|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20210K3631999-07-30030 July 1999 Marked-up & Revised TS Bases Page B 3/4 5-2 Re ECCS ML20196G3671999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing AOT for Crac from 30 Days to 60 Days on One Time Basis for Each Train to Facilitate on- Line Implementation of Design Enhancements During Current Operating Cycle ML20198E7411998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR-98-15,involving Relocation of TS 3/4.7.10 & Associated TS Table 3.7-3 to Technical Requirements Manual ML20198E7831998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages to LAR 98-09,re Editorial & Administrative Changes to TS ML20155J1821998-11-0404 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2b.1,removing Prescriptive Requirements of Using Venting Process as Sole Means to Verify That ECCS Piping Is Full of Water ML20249B4181998-06-17017 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20247R7021998-05-20020 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev of Refueling Water Storage Tank low-low Level Setpoint ML20217E8871998-04-22022 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle,Per GL 91-04 ML20217F9651998-04-21021 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3/4 5-5 Re Venting of Operating Chemical Vol & Control Sys Centrifugal Charging Pump ML20216C5921998-04-0808 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle Per GL 91-04 ML20217Q2981998-04-0303 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR 98-02,proposing Changes to TS to Accommodate Fuel Cycles of Up to 24 Months ML20217M3771998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20217F0961998-03-23023 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating New Spec 3.0.5 Administrative Controls,Currently Approved for Use in NUREG-1431 ML20217Q1031998-03-0505 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Programmatic Controls for Radioactive Effluents & for Environ Monitoring Conforming to Applicable Regulatory Requirements ML20217N7321998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Frequency for Performance of Specific Surveillances & Deleting Requirements for Accelerated Testing When Number of Valid Test Failures Associated W/Edgs Is Met or Exceeded ML20217N8211998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2B.1,excluding Prescriptive Requirement to Vent Operating CVCS CCP Casing ML20211E9981997-09-26026 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6,separating Requirements for CR HVAC Sys Re Operation of CR Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Sys Subsystem & CR Air Conditioning Subsystem ML20148G0011997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Replacing Term Zircaloy W/Terminology That Identifies NRC Approved Westinghouse Fuel Assembly Design Consisting of Assemblies W/Either ZIRLO or Zircaloy- 4 Fuel Cladding Matl ML20135C3541997-02-26026 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Retyped Page of Proposed Changes Re Design Features Fuel Assembly Reconstitution ML20134Q3451997-02-18018 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.3.1 Re Fuel Assemblies ML20134L8681997-02-12012 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0 Re Administrative Controls ML20129B8361996-10-17017 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-02, Proposing Changes That Involve Relocation of Four TS Re Instrumentation Requirements Contained in TS Section 3/4.3 & Relocation of Selected Requirements ML20129B7761996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-06, Proposing Four Changes Re EDG Requirements Contained in TS 3/4.8.1, AC Sources ML20113B2031996-06-20020 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Svc Water Cooling Tower Loop Electrical Supply ML20117K3111996-06-0404 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Leakage Testing Modifying Implementing Performance Based Program at Seabrook Station IAW 10CFR50,App J,Option B & Reg Guide 1.163 Requirements ML20094D5341995-10-30030 October 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage Pressure Isolation Valve Table ML20092M1071995-09-22022 September 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2,Table 3.3-3, ESFAS Instrumentation, Correcting Action Ref for Functional Unit 8.b Re Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump/Rwst Level low-low ML20098A4721995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Functional Unit 6.b, FW Isolation-Low RCS Tavg Coincident W/Rt from TS Requirements Manual Licensee Controlled Document ML20092K2201995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Plant TS Bases Section 3/4.9.1 for Refueling B Concentration ML20092F9171995-09-12012 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section Clarifying What Specifically Constitutes Operable Pressurizer Safety Valve in Mode 5 ML20092A6331995-09-0505 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoints & Max Allowable Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoints W/Inoperable Main Steam Safety Valves ML20091S1601995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20086R2111995-07-24024 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Table 3.4-1, RCS PIVs from TS 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage to Techical Requirements Manual ML20085L1161995-06-16016 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increased Requirements for Core Reactivity Control Available from Borated Water Sources ML20084U5521995-06-0707 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Amend Request 95-02, Revising Footnote to SR 4.4.7 & Table 3.4-2 to Increase Temp Limit at Which Rc O Levels Determined by Sampling from 180 Degrees F to 250 Degrees F ML20084N9561995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Operation of Core W/Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20082L5211995-04-16016 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.9.4 That Addresses Containment Bldg Penetrations to Allow Use of Alternate Containment Bldg Penetration Closure Methodologies for Postulated Accident Scenarios During Core Alterations ML20078E0491995-01-25025 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changing of Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.2.a from Specific Schedule for Performance of Containment ILRTs ML20078L5561994-11-23023 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Independent Technical Reviews ML20076G4701994-10-0707 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans,Per GL 93-07 ML20072G0371994-08-15015 August 1994 Proposed Bases of TS 3/4.1.1.3, Moderator Temp Coefficient & 3/4.3.3.2, Incore Detector Sys ML20059H6381994-01-14014 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Administrative Controls in Section 6.0 to Redefine Composition of Sorc,Create Station Qualified Reviewer Program,Delete Requirement to Perform Periodic Procedure Reviews & Revise TS 6.4.2.9 ML20058C3161993-11-23023 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Operation of Core within Axial Flux Difference Band Expanded from Current Band in TSs & Improved Fuel Cycle Mgt Through Implementation of Core Design Enhancements ML20059C5441993-10-28028 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Thirteen Line Item Improvements Recommended by GL 93-05, Line-Item TS Improvements to Reduce SRs for Testing During Power Operation ML20056F7671993-08-26026 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exercise of Enforcement Discretion from Requirement to Perform Channel Check on Narrow Range RWST low-low Level Transmitters ML20045C5571993-06-18018 June 1993 Proposed Tech Spec 6.2.3 Reflecting Title Change to Independent Technical Reviews & Deletion of Requirement to Maintain Five Person Organization,Iseg ML20045D5841993-06-18018 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Frequency of Surveillances, Required to Verify Integrity of CST Enclosure ML20127F8101993-01-13013 January 1993 Proposed TS 6.8.1.4 Re Submittal Frequency of Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept ML20117A8041992-11-25025 November 1992 Proposed Tech Specs for Incore Detector Sys ML20106E4181992-11-0303 November 1992 Proposed TS Section 6.2.2.f Deleting Requirement That Operations Manager Hold or Have Held Senior Reactor Operator License Prior to Assuming Operations Manager Position 1999-07-30
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20210R8051999-08-10010 August 1999 Startup Test Rept for Cycle 7 ML20210K3631999-07-30030 July 1999 Marked-up & Revised TS Bases Page B 3/4 5-2 Re ECCS ML20196G3671999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing AOT for Crac from 30 Days to 60 Days on One Time Basis for Each Train to Facilitate on- Line Implementation of Design Enhancements During Current Operating Cycle ML20198E7411998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR-98-15,involving Relocation of TS 3/4.7.10 & Associated TS Table 3.7-3 to Technical Requirements Manual ML20198E7831998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages to LAR 98-09,re Editorial & Administrative Changes to TS ML20155J1821998-11-0404 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2b.1,removing Prescriptive Requirements of Using Venting Process as Sole Means to Verify That ECCS Piping Is Full of Water ML20249B4181998-06-17017 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20247R7021998-05-20020 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev of Refueling Water Storage Tank low-low Level Setpoint ML20217E8871998-04-22022 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle,Per GL 91-04 ML20217F9651998-04-21021 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3/4 5-5 Re Venting of Operating Chemical Vol & Control Sys Centrifugal Charging Pump ML20216C5921998-04-0808 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle Per GL 91-04 ML20217Q2981998-04-0303 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR 98-02,proposing Changes to TS to Accommodate Fuel Cycles of Up to 24 Months ML20217M3771998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20217F0961998-03-23023 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating New Spec 3.0.5 Administrative Controls,Currently Approved for Use in NUREG-1431 ML20217Q1031998-03-0505 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Programmatic Controls for Radioactive Effluents & for Environ Monitoring Conforming to Applicable Regulatory Requirements ML20217N8211998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2B.1,excluding Prescriptive Requirement to Vent Operating CVCS CCP Casing ML20217N7321998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Frequency for Performance of Specific Surveillances & Deleting Requirements for Accelerated Testing When Number of Valid Test Failures Associated W/Edgs Is Met or Exceeded ML20217Q1111998-02-25025 February 1998 Rev 18 to Odcm ML20211F4401997-09-26026 September 1997 Cycle 6 Startup Test Rept for Seabrook Station,Unit 1 ML20211E9981997-09-26026 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6,separating Requirements for CR HVAC Sys Re Operation of CR Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Sys Subsystem & CR Air Conditioning Subsystem ML20195J1451997-07-23023 July 1997 Rev 15 to Seabrook Station Operating Experience Manual (Ssoe) ML20148G0011997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Replacing Term Zircaloy W/Terminology That Identifies NRC Approved Westinghouse Fuel Assembly Design Consisting of Assemblies W/Either ZIRLO or Zircaloy- 4 Fuel Cladding Matl ML20148K1251997-05-0707 May 1997 Rev 6 to Part I, Seabrook Station Pump & Valve IST Program Plan ML20135C3541997-02-26026 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Retyped Page of Proposed Changes Re Design Features Fuel Assembly Reconstitution ML20134Q3451997-02-18018 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.3.1 Re Fuel Assemblies ML20134L8681997-02-12012 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0 Re Administrative Controls ML20138J3351996-12-19019 December 1996 Rev 16 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML20129B8361996-10-17017 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-02, Proposing Changes That Involve Relocation of Four TS Re Instrumentation Requirements Contained in TS Section 3/4.3 & Relocation of Selected Requirements ML20129B7761996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-06, Proposing Four Changes Re EDG Requirements Contained in TS 3/4.8.1, AC Sources ML20113B2031996-06-20020 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Svc Water Cooling Tower Loop Electrical Supply ML20117K3111996-06-0404 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Leakage Testing Modifying Implementing Performance Based Program at Seabrook Station IAW 10CFR50,App J,Option B & Reg Guide 1.163 Requirements ML20115J7481996-03-26026 March 1996 Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination of Centrifugally Cast Stainless Steel Piping Using Low Frequency SAFT-UT System ML20138J3621996-03-21021 March 1996 Process Control Program ML20100G8351996-02-16016 February 1996 Startup Test Rept,Cycle 5. W/ ML20094D5341995-10-30030 October 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage Pressure Isolation Valve Table ML20092M1071995-09-22022 September 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2,Table 3.3-3, ESFAS Instrumentation, Correcting Action Ref for Functional Unit 8.b Re Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump/Rwst Level low-low ML20092K2201995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Plant TS Bases Section 3/4.9.1 for Refueling B Concentration ML20098A4721995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Functional Unit 6.b, FW Isolation-Low RCS Tavg Coincident W/Rt from TS Requirements Manual Licensee Controlled Document ML20092F9171995-09-12012 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section Clarifying What Specifically Constitutes Operable Pressurizer Safety Valve in Mode 5 ML20092A6331995-09-0505 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoints & Max Allowable Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoints W/Inoperable Main Steam Safety Valves ML20091S1601995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20086R2111995-07-24024 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Table 3.4-1, RCS PIVs from TS 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage to Techical Requirements Manual ML20085L1161995-06-16016 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increased Requirements for Core Reactivity Control Available from Borated Water Sources ML20084U5521995-06-0707 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Amend Request 95-02, Revising Footnote to SR 4.4.7 & Table 3.4-2 to Increase Temp Limit at Which Rc O Levels Determined by Sampling from 180 Degrees F to 250 Degrees F ML20084N9561995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Operation of Core W/Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20083K7351995-04-19019 April 1995 Rev 74 to Emergency Response Manual (Sser) ML20082L5211995-04-16016 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.9.4 That Addresses Containment Bldg Penetrations to Allow Use of Alternate Containment Bldg Penetration Closure Methodologies for Postulated Accident Scenarios During Core Alterations ML20081J6021995-03-22022 March 1995 Revised Table A.3-1, Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling & Analysis Program, to ODCM ML20078E0491995-01-25025 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changing of Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.2.a from Specific Schedule for Performance of Containment ILRTs ML20079B2491994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Changes to Part a of ODCM 1999-08-10
[Table view] |
Text
' '
TABLE 3.7-1 L'- <-
F*-
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE POWER RANGE NEUTRON FLUX HIGH SETPOINT WITH IN0PERABLE STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES DURING FOUR-LOOP OPERATION MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INOPERABLE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE POWER RANGE SAFETY VALVES ON ANY NEUTRON FLUX HIGH SETPOINT OPERATING STEAM GENERATOR (PERCENT OF RATED THERMAL POWER) v n
1 47 66 2
3 e 97 M L8 TABLE 3.7-2
~
^
STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES PER LOOP VALVE NUMBER Loop 1 Loop 2 Loop 3 Loop 4 LIFT SETTING * (* 3%)** ORIFICE SIZE
[
V6 V22 V36 V50 185 psig 16.0 sq. in.
~) V7 V23 V37 VS1 il sig 16.0 sq. in.
V8 V24 V38 V52 81cf -1330 psig 16.0 sq. in.
V9 V25 V39 V53 8116 4336 sig 16.0 sq. in.
V10 V26 V40 V54 1125 4355 psig 16.0 sq. in.
"The lift setting pressure shall correspond to ambient conditions of the valve at nominal operating temperature and pressure.
1
- 2_
l i
)
i SEABROOK - UNIT 1 3/4 7-2 Amendment No.15 ;
9509110116 950905 .
PDR ADOCK 05000443
- p. PDR
~
1 3/4.7 PLANT SYSTEMS _
BASES 3/4.7.1 TURBINE CYCLE 3/4.7.1.1 SAFETY VALVES The OPERABILITY of the main steam line Code safety valves ensures that the Secondary. System pressure will be limited to within 110% (1320 psia) of its design pressure of 1200 pila during the most severs anticipated system operational transient. The maximum relieving capacity is associated with a Turbine trip from 100% RATED THERMAL POWER coincident with an assumed loss of condenserheatsink(i.e.,nosteambypasstothecondenser).
The specified valve lift settings and relieving capaci es are in accor-dance with the requirements of Section III of the ASME Boi er and Pressure Code, (1974 Edition, including the Summer 1975 Addenda). The total relieving capac for all valves on all of the steam lines is 1. , 107 lbs/hr which
^1 s 1 of the total secondary steam flow of 1.514 x 107 O THE s/hr at 100% RATED POWER. A minimum of tc., CPERABLE safety valvas par steam ganarator ensures that sufficient relieving capacity is available for the allowable THERMAL POWER restriction in Table 3.7-1.
STARTUP and/or POWER OPERATION is allowable with safety valves inoperable within the limitations of the ACTION requirements on the basis of the reduction in Secondary Coolant System steam flow and THERMAL POWER required by the reduced Reactor trip settings of the Power Range Neutron Flux channels. The k.) Reactor Trip Satpoint reductions are derived on the following bases:
For four loop operation:
\ ,m ,m ....
">' x 109 -
SP = '^' ~X
, Where:
N, SP = Reduce eactor Trip Satpoint in percen RATED THERMAL g POWER, to V = Maximum number o operabl afety valves per steam line, 109 = Power Range Neutron ux- h Trip Satpoint for four loop h operation, b X = Total sving capacity of all safe valves per steam li n 1bs/hr, and
= Maxistura relieving capacity of any ons safety va. - in lbs/hr
% N j
SEABROOK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 7-1 Amendment No.15
. -. _ - . . . _ - . - -. . _ ~ - . - . - . - - - - - _
4 I
, INSERT "B 3/4.7.1.1" Hi o = (100/0,,te)*(W,*hr,*N/K - Occ,)
where: i Hi o = Safety Analysis power range high neutron flux setpoint, percent of RATED THERMAL POWER Q,,1w = RATED THERMAL POWER, Mwt Orc,= Reactor coolant pump heat Mwt K = Conversion factor, 3.412x10 6(Btu /hr)/Hwt hr, = heat of vaporization for steam at 110% of the Secondary System design pressure, Btu /lbm i
N = Number of loops in the plant W, = Minimum total steam flow rate, lbm/hr, of the operable MSSVs on ,
any one steam generator at the MSSV inlet pressure which assures all Secondary System pressures are no greater than 110% of design.
The steam flow rate through each operable MSSV is calculated with ,
consideration of 1) opening setpoint with allowance for as-found setpoint ,
tolerance, 2) accumulation, and 3) inlet pressure. For example, if the l maximum number of inoperable MSSVs on any one steam generator is one, then W, i is a summation of the calculated flow though each MSSV at the appropriate !
valve inlet pressure, excluding the MSSV with the highest flow. If the maximum number of inoperable MSSVs per steam generator is three, then W, is a summation of the calculated flow through each MSSV at the appropriate valve inlet pressure, excluding the three MSSVs with the highest flows. The !
following plant specific safety valve flow rates were used:
SG Safety Main Steam System Valve Number (Bank No.) Set Pressure (psia) Flow (lbm/hr per loop) 1 1200 893.160 2 1210 900,607 3 1220 908,055 4 1230 915,502 5 1240 922,950 The Safety Analysis limit values of the power range high neutron flux setpoints calculated from this algorithm are adjusted lower for use in Technical Specification 3.7.1.1 to account for instrument and channel uncertainties.
l l
l
l III. RETYPE OF LAR 95-04 PROPOSED CIIANGES The enclosed retyped pages reflect the currently issued version of Technical Specifications and 13ases. Revision bars are provided in the right margin to designate a change in the text.
I i
)
5
TABLE 3.7-1 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE POWER RANGE NEUTRON FLUX HIGH SETPOINT WITH INOPERABLE STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES DURING FOUR-LOOP OPERATION MAXIMUM NUMBER OF INOPERABLE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE POWER RANGE SAFETY VALVES ON ANY NEUTRON FLUX HIGH SETPOINT OPERATING STEAM GENERATOR (PERCENT OF RATED THERMAL POWER) 1 66 2 47 3 28 TABLE 3.7-2 STEAM LINE SAFETY VALVES PER LOOP VALVE NUMBER Looo 1 Looo 2 Loco 3 Looo 4 LIFT SETTING * ( 3%)" ORIFICE SIZE V6 V22 V36 V50 1185 psig 16.0 sq. in.
V7 V23 V37 V51 1195 psig 16.0 sq. in.
V8 V24 V38 V52 1205 psig 16.0 sq. in.
V9 V25 V39 V53 1215 psig 16.0 sq. in.
V10 V26 V40 V54 1225 psig 16.0 sq. in.
- The lift setting pressure shall correspond to ambient conditions of the valve at nominal operating temperature and pressure.
t l
l SEABROOK - UNIT 1 3/4 7-2 Amendment No. M.
3/4,7 PLANT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.7.1 TURBINE CYCLE 3/4.7.1.1 SAFETY VALVES The OPERABILITY of the main steam line Code safety valves ensures that the Secondary System pressure will be limited to within 110% (1320 psia) of its design pressure of 1200 psia during the most severe anticipated system operational transient. The maximum relieving capacity is associated with a Turbine trip from 100% RATED THERMAL POWER coincident with an assumed loss of condenser heat sink (i.e., no steam bypass to the condenser).
The specified valve lift settings and relieving capacities are in accor-dance with the requirements of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Code.
(1974 Edition. including the Summer 1985 Addenda). The total relieving capacity for all valves on all of the steam lines is 1.816 x 10' lbs/hr which is 120% of the total secondary steam flow of 1.514 x 10 lbs/hr at 100% RATED THERMAL 7
POWER. A minimum of two OPERABLE safetv valves )er steam generator ensures that sufficient relieving capacity is available for tie allowable THERMAL POWER restriction in Table 3.7-1.
STARTUP and/or POWER OPERATION is allowable with safety valves inoperable within the limitations of the ACTION requirements on the basis of the reduction in Secondary Coolant System steam flow and THERMAL POWER required by the reduced Reactor trip settings of the Power Range Neutron Flux channels. The Reactor Trip Setpoint reductions are derived on the following bases:
For four loop operations:
Hi @ = (100/0,,t,a) x $ x h; r x N) - Or, ;
K where:
Hi $ =
Safety Analysis power range high neutron flux setpoint.
percent of RATED THERMAL POWER
=
0,,teo RATED THERMAL POWER. Mwt Org
=
Reactor coolant pump heat. Mwt K =
Conversion factor. 3.412 x 106 (Btu /hr)/Mwt :
hr, -
heat of vaporization for steam at 110% of the Secondary System design pressure. Btu /lbm N -
Number of loops in plant W, = Minimum total steam flow rate, lbm/hr. of the operable MSSVs on any one steam generator at the MSSV inlet pressure which assures all Secondary System pressures are no greater than 110% of design.
l:
SEABROOK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 7-1 Amendment No. &
PLANT SYSTEMS BASFS 3/4.7.1 TURBINE CYCLE (Continued) 3/4.7.1.1 SAFETY VALVES The steam flow rate through each operable MSSV is calculated with consideration of 1) opening setpoint with allowance for as-found setpoint tolerance. 2) accumulation. and 3) inlet pressure. For example, if the maximum number of inoperable MSSVs on any one steam generator is one, then W3 is a summation of the calculated flow through each MSSV at the ap3ro3riate valve inlet pressure, excluding the MSSV with the liglest flow.
If the maximum number of inoperable MSSVs per steam ' generator is three. then W is a summation of the calcu~ ated flow throuah ~
each MSSV at the a)propriate valve inlet pressure, excluding the three MSIVs with t1e highest flows. The following plant specific safety valve flow rates were used:
SG Safety Main Steam System Valve Number (Bank No.) Set Pressure (psia) Flow (lbm/hr per loop) 1 1200 893.160 2 1210 900.607 3 1220 908.055 4 1230 915.502 5 1240 922.950 The Safety Analysis limit values of the power range high neutron flux set]oints calculated from this algorithm are adjusted lower for use in Tec1nical Specification 3.7.1.1. to account for instrument and channel uncertainties.
SEABROOK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 7-1A Amendment No. 46-
. _ - =-
}
l 1
I I
IV. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANT IIAZARDS FOR LAR 95-04 PROPOSED l CIIANGES
- 1. T__I
.L e proposed chances do not involve a sienificant increase in the probability or conseauences of an accident previously evaluated.
The proposed changes assure that the consequences of postulated overpressure events will remain in compliance with the Basis to Technical Speci6 cation 3.7.1.1. Specifically, the Secondary System pressure will be limited to within 110% (1320 psia) of its design pressure of 1200 psia during the most severe anticipated system operational transient. The most severe anticipated transient remains a Turbine trip from 100% Rated Thermal Power coincident with an assumed loss of condenser heat sink. No changes are made to the design or manner of operation of structures, systems or components. Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve an increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
- 2. The proposed chances do not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident nreviously evaluated.
As described above, the changes proposed in this LAR involve reducing the opening setpoints of the Main Steam Safety Valves (MSSVs) and reducing the maximum allowable Power Range Neutron Flux liigh Setpoints with inoperable MSSVs. These changes do not cause the associated structures, systems, or components to be operated outside their original design envelope. No changes are made to the design or manner of operation of structures, systems, or components.
No new failure mechanisms are introduced. Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different accident from any accident previously evaluated.
- 3. The proposed chances do not result in a sieni6 cant reduction in the marcin of safety.
The margin of safety is de6ned by: 1) the acceptance criteria for the design of associated structures, systems, or components; and 2) the acceptance criteria for previously evaluated accidents.
As previously stated, the proposed changes do not cause the associated structures, systems or components to be operated outside their original design envelope. Similarly, the proposed changes assure that the acceptance criteria for previously evaluated accidents will continue to be met. The proposed changes assure that the consequences of postulated overpressure events will remain in compliance with the Basis to Technical Specification 3.7.1.1. Speci6cally, the Secondary System pressure will be limited to within 110% (1320 psia) of its design pressure of 1200 psia during the most severe anticipated system operational transient. The most severe anticipated transient remains a Turbine trip from 100% Rated Thermal Power coincident with an assumed loss of condenser heat sink. Therefore, the proposed changes do not result in a reduction in the margin of safety.
6
~
=
V. PROPOSED SCIIEDULE FOR LICENSE AMENDMENT ISSUANCE AND EFFECTIVENESS North Atlantic requests NRC review of License Amendment Request 95-04 and issuance of a license amendment by October 27,1995 having etTectiveness when the MSSV lif1 setpoints have .
been reset, approximately November 3,1995. Specifically, the new power range neutron flux trip setpoint values will become effective after all of the affected MSSV lift setpoints have been reset, which may be done on-line. During the transition from the current setpoints to the new lift setpoints, the safety analysis remains conservative for interim configurations since the lift setpoints are being reduced. Each MSSV to be reset will be declared OPERABLE after its setpoint has been reset to the new value and verified. The power range neutron flux trip setpoints currently approved by Technical Clarification will be in effect until all of the affected MSSV lift setpoints have been reset. At that time, the higher power range neutron flux trip setpoints addressed in this evaluation will become effective in the event that a MSSV becomes inoperable.
7
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT ASSESSMENT Nonh Atlantic has reviewed the proposed license amendment against the criteria of 10CFR51.22 for environmental considerations. The proposed changes do not involve a signi6 cant hazards consideration, nor increase the types and amounts of ef6uent that may be released offsite, nor signi6cantly increase individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposures. Based on the foregoing, Nonh Atlantic concludes that the proposed change meets the criteria delineated in 10CFRS 1.22(c)(9) for a categorical exclusion from the requirements for an Environmental Impact Statement.
l l
8
_ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ _ _