be acceptable in lieu of each year of college level education. This requirement is based on a four year accredited curriculum.

Experience Requirements - Area s

a. Design m

b. Construction i

c. Operation

d. Quality Assurance

e. Nuclear Experience Requirements - Years The required number of years of experience, listed herinafter, shall be the sum of all the years in any or all of the areas listed in the E::perience paragraph above, plus a degree in engineering or a related field of study.

Position - HQ Experience Years

+

Vice President-Quality 10

• Assurance & Reliability i Director-Quality. Assurance 7*

QA Managers 7 QA Engineers 5 4

f~

17.2D-1 Rev. 2 7/84

JAF FSAR UPDATE Position - Plant Experience Years QA Superintendent 7*

QA Supervisors 5 VA Engineers 5 QC Supervisors 5 Plant QC personnel shall be certified based on the experience and education requiremnts as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.58 (Qualification of Nuclear Power aAant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel) and ANSI N45.2.6 (Qualifications of Inspection, Exanination, and Te sting Eb rsonnel for l Nuclear Power Plants) per Appendix 17.2B. The expe rience level certification shall be commensurate with the activity to be performed.

Qualification requireme nts have been established for QA pe rsonne l, not included in this appendix, commensurate with training and expe rience necessary to perform a designated function.

• At least one (1) year of this experience ahall be associated with work on nuclear power plants, in the implementation of the QA Program.

O 17.2D-2 Fev. 2 7/84

"N I

p, 1

(

LJ PRESIDENT 3 AND CHIEF OPER ATING OFFICER I E I

i I u VICE PRESIDENT

- - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - ~ ~

GUALITY ASSURANCE

, 8 RELI ABILITY NUCLEAR GENERATION i' ao r I a I E e

5 DIRECTOR VICE PRESIDENT O NUCLEAR SUPPORT O QUALITY ASSURANCE .-_--____-----------------T-- ---

l w l DIVISION l I

i l

i l l I

i NUCLEAR GENERATION OUALITY ASSURANCE  ! l DIRECTORS / I 1 MANAGERS l 1 MANAGERS l j , y _

l E > E I 6 5 m l y $

OUALITY ASSURANCE ____-_ ---_____ .-____

RESIDENT --__------]

I q 2! SUPERINTENDENT MANAGER l

' 04 d s i E

< 99 i z

< 1

- #4 0 4 a l l i

e l e 4

Zb Q>

E  !

i 0 oz x QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY CONTROL _ _ _ _ _ _ SUPERINTENDENT i 5 C

b$

> _d_

SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR OF POWER E ZO l '

i 52 att g

i g O$ ----- COMMUNICATION

, v" 2 ,

i o O m >

-1 m

8 2

S2S P

%UR RE P

A N R EE 3 I CN

.O.I OR R P N P

- G N

I Y I P E R R O &

A T

E R

C E

S R I

A E QE N

N GI O E Sl L g Av LA g Il QR I ANS E ll NR P RE U I S s

s S ET G e E TXAg N T

I R q I A R A INE g T AT R A .E N S N I QID r T IL E s E RRC D N

U A

• R E U

" .N E C 1 AN S = I A T 0" E OM

' S IE ImE N.C A M

! l

.Evl E P

AR

.ES TMC N

E EN S U

M VA E

E I RSL U IL R

O N

O C CEE S i

I T

ORV CV CC N l j RTR PNU Il QRE QE P

A T Y N T OS P U S R E R s IN U D u O S

I S lB T S EAIA I C E A I i iI I g i l i I ,n A RQL R Q Jj COgI L P E E R DI C _ R N O

I o

Y V 8 si I

T S Cv CC T TTR 3l QRE QE I

CRE P P L EOE u S N

I JPN s A S T

OPI RU.N I

U O

.C N

PS E

T N

Q ,E J

O E

D N

RmR

.E NP AT E

I I lR QN

.A ANE

.A R I G N

M E I

.EL P A T U

AC U TSR S _ S I QI D S R

.N CEE U T ECE A N&

EA I

I J VN R O Rl o R E. s i

D N

Q PS N E El Av QR i E .

E P

K u G T

N P.

R s I V E N L I R R O C E

/ A E P T P 0 I O E P N N U T

_ N E I

G S R

F T N AO A S E

- J QP E

1. R E

T O

N a D WEUihq {aE

.f

}>H O r h .D >* 2 wN 1>g 3 a g

> C4IO

- -Q O> O8,Z yd M <. g F }- e.- =eEm O 9"A n

,i! t

r NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY MAJOR CONTRACTOR, ARCHITECT ENGINEER,

, CONSULTANT, NSSS PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER l

l VICE PRESIDENT l QUALITY ASSURANCE l

8 RELI ABILITY I

DIRECTOR --- ~ - ~ ~

QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT

!O QUALITY

- ASSURANCE -------

QUALITY ASSURANCE REPRESEMAME

( l MANAGERS I

i i t

i I=

, a I

l 1

_______]

QUALITY ASSURANCE ___

SUPERINTENDENT RESPONSIBILITY i

--- COMMUNICATION JAMES A.FITZPATRICK FSAR UPDATE h

AUTHORITY AND MAJOR CONTRACTOR INTERFACE REv.2 JULY.1984 l FIGURE NO. 17.2-3

O O O h

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER u)

CE w

$ SENIOR EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE FIRST EXECUTIVE

$ VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT ' '

OU LITY ASSURANCE g PROCUREMENT S AND ^

CHIEF ENGINEER a RELIABILITY q CONTRACT ADMIN. GEN ER ATION ADMIN. OFFICER w

1 SAFETY

[ REVIEW y g E COMMITTEE 9 E O

" E ENGINEERING ' QA 8 RELI ABILITY HUMAN RESOURCES E

P

$ PROCUREMENT DEPARTMEN T NUCLEAR GENERATION DE PART ME N T DEPT.

E 4 & CONTRACT DEPT.

O5 2 ADMIN. DEPT. DESIGN 8 ANALYSIS PWR SUPPORT DOCUMENT CONTROL gS NR OJECTS WE6DMWME $ER. RECORDS h A .8 TRAINING

• rO h.

2 FUEL PROJECT SERVICES RAD. HEALTH 8 MANAGEMENT

@ ko O#

Y PROCUREMENT ENVIRONMENTAL @E R

FUEL HUMAN RESOURCES oO 6 NUCLEAR SAFETY EVAL GENERIC SUPPORT M

= gE - -

! EE F E

o h5

-4 d h 1 OUALITY ASSURANCE RESIDENT g jE $ 1 SUPERINTENDENT MANAGER n u> C y a 3 I;

m s

a 2

=

5

-a

/m ,

a e s s=

• Y a e, , .

V J e0CFnSO, V

a g

f 1

2 j

ft

~= **;

=7 3

-=

"3 .

=

e

8 I;

MY &j "* i:5 *

• PPE=o's e i a =

15 ;. *, = I s 3I $1 - I GuauTT c  : =  ;, Ba; gaf .. g o.3 gg g; gg  ; g AlluaanCE  ?,

t,3 8 .. e[

~ = g; vi

$g g* a  ; g g$" ,*

"c ...

$a$

5% ?j CRIT E tta y W I ax a U a 3 =

• a sg i $*l E * ,8. 8 sgl 3w 5:  :  ! "e I# *1 6 st g:'*:

E

.  :  ::  : e . .g 5 =: et es 5  : er: :I . 8  ::  :

auTee0erYT Qu ALI T Y I

, , 17J J 87.3.2 57.2 .S 17.2.4 17.2.5 17.2 .6 87.2.7 17.2.8 17.2.8 17.2.10 if2Js 17 2.32 I F.2.tl IF.2 J4 17 2 .85 17J J6 I?.2 J P IfJ.se es assu a L AUTMORITY I .I 20 S.4 4.0 S.0 6.8 7.8 8J S.6 10.8 45.8 12.8 85.9 14.1 19.2 16.8 a f.a is. s GuaLIT T l .2 2.2 S .2 S.2 7 .2 66 .3 le .2 ASSumamCE B.S 2.5 8.5 F .S se.4 18 .S 0CEQu.E ..S 2..  ;; ',;

1844uaL F .6 7 .7 c ar e*O OuatTY alluna wCE PeoCEDtmE YtTLE

t. QuateTT allueame.E Oasases2 af tou i 8 .2 DeGaus2af soas smTERFACE *es&JC3r ConvaaCTOR$

l .5 C0esOsttoeiaL RELE ASE asso STOP 50ps.Ptami s .4 DEt1TED. sesC0eP0aaTED se saat enassual f .S QuadatafsCes RE0ueREleENTS. Duties 440 Taasmen6 OF AuCETDAS 2.1 04 PROGaans SCOPE 2 .2 Ga PROGeaas SYaf ul REPORTue6 TD teamaGEestaf 2.5 essDOCTaemaT10e am0 inasenes4.m accmaamTERS 2 .4 Da Pm06aats ASSES $4st.af

5. 6 DEstem CoseTROL 4 PLauf aDessmeSTRAf tyt GENEAaL Pit 0CEDuRE S aRE * '

LeSTED em APPEasos3 87.2 8 0F GA P90Saan manuat.. 5, g PREPaAATIOm aseD PROCES$essG OF Ga pa0CloumES S.2 PeEPenafsom as$ PROCES$an6 0F 04 PROGaaans

4. 4 CowTROL OF ca asamuaLS 6.2 Comin0L OF Ca C08SESP0esDENCE

() 4.5 PROCESSesE 04 00Cuestaf75 t

'3 k' d f.e vEteDOR SELECitone aseD EveLuaTKas 7.2 tsoestT0eensG OF EarTEmmat A.E ONGam:2 aT 0ess DELEGATED PROCUREesENT ACTaviTIES ST THE AUT HostT V

?. S RECEtvem4 euSPECf 60m

7. 4 WEND 0a EveLuafi0m

?.S SWPPLet A QuaLIFICaTI0m UTsLt2ns6 TME CASE RE stSTE R 7.4 AUTMO#lTY Oa PamTiceraf en es TME CASE PROG #au 7.7 ComTRAC70aJvEmpon SvevEaLLassCE ser$PECTe0m e.e sotuf a C0eiTROL OF uaTERaat. pants e COUP 0nENTS 9.1 C0=Tn0L OF SPEC 4at pa0CE SSES 90.4 18esPECTION OF SuaLITT # ELATED aCT'VITIES I I .8 YEST CONTROL 12.8 CONTROL on estatuRING AND TEST E0ulPulleT IS.I Mam0Llest SYonAGE ase0 SeeiPPtmo 94.0 18eSPECT10N. TEST. AND OPER. STATUS 19 i OELE TED . CoutimED WlYu et.2 l S.2 CDuT91 0F enomCOssFORutus esATE Riat, P&ATS 04 C0mPoutufS 16 .f C0e#ECT svf aCYeon CONTROL PLauf 16 .2 DELETE D . Conse'mE O wit M 9 6 8 IG .S ComstECTivE ACTIOm CossTROL .seE A00uaRTtRS 14.4 CORRECTtWE ACTIOlu COmTROL/REcomestiscaf:04 APPRallat PROGAau e7.5 AUTMoltiTV Ga CEPanTtsEWT RECORO RETEnslom t 8.8 Ga aucif pm0Ga au . PL a mT 48.2 Ga FDA Conf maCTOsts Ase0 Sutcomf anCTORS 18.5 auDif 0F MAJOR C0minaCTORS .est a00uaaTEal 10.4 larTE mmaL anJDITS . seE ADouasTE RS 10.5 PROGRau aPPtalSALS JAMES A.FITZPATRICK FSAR UPDATE CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX p) s

'O OF IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS REV. 2 JULY.1984 l FIGURE NO. 17.2-5