ML17179A166

302 Exam Administrative Items for ADAMS 2D

ML17179A166
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	06/28/2017
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:	Duke Energy Corp
References
Download: ML17179A166 (21)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Chief Date*

Task Description (Reference)

Examiners Initials

-180 1.

Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.a and b)

-120 2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

-120 3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

-120 4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-90]

[5.

Reference material due (Ole; C.3c; Attachment 3)]

{-75}

6.

Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301 -1

, ES-301 -2, ES-301 -5, ES-D-1 s, ES-401 -1/2, ES-401 -3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

{-ZO}

{7.

Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{-45}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-30 9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10.

Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 1 1 Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12.

Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1J; C2.f and h; C.3g)

-7 13.

Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C3.h)

-7 14.

Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C2.e; ES-204)

-7 1 5.

Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 16.

Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3i)

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

Facility:

otoAJEE

/1JUc:::tE,9, S7;Y&A/

Date of Examination:

Developed by: Written

- Facility NRC D ii Operating

- FacilityJ NRCD 7 Page 25 of 28

WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

OCONEE Date of Examination:

DECEMBER 2015 Initials Item Task Description a.

Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 N/A R

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N/A I

Section D.1 of ES-40J and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

T

-z:;-

T c.

Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

7 N/A

,i%

d.

Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

N/A 2.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, N/A N/A N/A S

and major transients.

M b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U

and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation L

schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be N/A N/A N/A A

tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are T

duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on 0

subsequent days.

R c.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative N/A N/A N/A and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a.

Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1 )

the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w

distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I

(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form N/A N/A N/A T

(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b.

Verify thatthe administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-J:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form N/A N/A N/A (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix N/A N/A N/A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered N/A in the appropriate exam sections.

ttt G

E b.

Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

f/f N/A E

c.

Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

N/A d.

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

N/A N/A N/A L

e.

Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

?

N/A f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

N/A

a. Author Michael K. Meeks /

05/12/2015

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

N/A N/A

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

fCO ptLLI.. /

&*c...fLøJ2k... cJii7ic

d. NRC Supervisor t2\\

\\

c-f_______

Note:

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

- WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY

F/AJ41 ExnTh OPERA 77,43 6 Sosm, 777?L/%vV/&R/2A 77c41 msr 4j4 WRu&

EX%%I.

oF ES4OI Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES4O12 Facility:

Oconee Date of Examination:

12/07/20 15 tnitIaIs tern Task Descrtptton

aVerify that the outtine(s) fit(s) theappro;date model in accodancevAthES-401 or ES-401P&

4t

• R b.

Assess whether the outtine was systematically and randomy prepared in accordance with 4...

Section Di o1E5401 or ES4O1N and whether all VIA categories are appropriately sampled

T S

Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

N q

ci.

Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

- 1, 2.

a.

Using Form ES-301 %, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of y

normal evolutions, instrument and component faitures. technical specifications. and major C

S transients.

IA b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U

mix of applicants In accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedute 1.

without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A

least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T

appilcants audit test(s), and that scenarios wit not be repeated on subsequent days.

C.

To the extent possible, assess whether the outtine(s) conform(s) with the quatitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3.

a.

Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outtine(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed N

among the satety functions as specified on the form A

(2) task repetition from the test two NRC examinations is within the iimits specified on the form L

(3) no tasks are dupticated from the appiicants audit test(s)

K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, tow-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T

the form.

H R

b.

Verify that the administrative outiine meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form U

(2) at east one task is new or significantiy modified G

(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC ilcensing examinations H

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days 4.

a.

Assess whether piant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the

.f 7 A appropriate exam sections.

.1...

Pr2!! whether the 10 CFRE5.41143and55.45 sampiingisappropriate.

c 2

c.Ensure thatKlA importance ratings (exceptfor plant-specific priorities) areaueast 2.5.

7 R

Check forduptioation and osertap among exam sections.

- k L

e.

Check theentire examfor balance of coverage L

f:

Assess whether the examfits the appropriatejob ievei (RO or SRO).

a.

Author b.

Facility Reviewer ()

0.

NRC Chief Examiner (A) d, NRC Supervisor Note:

A independent NRC reviewer initial items in Coiumn C; chief examiner concurrence required.

NjpticableforNRC-preparedexamthathnouHines.

Pt 07 fly it?

11?

p7 07 Pt?

01 7

It, Vt It 111/

cv (2V1&o,r

44. &Jrai 6m1? 0 WUÜCS bv&oPep Lw AJR.:

ES-%O1, Page 26 of 28 cW A GaLMv if cHIEF ExAni/NER All Mea 15 CHiEF Cx4#lrnJ%i4?

9w4cg

,Nfi;U claN; or ECO.

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 PRINTED NAME I.&1De%i-Sh:LJ 2.OWAJ Df(v1Cf 0

3. :r 4.c&A&I ui\\A) 5.f,tAi&1 6.

777M CLJAFV1O1 8.jk LC..1t

9. 57(A/

RO1Ø6FI 1 0.

.s;(ep

11. iAtj IvoS 12.

J4PUk AI 13.

ILLDOLPH unf&1 J4.:

f-SfMLJcLetp*F%

15.5kv1SrO Sitrnct DATE SIGNATURE (2) 9-29qç Q%/VA

%;Z-cfq to.LS1

(

to-c-i 6I5;& 4i &i k:)-s-lr-7,-/L I e Vk P)i,c.

/t-%-/c&.q V1b fl-3..iS 1%i#Z Ifr ?- I(

17 I1-i-,s jz;;;

;Z tt 7q( cti

v. P&

4ifr/r WA DATE NOTE t-I7-t t1LD t-5i iij-2-i-cz-1.-i,cZ__

12 -i-S tt-7t--1(

iii) 1.

Pre-Examination L1/ c, 1t5 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) 0iDAC. o1 2oJ as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination

,LJOkOzOJc Ta the best of my knowled9e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of. 7,j4,29t5 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or plovide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE I RESPONSIB1LITY m

Co t%)

C 0

CD 3

0.-

3a, RO 7N i1I6t Ro S(Zo IGNATURE (1)

(/1 iL A</eH-7 IjA,h n;irikiiy fz (

P0 Sp.,c)

Lk AIJM.. 11,,LfAaA*

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 PRINTED NAME iML6JZI<

k) 2.

.Sc,iy::c Co 3.Cj çç

4. gcm ow 5.6.Th,r1k 19 7:re4 Merck

8. Ri Pr.,tr1s,i

9. (

io.q A;%J5 11.J44C7 cv4 12.

1Qfsi i

I 14.

(tcro iifl i-:ii fA DATE SIGNATURE(2)

DATE NOTE 5ZL T/%ftj

-2i;,-ts UYI:J t1AA--t) c51&

tZ](r-___

c-l4I4 -th/. ::

iZ-ii 7%.- tsr-r;-i 5____

afp)tc

_,2g,t_

i ra-iflTf F:jbf(

I____

git c

%T-1;/I Jbv dK.E t1z1ir r

%-*fr M% bj z

m 0) 0 0

CD 1.

Pre-Examination

/ti.c,7c45 j 4, &i%

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge aboutthe NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) 0fDEC. oil 2oi as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboutthese examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination t

WoV.3ot lb To the best of my knowled9e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of. 1)14)24015 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or plovide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) ekAfl1 A&Frik tJ L c

fDL-1

rctr, A3!K(-?

N tj(Zt AtA1(1o AJ1?C T-Sriso.

c (s4g:.-r qcoH-1 Mnit Jc jtIuL(t.aj O?

Spt s_4

/41tJA SfIee1L.

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 PRINTED NAME 1.

2.

c1,t4 3.

aJQc} Zcf;&Z)

4. 2/AtFtLIttiJ(

5. Cven,%&itelk-7.

pr-:L,

8. tift 9.Aai 6LJ

10. 3o cc(4,5L I 1

. sre4-J 7)e,pI 12.fP tfi 13.

I4t-t

&v(1t(

JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY 5P%O ti (eAA; Acv I V Oj:67Lq Adin iii Fw$

1L34?1

/i:i!tLs ScnA pp12f CAJ

&4,- 74 1.

Pre-Examination L1 cj 1t5 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge aboutthe NRC licensing examinations scheduled forthe week(s) oiDEC. 01) 2oi as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information aboutthese examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination Ajov,zoJc To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) oft. 1)14,2915 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or plovide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

m 0)

I)0 CD 0

00 15.c1Ls fl SIGNATURE(1)

DATE SIGNATURE(2)

DATE NOTE rc?;_:

I 245

\\24Z5__

1-*t5

-%--& tZ--/

9

, %A%A)J)d t42tflZ tiis%:

%Ftc (L4J C___

q-,c

.flAll vu

%/&/4r &*

Tf//ir 1A4::

JtItc 9/,hf5 t

- r gf22/t$ \\

U t tz% ;

/z-i 7/zc/ic :;t;4:;;;;

)2)7-J gz.1c-/

L/L)tZ t

,2-i -vr rc

,-3/-fy___

z_9

,t.tb ii.

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination sa lot5 ç 1 acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) oiD&C. oZ 2oi as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that 1 am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

m 0) r%)0

-a (Q

CD N)

C

-I N) 0, 2.

Post-Examination

,Jov,zoic To the best of my knowled9e, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of. 1j47f5 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or plovide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) ice-s

)C;4Q Pr1-r prw DATE SIGNA RE 2

DATE NOTE 1.:r.b £14e,I:g(l

z 7

d1l.f 1

z:fJd

11%/u

4. 8.c( £ tcL c I/iz/r U L 5.

6.

7..&iir:

r(/z;v.

9. i:;AJ k:- Gø1z 1 0.1Ayi6 11.(L2tefk\\ -iI OV,rt\\ fr\\Ga.

1 2tit1i m,eh%e-I ?

r-rV 13Jej 14/,Y/,&

3 1-)%t5. 11711?

14. 1Y)41 Adoj opJ /?J%1/*Y I

,lit -siitcr 12/ zt/

tlA7/_

uiM&-& vit k)1 izMc t&/zi,c

7. 3.tr-W<7.-L iz(5/5 c4AL1)h1AASL_____

/A 71 4-L-CI-I ii __:::f t-L i7/J thc tMr/1E tZrL?:is__

1-5-/6

)1/7-ic NOTES:

1

L11b ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.

Pre-Examination 4,,, oI5 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) oiTC. Of) 2o15 as of the date of my signature.

I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.

I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback).

Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of1. 1)I4ZOt5 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or plovide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

i; 2.Qc) rv 0

3 L/ VJ

4. Z(t te

5. LG 1cL4 z.eA ?.f, 8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

I 5.

z__

DATE SI NATURE(2)

DATE NOTE iVi d

j__

1?:i2)J fLiiL,_

kz%5 I L t

7 1 i ) It I

,)

4*l 1 c 4L8 2.

m C

0 0)

CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY

,4&,tA 1v1-c-e%,f LiL-t-L4_

SIGN5JURE (1)

OV 1stvc4i/L jLi NOTES:

RAJAt 5emi nvz/ CXAM

,4nwk/ZflM ES4OI Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES4014 Oconee

- Date of Examination:

11/07/2015 Operatin9TestNumber I

nitiats 1.

General Critena

a It c#

a.

The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline: changes are consistent with 5L. -4 operaUona importancesaletyfunctio dllstr4ion.

b.

There is no day-today repetition between (tile and other operating tests to be administered during s3....

this examination.

-c.

The operatThg[shall notdupllcate itemsfrorntheappllcants audittest(s).(see Section D.1.a.) 5L d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts ofthe operating test is within accepablelimits.

---C-e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and lessthancompetent jppcanftajjesnatediicenseteveL 4

._1_ Walk-Througeria

a.

Each JPM includes the following. as applicable.

initial conditions

initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures

reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally Important specific performance crIteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues

statements describing Important observations to be made by the applicant

criteria for successful completion of the task

identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

restrictions on thQ%ggence pf steps. ifapplicable b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance tY criteria (e.g.. item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3.

SImulator CriterIa The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form t5 a.

Author b.

Facility Revievier(*)

0.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d NRC Supervisor NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. friependentNRCreviewerinit!aHtems 7

w 7-1 7)1 7

1 a 4

&OLA%U

/5 cj/f6F nil MEEKS cl//sF 6x%#V/V6i Exmrnisg ornc rwstocvot oF R6coIti.

ES-301 Page 24 of 27

FNgL Sanii v*

Aim&,eM#o/V i::aoi

Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES3O1-4 FacUlty: Oconee Date of Exam: 1217/2015 Sosnado Numbers:

1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.: I QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES trthials a

b c#

1 The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentatfon may be out of sCNioe, 5f but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

U 3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when ft is to be initiated S

the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event L tS A

a the symptoms/cues that wilt be visible to the crew S

the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) i_Et!!:r!ts are vaUdwith regard to physics and thermodynamics.

2L 5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

It time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

U Cues are given.

7.Theslmulatormodelinglsnotaftered.

8.

The scenarios have been validated.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 56.46(d), any open simulator performance

.tJ deficiencies or deviations from The referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity LA is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

10.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-3OI6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

I I. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable ratinglactors.

(Competency Rating factors asdescribed on forms ES3O3-I andES3O3:3.)

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on FormES-30f.5 (submit the form with the simulatorscenarlos).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crow position.

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenarlo; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

-- Malfunctions alter EOP entry (1-2) 1 / I /2 /2

..k.. -4 a

eoa1ovents(2:1 (14L Majortran&ents(I2) 2/I/I/I

&_ dL

¶ EOPs entered/requidngsubstantive actions (1:2) 2 / I /1/I 71

- EOPcontingenciesrequlhng substantive actions(O-2)

I / I /1 /1 EOPbasedCriticaltasks(23) 3?IL..

. L. d NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

ft Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

9)7 07

1. 7 9%

01 fit 4

3,7

1. 7 7

7 1#

717 70 7

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Oconee Date of Exam: 12/07/2015 Operating Test No.:

1 A

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

M L

N CREW CREW CREW CREWPOSITION 0

I I

T POSfl1ON POSmON POSmON T

C A

B S

A B

S A

B S

A B

A M

A T

R T

0 R

T 0

R T

0 R

T 0

L u

0 C

P 0

C P

0 C

P 0

C P

M()

E R

IU RO RX 4

3,6 2

110 NOR SRO-I LI I/C 3,4 3

2,4 6,7 4

4 2

SRO-U MAJ 7

6 7

8 221

[J TS 022 RO RX 110 NOR Ill SRO-l LI I/C 26251514442 SRO-U MAJ 7

6 7

8 2

2 1

D TS 022 RO RX 110 SRO-I NOR D

I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 2

2 1

IS 022 Ol NOR D

I/C 23,4, 2,3,4, 1,2,3, 1,3,4, 4

2 SRO-U 5,6 5

4,5 6,7 MAJ 7

6 7

8 221 TS 2,4,5 2,4 1,3,6 1,5 0

2 2

Instructions:

1 Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

If an SRO-l additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-l in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Oconee Date of Examination:

12107/15 Operating Test No.: I APPLICANTS RO X

RO X

RO D

RO SRO-l D

SRO-I D

SRO-I D

SRO-I X

SRO-U LI SRO-U D

SRO-U X

SRO-U LI Competencies NIJQ NJQ jO_ SCENO_

1234123412341234 Interpret/Diagnose Events 3,6 2,4, 6,7, 2,5, 2,4, 1,3, 1,3, 2,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,3, fl 7

7 8

67 5,6 5,6, 48 45 4,5, 3,4, 4,5 and Conditions 6,7 6

5,6, 6,7, 7

8 Comply With and 1,3, 1,3, 2,3, 2,6, 2,5, 2,4, 1,3, 1,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 4,7 46 46 7,8 67 56 5,6 48 34 34, 34 34 Use Procedures (1 )

7 7

5,6, 5,6 5,6, 5,6, 7

7 7,8 Operate Control 1,3, 1,3, 2,3, 2,6, 2,5, 2,4, 1,3, 1,3, 4,7 4,6 4,6, 7,8 6 7 5,6 5,6, 4,8 Boards (2) 7 Communicate 1,2, 1,3, 2,3, 2,6, 1,2, 2,4, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4 4,6 4,6, 7,8 3 4, 5,6 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, 3 4, 3,4 and Interact 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 6,7, 5,6, 5,6 5,6, 5,6, 7

7 7

8 7

7 7,8 Demonstrate Supervisory 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, Ability (3) 5,6, 5,6 5,6, 5,6, 7

7 7,8 Comply With and 2A, 2,4 3,

1,5 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1 )

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

The Final Written Exam Sample Plan for OCONEE 2015-302 ILO Exam may be obtained by combining the initial sample plan (E$-4o1-2 and E$-4o1-3 forms) with the K/A changes as documented in the final ES-4o1-4 form.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-i Quality Checklist Facility:

co,JEl Date of Exam: t/_Exam Level:

RO LJSRO EV Item Description Initials 1

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

,t, 2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 4

1%

3.

Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

A1/,

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail N/j

.i 5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 7

,tf 6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training y

deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants ttt IF!

Date Printed Name/Signature a.

Grader

/%bI4E 4;h b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

17 11 c.

NRC Chief Examiner (*)

i/db d.

NRC Supervisor (*)

(L LCc)

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ci% DUKE ENERGY Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station ONS-201 5-100 September3, 2015 Mr. Victor McCree, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Operating Exam Outlines

- 90 day submittal Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 0: 864.8733274 f 864.873.4208 ScotLBatson@duke-energy.com

Dear Mr. McCree:

In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021, Duke Energy is submitting the operating exam outlines, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license operating exam scheduled for the week of December 7, 201 5, at the Oconee Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Site. The enclosures are listed below.

Form ES-D-1, Scenario outline (four)

Form ES-401-4, Record of Rejected K/As If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.

Sincerely,h Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station Form ES-201-2, Form ES-201-3, Form ES-301-1, Form ES-301-1, Form ES-301-2, Form ES-301-2, Form ES-301-5, Examination Outline Quality Checklist Examination Security Agreement RO Administrative Topics Outline SRO Administrative Topics Outline RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Transient and Event Checklist Enclosures www.duke-energy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II September3, 2015 Page 2 cc:

Gerald J. McCoy, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

f_(eI) DUKE Scott L.

It ENERGY Vice President

Oconee Nuclear Station ONS-201 5-1 04 Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 October 6, 201 5 864873.3274 l 864.873. 4208

$coft.Batsonduke-energy.com Mr. Leonard D, Wert, Jr., Regional Administrator (Acting)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION 1LT48 NRC Exam

- 60 day submittal

Dear Mr. McCree:

In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Duke Energy is submitting the written exam, operating exam, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license exam scheduled for the week of December 7, 201 5, at the Operator Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Site. Submitted for review are:

One set of Administrative JPMs with handouts, One set of Control Room/In-Plant JPMs with handouts, Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist, Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement, Form ES-301-1, RO Administrative Topics Outline, Form ES-301-1, SRO Administrative Topics Outline, Form ES-301-2, RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline, Form ES-301-2, SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline, Form ES-301-3, Operating Test Quality Checklist, Form ES-301-4, Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist, Form ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist, Form ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist, Form ES-DI for Four Simulator Scenarios, Form ES-D2 for Four Simulator Scenarios, Form ES-401-4, Record of Rejected K/As, Form ES-401-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist, RO written exam (with reference package),

RO written exam key, SRO written exam (with reference package),

SRO written exam key, Exam questions with answer analysis, Reference material on a DVD.

www.duke-enetgy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II October 6, 2015 Page 2 If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at ($64) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.

Sincerely, 1,

Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II October6,2015 Page 3 cc:

Gerald J. McCoy, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

(_(ea, DUKE Scott L. Batson ENERGY Vice President

Oconee Nuclear Station ONS-201 5-1 21 Duke Energy ONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy Seneca, SC 29672 December 17, 2015 864.873.3274 f: 864.873.4208 Mr. Leonard D. Wert, Jr., Regional Administrator (Acting)

Scott.Batson@duke-energy.com U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Subject:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION 1LT48 Post Exam Submittal

Dear Mr. Wert:

An NRC initial license operating exam was administered the week of December 7, 2015. The associated written exam was administered on December 16, 2015. Oconee has no post exam comments. Enclosed for your review as directed by NUREG I 021 are the following:

A student seating chart, The original student answer sheets, The original signed exam cover sheets, Two clean copies of the student answer sheets, A copy of the RO exam, A copy of the SRO exam, An RO exam key, An SRO exam key, A compiled list of student comments and proctor answers.

If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.

Sincerely, Scott L. Batson Vice President Oconee Nuclear Station www.duke-energy.com

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II December 17, 2015 Page 2 cc:

Gerald J. McCoy, Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 Michael Meeks U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Division of Reactor Safety Operations Branch Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257