ML20100L114

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:39, 29 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Part 21 Rept Re Shipment of Two non-safety Grade Circuit Breakers for safety-related Application.Initially Reported on 850405.Breakers Never Installed.Circuit Breakers Returned to GE & Replaced
ML20100L114
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/09/1985
From: Sherwood G
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
REF-PT21-85, REF-PT21-85-156-000 MFN-050-85, MFN-50-85, PT21-85-156, PT21-85-156-000, NUDOCS 8504160382
Download: ML20100L114 (3)


Text

.

GENERAL $ ELECTRIC NUCLEAR SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY OPERATION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY + 175 CURTNER AVENUE, M/C +

SAN JOSE, CAllFORNIA 95125 + (408) 925-

.MC 682, (408) 925-5040 MFN-050-85 April 9, 1985 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: J. M. Taylor Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

10CFR PART 21, REPORTABLE CONDITION INCORRECT CIRCUIT BREAKERS This letter is to inform the NRC of a reportable defect per 10CFR Part 21, as reported to C. E. Rossi by G. B. Stramback, Manager of Safety Evaluation Programs on April 5, 1985.

The defect, which is unique to Fitzpatrick, is the shipment of two non-safety grade circuit breakers for a safety related application.. The utility was notified. The circuit breakers were never installed and were returned to GE. The attached evaluation identifies all pertinent information required by 10CFR Part 21.

Very truly s, lenn G.'

r erwoo , Manager Nuclear Safety & Licensing Operation Attachment cc: J. M. Taylor (2) Q T E. Murley 7/

j J. N. Grace j J. G.

R. D.

Keppler Martin h

J. B. Martin C. E. Rossi G. G. Zech L. S. Gifford 8504160382 850409 @

gDR ADOCK 05000333 PDR g y w -

,.g.a. , , . , y - . - ,. - g--e .- -  % --

Pagn 1

1. Name and address of the individual or individuals informing the Commission.

Dr. G. G. Sherwood Manager of Safety & Licensing Operation General Electric Co.

175 Curtner Ave., San Jose, CA 95125

2. Identification of the facility, the activity, or the basic component supplied for such facility or such activity within the United States which fails to comply or contains a defect.

Non-Safety grade Circuit Breaker (188C7837) incorrectly supplied for Class IE GE Electric Protection Assembly

3. Identification of the firm constructing the facility or supplying the basis component which fails to comply or contains a defect.

General Electric Company Nuclear Energy Business Operation 175 Curtner Avenue San Jose, California 95125

4. Nature of the defect or failure to comply and the safety hazard which is created or could be created by such defect or failure to comply.

GE supplied to Fitzpatrick Nuclear Station two non-safety grade circuit breakers (CB) without required trip coils for use in the safety related Electrical Protection Assemblies (EPA). These CBs have the same physical dimensions as the required safety related CBs and could easily be installed in the Class IE EPAs. The safety hazard is the potential inoperability of necessaryportionsoftheRPS,geutronMonitoringSystem(NMS)andNuclear Steam Supply Shutoff System (NS ) to generate Scram and Isolation safety actions. With one deficient circuit breaker installed in an EPA, a degraded RPS bus condition, and a single failure of the redundant EPA, the safety equipment connected to the bus may not function. It is this specific degraded bus condition that brought the NRC to require backfit-ting of the EPA devices to all BWR plants.

5. The date on which the information of such defect or failure to comply was obtained.

April 5, 1985.

6. In the case of a basic component which contains a defect or fails to comply, the number and location of all such components in use at, supplied for, or being supplied for one or more facilities or activities subject to the regulations in this part.

Only two incorrect circuit breakers were supplied to Fitzpartick Nuclear Station.

LO31411*

Page 2

7. The corrective action which has been, is being, or will be taken; the name of the individual or organization responsible for the action; and the length of time that has been or will be taken to complete the action Actions taken to correct this concern and assure it does not repeat are:

pu'rged the incorrect drawing number identifying the non-safety related CB without a trip coil from the GE application documentation system; replaced the two incorrect CBs (188C7837), which have never been installed, with two safety related CB's; and conducting an audit to investigate adequate preventative measures.

8. Any advise related to the defect or failure to comply about the facility, activity, or basic component that has been, is being, or will be given to purchasers or licensees I

i l

LO31411*