IR 05000269/2003302

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:26, 19 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Retake Exam 50-269/2003-302 Administrative Documents
ML040490443
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/17/2003
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
Duke Energy Corp
Shared Package
ML040510003 List:
References
50-269/03-302 50-269/03-302
Download: ML040490443 (10)


Text

seuments OCONEE JUNE 2003 RETAKE EXAM 50-269/2003-302 OCTOBER 17,2003 ES-201-1 ES-201-2 ES-201-3 ES-301-1 t St ES-301-3 ES-301-4 4 ES-301-5 ES-301-6 ES-401-7 ES-501-4 t 4-

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: :-,?-,-$L.~ ,?;I .' Bate of Examination: fi.; /?kY Examinations Beveloped by: fiacilit9 I NRC (circle one)

Task Description I Reference 1 -180 I 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1 .a; C.2.a 8 b)

[I -120 I 2. NWC examiners and facility contact assigned (6.1.d; C.2.e)

1 -120 I 3. Facility contact briefed on security 8 other requirements (C.2.c) I )

,

1 -120 1 4. Corporate notification letter sent (6.2.d)

7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided 1 -q4 I 10. Final license applications due and assignment sheet prepared (C.1 .I; C.2.g; ES-202)

ed by NRC supervisor for facility licensee letters sent (6.2.9, ES-204)

distributed to NRC examiners ( 6 . 3 4 27 of 25 NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9

I - ~ -

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Qconae Date of Examination: October 17,2003 Initial Task Description NRC examination, b. Verify that:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ES-307, (2) one task is eonducted in a low-power or shutdown conditio (3) 4 6 (2-3 for SXO-U) of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path

~

procedur (4) one in-plant task tests the applicants response to an emergency or abnormal condition, and (5) the in-plant walk-through requires the applicant to enter the RC c. Verify that the required administrative topics are covered, with emphasis on performance-based activitie . Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Bate a Author b Facility Reviawer ()

e NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d NRC SUpeWlSQf -i-

/o 6 /LOOJ Note: Not applicable for NRC-developed examination # Independent MRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence require NUREG-1821 Draft Revision 9 I

ES-301 Operating Best Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Finat Submittal I. GENERA4 CRlTERlA repetition between this and other operating tests Io be administered Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

I initial conditions

. Initiating cues references and took. including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average t i e allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific perfmance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues

-

~

statements describing important observations to be tnade by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions OR the sequence of steps, if applicable Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity.

I Printed Name 1 Signature Date a. Author @S*3 b. Faairty Reviewerr) Bk3 -J$&

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) /u-3-2 E 5 d. NRC Supervisor 10-Q-rmJ NUREG-1821, Draft Revision 9

s-301

-

Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Oeonee Bate of Exam: October 17, 2003 Scenario Numbers: I I Spare Operating Test No.: 1 The scenarios consist mostly of related event n it is to be initiated the rnalfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the sceflario objectives. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are give performance deficiencies Rave been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity Is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

I Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 12.5of ES-301.

1 All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

1 Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). Abnormal events (24)

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

-

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Fork -E S - ~ Q-5-I -

Final Submittal OPERATING TEST NO.: 1 Applicant Evolution Minimum ~.

Scenario Number I

~

Type Type Number 2 3 I Component Major I

I

I I

4,7 ,

1 Reactivity I I* [

I Normal I I

a0 Instrument/ 2*

1 Component 1 I I I I

.-

As SRQ 1

~

Instrument/

Component Major I I

-

t-I i --

-

I l !

>

I I

I component I I

I 4*7I I Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-13-1event numbers for each evolution 12) #g&ivily manipulations ma be conducted under normal or confroNed abnormal conditions (refer to Section J.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.8 of Appendix D. *Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basi (3) Whenever practical, both instrument and Component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the ap@icant'svmpetence count toward the minimum requiremen Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUWEG-I 021. Bsafl Revision 9

~~

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-384-6 Final Submittal SCENARIO SCENARIO Events and Conditions Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control Boards (2)

1,2,3 1,2,3 Communicate and 4,5,6 4,5, ti 7,8,9 7,8,9 Interact 10 Demonstrate 1,2,3 1,2,3 Supervisory 4,5,6 4,%,6 7,8,9 7,8, 9 Ability (3) 10 Comply With and Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an W (2) Optional for an SRO- (3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

Author:

NRC Reviewer:

NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9

s-581 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1 Task Description Date Complete Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and n . Operating tests graded by NRC examiners 1012Z 183 NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test 10128103 grading completed 10128103 10/28/03 IO130103 Facility notified of results 10130103