ML20078N492

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:23, 24 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
COLR Cycle 13, Rev 0
ML20078N492
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/1995
From:
NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20078N473 List:
References
NUDOCS 9502150365
Download: ML20078N492 (10)


Text

. =_ _. .. _ . .. _ _ . _ . . . . _ _

d b i

Docket No. 50-336 .l

. B15111 i i

t i

r I

i f

i i

I i

+

t 4

Attachment 1 f ,

t Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit No. 2 j i

Core Operating Limits Report - Cycle 13, Revision 0 f i

6 i

h I

i i

i I

l l

l I

l i

February 1995 i 9502150365 950200 PDR ADOCK 05000336 P PDR

l 1

l l

Millstone Unit No. 2 Cycle 13 Core Operating Limits Report 1

l l

1 l

1 l

Millstone Unit No. 2 11.2-1 Revision 0 l January 1995 l

l 1

l l

l 2.0 - CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13  ;

l

~

1. CORE OPERATING LINITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for Millstone 2 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.7. The Technical Specifications affected by this report are listed below: 1 Section Specification 2.1 3/4.1.1,1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN - T, > 200*F 2.2 3/4.1.1.2 SHUTDOWN MRGIN - T 1200*F 2.3 3/4.1.1.4 Moderator Temperature Coefficient 2.4 3/4.1.3.6 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits 2.5 3/4.2.1 Linear Heat Rate l 2.6 3/4.2.3 TOTAL UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR - F,'

2.7 3/4.2.6 DNB Margin i Terms appearing in capitalized type are DEFINED TERMS as defined in Section 1.0 of the Technical Specifications.

2. OPERATING LINITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits have been developed using the NRC-approved methodologies specified in Section 3.

2.1 SHUTDOWN MARGIN - T, > 200*F (Specification 3/4.1.1.1)

The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be 2 3.6% AK/K 2.2 SHUTDOWN MARGIN - T 1200'F (Specification 3/4.1.1.2)

The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be 13.6% AK/K 2.3 Moderator Temperature Coefficient (Specification 3/4.1.1. 4)

The moderator temperature coefficient shall be:

4

a. Less positive than 0.7x10 AK/K/*F whenever THERMAL POWER is s 70%

of PATED THERML POWER, Millstone Unit No. 2 11.2-2 Revision 0 1 January 1995 I

2.0 - CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13 d

Less positive than 0.4x10 AK/K/*FwheneverTHERMALiOWERis>70%

b.

of RATED THERMAL POWER,-  ;

4

c. Less negative than -2.8x10 AK/K/*F at RATED THERMAL POWER.

2.4 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits (Specification 3/4.1.3.6)  !

The regulating CEA groups shall be limited to the withdrawal sequence and to the insertion limits shown in Figure 2.4-1. CEA insertion between the Long Tern Steady State Insertion Limits and the Transient Insertion Limits is restricted to: l i

a. 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> interval, l
b. s 5 Effective Full Power Days per 30 Effective Full Power Day interval, and l l
c. 114 Effective Full Power Days per calendar year. -

2.5 Linear Heat Rate (Specification 3/4.2.1)

The Linear heat rate, including heat generateJ in the fuel, clad and moderator, shall not exceed 15.1 kw/ft.

During operation with the linear heat rate being monitored by the l Excore Detector Monitoring System, the AXIAL SHAPE INDEX shall remain within the limits of Figure 2.5-1. -

During operation with the linear heat rate being monitored by the Incore Detector Monitor System, the alarm setpoints shall be adjusted to less than or equal to the limit when the following factors are l appropriately included in the setting of the alarms:  ;

1. .A measurement-calculational uncertainty factor of 1.07,
2. An engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03, and
3. A THERMAL POWER measurement uncertainty factor of 1.02.

2.6 TOTAL UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR - F,' (Specification 3/4.2.3) ,

The calculated value of F,7 shall be 11.69.

2.6.1 The Power Dependent F,' limits are shown in Figure 2.6-1.

Millstone Unit No. 2 II.2-3 Revision 0 I January 1995

2.0 - CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13 2.6 DNBMargin(Specification 3/4.2.6)

The DNB margin shall be preserved by maintaining the cold leg temperature, pressurizer pressure, reactor coolant flow rate, and AXIAL SHAPE INDEX within the following limits:

Parameter Limits l l

Four Reactor Coolant  !

Pumos Ooerations l l

a. Cold Leg Temperature i 549'F
b. Pressurizer Pressure 1 2273 psia * ,
c. Reactor Coolant Flow Rate A 360,000 gpm
d. AXIAL SHAPE INDEX FIGURE 2.7-1
  • Limit not applicable during either a THERMAL POWER ramp increase in excess of 5%

of RATED THERMAL POWER per minute or a THERMAL POWER step increase of greater than 10% of RATED THERMAL POWER.

Millstone Unit No. 2 11.2-4 Revision 0 1 January 1995

2.0 - CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13

3. ANALYTICAL METHODS The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC, specifically those described in the following documents:

3.1 XN-75-27(A), Rev. O and Supplements 1 through 5, " Exxon Nuclear Neutronics Design Methods for Pressurized Water Reactors," Exxon Nuclear Company. Rev. 0 dated June 1975, Supplement I dated September 1976, Supplement 2 dated December 1980, Supplement 3 dated September 1981, Supplement 4 dated December ~ 1986, Supplement 5 dated February 1987.

3.2 ANF-84-73(P), Rev. 3, " Advanced Nuclear Fuels Methodology for Pressurized Water Reactors: Analysis of Chapter 15 Events," Advanced Nuclear Fuel Corporation, dated May 1988.

3.3 XN-NF-82-21(A), Rev. 1, " Application of Exxon Nuclear Company PWR Thermal Margin Methodology to Mixed Core Configurations," Exxon Nuclear Company, dated September 1983.

3.4 ANF-84-93(A), Rev. O and Supplement 1, "Steamline Break Methodology for PWR's," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation. Rev. O dated March 1989, Supplement I dated March 1989.  ;

3.5 XN-75-32(A), Supplements 1, 2, 3, and 4, " Computational Procedure for Evaluating Fuel Rod Bowing," Exxon Nuclear Company, dated October 1983.

3.6 XN-NF-82-49(A), Rev. I and Supplement 1, " Exxon Nuclear Company Evaluation Model EXEM PWR Small Break Model," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, both reports dated April 1989.

3.7 EXEM PWR Large Break LOCA Evaluation Model as defined by:

a. XN-NF-82-20(A), Rev. I and Supplements 1 through 4, " Exxon Nuclear Company Evaluation Model EXEM/PWR ECCS Model Updates," Exxon Nuclear Company. All reports dated January 1990.
b. XN-NF-82-07(A), Rev. 1 " Exxon Nuclear Company ECCS Cladding Swelling and Rupture Model," Exxon Nuclear Company, dated November 1982.
c. XN-NF-81-58(A), Rev. 2 and Supplements 1 through 4, "RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model," Exxon Nuclear Company. Rev. 2 and Supplements I and 2 dated March 1984, Supplements 3 and 4 dated June 1990, Millstone Unit No. 2 11.2-5 Revision 0 1 January 1995

2.0 - CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13

d. XN-NF-85-16(A), Volume I through Supplement 3; Volume 2, Rev.1 -

and Supplement 1, "PWR 17x17 Fuel Cooling Tests Program," Exxon Nuclear Coapany. All reports dated February 1990.

e. XN-NF-85-105(A), Rev. O and Supplement 1, " Scaling of FCTF Based Reflood Heat Transfer Correlation for Other Bundle Designs," Exxon Nuclear Company. Both reports dated January 1990.

. 3.8 XN-NF-78-44(A), "A Generic Analysis of the Control Rod Ejection Transient for Pressurized Water Reactors," Exxon Nuclear Company, dated October 1983.

3.9 XN-NF-621(A), Rev. 1, " Exxon Nuclear DNB Correlation of PWR Fuel Design," Exxon Nuclear Company, dated September 1983.

An acceptable Millstone 2 specific application of these analytical methodologies is described in ANF-88-126, " Millstone Unit 2 Cycle 10 Safety Analysis Report," dated October 1988.

Millstone Unit No. 2 II.2-6 Revision 0 January 1995 l

l

5661 latnute 0 uots pay L-Z*II Z *0N llun auotstilW lg 6utgraado sdand tuvl003 J01 stay anoj 411M B3M0d 1VWH3H1 *sA ilmil uoltaasul y33

I-t*3 330SI3 Fracdon of Rated Thermal Perwer P * * *
  • 2 * * * -

- o o 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 . . . . . . . . .

2 .

= _ _._ _. __ _ , . _ . _ _. . _._ _. _ _ ,5 LONG TERM

- l  :

  • ST  :  : / e-:

a ..,Ns.E,ADYmen um STATE .

9

~ .

e

,r H-n  :. .

.)

. p .

a 2 N . . . -- *-? *

~

suonrTERu -

-l 8

~ -

. . .' STEADY STATE .

/y . .

y a  :  :  : INSERTION UMIT  : 4 -

./ y . .

u g

:  :  :  : / g  :  :
:  :  :  :/ , w .  :

o

) e. .

W t .

./- l M

~~

$o -  :  :  : /I  : e  :  :  :

3 . . . . .

3 .

E M . . . . .

t E

2 . . . . . .

/.

. . . . . . l . .

. . . . 1 . . . .

t g" o .

. m

. g . . . . .

. 3 . .

. f. . . . . .

8 . . . . . . . . . .

, W t E

l ,

g.; .

, ,e. . . . . . . . . .

l 3 3 y _.

N -

t [ 313A3 'M0d31 SAIN1,15N11VB3d0 3103 - 0*3 we

_ _ - ~

2.0 - CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13

~

l 130 -

120 -

UNACCEPTABLE OPERATING REGION i 110 -

C 100 - B D

E 80 -

g ACCEPTABLE OPERATING g REGION 80 -

Break Points

~

A. (-0.30, 65)

A B. ( 0.00, 100)

c. (+0.04, 101) E 60 - D. ( 0.08, 100)

E. ( 0.30, 65) 4 l

50 -

Note: Point "C" is provided for setting plant instrumentation onk Operation is not

  1. ~ allowed above 100% of rated power.

30 --  :: , , , , ,  ;;

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 -0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Axla! Shape Index l

FIGURE 2.5-l' AXIAL SHAPE INDEX vs. PERCENT OF ALLOWABLE POWER LEVEL Millstone Unit No. 2 11.2-8 Revision 0 I January 1995

.=,

=

3 T.

8 110 G

. ~.

=

100 - 18.1M o  !

Mk UNACCEPTABLE m S 90 --

OPERATION p

%  % REGION [

%  % i

<E 80 ------- *  % ---- ---

n I"  %  % $

.D S

-o , 70 ------------ - DSumme '

I E' M 2- ACCEPTABLE g

';;;;]60 a "i,,

3 OPERATION REGION g

? I

~

[hk 150 1, g m

!Q7 "Y lj 40 R

-, M o.

  • t3 lg 20 g

5 p 10 "

Q C E

o 1.69 1.71 1.73 1.75 1.77 1.79 1.81 1.83 -

If R' ai

[~;r Torn uwxxxx:o mtonarso nma rrumo racron - ry E

s

- - - - - - - - - - - ---~ew,,-- - "w ~ --n

o S

2.0 -- CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT. CYCLE 13 12 1.1 i

U 1.0 (-%.10,1.0) (0.15,1.0)

... ... ... .. ... .. . r. ... ...

/ .. ... ... .. ... . .. . . . ... ... .. ... ... ..

UNACCEPTABLE 1 UNACCEPTABUE i OPERATION - -' - - - - -- --- - '--

OPERATION -

REGION REGION _

g 0.8 (-0.30, 0.80) ACCEPTABLE (0.30,0.80) g .. ... .. .. ... .. .. ... ... ..

OPERATION REGi!ON --- -- -- --- -- -- --- --

0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 sedalShapeindex FIGURE 2.7--I AXIAL SHAPE INDEX Operating Limits with Four Reactor C001 ant Pumps Operating Millstone Unit No. 2 II.2-10 Revision 0 1 '

January 1995 ,