ML20106E331

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 5 to Millstone Unit 2 Cycle 12 Colr
ML20106E331
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1992
From:
NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20106E327 List:
References
NUDOCS 9211060339
Download: ML20106E331 (10)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- i ' Docket Noi-50-336 7 Millstone (Jnit No. 2 Cycle 12 Core Operating Limits Report Revision - s

i 9211060339 921030

-PDR -ADOCK 05000336. .P-PDR a

a Page i 1. col?E OPEllATING LIMITS REPORT This Core Operating Limits Report for hiillstone 2 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Technical Specification 6.9.1.7. The Technical Specifications affected by this report are listed below: SGlion SEGification 2.1 3/4.1.1.1 SilUTDOWN h1ARGIN - Tm, > ?00*F 2.2 3/4.1.1.2 SIRTfDOWN h1ARGIN - Tm, s 200*F 2.3 3/4.1.1.4 hloderator Temperature Coefficient 2.4 3/4.1.3.6 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits .15 3/4.2.1 Linear lleat Rate 2.6 3/4.2.3 TOTAL UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PHAKING FACTOR - F/ il 3/4.2.6 DNB hlargin Terms appearing in capitalized type are DEFINED TERNIS as defined in Section 1.0 of the Technical Specilications. e 2. OPEllATING l.lMITS The cycle-specific parameter limits for the specifications listed in Section 1.0 are presented in the following subsections. These limits l' ave been developed using the N - C-approved methadologies specified in Section 3. { 2.1 SHUTDOWN hlARGIN - Tmg > 200*F (Specification 3/4.1.1.1) The SilUTDOWN h1ARGIN shall be 2 3.6% AK/K 2.2 SHUTDOWN hlARGIN - Tog s 200*F (Specification 3/4.1.1.2) The SilUTDOWN hlARGIN shall he 2 2.0%.AK/K 2.3 N1oderator Teniperature Coefficient (Specification 3/4.1.1.4) The moderator temperature coefficient shall be: Less positive than 0.7 x 10' 4 Ak/K/*F wheneser THERNIAL POWER a. is s 70% of RATED THERh1As. POWER, b. Less positive than 0.4 x 10-4 AK/K/*F whenever THERh1AL POWER is > 70% of RATED THERh1AL POWER. Less negative than -2.8 x 10-4 AK/K/*F at RATED THERhlAL c. POWER. I l 1

L Page 2 2.4 Regulating CEA Insertion Limits'(Specification 3/4.1.3.6) The regulating CEA groups shall be limited to the withdrawal sequence and.. to the insertion limits shown in Figure 2 A-L CEA insertion between the Long Term Steady State Inseition Limits and the Transier411. 'ertion Limits is restricted to: a. s 4 hours per 24 hour interval, b. -s 5 Effective Full Power Days per 30 Effective Full Power Day interval, and c. s 14 Elfective Full Power Days per calendar year. 2.5 Linear llect Rate _(Specification 3/4.2.1) The Linear heat rate, including heat generated in the fuel, clad and moderator, shall not exceed 15.1 kw/ft. During operation with the' linear heat rate being monitored by the Excorel Detector Menitoring System, the AXlAL SHAPE INDEX 'shall remain within the liinits of Figure 2.5-1. During operation with the linear heat rate being monitored by the incore: Deuctor Monitor System, the alarm setpoints shall be adjusted to less than- ) or equal to the limit when the fc' lowing factors are appropriately: include <l iwthe setting of the alamts: 1.' A fliix peaking augmentation factor of 1.055, 2.

A measurement-calculational uncertainty factor of 1.07; 3.

-An engineering uncertainty factor of 1.03, 4.* A linear heat rate uncertainty factor of 1.01 due to axial fuel densification and thermal expansion, and 5. A THERMAL POWER measurement uncertainty: factor.of 1.02.

  • These factors are only appropriate to fuel batches "A" through "L".

2.6 TOTAL UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR - F/ P (Specification 3/4.2.3) The calculated value of F,T shall t e s 1.69.

2. 6.1 -

The Power Dependent 1/ limits'are shown in Figure 2.6-1. 3 F A %s

~ Page 3 2.7 - DND hlargin'(Specification 3/4.2.6) The DND margin shall be preserved by maintaining the cold leg temperature, pressurizer pressure. reactor' coolant flow rate, and AX1AL SHAPE INDEX within the following limits: l Pntaneter 1,imits Four Reactor Coolant Pumps Operations u. Cold Leg Temperature .s 549'FL b. Pressurizer Pressure 2 2225 psia

  • c.

Reactor Coolant Flow Rate 2 360.000 gpm - d. AX1AL SifAPE INDEX . FIGURE 2.7.1 Limit not applicable during either a TilERh1AL POWER ramp-increase in excess of SG of RATED TI-lERMAL POWER per minute or a TIlERh1AL POWER step increase of greater than 10% of RATED THERhlAL POWER. L e P t d .t_' \\ + n v ,a

y

p page 4 3.

' ANAIXi'ICAL METilODS-4 The' analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits shall be those F previously reviewed and approved by the NRC, specifically.those described in the following documents: 3.1 XN-75-27(A), Rev. O and Supplements 1 though 5, " Exxon Nuclear Neutronics Design Methods for Pressurized Water Reactors," ISxon Nuclear Company. Rev, O dated June 1975, Supplenient 1 dited September 1976, Supplement 2 dated December 1980. Supplemem 3 dated September - 1981. Supplement 4 dated December 1986, Supplemein 5 dated February 1987. 3.2 ANF-84-73(P), Rev. 3, " Advanced Nuclear Fuels hiethodology for Pressurized Water Reactors: Analysis of Chapter 15 Events," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation, dated hla) 1988. 3.3 XN-NF-82-21(A), Rev.1, ' Application of Exxon Nuclear Company' PWR Thermal Margin Metodology to Mixed Core Configurations." Exxon Nuclear Company, omed September 1983. 3.4 ANF-J4-93(A), Revi 0 and Supplement 1, "Steamline Break hiethodology for PWR's," Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation. Rev. O dated March 1989, Supplement 1 dated March 1989. 3.5 XN-75-32(A), Supplements'1, 2, 3, and 4, " Computational Procedure for Evaluating Fuel Rod Bowing," Exy.on Nuclear Company, dated ' October 1983. ~ 3.6 XN-NF-82-49(A), Rev.1 and Supplement 1,~ " Exxon Nuclear Company Evaluation Model EXEM PWR Small Break Model,". Advanced. Nuclear Fuels Corporation, both reports dated April 1989, 3.7 EXEM PWR Large Break LOCA Evaluation Modelas defined by: a. XN-NF-82-20(A), Rev. I and Supplements 1 through 4, " Exxon Nuclear Company Evaluation blodel EXEM/PWR ECCS Model-Updates,' Exxon Nuclear Company. All reports dated January 1990. b. XN-NF-82-07(A), Rev.1. " Exxon Nuclear Company ECCS Cladding 1 Swelling and Rupture Model " Exxon Nuclear Company, dated November 1982. c. XN-NF 81-58(A), Rev. 2 and Supplements 1 through 4, "RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model," E:non Nuclear Company. Rev. 2 and Supplements I and 2 dated March -1984, Supplem:nts 3 and 4 dated June 1990. l i ,.,.9 y t --1

p 1 j 3: ~ l' Page 5 d. XN-NP-85-16(A), Volume ! through Supplement-3; Volume 2, ReeJ1-: and Supplement 1f"PWR-17x17 Fuel Cooling Tests Program, _ Exxon l Nuclear Company. All reports dated February 1990. o -XN-NP.-85-lo:i(A), Rev. O and Supplement 1, " Scaling.of itCTF e. Based Reflood Heat Transfer Correlation for Other Bundle Designs,'? Exxon Nuclear Company. Both reports dated January _1990.~ 3.8 XN-NF--78-44(A), "A-Generic Analysis :of the Control Rod Ejection-Transient for Pressurized Water Reac(ors," Exxon Nuclear Company,' dated October 1983. 3.9 XN-NF-621(A), Rev.1, " Exxon Nuclear DNB Correlation of PWR Fuei Design," Exxon Nuclear Company, dated September 1983. An acceptable Millstone 2 specific application of these analytical methodologies is described in ANP-88-126, " Millstone Unit 2 Cycle 10 Safety ' Analysis Report," dated October 1988. h .a L l' F

d

[ y

l :

i .~. 4

2 ~m= ..m.. -. - - , ~... .m._ d i a 4 ~, ~ gig ~ e s s -s ,~ .e e m -c t 5 i A t v. - r-r- . m n - ~. -.7 g g 3 .m n e i a t 4 8 4 0 0 g _L. J g-O' O CD .r

E i

i y h .A m . 2 E e.d 4.g 4e e.e. _ m m; g j g . o E-n. 2-- O N- .. g m. ~ C 4 C g - ~.e - G ~ _9 _to ; -v-- --r-- o i 8 O e ,,i o o -r 2. r-V r-O z 3 j p ,r pg w x $_ s;o m ._ W a g._. 4 c g3 ,n m y. U 2 5 d' o. a_.2. . u,. m. L.. g 8 O - u. CO. g ; 4_ y -6.- g s e a, m a 'E .. y. 2 m y h..__ I to ~ - *E o i O O -c M8 _m p .g$'

f.,

g g m u o _y-.. m ___e. r-8 Q,, y Ia.I{ .-. m z. n w n. m <c y. m o. - Q. w-g. w: g_ y..- 7._- 7- = 't m g' n M x 6 _- g -- 8 _y [. m( m e m E 6j ---'llWM NOlluBSNI b~ M C 0: -- l-I o g M 31VIS AGV31S + - c- ~y W8311BOHS [ s g m. n o met m-. .g. e. .--a D c 4 ~ M

D.

't. m -W y O .Q n . y m s 3 s ,y-7 8 i e 4 /' itWn NOM 83SNi $ _ ~*:

  • i 31V19 AOV31S l

l 2 .._ WU31 DNO~l =m l g.

.7...-

8 _u. _a.-._ y c

h..

i s.. y y g c O-O -O-O O O O-O O O 8 - 0) (O. s. c. 4 4 M... - N. ' t/} O O O O O O O. O O y e-1 m g

ovod inwaotti potea lo uopou;3 MILLSTONE - UNIT 2

-. ~ a s

if,!li!llll1 !!ll)II: ll ijllj ,l jlI

%e p

4 3 0 iEV E 3 L " u0 R I E W \\ O P 2 E. B'. g 0 AW N O L O L A G t t E n o s n r. 1 F R G !ps g e 0 O NI iw G T N A gn o x T nop e N TI D R d E i t it d I C A E ) ) )1 t n e a R P N 50's 105 s e R r E nv O O 60006 et e E a 0 p P P I a 111 r pr O E G oOf , 0 a L t E r o h f 8 B R 00480 d. S s F. v L A i o 30003 ev6 l B T P dtn 0 ia X A P OC000 ivo 0 x E T E A D k + o 1 P C a ( ( i t ( r o N 1 E C e pce , 0 E iv I C A r st LPCDE i ta o C i b P f A " n a A N Ce H md S U e u w L t r int o A osi 2 I Pie 0 X n: A a

e t

1 o N 5 ^ 2 3 A y0 E c RUG IF 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 9 S 7 6 5 4 a 1 1 1 1 3*J E $'v0$::4 g t0HOZT t CZ_4 m 0 U r m

1 I 110 l l l t l 1 i 100 (1.690. 100) [ UNACCEPTABLE OPERATON 90 ~'_ j REGION ~ 80l e J ^ e 8 ( i.837. 70) i R E 70 i i z I ACCEPTABLE OPERATION 60 ! f c' i REGION 3 i I 5 50 e E R 40 C $a 30 i I 20 10 I 1 e 1 f I D 1.69 1.71 1.73 1.75 1.77 1.79 1.81 1.83 T TOTAL UNRODDED :NTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR - Fr FIGURE 2.6-1 TOTAL UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAK!NG FA : TOR {

s. AUowable Fated Thermal Power k

Page 9 1.2 j s.. j i ..)~. 1.1 i I I i 1.0 (-0.10, 1.0) (0.15, 1.0) ..j.. l a N UNACCEPTABLE ) UNACCEP1ABLE OPERATION OPERATION REGION REGION a 0.9 .m wxs q aw ...........-l.. k (-0.30.' O.80). ACCEPTABLE - (0.30. 0.80) O.8 OPERATION ... l.. REGION u-0 3 .-o L r o< m"- l 0.7 1 . J... i 1 0.6 -7 i -g i ( ~J ~~ l 0.5 l 1 0.4 - ~ ~ 0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 - 0.2 0.4 0.6 Axial Shape Index FIGURE 2.7-.1 AX)AL SHAPE INDEX Operating Limits with Four Reactor - Coolant Pumps Operating MILLSTONE - UNIT 2

- ----.--m W

=m}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20106E331&oldid=4301082"